2023 MLB Draft: Day One Recap

Below is a team-by-team analysis of last night’s draft activity. Remember that you can find more detailed scouting reports and tool grades for the players drafted over on The Board.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 7 | 50 | Tommy Troy | 3B | 21.5 | Stanford | Speed, Power |
| 48 | HM | 45 | Gino Groover | 3B | 21.3 | North Carolina State | Bat Speed, Athleticism |
| 64 | HM | 40 | Caden Grice | SP | 21.1 | Clemson | Slider, Frame, Projection |
Arizona drafted a mix of floor and upside on Day One, adding a relatively stable, Top 100 prospect to their mix in Troy before taking two college dev projects in Grice and Groover. Groover is one of the most exciting players in the draft because his bat speed is ridiculous, though he needs refinement in many areas, especially defense. Lefties with a breaking ball as good as Grice’s tend to pan out, if only as relievers, but Grice could break out if he focuses solely on pitching.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 6 | 50 | Hurston Waldrep | SP | 21.4 | Florida | Velo, Splitter |
| 59 | HM | 35+ | Drue Hackenberg | SIRP | 21.3 | Virginia Tech | Slider Quality & Command |
| 70 | 61 | 40+ | Cade Kuehler | SIRP | 21.1 | Campbell | Velo |
It was a huge coup for the Braves to get Waldrep in the back third of the first round. I consider him the second-best pitcher in the entire draft and a Top 100 prospect. The rest of the Braves’ first day doesn’t look great. They took two guys I have projected as relievers in Hackenberg (who had a nearly 6.00 ERA this year) and Kuehler (who struggled late in the year). Hackenberg has a key Braves prospect attribute, though: breaking ball command. Atlanta has had success augmenting prospects for the better, especially when they have this skill already on board when they’re acquired.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 17 | 45 | Enrique Bradfield Jr. | CF | 21.6 | Vanderbilt | Speed, Defense |
| 53 | HM | 40 | Mac Horvath | 3B | 21.5 | North Carolina | Bat Speed, Performance |
| 63 | HM | 35+ | Jackson Baumeister | SP | 21.0 | Florida State | Frame, Curveball Depth |
Bradfield was drafted exactly where I had him ranked. Horvath continues the Orioles’ trend of drafting pull-heavy college performers. Similar to Hackenberg, Baumeister didn’t perform well enough in college to be a slam dunk second rounder, but the Orioles like to take pitchers with good natural breaking balls and he has that. They’ll try to sync up his delivery and develop the rest.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 11 | 45+ | Kyle Teel | C | 21.4 | Virginia | Feel to Hit, Arm |
| 50 | 31 | 45 | Nazzan Zanetello | SS | 18.1 | Christian Brothers HS (MO) | Arm, Athleticism, Power |
It was a great first day for the BoSox. Teel fell into their lap at 14 and then Zanetello, who I had ranked 31st, was waiting there in the middle of the second round. While eavesdropping on folks in the media area, I overheard discussion about Teel being slot, which would be surprising. Zanetello might be over, though, so Boston may have to save some pool space on Day Two to fit him in.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 18 | 45 | Matt Shaw | 2B | 21.7 | Maryland | Bat Speed |
| 68 | HM | 40 | Jaxon Wiggins | SIRP | 21.8 | Arkansas | Frame, Velo |
I had Shaw ranked 18th, but I don’t think he was a reach or anything like that. He should have gone in the middle third of the first round and he did, another chalky detail in a chalky draft. I’m a little less enamored with the Wiggins pick because (assuming his rehab goes as expected) he already does the thing the Cubs seem to be able to coax out of their pitching prospects: he throws hard. He’s a pure relief prospect who needs help in every other area if he’s going to be a starter in pro ball, and the Cubs track record of improving that skill in their pitching prospects isn’t great.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 37 | 45 | Jacob Gonzalez | SS | 21.1 | Ole Miss | SEC Performer, Defense |
| 51 | HM | 40 | Grant Taylor | SP | 21.2 | LSU | Velo, Curveball |
I’m not on an island in thinking that the Gonzalez pick was a reach, but I am in the minority — he had realistic homes around pick 10 or so. I worry he’s going to Bleday, as like JJ Bleday, he swings inside so many fastballs riding up and away from him. The Taylor pick marks the second consecutive year the Sox have taken a guy coming off of TJ, and a vertical fastball/curveball type at that.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 9 | 45+ | Rhett Lowder | SP | 21.4 | Wake Forest | Scondaries, Command, Hair |
| 38 | 46 | 40+ | Ty Floyd | SP | 21.9 | LSU | Fastball Life, Changeup Projection |
| 43 | 59 | 40+ | Samuel Stafura | SS | 18.7 | Panas HS (NY) | Contact, Defense |
This was as close to a “draft for need” haul as there was on Day One. Lowder and Floyd should quickly help the Reds pitching staff at the big league level while their young core hitters blossom. Stafura adds a good hit tool to the system and indicates a departure from the Hinds/Hendrick/Allen types who do everything but hit. I was a tad lower on each of these guys compared to where they were picked, but I still like all three and know people around baseball think this was a big first-day haul.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 44 | 40+ | Ralphy Velazquez | C | 18.1 | Huntington Beach HS (CA) | Lefty Power |
| 58 | 62 | 40+ | Alex Clemmey | SIRP | 18.0 | Bishop Hendricken (RI) | Fastball Velo, Frame |
| 62 | HM | 40 | Andrew Walters | SIRP | 22.6 | Miami | Velo, Fastball Shape |
I had Ralphy in the early second round, so that was a bit of a reach for me, but there were other teams on him in that range and I think Cleveland may have picked San Diego’s pocket. Walters’ ability to throw strikes with his style of fastball is very exciting now that he’s in this system. He has a shot to be another James Karinchak type of reliever. If Walters (who remember was drafted last year and didn’t sign, giving him a little less leverage now as an older prospect) is under-slot, then that bonus pool space might be allocated to Clemmey. The Guardians don’t shy away from high school pitching in the draft, to mixed results.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 8 | 45+ | Chase Dollander | SP | 21.7 | Tennessee | Slider, Frame, Velo |
| 46 | HM | 40 | Sean Sullivan | MIRP | 21.0 | Wake Forest | Fastball Movement |
| 65 | HM | 40 | Cole Carrigg | C/SS/CF | 21.2 | San Diego State | Versatility, Arm |
I can’t imagine the culture shock Chase Dollander is about to experience going from the frat house of Tennessee’s college baseball program to a buttoned-up org like the Rockies. I think it’s fair to anticipate he’ll be pushed quickly in the same way Gabe Hughes has been so far. The Rockies have taken their fair share of college relievers in the past (Tommy Doyle, Ben Bowden) and scooped up another one very high in the draft in Sullivan, who I liked, just not in the second round. Carrigg is one of the more fun players in the draft and he blew up the Combine, especially the throwing drills. He’s going to be a cool multi-positional utilityman.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 50 | Max Clark | CF | 18.6 | Franklin HS (IN) | Contact Quality, Speed |
| 37 | 19 | 45 | Kevin McGonigle | SS | 18.9 | Monsignor Bonner HS (PA) | Contact, Defense |
| 45 | HM | 40 | Max Anderson | 2B | 21.4 | Nebraska | Bat Speed, Performance |
Detroit got two top-20 talents and two of the higher-floored high school prospects in the draft in Clark and McGonigle. I’m a little skeptical Anderson is going to keep hitting like he did this year. More on that in his scouting blurb.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 39 | 40+ | Brice Matthews | SS | 21.3 | Nebraska | Twitch, Power, Athleticism |
| 61 | HM | 40 | Alonzo Tredwell | SP | 21.2 | UCLA | Frame, Fastball Ride |
It sounds like several teams in the Comp round were dying for Matthews to fall to them. His report reads a lot like George Springer’s did when he came out of UConn: huge bat speed, plus runner, feel to hit needs polish. The vertical break on Treadwell’s fastball is right in line with what Houston tends to target in the draft.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 20 | 45 | Blake Mitchell | C | 19.0 | Sinton HS (TX) | Arm, Power |
| 44 | 47 | 40+ | Blake Wolters | SP | 18.7 | Mahomet-Seymour HS (IL) | Curveball, Projection |
| 66 | HM | 35 | Carson Roccaforte | CF | 21.3 | Louisiana-Lafayette | Low-ball Power, Speed |
Mitchell (likely under slot) and Wolters (maybe over) provide a much needed injection of upside into the Royals system, which is arguably the worst in the sport. Mitchell has a lot of work to do on defense, but he has rare power for a catcher. Wolters is the latest in a recent run of highly priced high school arms in Kansas City. The Royals may have saved on Roccaforte to make their bonus pool math work.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 33 | 45 | Nolan Schanuel | 1B | 21.4 | Florida Atlantic | Contact, Power, BB:K |
Again, chalk. Teams were putting the Angels on near-ready hitters who they could rush up to the big leagues as soon as possible, and Schanuel is arguably the most polished hitter in the draft.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | HM | 40 | Kendall George | CF | 18.7 | Atascocita HS (TX) | Elite Speed |
| 60 | HM | 40 | Jake Gelof | 3B | 21.4 | Virginia | Power, Patience |
The Dodgers had their pocket picked by Miami (Thomas White) and diverted to elite speedster Kendall George, who I expect will sign for less than slot. That should give Los Angeles the flexibility go over at some point during Day Two. Gelof finished his college career with two consecutive years of .700 slugging percentages and at least 20 home runs.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 12 | 45+ | Noble Meyer | SP | 18.5 | Jesuit HS (OR) | Three Pitches, Projection |
| 35 | 27 | 45 | Thomas White | SP | 18.8 | Phillips Academy (MA) | Curveball, Projection |
| 47 | HM | 40 | Kemp Alderman | OF | 20.9 | Ole Miss | Elite Power |
It takes guts to use a top 10 pick on a high school pitcher, let alone to use two first round picks on high school arms in the same draft. I think you could argue the Marlins got the two best prep pitchers in the whole draft and that it makes sense to lean into the org’s core competency, which is developing arms.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 32 | 45 | Brock Wilken | 3B | 21.1 | Wake Forest | Elite power |
| 33 | 26 | 45 | Josh Knoth | SP | 17.9 | Patchogue-Medford HS (NY) | Athleticism, Curveball |
| 54 | HM | 40 | Mike Boeve | 3B | 21.2 | Nebraska – Omaha | Contact |
The Wilken pick is perhaps a bit of a departure for Milwaukee. Yes, they’ve picked the Wes Clarkes of the world late in previous drafts, but they tend to use high picks on Eric Brown Jr. types, up-the-middle contact bats. Knoth is in Milwaukee’s wheelhouse, another power pitcher starter kit with a vertical fastball/curveball combo. Boeve continues Milwaukee’s trend of drafting smaller program guys.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 | 50 | Walker Jenkins | LF | 18.4 | South Brunswick HS (NC) | Hit/Power Combo |
| 34 | HM | 40 | Charlee Soto | SP | 17.9 | Reborn Christian HS (FL) | Velo |
| 49 | HM | 40 | Luke Keaschall | SS | 20.9 | Arizona State | Athleticism, Bat Speed |
Minnesota took the final player of the consensus top five available in Jenkins. The rest of their draft was mildly surprising. Soto throws hard, but I didn’t expect his sink-oriented heater to appeal to a more progressive team’s sensibilities. Keaschall checks a lot of data-related boxes and definitely has plus athleticism to the eye, but I’m not sure his feel to hit was actually tested by the Pac-12.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 23 | 45 | Colin Houck | SS | 18.8 | Parkview HS (GA) | Athleticism, Projection, Bat Speed |
| 56 | 43 | 40+ | Brandon Sproat | SIRP | 22.8 | Florida | Sinker Velo, Changeup |
Houck will probably cost the Mets a lot of extra pool space, which is why they drafted (with his permission) Sproat, who is an older college prospect and therefore likely signable for a below-slot price.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 22 | 45 | George Lombard Jr. | SS | 18.1 | Gulliver Prep (FL) | Feel to Hit, Natural Loft, Age |
I don’t have much to say about the Lombard pick. He went right near where I ranked him and I mocked him to the Yankees in my first mock. It will be interesting to see how they fit Lombard into their crowded complex-level infield.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 10 | 45+ | Jacob Wilson | SS | 21.3 | Grand Canyon | Elite Contact |
| 39 | HM | 35+ | Myles Naylor | 3B | 18.3 | St. Joan of Arc HS (ON) | Arm, Bat Speed |
| 41 | HM | 40+ | Ryan Lasko | CF | 21.1 | Rutgers | Speed, Raw Power |
Wilson is rumored to be signing a below-slot deal so, in the end, the A’s will probably pay him on par with about where I have him ranked on The Board. I hope they do more with the savings than just sign Naylor, who I consider more of a bat speed flier than a multi-million dollar prospect. I just don’t think he’s going to hit. With Henry Bolte in last year’s class, that marks two straight years the A’s have taken a guy with a questionable hit tool near the top of their class.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 15 | 45 | Aidan Miller | 3B | 19.1 | JW Mitchell HS (FL) | Power, Frame Projection |
Good value again this year for the Phillies, who end up with one of the more promising high schoolers in the draft, a player who many expected would go prior to this. Miller might already be their best hitting prospect.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 55 | Paul Skenes | SP | 21.1 | LSU | Velo, Slider |
| 42 | HM | 40 | Mitch Jebb | 2B | 21.2 | Michigan State | Contact, Speed |
| 67 | 66 | 40+ | Zander Mueth | SIRP | 18.1 | Belleville East HS (IL) | Low Release, Fastball Mvmt, Slider |
This is a sexy group. Skenes was a mild surprise at 1.1, but he’s ready to help a big league team and the time is nigh for the Pirates to actually contend. Jebb is like a Ji Hwan Bae clone, and if he came in under slot to help facilitate the Mueth pick, his selection looks even better.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 14 | 45 | Dillon Head | CF | 18.8 | Homewood Flossmoor (IL) | Feel to Hit, Speed |
Folks in rival war rooms thought San Diego was on Ralphy Velazquez at pick 25. The Guardians took him just two spots earlier and, as is often the case when the player you wanted goes right in front of you, the Padres scrambled to find someone with whom they could cut a deal. Head gives the Padres yet another high-upside athlete near the bottom of their farm.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 35 | 45 | Bryce Eldridge | 1B | 18.7 | James Madison HS (VA) | Power Projection |
| 52 | 41 | 40+ | Walker Martin | SS | 19.4 | Eaton HS (CO) | Gorgeous Swing, Arm |
| 69 | 21 | 45 | Joe Whitman | SP | 21.8 | Kent State | Slider Command, Late-Bloomer |
Even though I’m apprehensive about both of their high schoolers, I really like the Giants’ draft so far because I think Whitman was incredible value at pick 69. The Bryce Eldridge two-way experiment should eventually lead him to a full-time hitting role, but the Giants have some experience working with two-way guys. The Walker Martin second round deal was a pervasive pre-draft rumor coming from the crew who scouts the four corners.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 38 | 45 | Colt Emerson | SS | 18.0 | John Glenn HS (OH) | Hitting Hands, Defense |
| 29 | HM | 40 | Jonny Farmelo | CF | 18.9 | Westfield HS (VA) | Elite Speed |
| 30 | 29 | 45 | Tai Peete | 3B | 17.9 | Trinity Christian HS (GA) | Power, Projection, Athleticism |
| 57 | HM | 35 | Ben Williamson | 3B | 22.7 | William & Mary | Motor, Contact |
The Mariners’ complex-level team is going to be loaded after the draft now that they’ve added three high-upside high schoolers to their farm. Even among that group, there’s a well-rounded collection of floor (Farmelo’s defense), upside risk (Peete’s power and projection), and hit tool stability (Emerson). With those three in the fold, the Williamson pick is likely to be way under slot. Williamson is a high effort R/R third baseman with a weird bat wrap and a slice-and-spray approach.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 16 | 45 | Chase Davis | LF | 21.6 | Arizona | Sweet Swing, Power |
I don’t have much to say here, as Davis was mocked to St. Louis before the draft. The recent history of Pac-12 hitters in pro ball is not good and the Cardinals are familiar with that (Ryan Holgate), but they went back to the well in Tucson to select Davis.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 24 | 45 | Brayden Taylor | 3B | 21.2 | TCU | Defense, NCAA performance |
| 31 | HM | 40 | Adrian Santana | SS | 18.0 | Doral HS (FL) | Athleticism, Switch hit |
| 55 | 45 | 40+ | Colton Ledbetter | LF | 21.7 | Mississippi State | Contact, SEC performance |
I thought the Rays’ three Day One picks would enable them to get creative, and maybe try to move someone very talented back to their third or fourth pick. Instead they caught a falling Taylor, who was great value where they got him, took another college performer in Ledbetter, and a “Rays Special” in Santana. Santana is a compact, switch-hitting shortstop, right up Tampa Bay’s alley.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 55 | Wyatt Langford | LF | 21.7 | Florida | Power, Speed |
The Rangers were viewed as Langford’s floor on draft day and they ended up getting their guy. Langford runs well enough to play center field, but his feel for the outfield is awful. He could probably move quickly as a DH if the Rangers want him in Arlington ASAP.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 28 | 45 | Arjun Nimmala | 3B | 17.8 | Strawberry Crest HS (FL) | Age, Power, Projection |
Nimmala struck out a lot during the spring, which is why he fell. Is he a righty Nolan Gorman, who K’d a ton as a senior but panned out anyway, or is he Keoni Cavaco? It seemed likely that a team that cares a lot about draft day age would be the one to catch him, and that’s why I mocked Nimmala to Toronto in my first go.
| Pick | Rank | FV | Name | Position | Age | School | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 60 | Dylan Crews | CF | 21.4 | LSU | Everything |
| 40 | 13 | 45+ | Yohandy Morales | 3B | 21.8 | Miami | Size, Power, Arm |
The Nationals now have two star-level outfielders in their farm system in Crews and James Wood. Morales had a mid-first round grade from me and was incredible value in the second round.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Thank you Eric, very cool!
It’s hard to really say whether someone had a bad draft on the first day because even if a team looks like they reached (Guardians with Ralphy Velazquez, Royals with Blake Mitchell, Dodgers with Kendall George) there’s always a chance they’ll use the savings to get more talent later in the draft. Along with Jacob Wilson (A’s) those are the big “reaches.”
That said I am not a fan of teams picking for need and it sure seems like a lot of teams were reacting to perceived organizational needs. Rhett Lowder (Reds), Nolan Schanuel (Angels), and Dollander (Rockies) seem like cases is looking to the short term. These could all work out, but…
Lowder seems like a curious fit for a team that excels optimizing pitchers who haven’t been in a lab before. Lowder has already had extensive work done. It seems like he was picked to move fast. They probably should have grabbed Dollander or Waldrep who seem like they have a ton of upside and whose pitches play to the team’s organizational strengths.
Schanuel is at least the third consecutive guy the Angels have picked who they think will race to the majors. This worked with Neto and didn’t with Bachman. This is not a team that needs quick fixes, though, it needs good players which Neto is and Bachman wasn’t. This reads like “we don’t have faith in Jared Walsh ever returning to his previous form and we need a replacement now.”
Dollander has a ton of spin all his pitches, and Colorado is the one place where high-spin pitches don’t play up. I think they’re going to screw him up like they did with Jeff Hoffman. This is a team that would have gotten way more value with Teel or Bradfield, but they seem to think they needed pitching soon and were focused on them instead.
Tbf the Angels should have 0 faith in Walsh’s power coming back. Major shoulder injuries are power drainers
Yeah, but couldn’t they…I don’t know, sign Joc Pederson as a free agent and try to convert him to first base or something? I actually kind of like Schanuel, but the logic here seems to be weak.
They can do both, in fairness!
I’m in the “there’s room to do both” camp for sure and will throw in that I generally thinking finding a good, contending 1B is harder than They want you to think (mostly because The Man wants you to think no one matters unless they come cheap and even always could be younger and cheaper). Schanuel’s got a ton going on on paper: 6’4″, athletic enough to handle the OF, lots more BBs than Ks, feasted in college, probably hits flyballs and posts good EVs…I took him seriously as an option for the Cubs :dontknow:
Yeah I suppose he’s not that far off. In terms of the non-Crews/Langford tier of hitters I’d put him behind Kyle Teel and Tommy Troy, and at the same level as Brayden Taylor (I’m not sure which level I would put Bradfield Jr and Matt Shaw at, but they would be in one of those two). But the error bars around these are big enough that you could come to another conclusion pretty easily.
The thing about him being behind the other guys is (1) he offers a lot less defense than those guys and (2) the competition he faced was worse. I think if it were just one of those two things he would be widely considered a half-notch higher and this pick would have been far better.
In his defense: he wrecked top competition too…Someone posted the numbers on the Cubs site (NSBB plug sorry)
Who is “The man” here?
You don’t draft for need because it takes guys 2-3 years in even the best case to make the majors and what you need then won’t be the same as what you need now; maybe you will find a guy who breaks out, maybe someone will bounce back, maybe one of your current prospects will get there, etc.
You draft the best talent and if it doesn’t align with what you need when it’s MLB ready, you trade it for what you need.
Otherwise you end up with what you don’t need and with a lower trade value a lot of the time because you took less talent and less long-term success based on ‘need’ (especially since every good athlete in the draft is a SS or CF or whatever, but most won’t stay there professionally)
“You draft the best talent and if it doesn’t align with what you need when it’s MLB ready, you trade it for what you need.”
…or you attempt to have them convert positions in the upper minors like the Cardinals have done with Gorman and Walker. So far it seems to be working at least decently for Gorman, while the jury is still out on Walker with poor initial returns on his defense.
Velazquez may have been a reach but between him, Delauter (last year), and Winokur (3rd round this year), Cleveland seems to have abandoned their slap hitter approach. Which I think most of us would see as a good thing.
The Guardians love young prep guys, though, and Velazquez turned 18 very recently. So this is absolutely still in their wheelhouse.
Sorry looked at the tracker wrong. Winoker went to the Twins. But at least the Guardians last two first round draft picks are bigger guys who are known for their hitting.
Totally disagree with ya take on Dollander. I think the Rockies had a layup with that pick, personally. His fastball succeeds thanks mostly to velo and approach angle, not raw IVB, and that’s what you want out of a pitcher at altitude. Dollander is athletic, moves very well, and his control is perfectly fine (and has been excellent at times in the past).
And even if altitude messes with Magnus movement, sliders and curveballs are still the best pitches to throw at altitude. Dollander has had a plus slider in the past and he can really spin his curveball, which is a great tool to have. He’s far more raw than the average 3-year 1st round college draftee, but his ceiling is sky high. I loved the pick and their following pitching selections are a great sign that they might be moving past the “everyone needs to be a sinkerballer” idea.
The only time drafting for need in MLB makes any sense is if you’re a competitive team and one of those rare relief-only, might-debut-the-same-year-hes-drafted guys comes along who might LITERALLY fill your need in the same season that you draft him.
Thats like a once a decade thing
And you’re still usually better off spending that pick on a toolsy prep bat than Drew Storen!
It depends on which round you’re on…
I don’t understand drafting for need in baseball either. It may work in very specific cases – like if you knew you were drafting Ohtani, for example, a mature talent that had proven himself at a high level.
But high school kids and particularly pitchers…a large percentage of these guys won’t even see the big leagues. Draft the best possible talent and if you get lucky enough to have a surplus at a given position you can either move players around the diamond or trade ’em away.
I thought it was axiomatic at this point that you never draft for need for the reasons you outlined—it’s so hard to get functional major leaguers you are just struggling to find them. But it seems not every team shares that assessment.
All that, plus like 99% of players who do reach the majors take at least a year to do so, many take 2+ years, and most high schoolers take 3+ years. Good luck trying to predict what your needs are on that time scale.
Myles Naylor’s FV is listed as “37”. Is that like the prospect version of the hidden floor from Being John Malkovich?
37 is a 35+ in the underlying data they use since it’s sortable. Probably just missed it in the edit.
Ahh, that makes sense.
That is indeed what happened – updated.
In terms of teams that did well, I think everyone would agree that the Nationals look great. But I don’t think the Red Sox are getting as much love as they should. Teel has everyday catching upside, and there are just so few good catchers. Zanetello also has everyday upside at third base and although he is way riskier it’s not that common to find a guy like that at pick 50.
Eric is very skeptical of Nimmala but Kiley loves him. Lots of bust potential but I think he’s got a better chance of sticking at shortstop than Eric thinks and there are other prospects who struck out a lot their senior year who got dinged way less than he did (Jordan Lawlar, for one) and Nimmala is very young and raw. He reminds me of Jordan Lawlar in some ways, Bo Bichette in others.
The Rangers must be thrilled to get Langford; the high schoolers are fine but Langford is awesome, and he’ll be in the majors before this current core ages out of their prime.
Didn’t the Mets draft Sproat last year? I think if they’re saving money, Sproat is a good pick to take. Probably an 8th inning guy but the stuff is so good, it’s worth a shot even if he’s a bit older.
The Red Sox took Antonio Anderson in the 3rd round too–I like him a lot too, he’s a big guy with some infield ability. The Red Sox are having a great draft.
Anderson is a guy who dropped the last year and a half without a clear, compelling reason. He’s young for the class, already polished in his actions, and features a discerning approach with two workable swings. Has the arm for 3B, obvs. Could see him still being a hit over power guy at peak, which I assume is the why behind is slide.
He and Bitonti are the two I targeted two years ago. Lots of present tools and extra development time.
Terrific draft for Red Sox, probably my favorite of the classes. But in terms of most impactful, it’s got to be the Rangers. Just a perfect storm for them–they shoot up to the fourth pick thanks to the first lottery in MLB history, happen to land that pick in a draft with arguably the best top three in draft history, watch a team pass on one of those three, and land a guy that would go #1 in many, many years just as they are surging to contention. As an O’s fan, I am none too happy about it. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s their Opening Day LF next year. He’s so good, and their lineup is going to be ridiculous.
Tip of the cap for the Lowder hair appreciation
I didn’t actually expect Shaw to get to the Cubs as at least his offensive resume in the NCAA is a pretty easily top 10 pick in a normal draft. My guess is the only reason he fell out of the top 10 in this one is the algorithms that actually draft didn’t approve of so many Amateur level games off of SS. He could/should be among the first players in this class to reach the MLs
I don’t agree that the Cubs’ pitching development can be reduced to adding velo, that’s the easy part from the sounds of it and certainly isn’t the skillset we see them showing off at the ML level (yet!). I do agree that Wiggins is purely a (2020s) relief prospect, is joining a big pool in the low minors they let air it out
With so many of their front office executives changing out over the last few years, it’s also possible they do have the knowledge to add control or improve secondaries even if they were not succeeding at it earlier. I certainly hope that’s the case.
Great stuff as always. Thanks. Hope my question about the getting the picks early vs analysis (as I said, I expected great coverage today) wasn’t annoying. I was really just curious.
GO NATS!
Here for the Strengths on Rhett Lowder. Thank you for that marvelously astute observation, made my day.
Do HS players selected in the 1st round use college as a negotiating tactic to get better deals from teams? Like being put on the 40 man roster straightaway etc. along with asking for more money than the slotted amount. I know there is slot allocation, but I thought that was only advisory.
Also, is Arjun Nimmala the first Indian American position player selected in the 1st round?
Slot is not a hard number, so yes, that is 100% what HS students do.
They wouldn’t want to be put on the 40-man straightaway but getting more bonus money? Absolutely they do this, but usually this stuff gets negotiated before they get drafted. Every high school player has a “number” that they tell to teams that it will take to sign them. Sometimes they’re bluffing and sometimes they aren’t. (Technically all this is true with college players too, it’s just that they don’t have as much leverage). Sometimes this lines up with how teams value players. And sometimes players really want to go to college (either because that’s what they dreamed of doing, they want to play two sports in college, or because they think they’ll be stars if they spend a few years at school) and they will only forgo it if they get blown away.
So Roch Cholowsky very likely would have been picked if his number was somewhere between $2M-3M but his number was $4M and it seems unlikely anyone will pay that. In fact, if you look at the list of the top high schoolers who are still on the board–guys like Cholowski, Travis Sykora, Cameron Johnson, Cole Schoenwetter, Cooper Pratt–it seems very likely that all of them have big numbers that haven’t been met and might not be. The other guy who has a really big number that probably won’t be matched is Grant Gray, who is probably a two-way guy in college.
This is also a tactic used so players can essentially prevent from being drafted by teams they’re not confident in developing with too, no?
Yes, although to a lesser extent I think.
Crews was apparently demanding over-slot to sign with Pitt, haha
I write this and almost immediately the Nationals take Sykora. They must be committed to taking college seniors (who have no leverage) from here on out (they took a senior at the top of Round 4). The Reds also took Schoenwetter. I’m still assuming that Johnson, Cholowsky, and Pratt are going to school.
redshirt junior – does that make him in effect a senior for draft purposes or does he have another year of eligibility for the draft?
I believe he would have another year of eligibility. That said, he would be 23 in next year’s draft, two years older than the typical prospect, so it’s rather unlikely he’s going to do better than this even if they only offer him $300K (slot is $660K).
Is there any precedent for a player refusing to play for an org a la Eli Manning and the chargers? Asking cause if I was Dollander I’d seriously consider telling the Rockies to pound sand with their history of never ever developing pitchers. I guess he’s a Junior so he could just go back to school next year. Would that be something a player’s rep would communicate ahead of time like a bonus demand? If I was a pitcher with any leverage I’d do anything I could to stay away from Colorado
Presumably someone would communicate that to the team before the draft. You see soft versions of this like when Marcelo Mayer wanted to get picked by the Red Sox and so he said he would only sign for slot wherever he was picked. I imagine some of this was what was happening with Dylan Crews and his reported bonus demands. But if a player simply told a team “don’t draft me” I sincerely doubt they would take him unless they were prepared to take an extra pick next year.
But I agree, this is a horrible place for him and I would have taken less money to play for either of the two teams ahead of him (Reds, Royals) or behind him (Marlins, Angels).
You can almost hear the voice of Boras saying, “so you’d like to go the Nats? I used to deal with Old Man Ted when my stars played for them. The only guy I landed an extension on was Strasburg, but Rizzo will treat you fairly. No gaming on super-2 status if you are ready. Talk to Juan or Bryce about that. Why don’t we let the Pirates know that it’ll take overslot money to sign you if they take you 1/1, and hope the Pirates don’t cut a deal with Langford?”
Obviously Langford is no Kumar Rocker insofar as the Rangers won’t be able to sign him well under slot to go hunting for later overslot opportunities, but is there any word whether he is likely to sign at or near slot, or if it will take seriously cramping their style in rounds 4-10 to get Langford signed?
He’s almost certainly signing for slot, and it would be stunning if there’s any real haircut there. Many mocks had him going #1 overall, and almost everyone had him ranked in the top 3 (I would have had him 1A personally).
> It sounds like several teams in the Comp round were dying for Matthews to fall to them.
You had Matthews at 39 and I know MLB.com had him even way lower than that. Assuming the Astros sign him for around slot money, do you know what reason why a player may suddenly jump up so unexpectedly? Is it just baseball draft having much wider opinions on players compared to the NFL/NBA where usually you can see the rise or the fall fairly clearly.
I never quite figured out why Matthews was so low most places except that teams are paying way more attention to the numbers than the scouts, and public-facing rankings pay more attention to the reverse. Among draft-eligible college guys, he had something like the 15th-best offensive season, and he probably will be at least average at second base and is fast enough to get a tryout in center field. There are some mildly concerning contact issues under the hood, kind of like with Mac Horvath, and it seems likely he’ll only be a 40 hitter, maybe a 35. But the exit velocity also suggests the power is real. Models were always going to love this guy, they probably think he’s the next Brian Dozier or Rickie Weeks. Which he might or might not be (the hit tool risk is real), but I have no doubt that he would have gone before Round 2 started.
Yeah reading his scouting report seems like low first round is about right for someone of his potential and risk profile. Seems like this may be a case where teams believe they can fix his contact issue.
As an M’s fan, I like that the team seemingly drafted HS bats with great upside potential. Lately, the team has been able to find pitching talent that fits their development approach in the middle rounds, so not drafting pitching early also made sense – even though their upper minors are devoid of starters right now.
I miss when there was a big “draft hub” page that made it easy to get around the draft content.
That’s good feedback for next year – thanks!
Strength: “Hair.” lol
Thanks as always, Eric. Great stuff.