A Top 100 Prospects Update

Jim Rassol-USA TODAY Sports

We’re about a month and a half into the minor league season, a reasonable time for a Top 100 update, albeit one with a relatively light touch. The purpose of this update is to pluck the low-hanging fruit, to polish and reshape the list rather than tear down the one from February. Much of the country is chilly or rainy in April and early May, and it can take time for players (hitters especially) to get going. Young players are also changing all the time, which often includes adjustments to their first taste of failure.

You can see the updated list in its entirety here. Below, I’ve highlighted some individual players. I touch on how everyone who is a 60 FV prospect or better has performed so far this year, as well as which players have moved up the list in a meaningful way. There are many cases in which the order of the list changed but the player’s overall grade and evaluation did not. If a pitcher is hurt and slid to the back of their FV tier (as with River Ryan, Ricky Tiedemann, Kyle Hurt and Chase Hampton), or if guys are stacked differently due to syllogistic reasoning (such as former back-of-the-list starter Christian Scott racing past similar talents who are in, say, Double-A), then I don’t address that individual move.

How Does Each Top Prospect Look?

Jackson Holliday, SS, Baltimore Orioles

You’re probably familiar with the sequence of Holliday’s 2024. He and the entire Norfolk lineup began the season on a collective tear while the Orioles were getting little production from second base. Holliday was promoted, hit .059 during a two-week big league trial, was sent back down, and has only sort of bounced back. Holliday’s spray chart has shifted away from his pull side and moved toward left field and the third base line. For most of the last three weeks following his demotion, he’s been inside-outing lots of contact the opposite way, including pitches on the inner third of the plate that he typically turns on. He is swinging with a ton of effort and imprecision right now. The way Holliday’s body unwinds throughout his swing is still very exciting and athletic, but he may need to make an adjustment that simplifies things so he can be on time more consistently. Bryce Harper’s swing might be a good template. These early hiccups are not reason enough to come off of Holliday’s top prospect evaluation.

Wyatt Langford, OF, Texas Rangers

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Langford went on a god-like Cactus League tear, broke camp as a heart-of-the-order hitter on the defending champions’ Opening Day roster, and then didn’t hit for power during a month of big league at-bats before he was shelved with a hamstring injury. Langford’s quality of contact was better than his surface-level slash line, and the things that made him the no. 2 overall prospect before the season started (huge tools and plate coverage) were still evident. He hit a lot of balls just shy of the wall in April. I still expect him to be an offensive star upon his return, and probably pretty quickly.

James Wood, OF, Washington Nationals

Wood, who entered the season as our fifth overall prospect, has cut his strikeout rate significantly early this year. Entering the season, it had been up around 30% since he was traded to Washington, but it’s a rock solid 19.1% so far in 2024, and Wood is getting to so much power that he has an OPS over 1.000 as of this writing. Wood’s wrists are remarkably quick and he has uncommon bat control for a hitter his size. For such a huge guy, the holes in his swing are relatively small, mostly up around his hands right now. It’s likely that big league velocity will sneak past him more often (the average Triple-A fastball is 91-92 mph so far in 2024), but the ceiling on Wood’s power is as big as anyone in the minors and he’s increasing collective confidence in his ability to get to it. His ranking on the preseason Top 100 was already very aggressive, but Wood’s grade has been boosted.

Paul Skenes, RHP, Pittsburgh Pirates

I wrote a long Skenes update here. From an FV grade standpoint, his new splitter/sinker and increased changeup usage and feel are meaningful developments, enough for Skenes to move up a FV tier into rarified air for a pitching prospect. Here are the pitchers who I’ve ever 65’d or better: Alex Reyes, Shohei Ohtani, MacKenzie Gore, Eury Pérez, Grayson Rodriguez, and now, Skenes.

Jackson Chourio, OF, Milwaukee Brewers

It became a virtual lock that Chourio would break camp with the big league team when he signed a contract extension this winter. In his offseason scouting report, I wrote about how the length of Chourio’s swing might make it tough for him to catch up to big league velocity, and that has so far been the case, as he’s got an OPS close to .600 against fastballs 93 mph and above, against which he basically has no pull-side airborne contact. He has enough power to be dangerous to the opposite field and his defense is going to give his offensive production quite a bit of margin for error, so while Chourio isn’t off to a great start, he’s still a super talented 20-year-old who should be an impact player over time.

Jackson Merrill, SS, San Diego Padres

I wrote about Merrill’s transition to center field and its impact on his prospectdom here. In short, he looks like he’s going to stick out there and that’s a big deal.

Jordan Lawlar, SS, Arizona Diamondbacks

In late March, Lawlar suffered a torn UCL in his thumb that required surgery and, according to the Arizona Republic’s Nick Piecoro, was to keep him out for at least all of April and May. Lawlar is rehabbing in Arizona and making frequent cameos at Chase Field.

Junior Caminero, 3B, Tampa Bay Rays

Caminero is hitting well (he has an OPS north of .900 as a 20-year-old at Triple-A as of this writing) and included in this update is a more bullish forecast for his defense. It’s still plausible at his size that he’ll eventually need to move to the outfield, but for now, what Caminero lacks in hands he makes up for with a lightning fast exchange and plus arm. The concerns about his swing that I outlined in his full scouting report are still present, but he continues to perform in a superlative way despite them.

Samuel Basallo, C, Baltimore Orioles

Basallo has a slightly below-average wRC+ so far in 2024, but he’s a 19-year-old catcher at Double-A, so that’s fine. He looks good behind the plate (his receiving has improved, and his arm is still great), but he is more often playing first base and DH’ing than he is catching. Especially with his offense slowing down somewhat, I think it makes sense for the Orioles to revisit focus on the catching position. He’s going to have enormous power at maturity and has rare ceiling for a catcher, and there isn’t an immediate need on offense at the big league level. It’s possible this isn’t an indication that the Orioles are effectively moving on from Basallo as a catcher and instead are just trying to preserve his body with a lighter load. If I thought Bassallo was going to move off of catcher entirely, I would slide him into the 55 FV tier of the list, right around the corner thumpers like org-mate Coby Mayo.

Dylan Crews, CF, Washington Nationals

Here we have another upper-echelon prospect whose pre-existing swing issues have been exposed and are going to force an adjustment. I wrote in Crews’ Top 100 blurb from the offseason that he’s often late against fastballs and really only able to pull softer stuff on the inner third with any kind of power. This has been an issue in the early portion of 2024, as he’s striking out nearly 30% of the time while getting to enough of his power to be productive anyway. He and the Nationals need to find a way for him to cover the inner half of the zone.

Ethan Salas, C, San Diego Padres

Salas, who turns 18 at the beginning of June, is struggling to hit at High-A Fort Wayne. It’s common for hitters to struggle during the frigid first month of the Midwest League, and there’s very little precedent for a prospect this young being at High-A. Salas is still an incredibly advanced defender for his age and he can move the barrel around the zone. He isn’t making flush contact right now and he’s swinging through a ton of high fastballs, but he’s also making contact with many of them. It’s too early to move off him at all.

Andrew Painter, RHP, Philadelphia Phillies

Painter entered 2023 spring training looking like he might break camp in the Phillies rotation and give the then-defending NL champs another high-end starter. He began to have elbow issues before the regular season and the Phillies took a relatively conservative approach to his rehab in the hopes he’d respond to a PRP injection and be able to pitch at some point last year. It didn’t work and he had TJ at a time that will likely cost him all of 2024. He looked like a potential top-of-the-rotation starter at the end of 2022.

Moving Up

Xavier Isaac, 1B, Tampa Bay Rays

Issac’s rotational explosion for a hitter his size is very special, and while he is going to swing and miss at an elevated rate, he also has ridiculous power all over the strike zone. He’s drastically overhauled his conditioning since he was drafted and looks like a future middle-of-the-order anchor. He has a 150 wRC+ at High-A Bowling Green as of this update, and in terms of hard-hit rate and peak exit velocities, Isaac is performing at the very top of the scale. If you’re in a dynasty league or collect prospect’s cards, you need to get this guy now, because if he continues on this pace against Double-A pitching in the second half of the year, he is going to finish the season as a top five or 10 overall prospect. Tip of the hat to the Rays, who drafted Isaac even though he wasn’t a famous showcase prospect. The pick was initially met with confusion, even derision, but like the Evan Carter Rangers pick, it looks like it’s going to have a meaningful impact on this franchise even though Isaac is still obscure enough that the photo service we use for header art doesn’t even have a picture of him in its database yet.

Marcelo Mayer, SS, Boston Red Sox

Speaking of changes in conditioning, Mayer looks more svelte than last year, his range on defense is better, and he’s changed the way he throws, now getting rid of the baseball as quickly as possible even if it means throwing three- and four-hoppers to first base. I’m still apprehensive about his ability to contact soft stuff in the bottom of the strike zone, but he’s raised his chances of staying at short. His FV grade hasn’t changed, but he’s moved up enough that I wanted to mention it.

Moving In

Aidan Miller, SS/3B, Philadelphia Phillies

It’s definitely important to keep Miller’s performance in context. He was an older high school pick and he’s just about to turn 20, which is a little old for Low-A. He also shares swing elements that make me fearful of eventual swing-and-miss, which you can read about in his report. But so far, none of those issues have manifested in Clearwater, Miller has a 90% in-zone contact rate, and he isn’t showing any vulnerability to fastballs at the top of the zone. You can also watch Miller swing and be reminded of Nico Hoerner, and it’s plausible Miller could end up with a similar profile, albeit one with more power.

Josue De Paula, OF, Los Angeles Dodgers

De Paula was left out of the Top 100 during the offseason because I wanted to see him actually hit for power (he is a corner defender, after all), which has started to happen. He didn’t have a home run until a few days before this update, but his underlying exit velos have been sensational. His 94 mph average exit velo so far this season is elite, up eight ticks from last year, while his 114 mph max is up four.

Andy Pages, OF, Los Angeles Dodgers

Another guy who remade his physique during the offseason, Pages had season-ending shoulder surgery in 2023 and came back this year with a totally different body and level of athleticism. He is swinging with more athletic verve than ever before (he was a Top 100 guy before his injury), and it raises the ceiling on his defense to have better speed.

Cade Povich, LHP, Baltimore Orioles

Povich was left off the offseason Top 100 because I thought that at his level of velocity, he’d need better command than he has for his fastball to play. He seems to have leveled up in this regard and is having a better go of Triple-A than he did last year.

Others Who Received Consideration

Owen Murphy, RHP, Atlanta Braves

Murphy was a Pick to Click and he’s off to a fantastic start at High-A Rome, but he hasn’t yet shown a consistently good slider. His vertical fastball and curveball combo is very promising on its own, and Murphy’s arm action is the sort generally well-suited for changeup development, but he and the Braves seem focused on developing that slider right now, and it’s still only okay.

Jacob Melton, OF, Houston Astros

Melton’s swinging strike rate is surprisingly low considering what I expected of him coming out of Oregon State. His head is still flying around a lot throughout his swing and he tends to spray a lot of contact to the opposite field. I’m just not comfortable projecting that this is the offensive skill set of an everyday outfielder.

Joey Loperfido, 1B, Houston Astros

Lopefrido was on a homer-hitting tear at Triple-A Sugarland prior to his big league promotion, but he was also striking out 30% of the time. Last list cycle’s grade still feels sufficiently high on him. He’s a fine corner role player more than he is a true everyday player.

Lazaro Montes, OF, Seattle Mariners

Montes is a gigantic outfield prospect who has a ridiculous Cal League slash line so far this year. Surprisingly, his hard-hit rate has been a relatively modest 30% so far, while his contact rates (in-zone and out) are hovering in the 70-74% range, which is comfortably below the big league average. There’s indeed big power-hitting ceiling here, but I’m not comfortable projecting the long-term offensive success needed for him to be an impact player at the positions Montes will be able to play.

Brandon Young, RHP, Baltimore Orioles

Young has had a little velocity bump and has been utterly dominant at Double-A Bowie. His fastball has always had big vertical break, but now it’s more often 93-94 mph, up from 91-92. He has a well-defined four-pitch mix and plus command, though only his changeup is generating a plus rate of swing-and-miss and Young locates that pitch in the zone much more often than is typical of a big league pitcher. He’s a near-ready starter but let’s see him sustain the velo bump all year before considering him a mid-rotation prospect.

Luke Keaschall, 2B/CF, Minnesota Twins

As we approach work on the Twins list from top to bottom, we checked on Keaschall, who has done nothing but rake since entering pro ball, albeit in a relatively small sample. He’s shown feel for the zone, bat control, and modest power. Keaschall has never been a very good infield defender and the Twins have been experimenting with him in center field. He is very much still learning to play out there.

Rubel Cespedes, 3B, Minnesota Twins

Cespedes is a potential plus third base defender with a 70 arm, capable of hosing guys from deep in the corner. His swing is similar to Cam Collier’s and draft prospect Bryce Rainer’s — there’s big bat speed and low-ball lift but real vulnerability at the top of the strike zone.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

101 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
shaq_diesel
2 years ago

Is Chandler Simpson now a top 100? At some point, what he’s great at cancels out what he can’t do at all.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

He literally has a .008 ISO. I didn’t think that was possible. 1 extra base hit in 147 PAs isn’t going to get you in the top 100.

shaq_diesel
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

Chandler Simpson had the highest OBP in NCAA while playing in the ACC. If your OBP is over .400 and you have more stolen bases than games played, does it matter if you can hit the ball over the fence? Especially if you can stick in CF. Juan Pierre looks likely, and Kenny Lofton pre-roids looks doable.

LanceRichardsonMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

I became a fan in the mid-70s, so I was around for all of the supposed “Steroid Era.” Your comment is the first hint at Lofton using PEDs that I’ve ever come across. Unless you know something that nobody else does, it seems irresponsible at best, but deplorable on its face.

shaq_diesel
2 years ago

Lofton went from 6 HR in 1300 PA in his mid 20s, to setting career highs in his mid 30s. Nobody clean is better at 35 years old than they are at 25 years old. Alomar, Baerga, Belle, ManRam, Thome, Lofton…they were all using. You think it’s just coincidence that as soon as steroid testing came around, Carl Crawford, BJ Upton, Desmond Jennings, McCutchen, Ellsbury, and countless other speed first guys’ careers were basically over by 28 years old? Yet Lofton’s developing power in his mid 30s.

Those Indians were about as clean as mid 80s WWE were. Here’s Jim Thome’s rookie card.

comment image

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

Today I learned that Andrew McCutchen was a “Speed First” guy!

Anyway, Lofton hit 5 HR as a rookie, 12 in Year 3, and 7 in Year 4, fluctuating around that range for his entire career.

Meanwhile…Thome was 20 years old in that photo, and was pretty much fully formed at 24.

It’s not like we’re talking about Jeff Bagwell here.

shaq_diesel
2 years ago

Tell me what happened to McCutchen immediately after his age 28 season. He went from a .350 BABIP to a .300 BABIP, he went from a good defender to an awful one, and he went from a good baserunner to a bad baserunner. His K rate didn’t change, his BB rate didn’t change, his iso didn’t change, the only thing that changed was his speed, and he went from an MVP contender to a has been in one season, just like Crawford, Upton, Jennnings, Ellsbury etc. Same age, all of em.

Miraculous that Lofton, long time team mate of confirmed steroid users Albert Belle, Baerga, Manram, Alomar, miraculously had a different aging curve than all speed first players before and after him. Lofton and Thome extremely likely to be PED users.

Last edited 2 years ago by shaq_diesel
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

Cutch’s best sprint speed was in his age-29 season, haha – the issue in 2017 is that his power and walks ticked down, while his strikeouts ticked up.

He then put up a 121 wRC+ over the next three years, before tearing his ACL in 2019, which is what *actually* cooked him.

What do you think of Lou Brock’s aging curve?

mattMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

The funny thing is Rays have another player version of this in xavier edwards, speed and hit tool can carry you. But you can’t be doing it with 20 game power and no defensive position

Devern Hansack
2 years ago
Reply to  matt

He’s with the Marlins now

shaq_diesel
2 years ago
Reply to  matt

you better check your roster list homie.

mattMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

Not “my” team but my bad on the mistake

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

It’s not about hitting it over the fence, it’s about hitting it out of the infield against major league pitching. He’s 23 and playing well in A+, with 20 power and below average defense – that’s not even close to a top 100 prospect.

Billy Hamilton also had a .400 OBP in A+ (when he was 2 years younger than Simpson is now). Billy Hamilton without the defense is not a good player

shaq_diesel
2 years ago
Reply to  coolcoolcool

Below average defense? Played SS at Georgia Tech, now playing excellent CF. You guys are ignorant. Billy Hamilton had a 25% K rate at every level. Chandler Simpson has a below 10% at every level. Chandler Simpson legit has 80 speed, 80 contact rate, 80 eye, 70 defense. 150 SB doable this year, but sure, tell me about how if he had 2-3 HR instead of 0 HR and his ISO was .100 he’d be a much better prospect. Sigh.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

Billy Hamilton ran a 25% K-rate once.

As an 18 year old in rookie ball.

When he was Simpson’s age, he K’d 19% of the time in the majors, en-route to a 2.7 WAR season.

slamcactusMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

He can’t hit the ball in the gaps either. Lofton had a .109 ISO his last year in the minors. 35 power/80 field plays. 20 power/50 field doesn’t.

Which isn’t saying he can’t make it, but he’s got the sort of outlier profile who has to prove it at each level. Most guys whose believers project them to become Juan Pierre struggle to have even Joey Gathright or Billy Hamilton’s career, and a guy whose 98th percentile outcome is Juan Pierre isn’t going to get ranked.

SertoriusMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  shaq_diesel

To paraphrase Bear Bryant: he can’t field and he can’t hit it out of the infield “but he sure is fast!”

romorr
2 years ago

Are you waiting to see De Leon from the Orioles perform in A+ before considering him as well? He has looked strong in A ball, but I think a bit of that was expected. 35% K%, 6% BB%, and just 1 HRs allowed in 28 innings.

tdmocMember since 2023
2 years ago

I know it’s not in your style to respond to the comments, but do you have any commentary on Coby Mayo’s drop in walk rate and corresponding spike in strikeouts? When I checked a few weeks ago, his z-con and o-swing rates were basically unchanged.

Thank you for your and Tess and Travis’ hard work.

Last edited 2 years ago by tdmoc
HowBoutDemOsMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  tdmoc

Total guess without digging, but this fits what the MLB roster is doing too. The org seems to have made a deliberate choice to get their hitters to swing early in counts, looking to do damage. They’re like 29th in walks, and there’s been big drops for guys like Henderson and Rutschman. I’m guessing it’s the same for Mayo—eschewing walks for power.

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  HowBoutDemOs

That tracks for Adley, but not really for Gunnar. Gunnar’s walk rate is consistent with last year, and his swing rate is actually down. He just looks like he’s swinging at better pitches, and making a little more contact

wadz
2 years ago

Everyone is gonna chime in with their ‘what about my guy’ takes..

But idk what Brady House isnt doing to be a consensus t30 guy at this point. Hes exceeding what Wood was doing last year in the tough, pitching heavy AA Eastern league at a comparable age.. with fewer Ks.. lower BABIP and elite 3B defense.

Thanks for your hard work.

pepper69funMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  wadz

Purely a guess, but I think the bulk of the prospects in top 100 are pretty much equivalent. A 50 is a 50 is a 50. Don’t matter if guy is ranked #40 or #90. I am a Brady House fan and I am not remotely discouraged by his “low “ ranking. It’s a buying opportunity

wadz
2 years ago
Reply to  pepper69fun

Yea.. I’m not discouraged by it.. he just seems to have the same eval as 2 years ago when he was injured in A..

What he’s been doing age/level.. with his toolset looks like he’s due for a FV bump personally.. the raw power is showing up consistently..

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  wadz

He and Marcelo Mayer seem to have done better repeating AA. I would say both have dramatically raised their chances of being starting caliber players (or better). Some of these guys out of high school need a little more time.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Not everyone can be a Jasson Dominguez

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
2 years ago

Appreciate the update Eric. Hate to always point out where I disagree but I just can’t see anyway Spencer Jones is the #16 prospect in the game right now, he doesn’t even belong on the list at all. He must put on one hell of a batting practice because there’s nothing in his statistical profile that suggest 70 grade power. Currently striking out 33% of the time with a .115 ISO and 84 wRC+ as a 23 year old in AA. I’m just not seeing it.

CamraMaan
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

My guess is the draft slot as a Yankee pick, and the ’22 stats, have ballooned his prospect status. What he did last year, and so far this year, hasn’t been enough to warrant that high of a grade, that’s for sure.

pepper69funMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  CamraMaan

I would be shocked if the FanGraphs rating had anything whatsoever to do with their evaluators being Yankee fanboys. More likely it’s because of their projecting future value over current performance

Pepper Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

Meanwhile, Jasson Dominguez came back from Tommy John in 8 months; hit .385/.529/.462 to start his rehab at Class A, and is moving to AA to continue rehab… but remains planted at number 57. If he can show that he can field again once he gets optioned to AAA, I simply cannot see a justification for keeping him out of the top 10.

pepper69funMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

I’m a Pepper. You’re a Pepper. Would not everyone else like to be a Pepper too?

KervinMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

4 games of single a rehabbing (at DH) for a guy who has already played in the majors should not have someone significantly readjusting their evaluation.

I mean what do you make of his .000/.250/.000 line with a 75% strikeout rate at double-a so far this year?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Kervin

I mean, the thing that “should have him significantly readjusting his evaluation” is the fact that Dominguez is a 21 year old switch hitter, haha.

To quote Eric writing about a guy whom he doesn’t resent for not being Mike Trout:

Liranzo doesn’t have great feel for the barrel, which is typical for a young a switch-hitter, let alone one of atypical size.”

Pepper Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Kervin

Obviously 4 games isn’t indicative of future performance, but the one thing it is indicative of is that he’s back capable of hitting a baseball. Kind of like how spring training numbers don’t matter, but for Anthony Rizzo this year it was encouraging because there was a non-zero chance that due to his concussion he was no longer physically capable of playing baseball, so seeing him actually play competently in spring training took away a lot of downside risk. Dominguez coming back and actually hitting the baseball removes some of the downside risks of his TJ surgery that could potentially have been there.

MikeD
2 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Dominguez’s path back to the majors this year will require an injury, or significant under performance from Giancarlo Stanton. So far they’ve been healthy and Stanton has had a bit of a rebirth. I suspect Dominguez will come into play in the second half, but he may not get full-time reps in the majors until 2025.

Last edited 2 years ago by MikeD
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

There’s also the possibility (probability?) of Verdugo turning back into a pumpkin, as is his wont.

Left of Centerfield
2 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Kiley McDaniel released his updated top 50 today on ESPN. He has Dominguez as a 60FV and #13 overall.

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

The entire point of Eric’s job is to look at things beyond the surface level stats, so just using Jones’s underwhelming start over 126 PAs to conclude that “he doesn’t even belong on the list” isn’t a very compelling argument. Eric has already laid out in detail why he thinks Jones has several traits of a late blooming prospect who does have significant bust risk but also has superstar potential. Now I’m not saying I agree that Jones should be that high, but I would be pretty alarmed if Eric moved entirely off of his stance on Jones after a very small sample slow start, unless he also had updated scouting looks (or underlying metrics) that made him more pessimistic about his ceiling.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  coolcoolcool

Well said. If lists are treated so reactionary as to boom or bust any guy for a good or bad six week stretch, there’s no point to the lists at all. The only exception to that is something different in the scouting profile: velocity change, swing change, etc.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  coolcoolcool

As a Yankees homer:

The kid has a 100 wRC+ since the beginning of last season, despite a .348 BABIP…because he strikes out thrice as often as he walks and hits for middling power.

Eric’s great. I learn a ton from each and every one of his articles.

Eric also has a massive blind spot for Frenchy types who look good in shorts and have the in-box athleticism to make up for sub-optimal swing decisions, while writing off guys like Lars Nootbar and Brandon Nimmo who just, y’know, make good swing decisions.

That’s why it’s important to read a bunch of different prospect guys, rather than treating any single writer as gospel.

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago

Totally agree about gathering a bunch of sources is the right way to go about it. But I also think it’s irresponsible to just disregard one scout’s opinion because of a perceived bias. That’s putting way too much confidence in your ability to evaluate Eric’s biases and whether it applies to an individual prospect’s case

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  coolcoolcool

I’m not “just disregarding” Eric’s opinion on Jones.

I weight it every bit as heavily as I do KLaw’s opinion that he doesn’t belong on the list to begin with.

Just like I weight his opinions on Tyler Black and Michael Busch just as strongly as I do Kiley’s.

But I’m pretty confident in my assessment of the preferences of a man who had Miguel Bleis as a Top 20 prospect last year, haha.

sharks2431
2 years ago

Eh, if that were the case he’d be right there with MLB Pipeline and have Druw Jones in the top 100. He also dropped Elijah Green down before most other lists I’ve seen.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sharks2431

Eh. If MLB Pipeline were biased towards those types, they’d still be right there with Eric and have Miguel Bleis in the Top 100!

(Yes, it is very easy to use anecdotes!)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

He’s on there as an upside play, where if he puts it all together he looks a little bit like James Wood. But James Wood has been doing far better at younger ages for their minor league careers. I don’t see Jones as higher than an FV50 for that reason. Real bust potential here even if the ceiling is great.

tdmocMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I feel like it would be helpful for people perplexed about Spencer Jones’ presence to double check his FV outcome graph in the original top 100. Longenhagen and co. agree that he has real bust potential (~1/3) but also ~1/3 60 or above.

si.or.noMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  tdmoc

I always get confused by those graphs and think they apply to the profile _above_ the expand button, and not the one below (which is the correct one).

But Spencer Jones is such a volatile prospect that I _knew_ that Roman Anthony’s graph couldn’t possibly be Jones’.

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  si.or.no

They do apply to the profile above the expand button, not the one below…

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  tdmoc

Yeah, I just don’t see that 35% chance at being a star…much as I wish I did!

He’s a 23 year old baseball-only kid from SoCal who went to a powerhouse high school before spending three years at Vandy: the fact that he pitched his freshman year really shouldn’t have anyone mistaking him for Owen Caissie.

markakis21
2 years ago

Happy to see Povich finally get love!

I’m actually going to inverse “what about my guy” here though. I think Holliday should be dropped a few spots. And I think Kjerstad is a fringe top 100, not 26. This is now twice Kjerstad has been shuttled. When a generally smart team tells you what they think of a player, believe them.

KvnMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  markakis21

They brought him up without any guarantee they could fit him into the lineup and then basically never played him, so if you want to blame anyone for his shuttling you should blame the “smart team” here. Now they’ve just decided to have Stowers not get any ABs instead of Kjerstad. I’m not even the biggest Kjerstad fan, but the main issue is that half of their AAA lineup should be in majors but they have nowhere to play them. If Ryan O’Hearn hadn’t become an elite hitter somehow Kjerstad would be starting against every righty.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Kvn

At first I thought maybe the Os were gambling for a hot hand…hoping someone would just blow up right away coming out of the gate, and then flipping to a different guy when that didn’t happen.

Then maybe I wondered if these are shots across the bow of some of the underperforming vets, and has little to do with the prospect at all.

Now I almost wonder if they’re just culture-testing these kids. Let them be in the show for a couple of weeks without actually playing them much. Inoculate them a bit against the bright lights for when it’s time for them perform for real.

Either way, it’s a little weird.

cregwalkerMember since 2025
2 years ago

I saw Luke Keaschall go yard in Phoenix last spring and decided from that alone that he’d be a dude. Hope it works out for him.

OddBall Herrera
2 years ago

The analysis on Holliday tracks with what I have been reading on his struggles. Apparently velocity, particularly inside, is just killing him, and they have been trying to tweak his swing so he can get ahead of and pull those pitches

Sonny LMember since 2017
2 years ago

De Paula is an 18y with a recorded 114 EV against a professional pitcher?

Sirens! Bells! Whistles! Go get em prospectors

votto eroticaMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  Sonny L

The video from his recent two-homer is instructive. The bat speed on the second one was especially inspiring.

What’s great about following Eric is that he always justifies his rankings, lays down the markers for improvement and adjusts when improvement occurs. So while I still think the pre-season ranking was light, it was defensible, especially with the defense being a drag on value.

We’re still talking about a young player with a lot of adjustments ahead, but at least this serves to debunk some of the stat line scouting and ignoring of the visuals from JDP’s skeptics. Not a player we need to overthink.

acklyoungMember since 2016
2 years ago

Can you speak to the platoon splits of Lawlar and Isaac?

OddBall Herrera
2 years ago
Reply to  acklyoung

Lawlar’s platoon splits in 2023 were mostly a product of being terrible against righties the first couple months. I don’t have monthly platoon splits but you can track his monthly BA splits from last season and see that he worked it out

Last edited 2 years ago by OddBall Herrera
coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago

Platoon splits take a long time to stabilize as is – breaking them down to monthly splits is almost certainly way too small a sample to draw any conclusions

Joe Joe
2 years ago

I know it was you, Lopefrido. You broke my heart.

squirreldance
2 years ago

Basallo wasn’t able to catch until recently (late April or early May) due to a stress fracture in his elbow this offseason. I expect that may be the reason if he isn’t catching as frequently now, they don’t want to overdo the workload on the elbow.

It may have also contributed to his slow start at the beginning of the year, as he got a late start in Spring Training.

lupus9999
2 years ago
Reply to  squirreldance

I was coming here to add this context but you beat me to it.

He started the season as DH only due to the elbow injury and played 1B for the first time on April 16. His first game behind the plate was April 30. Since the 30th (inclusive) he’s started 9 games at catcher, 5 at 1B and 3 at DH.

In 2023 across A, High A and AA he played 68 at C, 28 at 1B, and 15 as DH. So yes, the Orioles have been ‘cross training’ him at 1B, but catcher seems to be his primary position still.

I’ve read some scouting concerns about his ability to stay behind the plate given his size, but the general consensus has been to keep him there as a primary position until it’s been “proven” that he has outgrown it. And, of course, projecting out to 2025, the O’s expect to still have Rutschman behind the plate, so positional versatility for Basallo to get his bat into the lineup as often as possible would be a good thing.

OkraMember since 2016
2 years ago

Thanks for the update! Great work as usual. My two biggest disagreements:

Jared Jones – still only a 55?? I’m not sure how much more you could ask of a rookie. He is 5th in MLB among qualified starters in K-BB% and 8th in xFIP. And his filthy stuff looks the part. Painter hasn’t thrown a pitch in two years and is ahead of him with a 60 grade.

Dylan Crews – He’s 22 and putting up good not great numbers in AA with a very alarming strikeout rate, little power, and a sizable hole in his swing. Just not a 60 for me.

wadz
2 years ago
Reply to  Okra

In May.. Crews has a .315 AVG, .980 OPS, .275 ISO..

22% K rate

He’s adjusted. It’s a pitching heavy AA league… the move from A to AA took a little time.

Last edited 2 years ago by wadz
mattMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  Okra

I agree with part 1 of your post, not part 2

casey jMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  Okra

Crews has played 30 games in AA. He’s had 7 doubles, 3 triples, and 3 homers. If you made that into a 150-game season (30×5), he’s on pace for 35 doubles, 15 triples, and 15 homers, .191 ISO

will1331Member since 2019
2 years ago

What do you make of the Jack Leiter early season ups and downs?

casey jMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  will1331

As a minor leaguer he gave up 33 bombs and 115 walks in 208 Innings, then started facing better hitters.

sharks2431
2 years ago

Appreciate the update!

I know Eric doesn’t typically read comments, but curious as to what others think about a few things.

What happened to Rubel Cespedes that he’s gone from almost complete obscurity (not even a 35+ FV player in last years list) to nearly a top 100 player. That rise seems fairly meteoric. His numbers certainly support it, but he’s also very old for A+.

Also, I wonder how close Ralphy Velazquez and Agustin Ramirez were to making the lists? Ramirez especially seems like he’s done everything to move up into that 50 FV tier, even if he moves off of Catcher. It seems like he compares nicely to Xavier Isaac.

votto eroticaMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sharks2431

Good call on Ramirez. I was intrigued last year but wasn’t sure he’d hit enough. Now I can see him as a solid 45 hit with top-flight K and BB rates and legit 30 home run potential like the actualized version of Sal Perez with the stick. The glove seems to be another matter, and is almost surely what’s keeping him off a T100.

I am confounded that he has somehow stolen eight bases this year. Even with his power and hot hitting he only has five doubles, so I’ll assume this is not a secret skill or harbinger of things to come..,

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sharks2431

IMO this seems very optimistic about Isaac. He’s good but he’s first base only, he hasn’t reached AA, and he is striking out a fair amount. Seems likely to be a major leaguer of some kind but he’s got a ways to go.

MRDXolMember since 2021
2 years ago

Any consideration to Jacob Gonzalez? Been performing very well statistically, just got bumped to AA, but dunno if the on-field scouting report is changing much.

shultz
2 years ago

I know the Padres were in win-now mode, and I know they thought they might make it to the World Series–with Soto. I know hindsight is 20/20, and foresight is not.

All that being said, the Padres overpaid for a season and a half of Soto. And, no, I don’t think the Padres ever could have ponied up to keep Soto for the long haul–even if Seidler had lived to see the day and they hadn’t lost their cable contract.

How bright would the Padres future look right now if they had C.J. Abrams, James Wood, and Mackenzie Gore–instead of King, Higashioka, Vasquez, and Brito?

Oh, and with Abrams on the team, they wouldn’t have acquired Bogaerts–and his $25 million. You really can overpay for talent with prospects, and people will cheer on someone like Preller for doubling down on that mistake with cash, too.

mattMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  shultz

They did not overpay for a season and a half of soto. What they did was cheaped out after it, I’d much rather have soto than cj/gore/woods

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  shultz

I am pretty sure Preller would have signed Bogaerts anyway and moved Abrams to the outfield. A hundred shortstops would not be enough for him.

kevo8Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And honestly, with Abrams’s defensive stats, it actually might have been the right call for a change.

mattMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  kevo8

it’s worked out well with merrill (so far)

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Given that Abrams is still an absolute butcher at short and seems like he would profile damn well in CF…I wouldn’t blame him.

AzizalMember since 2017
2 years ago

not arguing, legitimately asking. Why is Abrams projected for solid defensive value by every single projection system if he’s that bad?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Azizal

They’re probably projecting his UZR or DRS – both systems think he’s pretty good defensively.

Statcast is the outlier in thinking he’s terrible…but Statcast also has by FAR the best dataset of the three systems.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Azizal

These projection systems tend to regress back towards the mean, especially on defense where it’s even trickier than projecting offense. But he was -9 OAA last year and he’s on pace to be worse this year.

If they didn’t have James Wood and Dylan Crews in the minors I would absolutely move him to CF and not think twice about it. But they have those guys, so I’d at least like to see what he can do at 2B or 3B. I had always assumed 2B was his eventual home, but someone said his arm has been great while his lateral mobility hasn’t been, so maybe he would fit better at third.

mattMember since 2023
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It seems like the biggest issue is the infield instincts

matt
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

His main issue is throwing when moving to his glove side. He’s never been comfortable spinning and throwing. He’ll do a weird weak jump throw when moving up the middle. And he has more than adequate athleticism and arm to get to balls. It’s an odd weakness because that is most SS’ stronger side defensively.It’s even odder because he’ll occasionally make plays on the outfield grass deep in the 3B hole that I’ve only seen Andrelton Simmons make.

Last edited 2 years ago by matt
Dooduh
2 years ago

I would suggest not sleeping on Jeremy Rodriguez.

pepper69funMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

Sounds incredibly uncomfortable and he’s likely to object

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  pepper69fun

I agree with the second part, but maybe he’s an excellent snuggler?

DjangoReinhardtMember since 2017
2 years ago

Nothing to say besides I think this article was great. Love this stuff, Eric, good work.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I am a little concerned about Crews at this point. Not enough to move off him long term but enough that warning bells are going off.

James Wood is going to be a star, though. I have been very excited about his upside for a while and it looks like he is putting it all together. Not every day you get 40-homer potential from a center fielder.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I will say that I’m always leery of a guy suddenly cutting his K-Rate and getting to more of his power in AAA, since the advent of the autozone…but Wood looks like a ton of fun.

wadz
2 years ago

The K rate gains are probably a little flukey.. as stated higher MLB velocity will likely eat Wood up for a period…

Yet.. on the power hes rocking a lower ISO than A-AA.. hes going to hit for big power wherever he plays

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think he’s probably going to hover around 30% K rates in the majors, but I also think he’s going to walk and hit for a lot of power. The upside looks like if Matt Olson or Ryan Howard or Adam Dunn played a credible center field. I think he has star written all over him.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah – he looks like what Yankees fans hoped Aaron Judge would be…before he exceeded everyone’s wildest dreams.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I can’t say I’m that worried about Holliday or Chourio either. These guys are barely done being children. They will probably fix their swings.

DoctorPayne
2 years ago

No love for Carson Williams? I’m just scouting the stat line, but he’s obliterated AA, and cut his K rate significantly in the process.

SenorGato
2 years ago
Reply to  DoctorPayne

I am all aboard the Williams wagon. Stopped in Fredricksburg (not to brag) to catch House (and Lara but wasn’t scheduled) during 2022 and left thinking Carson Williams was handily the best player on the field

sharks2431
2 years ago
Reply to  DoctorPayne

I think there are still hit tool concerns. A month and a half of PAs hasn’t changed that yet. If he can keep it up for the whole season though? Then I think we’re looking at a top 15ish prospect in the mold of Jordan Lawlar (with more power)…

SenorGato
2 years ago

I’m curious about Andry Lara in the Nats org as this season goes along. Think he’s more interesting than many prospect pitchers out there

SenorGato
2 years ago

I’m pretty interested in Aidan Miller’s performance but for potentially selfish reasons. PJ Morlando is also an older HS bat, and Miller’s one of the few 2023 draftees who has maintained or even improved his position in 2024. Morlando’s a different prospect but if it’s not scary to take an older HS bat with present strength and physicality etc then yay an option for Cubs

LanceRichardsonMember since 2018
2 years ago

I know you’re low man on Robby Snelling, but is he really not at least a 35 FV in your eyes? He’s nowhere to be found on The Board.

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago

He’s a 40+ and Tess named him as a Pick to Click before the season. He shows up on the board if you select “2023 Updated” since he doesn’t have an updated 2024 report yet

Harry Arrieta
2 years ago

Mo Ballesteros is 20 in AA swinging a 150 bat and a 12% K/10% BB galavanting as a C. If he weren’t 5’7 I have to assume he would get some recognition