And Now, the Worst Team Defenses

Jeff Curry-USA TODAY Sports

It’s tough not to pick on the Cardinals these days. Last season, they won 93 games and took the NL Central title with a team that combined strong offense, exceptional defense — long a St. Louis tradition — and good pitching; it was their 15th straight season above .500 and fourth in a row reaching the postseason. This year, however, they’ve spent time as the NL’s worst team, and while they’re now merely the third-worst, at 33-46 they’re going nowhere and impressing nobody.

A big and perhaps undersold part of the Cardinals’ problem is the collapse of their vaunted defense, which has often featured five players — first baseman Paul Goldschmidt, third baseman Nolan Arenado, outfielder Tyler O’Neill, and multiposition regulars Brendan Donovan and Tommy Edman — who won Gold Gloves in either 2021 or ’22. Manager Oli Marmol has been tasked with shoehorning hot-hitting youngsters Nolan Gorman and Jordan Walker into the lineup at comparatively unfamiliar positions, as both are blocked by Arenado at third base, their primary position in the minors, and between injuries and offensive issues, lately Edman has been patrolling center field instead of the middle infield. Backing a pitching staff that doesn’t miss enough bats — their 21.1% strikeout rate is the majors’ fifth-worst — it’s all collapsed into an unhappy mess.

Given that context it’s less than surprising that the Cardinals show up as one of the majors’ worst defensive teams using the methodology I rolled out on Thursday to illustrate the best. For that exercise, I sought to find a consensus from among several major defensive metrics, namely Defensive Runs Saved, Ultimate Zone Rating, and Statcast’s Runs Prevented (which I’m calling Runs Above Average because their site and ours use the abbreviation RAA) as well as our catcher framing metric (hereafter abbreviated as FRM, as on our stat pages), and Statcast’s catching metrics for framing, blocking, and throwing (which I’ve combine into the abbreviation CRAA). Each of those has different methodologies, and they produce varying spreads in runs from top to bottom that owe something to what they don’t measure as well as how much regression is built into their systems. Pitchers don’t have UZRs or RAAs, for example, and the catching numbers are set off in their own categories rather than included in UZR and RAA. I’ve accounted for the varying spreads, which range from 86 runs in DRS (from 42 to -44) to 25.6 runs in FRM (from 13.8 to -11.8), by using standard deviation scores (z-scores), which measure how many standard deviations each team is from the league average in each category.

I don’t proclaim this to be a bulletproof methodology so much as a reasonable way to spoon through the alphabet soup of defensive metrics. Still, we should generally… slurp?… with caution because even one full season of a single metric may not be enough to get to a player’s underlying skill level, to say nothing of a few hundred innings scattered through half a season. Throughout this piece (as with the last one), I’ll make reference to a fielder’s OAA, DRS, and UZR, and the numbers not only may not match up but may have differing signs, a situation that many people find frustrating. To return to an example I used on Thursday for Rangers second baseman Marcus Semien, his 6 DRS and 5 RAA are contrasted by his 0.8 UZR, but to these eyes, it’s not a matter of which one is “right” so much as it is understanding that he shows up somewhere along the spectrum from slightly above average to solidly above average; with half a season of data, defense is just not as easy to pinpoint as a player’s offensive performance.

Here are the rankings, followed by a couple hundred words about each of the worst teams.

Team Defense Standard Deviation Scores
Team DRS-Z UZR-Z FRM-Z RAA-Z Statc-Z Total2 ▾
Nationals -1.36 -0.64 -1.66 -0.36 -3.74 -7.77
Athletics -2.28 0.01 -1.85 -0.93 -1.17 -6.22
Red Sox -1.07 0.15 -0.97 -2.08 -0.31 -4.29
Cardinals -1.41 -0.90 -0.72 -0.70 0.03 -3.70
Reds -0.93 -0.15 -0.45 -1.16 -0.31 -3.01
Phillies -1.12 -0.22 -0.89 -0.24 -0.49 -2.97
White Sox -1.46 -0.56 0.47 -0.82 -0.14 -2.50
Royals -1.12 -0.34 -0.52 1.02 -0.83 -1.80
Angels 0.42 -0.05 -0.67 -0.13 -0.83 -1.26
Twins 0.66 -0.65 0.32 -1.50 0.03 -1.15
Rockies 0.37 0.28 -0.88 -1.62 0.71 -1.13
Mets -0.83 -0.76 0.98 -0.47 0.37 -0.72
Marlins -0.35 -0.42 0.85 -0.82 0.20 -0.54
Tigers 0.22 -1.80 0.76 0.33 0.37 -0.12
Astros 0.13 0.89 -1.24 0.79 -0.66 -0.09
Rays 1.14 0.21 -1.18 0.79 -1.00 -0.04
Dodgers -0.11 0.31 0.13 -0.02 -0.14 0.17
Cubs 0.18 -0.63 -0.03 0.79 0.20 0.50
Mariners 0.46 -0.89 -0.19 1.36 0.03 0.78
Orioles 0.22 1.28 0.11 -1.16 0.37 0.82
Braves 0.51 -1.74 1.18 -0.59 1.74 1.11
Guardians 0.27 0.23 0.38 0.33 0.20 1.41
Giants 0.18 -0.43 0.82 1.02 0.54 2.13
Diamondbacks 0.85 1.30 -0.85 0.67 0.20 2.17
Yankees 0.80 -0.98 1.78 0.33 1.06 2.98
Pirates -0.21 -0.71 2.17 0.10 1.74 3.09
Padres 0.80 1.73 -0.69 2.05 -0.66 3.23
Blue Jays 1.86 1.67 0.83 0.33 0.71 5.40
Rangers 1.86 1.37 0.63 1.13 1.23 6.22
Brewers 1.33 2.44 1.40 1.59 0.54 7.30
Based on defensive data through June 27. FRM = FanGraphs catcher framing runs. StatC = Statcast catcher framing, blocking, and throwing runs.

As noted, the tables are based on data through June 27, as I wanted to stick with a single point in time for the rankings. That said, the individual values cited below may reflect the one or two games played since then. You can see the actual run values for all but the Statcast catching metrics here, and if you want further background on the difference between these measures, our library is a good place to start but by no means the final word.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Nationals

The blockbuster trades that involved Max Scherzer, Trea Turner, and Juan Soto netted some promising talent, but that’s not to say it has panned out as planned on the defensive side. CJ Abrams’ -7 RAA is the second-lowest mark of any shortstop, and while his -0.5 UZR and 1 DRS suggest things may not be that bad, last year’s metrics were’t so hot either. The real disappointment and driver of this bottom ranking, however, is the catching. Keibert Ruiz was one of the key pieces in the Scherzer/Turner return, but his play behind the plate has been pretty lousy. His -8.9 FRM ranks dead last, and he’s one run away from completing a clean sweep within the Statcast defensive categories, ranking last with -11 framing runs and -6 throwing runs but “only” second-to-last with -2 blocking runs; meanwhile, his -9 DRS is tied for third-worst. Backup Riley Adams is in the red as far as framing goes, too, and all told, the team’s -22 CRAA is 15 runs worse an any other team. Their -3.74 z-score in this category is the largest in either direction in this whole exercise.

Speaking of 2021 deadline acquisitions, right fielder Lane Thomas (acquired for Jon Lester) has been subpar (-4 RAA, -2.7 UZR, -2 DRS), but he’s hardly the worst offender in the outfield. That dubious title belongs to center fielder Victor Robles, who has cratered relative to last year’s numbers (from 12 to -10 in DRS, 5 to -3 in RAA, and 4.3 to -4.9 in UZR) in just 303 innings; to be fair, he’s now on his second stint on the injured list due to back spasms, which may be a factor. On a positive note, Alex Call has been pretty good in center and left (6 RAA, 5 DRS, -2.0 UZR), and Jeimer Candelario has been strong at third base (5 RAA, 3.8 UZR, 3 DRS) and will likely be a highly-sought rental in next month’s trade talks.

Athletics

What did you expect given their decrepitude? This ranking is driven mainly by the Athletics’ major league-worst -44 DRS. Center fielder Esteury Ruiz’s -17 DRS and -7.6 UZR both rank as the majors’ lowest marks at any single position, though it’s worth noting those numbers are contrasted by his 0 OAA. Catcher Shea Langeliers has the third-lowest DRS (-12) as well as the second-lowest FRM (-8.5), and backup Carlos Pérez isn’t helping in the latter department (-3.5 FRM). The team’s shortstops have combined for -15 DRS and -6 RAA, and individually, both shortstop Aledmys Díaz and second baseman Tony Kemp have some eye-watering DRS marks (-8 and -7, respectively), though they’re each within a few runs of average via OAA and UZR. Adding injury to insult, their best defensive performance, from right fielder Ramón Laureano (8 DRS and 5 RAA), is now offset by his recent loss due to a right hand fracture, suffered when he was hit by a pitch earlier this month.

Red Sox

A 1-7 skid has knocked the Sox below .500 (40-42), not that they looked like a juggernaut to begin with. With Xander Bogaerts gone to San Diego and Trevor Story likely out until August due to an internal brace procedure on his elbow, the team tried to get by with Enrique Hernández at shortstop, but the going was rough (-7 RAA, -5 DRS, -4.2 UZR), and earlier this month manager Alex Cora said that he’d play more second base and center field going forward. Since then, Pablo Reyes and David Hamilton have gotten the reps at short. The team already switched gears at second base, where Enmanuel Valdez struggled; Christian Arroyo’s gotten most of the time there lately, and he’s been solid, much better than his time in the outfield. Elsewhere in the infield, first baseman Triston Casas‘ glove work has been questionable (-5 DRS, -4 RAA, 0.5 UZR), offsetting his offensive improvement after a slow start; Justin Turner has done well in his limited time at the position, which he hadn’t played since 2016, but his injury-prone nature prevents him from making that his regular gig.

As for the outfield, Fenway Park’s Green Monster is a unique challenge, so it’s tough to ding newcomer Masataka Yoshida too hard, but the numbers aren’t pretty (-7 DRS, -4 RAA, -0.9 UZR). Fourth outfielder Rob Refsnyder has done a commendably average job in his time there and across the other two positions as well. In right, Alex Verdugo has been very good (7 DRS, 5.6 UZR, 2 RAA).

Cardinals

Perhaps the most shocking or at least unsettling thing about the Cardinals’ defense is the sudden decline of the 32-year-old Arenado, a 10-time Gold Glove winner; he’s fallen from 19 DRS to -3, 13.0 UZR to -0.9, and from 11 RAA to -2. Given that he’s missed games due to neck stiffness and back tightness, one wonders if he’s been playing through some larger issues, though it’s worth noting that at least on the offensive side, he’s heated up after a slow start. At second base, Gorman’s been right around average in his 256.2 innings, but Donvoan and Edman have combined for -6 DRS and -3.0 UZR there in 411.1 innings. Edman was stellar while moving around last year, producing 18 DRS, 15 RAA, and 8.7 UZR spread across various positions (mostly shortstop and second), but he’s fallen to 3 RAA, 1 UZR, and -2 DRS.

Meanwhile, Walker has been downright brutal in the outfield corners, accumulating -10 DRS, -6 RAA, and -5.0 UZR in just 310.1 innings; as I noted earlier this week, even in the midst of his 17-game hitting streak — not to be confused with his season-opening one — his defensive woes have knocked him down to replacement level. With Gorman now more than playable at second, Walker should be DHing regularly.

As for the catching, which was the source of an embarrassing debacle earlier this season, Willson Contreras has been subpar. His framing has been nothing to write home about (-3.0 FRM), but the Cardinals knew what they were getting there; of greater concern is that his -4 DRS represents a career low, but that still doesn’t mean they should be playing the weak-hitting Andrew Knizner instead.

Reds

With a 17-5 run that has rocketed them into first place in the NL Central, it’s an exciting time for the Reds, though run prevention really hasn’t been their forte; even during this hot streak, they’re allowing 5.1 runs per game. Their infield defense has been a weak spot; they’re in the, uh, red according to DRS at all four positions (-2 at first, -4 at second, -6 at shortstop, -7 at third base), and according to RAA at all but third base. To be fair, the unit is in flux with the return of first baseman Joey Votto, the arrivals of prospects Matt McLain and Elly De La Cruz, and the need to find a place for Spencer Steer given his offense. McClain has played mainly shortstop with a bit of second base, Cruz mainly third base with a bit of shortstop, and Steer third and first with a bit of left field. At the very least, the days of the Reds playing Kevin Newman and Jose Barrero at short — where they’ve combined for -9 DRS, -5 RAA, and -4.1 UZR — are largely if not entirely behind them. Center field has been something of a sore spot, with four players including Barrero and Nick Senzel combining for -7 DRS, -5.8 UZR, and -1 RAA, though TJ Friedl has stabilized the position. Going forward, I’d expect some improvement here, but probably some growing pains as well.

Phillies

By now you know the story well. The Phillies made it all the way to the World Series last year after overcoming not only a slow start but a defense that featured two DH-caliber corner outfielders in Kyle Schwarber and Nick Castellanos, as well as a brutal left side of the infield in Alec Bohm and Bryson Stott; as a team, they ranked 29th in RAA and 25th in DRS. The signing of free agent shortstop Trea Turner and the shift of Stott to second base was supposed to provide an upgrade, but here they are again.

In left field, Schwarber has the majors’ lowest RAA (-12) and second-lowest DRS (-16) at any single position. In right, Castellanos — who by his own description has worked on improving his focus in the field — has nonetheless put up -7 UZR, -3 DRS, and -2 RAA, which at best represents incremental improvement. Likewise for Bohm, who has split his time at the infield corners due to the season-ending ACL tear of first baseman Rhys Hoskins. Bohm is sharing time with Kody Clemens at first and Edmundo Sosa at third; between the two spots, he has -6 DRS, -2 RAA, and 0.7 UZR. At least Stott has improved with the move (3 DRS, 3 RAA, 1.2 UZR), and center field, anchored by Brandon Marsh with contributions from Cristian Pache and Dalton Guthrie, has been a plus, with the trio combining for 8 DRS, 8 RAA, and 6.7 UZR, though the Phillies traded Guthrie to the Giants last week.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago

Still, we should generally… slurp?… with caution because even one full season of a single metric may not be enough to get to a player’s underlying skill level, to say nothing of a few hundred innings scattered through half a season. 

This reasoning seems quite deeply confused. In an exercise like this we’re trying to quantify performance already achieved in the past, not any kind of predictive “underlying skill level.” The number of fly balls Kyle Schwarber has dropped or missed that he shouldn’t have, over the first half of the season, is constant and already known, and doesn’t depend on how many he might drop, or at what rate he might drop them, in the future.

CC AFCMember since 2016
3 years ago

Even if it’s an exercise in reviewing the performance so far, there’s no reason you can’t also mention the level to which the numbers indicate the true talent level of players. We can walk and chew gum.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
3 years ago

It’s tough because the ways we have to measure defense doesn’t really mean that we know the number of fly balls Schwarber missed that he shouldn’t have. All the metrics do something to measure the “shouldn’t have” part, all the ways they measure it approximate something, and in smaller sample sizes we can be less sure that the things that are approximated away average out. (Like, in zone-based systems, whether the ball was hit to the nearer part of the zone or the farther one.)

Many batting and pitching stats use raw events (with just a touch of subjectivity over what counts as an error), but these fielding stats don’t do that, so it’s hard to say they measure pure past performance even in a small sample size.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago

Exactly! We don’t even know how to measure past performance, so it’s an even bigger mistake to add to that (as this article, and its author frequently elsewhere, does) the conceptual confusion between measurement of past performance and inference from that of a predictive “skill.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

It’s hard to point and laugh at many of these situations, even if I’m going to try, because so many of them were things we could have called before the season started. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to tell you that moving your very good defensive center fielder to shortstop (which he has never played well) is going to wreck your defense. But the Red Sox did it again last night, so clearly they haven’t fully learned their lesson.

Brock244
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

To be fair, Jarren Durans emergence + having Duvall make it hard to play Hernandez in CF

Duran is a significantly better hitter vs RHP and you’d probably want Duval Vs LHP more than Kike. Plus, you don’t want to move any of those guys to a corner bc they already have Verdugo, Yoshida, Refsynder (vs LHP). OF is an area of depth for the Redsox

Ideally he’s playing 2B with Story at SS

Last edited 3 years ago by Brock244
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Also, if you’re a Cardinals fan who has spent the last few years touting how your team’s pitching staff keeps beating its peripherals and attributing it to the pitchers themselves rather than the defense, now would be the time to stop. Turns out it’s a lot harder to beat your peripherals without gold glovers at 3-5 fielding positions.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

For example, here are the Cardinals’ DEF contributions from 2019-2023:

2019: +38.6 (4th in MLB)
2020: +12.6 (5th in MLB, over only 60 games)
2021: +43.9 (2nd in MLB)
2022: +33.8 (3rd in MLB)
2023: -4.6 (19th in MLB)

You can paper over a lot of deficiencies when you’re 20-45 runs above average in terms of defense before even considering things like double plays, outfield throwing arms, catcher defense, etc.

Last edited 3 years ago by sadtrombone
tdouglas
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m not sure that fan exists. It has been clear for years that the pitchers have been lucky as hell to pitch with those defenses. I mean, nobody bought that JA Happ and Jon Lester suddenly became good again after coming to STL. Guys like Jon Gant and Alex Reyes were clearly terrible but got by with solid results for much longer than they should have.

The surprising thing is how bad the defense has become in 2023. How many players have declined as much as Arenado has in a single year? Why is the elite Edman playing like he has all year? It’s flabbergasting.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

I know it was a semi-rhetorical question, but Arenado had 14 OAA in 2022 and is at -2 now. In the OAA era (since 2016) only three players have gone from 14 or above into negative territory the next year:
Andrelton Simmons: 19 in 2019 (in only 873 innings!), -1 in 2020. Gotta put a 2020 asterisk on that though, and he had only 265 innings.
Rafael Devers: 17 in 2018, -4 in 2020. This isn’t so much a 2020 asterisk as a 2019 asterisk, otherwise he’d never been above -6 until clawing up to -3 over the last two seasons.
Brian Dozier: 17 in 2017, -9 in 2018. Yikes. FWIW, his UZR and DRS were both negative in 2017.

So, given 2020, the outlieriness of Devers’s 2019, and the other metrics disagreeing over Dozier’s 2017, it looks like Arenado’s decline so far may be unique in the OAA era. Though there’s plenty of time for him to get back on the positive side.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

That fan exists. I know him. I am less certain he comes to FanGraphs but it if he does, SadTrombone is letting you know.

Glengarry Glenn Braggs
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

Yes, I’ve never heard of such a fan. SadTrombone says he exists, but he seems to be his personal friend, not anyone who’s part of a general trend. As you say, it’s always been clear to Cardinals fans that our pitch-to-contact staff was benefitting greatly from the gloves behind them.

Last edited 3 years ago by Glengarry Glenn Braggs
NobleHelium
3 years ago

That fan exists, but he’s not a Cardinal fan, he’s the Yankee fan from last season who paid attention to Montgomery for a month after the trade and complained incessantly (as he does for everything else Yankee-related) about how Monty’s numbers instantly went up.

jfree
3 years ago

Reading these two articles about defense makes me a bit sad that defensive metrics are – well – poor and confusing. I was trying to figure out what seems to be wrong with Lance Lynn this year. It quickly became obvious to me that his performance v LHB has fallen into a giant hole. Pretty much everything on the pitcher side of that split confirmed that. But is that cause or consequence of something else?

The change in shift had a huge impact on him. 76% of PA v LHB last year were shifted. Obviously had been for a few years. So did CHW downgrade defense on that side of the field – where that then gets exposed this year? Even if that did happen would it mostly affect RHP? Or, if it is RF that was downgraded, pitchers who are most vulnerable to some pitch that is vulnerable to LHB pulling the ball into the air?

I have no idea how to even look at defensive metrics to follow it in that sort of situation. Defensive metrics seem to be in splendid isolation. Easy to assess range. Or ability to catch the ball. Or arm strength. Or is it? I don’t know. And it is impossible to measure defense/fielding as a TEAM in particular situations . As if defensive metrics are intended entirely to measure trees without even comprehending that, re fielding at least, the forest/team matters in baseball.

jfree
3 years ago
Reply to  jfree

To take it out of weeds of this stuff re Lynn. Is there any defensive metric that can help settle (or even help stoke) an argument about the best double play combos of all time? That’s a great situation when baseball proves that yes Virginia it is a team sport.

Is it Tinker to Evers to Chance? Clearly that’s the most poetic. But how about Trammel to Whittaker to ??? Or Morgan to Concepcion to ???? Or maybe Concepcion to Morgan to ???

Last edited 3 years ago by jfree
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  jfree

The Baseball Savant page is really good at breaking down exactly where fielders are succeeding and where they are not, but it is absolutely true that it is less useful for explaining the impact on pitchers. This seems like something an enterprising FanGraphs writer could take on.

Glengarry Glenn Braggs
3 years ago

Who (if anyone) do we blame for the Cardinals’ defensive collapse?

Cardinals Twitter relentlessly rails at Oli Marmol for the breakdown in team fundamentals. And yet the biggest drop-off in defense is due to normally dependable guys like Arenado, Edman, and Donovan. By all accounts they each work crazy hard. Not really sure what Oli – or any manager – could be doing to make them better. (Maybe not move Edman around as much? Then again, Edman’s defense at short was really poor before he played so much outfield, so that doesn’t seem right.)

Walker has been dreadful in the field – the worst fielder (alongside Jose Martinez) I’ve ever seen. I suppose you could blame his woes on poor coaching. Or maybe the decision not to DH him more (OTOH, not sure you want to relegate a relatively athletic guy to a full-time DH role at age 21).

I guess I’m wondering how the Cardinals defense could have been better this year? Or is it just one of those things?

maguroMember since 2016
3 years ago

Signing Contreras instead of trading for a catcher they believed in is probably the biggest avoidable mistake.

Glengarry Glenn Braggs
3 years ago
Reply to  maguro

Good point. Seems like Contreras is somewhat further down the list of Cards’ defensive problems this season, but he’s been not good, and he certainly factors into our overall poor run prevention.

Last summer I’d heard from someone inside the Cards org that the Cubs shopped Contreras at the trade deadline and couldn’t unload him b/c he was so difficult to work with. I don’t know exactly where the bad rep came from – a bad attitude, an inability to learn/adjust, or a combo of the two – but for the Cards to know that last summer and then sign him for a lot of money a few months later is… very weird to say the least.

Shirtless George Brett
3 years ago

Considering the royals are routinely playing a catcher and a 1B in the OF (and their regular catcher is one of the worst defensive catchers in MLB), the fact that 7 teams are worse defensively is a rather large indictment of those 7 teams.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

You know what my grandma used to say, “outfielders is as outfielders does”

NATS FanMember since 2018
3 years ago

I think our Nats defense is bad but it seems better than at this time last season. MUCH better. Except for Ruiz. he is not improving as a hitter or catcher as far as I can see. I know he is quite young for an MLB catcher, but we paid him to soon if you ask me. Not sure he has incentive to get better with that contract. I certainly hope I am wrong.

tohupMember since 2020
3 years ago

Surprised to see Dodgers ranked where they are. They sure don’t look that good defensibly to my eyes.

hazelrah
3 years ago

Yoshida is probably better than he’s getting credit for. A few weeks back there was a close look (on this site) at 3 and 4 star catch chances for a certain player (forget who) and statcast dinged him for a 2 or 3 star ball that hit 12 feet up the monster. That KILLS your OAA. Yoshida is probably getting hurt by that

Lanidrac
3 years ago

The Cardinals are in a weird situation defensively and one that can hopefully be much improved in the second half. They still have great defense at 1B, SS, and part of the outfield depending on who’s playing.

As stated, it’s very weird that Arenado and Edman have suddenly declined so much defensively, and at least some positive regression should be expected going forward, especially since Edman has played so well defensively in center field. (Donovan, on the other hand, was always a little below average defensively and only won that Gold Glove through the unfair positional voting splits faced by Edman and Varsho.)

Much of the outfield troubles were due to playing Burleson and Yepez out there quite a bit and injuries to Carlson and Nootbaar, which shouldn’t be major issues going forward. Walker’s bat needs to play, but at least there’s the DH spot to hide his glove at least part of the time.