Aaron Judge’s Decision To Bet on Himself Is Paying Off

As you may recall, just as the season was getting underway, Aaron Judge, who is set to become a free agent after the 2022 season, rejected a contract extension proffered by the Yankees; the deal would have been worth $230.5 million over eight years (seven years at $30.5 million per year, plus $17 million for this year), keeping Judge in pinstripes for most of the rest of his career. Instead, Judge decided to play out his final season under team control and then hit the free agent market with as much leverage as he is ever likely to have. Judge gambled on himself, and while two-thirds of the season remains, the early returns are pointing in his direction.

In a year that has seen offense largely disappear — just as a number of power hitters have seen their performance evaporate — Judge has bucked the trend. After his home run in Sunday’s loss to the Rays, he’s already up to 18 on the season, nearly half of his total (39) from his impressive 2021 campaign. That number even outstrips the pace of his 2017 season, during which he hit 52 round-trippers in an offensive environment far more conducive to crushing pitchers’ dreams. Judge might not have the big contract he’s looking for yet, but he’s done about as much to improve his standing as anyone could in two months.

Judge’s season line stands at a spicy .303/.371/.657, numbers that would count as superlative even in Coors Field during the era’s highest-offense seasons. In 1968: The Next Generation, that’s enough for a 192 wRC+ and 2.8 WAR; spicy may actually undersell just how dangerous he’s been.

Unlike a lot of similar extension offers, it’s hard to call the Yankees’ unreasonable. Some might compare Judge’s potential deal to what Mike Trout is set to get through his age-38 season, but even ignoring Trout’s strong argument for being the superior player entering the season, the Angels superstar’s contract also started at age 29. Similarly, the extension Mookie Betts signed started at age 28. How much does that matter? Let’s start with the ZiPS projection for Judge entering the 2022 season:

ZiPS Projection – Aaron Judge (Pre-2022)
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2023 .273 .366 .531 469 80 128 22 0 33 89 68 144 4 141 9 4.6
2024 .269 .361 .514 453 75 122 21 0 30 83 64 135 4 136 9 4.1
2025 .265 .356 .491 430 67 114 19 0 26 73 59 123 4 128 8 3.5
2026 .257 .343 .461 408 59 105 17 0 22 64 52 110 3 117 7 2.6
2027 .253 .333 .424 384 52 97 15 0 17 54 45 95 3 106 7 1.8
2028 .246 .321 .401 357 44 88 13 0 14 45 37 80 2 96 6 1.2
2029 .239 .306 .366 284 32 68 9 0 9 32 26 57 2 83 4 0.3

Past this season, New York’s offer to Judge was seven years at $213.5 million. Suffice it to say, ZiPS would not have made such a generous offer for his services, with the computer only recommending $147 million. It’s not that Judge isn’t a terrific player, but two major factors seem likely to affect how teams value him: his age and his health. As I mentioned above, hitting free agency at age 31 rather than 29 or 28 does change things quite a bit, as those are going to be the most valuable years in any contract projection. Just to illustrate, let’s make Judge three years younger entering 2022:

ZiPS Projection – Aaron Judge (Pre-2022, Born in 1995)
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2023 .272 .370 .539 492 86 134 23 0 36 95 75 161 5 144 9 5.1
2024 .270 .371 .530 481 84 130 23 0 34 91 75 157 5 142 9 4.9
2025 .271 .370 .530 468 81 127 22 0 33 88 72 147 4 142 8 4.7
2026 .268 .366 .521 451 76 121 21 0 31 83 68 140 4 139 8 4.3
2027 .263 .360 .501 433 71 114 19 0 28 76 64 130 4 132 8 3.7
2028 .259 .352 .475 413 63 107 17 0 24 68 58 118 4 123 7 3.0
2029 .256 .344 .450 391 56 100 16 0 20 60 51 103 3 115 6 2.3

Knocking three years off his age bumps that valuation all the way from $147 million to $232 million. Similarly, if Judge was scheduled to become a free agent at 26, like a number of other young phenoms have, ZiPS would suggest $273 million over seven years or $334 million over 10, comparable to those other players.

While Judge hasn’t had one major underlying injury causing concern (instead having suffered a bunch of nagging injuries), the fact remains that last season was the first time he managed 120 games in a season since 2017. Attendance counts, and if you’re going to pay someone a quarter of a billion dollars, generally you want them to be on the field. Going back to the original projection once more, if instead of changing his age we tell ZiPS that Judge will play 156 games in 2022, it adds $23 million to the valuation on its own:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
ZiPS Projection – Aaron Judge (Pre-2022, 156 G in 2022)
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2023 .274 .367 .531 573 98 157 27 0 40 108 83 176 5 141 9 5.5
2024 .271 .363 .517 553 91 150 25 0 37 101 78 165 5 137 9 4.9
2025 .264 .355 .490 526 82 139 23 0 32 89 72 151 5 128 8 4.0
2026 .259 .346 .458 498 73 129 21 0 26 78 64 135 4 117 7 3.0
2027 .254 .334 .426 469 63 119 18 0 21 66 55 116 3 106 7 2.1
2028 .248 .320 .399 436 54 108 15 0 17 56 45 98 3 95 6 1.3
2029 .238 .304 .355 344 38 82 10 0 10 38 31 69 2 80 4 0.2

Without any change in his baseline, I wouldn’t have expected ZiPS to be that far off when it came to the ultimate value of Judge’s next deal. Freddie Freeman‘s contract is only six years and $162 million, and while he signed his deal when he was more than a year older than Judge will be when he hits free agency, that value is also reduced by a significant portion of his deal ($57 million) being deferred from 2028 to 2040. Matt Olson, who is two years younger than Judge, isn’t getting $30 million to cover his free agency years either. Even if we assume for the sake of argument that Judge is a bit more valuable, there’s a pretty big gulf between what Freeman and Olson very recently got and a contract offer that’s significantly superior to the Yankees’. Not that it’s impossible (see Kris Bryant’s baffling deal), but as a general rule, teams today aren’t as keen on giving lucrative mega-deals to players over the age of 30, especially those on the easy side of the defensive spectrum, as they were a generation ago. And that’s not without cause.

Now, you can’t actually change your age the way you can demonstrate that you’re healthy, but Judge is doing the next best thing in establishing a new baseline from which to decline:

ZiPS Projection – Aaron Judge (New Baseline)
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2023 .283 .366 .554 576 100 163 27 0 43 109 75 171 7 153 6 5.9
2024 .281 .364 .542 548 93 154 26 0 39 101 71 160 6 150 5 5.3
2025 .273 .356 .514 523 84 143 24 0 34 90 66 150 5 140 5 4.4
2026 .268 .347 .488 496 75 133 22 0 29 79 59 134 5 131 4 3.5
2027 .263 .336 .451 468 66 123 19 0 23 68 50 119 4 118 3 2.4
2028 .257 .324 .421 435 56 112 17 0 18 57 42 101 4 107 2 1.5
2029 .249 .308 .388 402 47 100 14 0 14 47 34 84 3 94 1 0.6

In just two months, Judge has added nearly $40 million to his ZiPS valuation, an impressive feat for a very well-established player. Naturally, if he continues at his current pace, he’ll do even more than that. And him maintaining a 198 wRC+ isn’t as preposterous as it might sound:

ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Aaron Judge (Pre-2022)
Percentile BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ WAR
90% .324 .423 .672 485 98 157 29 1 46 117 82 127 11 193 8.4
80% .306 .402 .610 490 93 150 26 0 41 107 77 136 9 172 7.0
70% .297 .391 .591 492 91 146 25 0 40 103 75 142 7 164 6.5
60% .285 .379 .563 494 89 141 23 0 38 99 73 146 6 154 5.7
50% .276 .369 .538 496 85 137 22 0 36 95 71 153 5 144 5.1
40% .269 .360 .516 498 84 134 21 0 34 91 69 158 5 136 4.6
30% .260 .350 .490 500 81 130 19 0 32 86 67 166 4 127 3.9
20% .251 .339 .468 502 78 126 19 0 30 81 65 172 4 118 3.3
10% .233 .318 .433 506 75 118 17 0 28 76 61 187 3 103 2.2

Now it obviously wasn’t his mean projection, but coming into the year, ZiPS gave Judge an 8% chance of an OPS+/wRC+ of at least 198 for the entire 2022 season. That was unlikely, but it’s also better than the odds of any randomly chosen Barry Bonds plate appearance resulting in a home run, and nobody questioned the nature of existence when he hit one out, did they? After managing it for a third of a season — and with a higher baseline and less time needed to maintain it — ZiPS now gives Judge a 22% chance of finishing at least at that level:

ZiPS Projection – Aaron Judge (Based on 2022 Pace)
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2023 .295 .366 .595 583 110 172 28 0 49 119 65 169 6 164 6 6.7
2024 .292 .364 .586 555 103 162 28 0 45 111 62 158 5 160 5 6.0
2025 .284 .355 .554 531 94 151 26 0 39 99 57 147 5 150 4 5.0
2026 .280 .347 .525 503 84 141 24 0 33 87 51 133 5 140 4 4.1
2027 .272 .335 .487 474 73 129 21 0 27 75 44 118 4 127 3 2.9
2028 .267 .324 .457 442 63 118 18 0 22 63 37 101 3 116 2 2.0
2029 .257 .309 .419 408 53 105 15 0 17 52 30 84 3 102 1 1.0

While ZiPS still wouldn’t offer him $250 million, it’s a lot closer, and we’re now talking a $70 million single-season jump in valuation. It also puts the Yankees in an interesting negotiating position. If they thought that Judge was worthy of $213.5 million from 2023-29 before the season, it’s going to be quite difficult to say that they shouldn’t offer him significantly more after turning in an MVP-type season that’s every bit as stunning as his 2017 campaign. In this case, Judge may very well get the contract he wants.

By turning down a fair offer entering the season, Aaron Judge made an enormous wager on himself, bigger than any ever seen at the World Series of Poker. So far this season, he’s done as much as he possibly could to ensure that come 2023, he’ll be the one raking in the chips.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

56 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
crocb3
4 years ago

For the reworked ZiPS figures, are Judge’s innings in centerfield factored in? The Yankees have been trotting him out there quite a bit this season, but I’m not familiar enough with ZiPS to know if that will change any projections moving forward.

JustinPBGMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  crocb3

I’m curious about this too

steveo
4 years ago

Great article as always, Dan. I do think Aaron Judge’s injuries have been a bit flukish. He missed two months with a HBP and missed over a month with an oblique strain. He also broke a rib diving for a ball. Obviously those are still injuries that other players seemed to avoid, but it’s a good thing that he hasn’t had any recurring injuries.

As far as how much more Judge gets, I’d think he probably gets about what Rendon gets or maybe a bit more. So about 30-40M more than what the Yankees offered. 7/260ish. I don’t think the Yankees will bid against themselves too much and I don’t see any other team offering up 300M. The Giants could in theory but if they didn’t extend their Cy young caliber pitcher, why would they sign a major FA? I guess the Mets are somewhat interesting, but I don’t think Cohen is keen on 300M+ payrolls every year. Plus they’re already paying 3 players 100M+ and have their own major FA in Brandon Nimmo (and DeGrom if he opts out) and will have to pay Alonso soon.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I don’t see anyone paying more than $230M for Judge except the Mets and Yankees. Not that I think paying that much or more would be a smart move for either of them in terms of costs and benefits, but if you’ve already decided that money is no object, why not? Plus he’s got a following in NYC.

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I generally agree with you, but it only takes one team. But there are basically no good fits around baseball. The high spending teams have other guys they need to pay. Maybe the Mariners? I think the Mets high spending is temporary. I think eventually Cohen will get tired of paying the luxury tax and basically try to do what the Yankees, Dodgers, and Red Sox do by creeping under the tax every few years. I think Martino or someone wrote that it essentially is temporary until they can build a player development system that will develop cheap players. It’s just that the Mets weren’t good last year and they needed to spend the money to contend. Coincidentally, the NL East is awful, and they probably could’ve spent a lot less and still win the division.

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

A team I could see doing it is Detroit. They have all that young pitching, but, not much hitting.

As for OF’s, they have Riley Greene getting ready to be called up any day now. Meadows will be around. Akil Baddoo had a terrible start & is hurt now, too. Guys like Derek Hill, Daz Cameron, Reyes are not building blocks. Put Judge in RF, Greeene in CF, Meadows in LF, Baddoo as 4th OF?

Grossman’s deal is done after this year & Cabrera’s albatross deal is done after 2023.

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Oh yeah, they’re a good pick. Even though they’d probably need to go to 10/300 or something to win Judge over. Maybe more. I don’t think Judge is all that keen on going to Detroit. So would they be willing to give 300M to Judge when they didn’t give it to a younger and equally as good player in Correa? Maybe! I think he’d be a good fit on the roster but I do think they’d need to make a couple other moves to really be competitive (coincidentally I think Jameson Taillon would be a great fit for them and that ballpark, he’s been nails this year and looks like he’s back to his Pirates form and would be a great #2 for them).

Travis LMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

Is there evidence to suggest that Judge won’t follow the money, same as any other player? I’m wondering if you have special knowledge of his preferences or if perhaps you’re substituting your own opinions for his.

Pepper Martin
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

Aaron Judge is probably the first player since Derek Jeter to be able to truly leverage the power of being a Yankee into absolutely massive endorsement deals. Whatever the value of Judge’s contract, figure he can easily make an additional $10 million / year on top of that in endorsements if he stays with the Yankees (which is what Jeter was making around 2014), and that those dollars aren’t going to be there if he signs with Detroit or Texas or whoever.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

I don’t see Judge’s Q-score as being anything close to Jeter’s.

Luy
4 years ago
Reply to  synco

Judge’s Q-score doesn’t have to approach Jeter’s Q-score.

If you’re an advertiser in New York… what other Yankee do you want advertising your product?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I would say that there’s an important distinction between Judge and Correa:

Correa’s a few years younger, but Judge is better.

A lot better.

Every measure we have to measure “How good is this person at baseball” says so.

The only difference comes as a matter of degree.

In the 5 preceding seasons, B-Ref says it’s only 0.5 wins per 650 PA and .8 wins per year, while FanGraphs says it’s .8 and 1, respectively.

Last edited 4 years ago by Cool Lester Smooth
sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

I just don’t see it. Chris Ilitch doesn’t strike me as the type, and that’s definitely an ownership driven move.

DrazMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

Giants would be 3rd, dodgers, rangers, angels, tigers. I think he will get a min of 5 300 million offers and ultimately 350 million. Giants didn’t pay big on a pitcher but they were in on multiple hitters, Colorado had to get stupid to get Bryant. I wouldn’t put it past Mets to go 400 million. Judge is a unique talent and you can’t just replace him with a similar priced player.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Judge was my pick for AL MVP before the year started and I also said that I wouldn’t offer him anything more than what the Yankees offered him in the offseason. I think I’m going more or less stick with both positions.

I think he and Trout are going to be the two left standing at the end of the year and since I already committed to Judge I haven’t seen enough evidence to change my mind.

Also, pretty much everyone who is that big has their knees start to give out in their early to mid 30s, back problems are much more common in guys that big and tall, and he’s the classic case of “so strong he hurts himself” that we’ve seen in recent years (like Giancarlo Stanton). With Stanton, I thought that $300M+ deal when he got it would be good for the team and I was wrong, precisely for these reasons. Like Stanton, Judge is so strong he’ll continue to be a useful hitter as long as he isn’t hurt, but once his knees go Judge is a DH and as good as he is guys that big who age like Frank Thomas and David Ortiz are pretty rare (and many of the other ones were steroid users).

(Stanton, BTW is only 2.5 years older than Judge, a fact that freaks me out every time I think of it because despite all of Stanton’s maladies he still has over twice as many PAs as Judge. That’s what happens when you hit your way to the majors at age 20)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One more thing about this–it’s telling that before the season started, ZiPs recommended $147M. I’ve often been a bit suspicious of the ZiPs estimates for contracts, probably because of the $/win number plugged in. So when it’s below the conventional wisdom (like here and with Kris Bryant), I really pay attention. If we take the most optimistic projection (which is him just repeating what he’s doing now for the rest of the year) that adds $70M to the projection which would take him to $217M…which is something like $5M more than what the Yankees offered him to start the season.

No, I think the Yankees had this one right all along. He had great xStats last year, so a breakout made total sense, but with the breakout sustained throughout the year ZiPs estimates what the Yankees offered before. I’d probably be willing to add a small amount of extra money to get it done (especially since it’s now a bit higher than the ZiPs estimate) but I’d walk at some point at or near $235M, even if he keeps it up.

DBA455Member since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m in agreement with sadtrombone here.

And in disagreement with Dan, which doesn’t happen that often. I think this is potentially wrong: “it’s going to be quite difficult to say that they shouldn’t offer him significantly more after turning in an MVP-type season”.

If I’m Cashman, I simply present along the lines ‘we have enormous confidence in Aaron and made an offer consistent with our expectations that he would be a superstar/franchise player/MVP-type. He delivered on those expectations and our offer stands”.

Separately, I disagree with the Steveo take that the Stanton contract is not a bad deal. NY owes him something like $152 (net) from here through 2027. He’ll be 33 at the end of this season and while it’s encouraging that he’s back to playing the field semi-regularly, does not have a good track record of staying on it (note that he’s back on the IL yet again with nagging lower-body injuries). There’s a good chance he gets to 3fwar this year – but it will be the first time that’s happened since 2018. I’ll defer to Dan, but I bet the Yankees would have to eat at least $50M to move him (and this is on top of the $30M that Miami is kicking in).

The list of contracts worse than that (to an acquiring team) is short. Strasburg is on it. This bizarre Bryant deal may be too. The Rendon deal that’s been cited as a comp. And maybe a handful of others. But “not quite as bad as Ellsbury” is about as damning as faint praise can be.

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

I guess it just depends on how you look at it. The Yankees don’t really care about actual dollars being paid, they care about the luxury tax. Stanton’s luxury tax number (this is what really matters) is just 22M. What does 22M get you in free agency these days? Not much. Could the Yankees even replace him with a comparable hitter for 22M? Not really. He’s still an elite hitter. Also he’s out with a minor calf issue (calf inflammation, not a strain) and all reports indicate that he’ll be back after the ten days are up. Also it’s a bit unfair to say he hasn’t put up a 3 WAR season since 2018 since he basically missed the entire 2019 season, and the 2020 season was shortened. In 2021 he basically played a full season but the DH penalty nuked his value and he still put up a good year. The Yankees can afford him and he’s a key part of their lineup. As long as he plays 130-140 games and is healthy for the postseason, I don’t think they care if he has 1-2 IL stints per year.

Travis LMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

It’s not unfair to point out that 2019 was missed due to injury – that’s literally the major issue against Stanton. His health is unlikely to get better as he ages.

However, when you hand-waive away the DH penalty, that’s when I knew you weren’t serious. These are both relevant facts that you dismiss – why do you do that, is it evidence or your opinion?

Mule
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

It’s not really hand-waving. The Yankees need to fill the DH position with the best hitter possible. Using WAR, which incorporates fielding, isn’t a great metric for determining that. In fact, it’s terrible. Nobody is going to look at Nicky Lopez’s 6 WAR season last year and think he’d be three times the DH Stanton is.

The question for the Yankees is, “Is a 140 wrc+ hitter is worth the resources committed to him?” Given the scarcity of elite hitters and the Yankees deep pockets I’d lean towards yes.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

Stanton’s contract is almost certainly not among the 5 worst contracts in MLB, may be among the 10 worst, and is definitely among the Top 15. Strasburg, Cabrera, Bryant, and Heyward are definitely ahead of him, and at least some of Corbin, Rendon, Bumgarner, and Semien are too. It’s hard to know where to put Stanton relative to Baez (rocking a 50-something wRC+ right now), Salvador Perez (64 wRC+) and Yelich (101 wRC+) but I’m guessing he’s probably around there.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Anecdotally, ZiPS seems to often over-estimate pre-arb buyout contracts, and underestimate standard FA contracts. Sometimes by a lot. Put another way, I don’t think there’s any universe where Judge’s next contract was going to be “only” 7/147.

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You make some great points, but I disagree on Stanton’s deal being a bad deal. He’s only getting 25M/yr from 2015-2027 (13 years). If he were a free agent after last season, he probably (conservatively) get something like 4/80 and he’s got 5/110 left on his deal. And the Yankees are only covering 22M per year so it’s slightly better. Since 2015 (excluding the weird 60 game season, and excluding this season even though he’s off to a great start), he’s put up 19.4 WAR. At 7M/win (which is a low valuation for free agency), he’s been worth about 136M while being paid 125M. Though he would’ve been in his final arb years in 2014 and 2015 (which would’ve been expensive). He’s been worth the deal he received, even though fans act like he’s been an albatross. Is he overpaid? Yes, a bit. But this isn’t a Jacoby Ellsbury situation.

Travis LMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

On these big contracts, you generally need a ton of surplus value in the front end to make up for the lack of value in the back end of the deal. Stanton might be about neutral right now, but even Miguel Cabrera was above water for the first couple of years of his extension (if you count the arb years, since his was a little bit of an oddity in timing)

JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

Where are you getting 110/5, I have 159/6 (inc this year), counting the 10mil buyout and the 30 mil from the Marlins. Last 2 years won’t have much value, so let’s say 4/80 = 6/100, thus 59 mil in negative value.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago

Time will tell. For his career, Judge’s best two months have been April and May. This is Baseball Reference data using OPS since I don’t see monthly data on Fangraphs.

April: 1.011
May: 1.019
June: .950
July: .865
August: .900
September: .926

On top of that, the Yankees schedule has been fairly easy so far this season. So I doubt he’ll be able to keep up this pace. I think the big issue re: his next contract is his health. If he can stay healthy for a second straight season, that will help him more than anything else in my opinion.

steveo
4 years ago

We’re in June and people are still harping on the Yankees schedule? Lol come on dude. The Dodgers have had the easiest schedule in baseball. They just lost the season series to the Pirates by dropping two straight.

There are only 13 teams .500 or above in baseball. Just 12 teams above .500. There are a bunch of bad teams. The NL East is an absolute garbage division but no one is saying anything about the Mets being frauds (I think they’re quite good, but not as good as the Dodgers/Astros/Yankees).

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I’m not harping on it. I’m simply pointing out a fact. And what the heck do the Dodgers and the Pirates have to do with the Yankees schedule??? And btw, June just started today so yes we’re “in June” but 0 baseball games have been played in June. Just a weird, weird comment.

Travis LMember since 2016
4 years ago

Have monthly splits ever been shown to be predictive? I have seen a number of studies that show they are not – any counter evidence?

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

I don’t know. It’s a fair question. I know there are players who are notoriously slow starters (Jason Kipnis, I’m looking at you and your career .619 OPS in March/April).

With Judge, what I see is this. We have 9 months of data on him for April/May and in every single month, he’s run an OPS above .900. Outside of April/May, he’s run an OPS above .900 only 6 times in 15 months. (minimum of 50 PAs in a given month). Obviously, we don’t have sufficient data to draw definitive conclusions but it is suggestive that he’s the anti-Jason Kipnis.

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago

Judge has a striking first half/ second half split also.

I’m guessing he tires and lots of accumulated nagging injuries affect him as the season goes on.

That’s true for everyone, but maybe more so for him because of his size.

All that’s to say that I’m quite confident his full season numbers will come down a lot from where they are now. And while it will still be a strong season, I don’t see anyone going more than $250m at absolute most.

So he risked maybe $100m to make an extra $30m.

JaySap
4 years ago

The way I read this, including Dan’s article, the first 2 months of the season haven’t done any damage to Judge’s potential earnings.

The thing is, the only thing Judge can really do by playing well is just that – avoid doing harm. Nothing he can do will make anyone want to pay 300 million to a big guy with his injury history, who will turn 31 early next season.

So if you’re in the Judge camp, you’ve been holding your breath for 2 months and will keep doing that for the next 4-5 months.

Even now, the smart thing to do is talk to the Yankees, eek out a few more million and sign before you pull a lat. There is no upside and the risk of losing it all is too great.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  JaySap

completely agree

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  JaySap

Exactly. I understand Dan’s point to a degree, that if the Yankees offer X and Judge has a career year and is also a free agent, he would ask for X+Y. But the problem is the Yankees were already offering Judge a deal that presumed he’d be one of the best players in baseball. Just not Trout. And it would be pretty stupid to let one season fool you into thinking that Judge is now at Trout’s level.

Judge still has the opportunity to find that one sucker, and it’s happened several times before, but the downside risk seems so much worse than any reasonable upside.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Again, I do get that, but the Yankees may just say “listen, this was the most we were willing to pay a behemoth on the wrong side of 30 before and it remains the most we are willing to pay. You turned it down before and you can turn it down now, but good luck finding someone willing to pay a behemoth on the wrong side of 30 any more.”

I don’t believe Judge will automatically get some huge bonus because he overplayed his hand. The Yankees willingness to pay him so much more than he was worth, which he turned down, should absolutely not lead to a similar decision next offseason. These discussions happen all the time when considering payer contracts (you can’t use terrible decisions as comps). Yes, this one is the same player and the same team, but that rule holds: the Yankees could and should tell Judge’s incredulous camp “tough titties.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  JaySap

I think this is more or less correct. No matter what you think his contract would look like today and whether he’s improved his position (which he probably has, albeit marginally), the chances of getting an extra $20M are probably about the same as losing $80M from here on out.

Pepper Martin
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

At the beginning of the season, the rumor was that Judge was asking for 9 years, $330 million (that is, through age 40, and just enough money to bring his average annual value above Trout’s). I cannot imagine that his demands are going to go down as long he stays healthy and keeps hitting like this.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

I can never entirely rule out that some owner will play the greater fool but $330M seems highly implausible to me. Because that would require that some other team was offering him, I don’t know, $310M, which implies the existence of two teams willing to go above $300M. I’m not even sure there will be one. Here is the complete list of players who have gotten a contract worth more than $300M who were going into their age 30 season or more (so that includes the age-31 season, which is what Judge will be):

.
That’s right, it’s nobody. Maybe Judge is the first–who knows? But $330M? No way.

By the way, in case if you were wondering if it was a good idea to give a guy going into his age-31 season a $230M+ contract, here is the complete list of players over the age of 30 who have gotten more than $230M going into their age 30 or later:

  1. A-Rod ($275M)
  2. Miguel Cabrera ($248M)
  3. Stephen Strasburg ($245M)
  4. Robinson Cano ($240M)
  5. Albert Pujols ($240M)

.
This list also serves as a list of the worst major league contracts given out in the last 15 years. (FWIW, there was a case of a guy that panned out well closer to $200M–Max Scherzer. This is very likely the single best nine-figure deal given out to a guy who was 30 or older). The closest precedent is A-Rod, who was coming off of a whopping 9.6 win season which was the sixth season where he had put up more than 9 wins in a season and where people were talking about him topping Bonds’ all time home run record (the steroid era was crazy).

So I can’t exactly predict what teams will do, and who knows, maybe he’ll beat the odds, but I guarantee you that anyone giving him a contract even close to $300M doesn’t have an actuary on staff.

Last edited 4 years ago by sadtrombone
Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One clarification – having a team willing to go to $300M, or $330M, or $500M, or $1B, is in no way reliant on having another team in the running, making a similar/close offer, etc. There assuredly do NOT have to be two teams in the running for someone to offer a foolish contract to Judge or anyone else; it just takes one. That one just has to *think* someone else is in the running, planning on making a big offer, etc.

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago

I suspect that Judge’s power will fall off at a much slower rate than ZiPS predicts. Being the extremely large human that Judge is makes it significantly easier for him to generate the power that makes him so valuable. He can loose 5 mph off his average FB/LD exit velocity and still be hitting the ball as hard as Freddie Freeman and JD Martinez are now.

Additionally, Judge actually has room to improve even more. Already a quarter of his batted balls are barrels but he’s doing that with a below average SweetSpot% of 34.4%. Because he hits the ball so insanely hard, any increase in SweetSpot% would lead to an almost 1:1 increase in barrels. Players with launch angle optimized swings generally have sweet spot percents in the 42% to 43% range. If Judge somehow made an adjustment to increase his SweetSpot% to that range he could have added 11 barrels in the season, the same number that Daniel Vogelbach and Brandon Nimmo have. Such an increase would take his already insane 25% barrel/bbe to 35% and his 16.3% barrel/pa rate to 20.7%.

tdouglas
4 years ago

I mean, if any player increases their sweet spot percentage, their numbers will go up. Judge has some swing and miss to his game, so expecting something like that to happen for him is wishful thinking. He’s just as likely to start hitting the ball on the sweet spot more in his 30’s as any other player.

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

That’s not actually the case.

The poster boy for launch angle is JD Martinez and so far this year he has a 50% SweetSpot%. He also hits the ball hard so he gets. Aton of barrels and good results on contact.

Matt Carpenter altered his swing midway through his career to optimize his launch angle and has consistently run a SweetSpot% around 42% +/- 1.5%, but Carpenter’s problem is that he simply doesn’t hurt the ball hard enough anymore to take advantage of those optimal launch aglnles and thus hits a ton of lazy fly balls.

I mentioned this in comment on a different article, but Dominic Smith altered his swing over the winter and now has the opposite problem that Carpenter has in that he is running a terrible SweetSpot% of 25%. Dominic Smith hits the ball very hard so he has disproportionately lost results on contact because he’s hitting the ball at sub optimal angles.

Barrels are one of the best ways of determining hitter performance and the two best predictors of barrels are how hardhit rate on FB/LD or average exit velocity on FB/LD and Sweetspot%. Neither the exit velocity metrics nor Sweetspot% translate one to one to barrels but once a player starts hitting air balls past a certain velocity the best predictor of barrel rate, and therefore results on contact, is SweetSpot%. However, below that critical point exit velocity generally matters more than launch angle since exit velocity has a bimodal distribution where certain lower exit velocity are more likely to land for hits.

Additionally, Judge’s strike out rate is actually at near career low at around 26%.

JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago

Sweet spot = 8-32 degrees, 10-25 degrees is considered a line drive, so this is pretty much a fancy way to say “hit more LDs (or balls not to far from LDs)” lol. There’s no easy way to do this, like tdouglas said. Vladdy Jr. has been trying for a while with limited success.

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago

The stat is very sticky year to year and there have been numerous hitters that have altered their swing plane and increased their sweetspot%. You’re argument is that the fly ball revolution is that Vladdy Jr hasn’t been able to increase his launch angle, but he may not actually be trying to because doing so would likely result in a decrease in his babip.

JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago

Ok you’re just talking out of your ass lol.

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago

Am I talking out my ass because fly balls produce a lower babip than grounders and line drives but fly ball are more valuable than grounders because they can produce extra base hits and homers, or am I talking out my ass because you don’t know what you’re talking about so you can’t rebut my statements and therefore have to resort to personal attacks?

JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago

You’re talking out of your ass b/c you said Judge should increase his sweet spot %, but Vladdy (who’s SS% is lower than Judge’s) shouldn’t b/c it will hurt his BABIP.

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago

I didn’t say Vladdy shouldn’t. I said he may not want to or may not be trying to which is a very different statement from what you just stated. Read better

JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago

“very different”

MorboTheAnnihilator
4 years ago

Your lack of literacy is not my problem

JaySap
4 years ago

The title of Dan’s article is –

“Aaron Judge’s Decision To Bet on Himself is Paying Off”

Based purely on the content of the article (which is great), I think a more accurate title would have been –

“Aaron Judge’s Decision To Bet on Himself Hasn’t Exploded in His Face – Yet”

Dmitri
4 years ago

Guys like Aaron Judge always rekindle my romance with baseball.

I recall there being doubts as to whether he’d amount to anything more than a three true outcomes player: tall, long levers, huge strike zone that would be difficult to cover.

He has defied the odds by being talented, a high character dude, and working hard.

Sonofabitch is this Orioles fan’s favorite player. Damn Yankees!

Mike NMN
4 years ago

The interesting thing about this discussion is that, assuming both sides stick to the “don’t negotiate within the season” approach, most of what Judge has already accomplished is going to be see as an appendix to what the last 110 games are like. Will he get hurt, will he slump, etc. He’s a genuinely terrific player, a far better athlete than he often gets credit for being, but….it’s a ton of money he was asking in AAV and years. If he can sustain even 85% of this performance the rest of the way, he’s going to get paid. But every FO out there has to wonder whether Judge’s years are going to be like buying a fantastic convertible…that spends an inordinate amount of time in the shop. I wonder what level of insurance they can buy.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago

As much as I admire Judge, both with the stick in his hand or with the glove on it, I just find it hard to imagine that he will be able to continue playing at this level for many more years. There haven’t been many players as big as he is in the history of the game but I carry with me the belief that men his size are going to age poorly. Carrying 270 pounds around seems to put tremendous stress on the legs and when the legs go, the game goes. The GM’s are wading into deep water deciding whether to risk huge money on a true unicorn.