2022 Positional Power Rankings: Introduction by Meg Rowley March 28, 2022 © David Kohl-USA TODAY Sports 2022 Positional Power Rankings IntroC1B2B3BSSLFCFRFDHRP 16-30RP 1-15SP 16-30SP 1-15Summary Welcome to the 2022 positional power rankings! As is tradition, over the next week and a half, we’ll be ranking every team by position as we inch closer to Opening Day. This is always something of a funny exercise. You read FanGraphs regularly, after all — a fact for which we are very grateful — and are well-versed in the goings on of the offseason. You know that Carlos Correa signed with the Twins and that Kris Bryant now calls Denver home, and that the Mets remade part of their rotation and a good bit of their lineup. And yet after a protracted lockout and the subsequent frenetic conclusion to free agency, you’re still keen to know more about the game and what it might look like between now and October. The positional power rankings are our answer to that impulse. This post serves as an explainer for our approach to the rankings. If you’re new to the exercise, I hope it helps to clarify how they are compiled and what you might expect from them. If you’re a FanGraphs stalwart, I hope it is a useful reminder of what we’re up to. If you have a bit of time, here is the introduction to last year’s series. You can use the navigation widget at the top of that post to get a sense of where things stood before Opening Day 2021, a year during which the projections were feeling the effects of 2020’s COVID-shortened slate. Unlike a lot of sites’ season previews, we don’t arrange ours by team or division. That is a perfectly good way to organize a season preview, but we see a few advantages to the way we do it. First, ranking teams by position allows us to cover a team’s roster from top to bottom. Stars, everyday contributors, and role players alike receive some amount of examination, and those players (and the teams they play for) are placed in their proper league-wide context. By doing it this way, you can more easily see how teams stack up against each other, get a sense of the overall strength of a position across the game, and spot places where a well-constructed platoon may end up having a bigger impact than an everyday regular who is merely good. We think all of that context helps to create a richer understanding of the state of things and a clearer picture of the season ahead. We will have a post for each position, with starting pitchers and relievers getting two pieces each to allow us to do the league’s rotations and bullpens justice without taxing your patience. Each post will start with a brief summary of the position, then rank each team’s group of players from the best down to the worst based on projected WAR. Those WAR numbers are arrived at using a 50/50 blend of the ZiPS and Steamer projections and our manually maintained team depth charts (courtesy of Jason Martinez), which include playing time estimates for every player. Importantly, this approach means the rankings are not an expression of the preferences or opinions of whoever is responsible for writing up that position, though if the author thinks there’s something about a team’s situation that the projections aren’t capturing (and that might result in the club over- or under-performing relative to expectations), they’ll often tell you so in that team’s capsule. What a player is projected to do and what he actually does can diverge over the course of a season, sometimes significantly. Some players will exceed our expectations; others will lose innings or plate appearances to injury or under-performance. It’s hard to know, for instance, how the abbreviated ramp up to the season will affect player health, or how unvaccinated players being unable to take the field in Toronto might shift some guys’ playing time. What you will see here are our projections coupled with our very informed best guesses about playing time. If you notice anything that strikes you as off about how we’ve allocated that playing time, please let us know. Obviously, we won’t be totally spot on; baseball always has the potential to surprise us. And while I want our projections to be right, I’m personally okay with a bit of the unexpected sneaking in, even as I hope it’s the result of unanticipated star-turns and not poor health; baseball would be awfully boring if the preseason projections were truly omniscient. Beyond that, a few additional words of caution. First, it is important to remember that if a player is projected to play multiple positions, their WAR total in any given position’s post may strike you as low. That may be because the projections are down on them, but just as likely, it’s because the number you’re looking at only reflects the WAR projected at that specific position. To arrive at the WAR projection for, say, Chris Taylor or Daulton Varsho, you’d need to add up their projections across all of the positions where we expect them to see playing time. It is also important to remember that each player only gets one defensive projection, which remains the same across the different positions, though that number does take all projected positions into account. Another thing folks tend to fixate on is the ordinal rankings themselves. That’s understandable. You want your favorite team to do well, and for their division rivals to fare poorly. But it is important to look at the magnitude of the differences between the rankings, as well as the rankings themselves. At the top of every post is a graph of each team’s projected WAR at the position to help better illustrate this. Sometimes the gaps between teams are small; a minor shift in production or playing time could mean moving up or down a couple of spots. At some positions, though, there may be quite a bit of difference between the first and second ranked teams (otherwise known as “The Trout Effect”), but then much less between, say, the fourth and 10th, with some of the teams that come after bunched up around a similar projection. It’s not that where a team ranks is unimportant; it’s that the distribution is important, too, and thinking about whether a team falls above or below average, and by how much, might be more telling than the ranking next to a team’s name. Our first ranking will go up in short order. We’ll cover all of the position players this week, with the pitchers — both starters and relievers — and a summary post slated to go up next week before Opening Day. If you’re interested in seeing how your favorite team fared across all 11 positions, don’t fret: I’ll include a table with each team’s rankings and cumulative projected WAR in my summary post, and of course every team’s projections are available in our Depth Charts. We hope the rankings are illuminating and useful, both in understanding the season we might have and for recalling the signings, trades, and Tommy Johns that might have faded from memory as we’ve tried to navigate the last several months. Again, thank you for reading. And now, on to the catchers.