August Trade Targets to Fight the Post-Deadline Blues

There’s always this moment of reflective depression for me, after July’s non-waiver trade deadline passes and all the autopsies are done, when I wistfully look over the players not traded and sigh at the possibilities that never came to pass. Trades are fun after all, and let’s be honest, they’re also raw meat for loudmouth internet commentators like myself.

August isn’t a completely dead month, however, and trades can be made, especially when there’s a large contract in the mix. Woe be unto the teams that recklessly make a claim on a player with a contract they do not wish to have. And with many of the currently contending, large-payroll teams being run in a manner that demonstrates their cognizance of MLB’s soft salary cap — let’s call things what they are — there’s an opportunity to sneak smaller contracts through in addition to some of the more expensive ones for players that can help a team while not necessarily being worth their contracts.

In 2017 alone, you had Justin Verlander, Justin Upton, Yonder Alonso, Curtis Granderson, and Mike Leake, among others, all notable players that were able to be moved due at least in part to contractual reasons. It’s weird looking at it now, but Verlander completely cleared waivers and the Tigers ate some of his contract to get better prospects than they would have otherwise.

As in most years, there are a number of players who are extreme risks to claim on waivers, as their current teams likely will just say “Done. Thanks!”

JORDAN ZIMMERMANN

Jordan Zimmermann has a full no-trade clause (partial after this season), and while nobody would give him 2 years, $45 million with a partial no-trade, essentially what his contract is for 2019-2020, he’s shown enough this year that if the Tigers are willing to eat enough of his contract, he can help a team in desperate straits. A 4.03 FIP isn’t anything to scoff at, and he’s been effective enough to get his strikeout rate back to his career-highs after a K/9 of 5.6 and 5.8 the past two seasons. He even has a career-best for contact percentage allowed.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

JOSE IGLESIAS

With $2 million remaining on his contract and most of the contending teams addressing shortstop already, it’s unlikely Jose Iglesias is claimed capriciously simply given that there’s no team that would likely make him the starter for the final two months of the season. However, a team like the Brewers or Phillies with some weak defenders in the infield ought to have at least some interest in having Iglesias in the mix.

FRANCISCO LIRIANO

I swear, I’ll talk about non-Tigers soon. Even in a lousy season as a starter, lefties have only gone 7-for-62 with two homers (.113/.214/.210) against Francisco Liriano, so using him as a lefty specialist remains a possibility. The Astros liked said possibility enough to give up an actual prospect in Teoscar Hernandez for Liriano in 2017, and while Liriano won’t fetch anyone of that value, there ought to be some interest in him for that limited role.

SHIN-SOO CHOO

Shin-Soo Choo could absolutely help a team considering he’s hitting .278/.388/.486 this year, and who isn’t going to love a player with a 52-game on-base streak? The answer, naturally, is the person who has to pay the remainder of Choo’s contract, which comes out at about $48 million for two-plus years. Not a good deal now, not a good deal the moment it was signed, and not a good deal at any point during the contract, which is why Choo would pass through waivers. I think a team would give him a two-year, $20 million contract if he were a free agent at this moment, so if I’m the Rangers, I try to shop him around with $35-$40 million and try to snag a B prospect in return or some low-level lottery pick.

JOSH DONALDSON

Call me crazy, but given a calf injury that’s keeping him on the shelf and a rather down .234/.333/.432 season, could Josh Donaldson pass through waivers? At the very least, Donaldson’s $7 million remaining for that uncertainty will certainly keep him unclaimed up until a contending team that’s serious about wanting to make a deal. A willingness to cover that tab by the Jays may net them a better prospect than they can draft following a qualifying offer.

ANDREW MCCUTCHEN

Whether Andrew McCutchen moves depends on the timing of when he’s placed on revocable waivers and whether the Giants fall out of contention. While I think he would pass through revocable waivers given that he’s only league-average with the kindest possible spin on his 2018 and the remaining salary, it’s not a guarantee. Ideally speaking, the Giants would probably like to have him pass through waivers and leave the option to trade him open, but if they placed him on waivers right now and he’s claimed, the team only gets a couple of days to close a deal, and they’re still competitive right now.

MATT HARVEY

OK, this is a gimme. It would be shocking if the Reds didn’t end up trading Matt Harvey at all, given that they did the Devin Mesoraco swap for the expressed, or at least heavily hinted-at, purpose of flipping him this summer if he showed anything at all. Unlike many players the Reds don’t trade, there’s no long-term organizational fondness to stay their hand nor is there likely to be any real benefit to signing him long-term.

JAMES SHIELDS

Don’t laugh. Nobody’s going to claim him and pick up even the few remaining million that the White Sox owe, but James Shields has at least shown the ability to eat some innings, and with pitchers being the sports equivalent of a vase on a table next to a cat, bad things can happen to pitchers very quickly, and the post-deadline rules make it a trickier task to find a quick replacement. Chicago’s demands are likely to be extremely minimal; I’m not sure he would fetch Fernando Tatis Sr. right now.

TYLER CLIPPARD

I personally don’t see the lure of bringing in Tyler Clippard at this point, but teams sometimes make poor decisions. The Jays don’t have much use for him at this point, and if someone wants him and is willing to pick up a token percentage of his salary, Toronto likely knows they don’t have any leverage here.

CURTIS GRANDERSON

Granderson has shown enough in Toronto that I’m betting he gets moved for a second straight August, hopefully with better results for his new team than last year, when he hit .161/.288/.366 for the Dodgers after a respectable mid-summer for the Mets. There are teams that can still use an extra corner outfield bat, like the Phillies or D-backs. The Rockies could as well, but the team being full of lefty hitters and apparently being unaware of any problem probably kills any chances of that happening.

CHRIS DAVIS

OK, this isn’t happening, but being from Baltimore, it makes me happy to imagine this. Like Bobby Bonilla’s deferred money, I’m doomed to hearing about and making jokes about Chris Davis‘ contract and yearly payments until I’m nearly 60.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
mike sixelMember since 2016
8 years ago

Ervin Santana and Fernando Rodney, and we can dream on Logan Morrison….

RWinUT
8 years ago
Reply to  mike sixel

Yeah, too bad on the Morrison thing… I’d hoped he’d be a factor for the Twinks

Ryan21
8 years ago
Reply to  RWinUT

Oh he was definitely a factor in the outcome of the Twins’ season . . .

BillClinton
8 years ago

No Will Smith from SF?

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  BillClinton

Highly doubt he would clear waivers at all. Only has about even right now about 800k left on his deal and by end of month would be down to less than 500k.

tb.25
8 years ago
Reply to  BillClinton

Too much team control, too low a salary. Not even the Orioles would put him on waivers.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

actually they would- pretty much everyone is put on waivers thru the month. But a guy like that gets claimed fast.

jmsdean477
8 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Yeah teams try and do it strategically so as to get the most players through possible, but there are a ton of players that will be auto claimed by someone, and will just never ever make it through waivers. Most teams waive most of there roster just to see what they have to work with.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  jmsdean477

yep. One thing though that is interesting is there’s so many teams that are just right up against the tax threshold that they won’t be able to do any blocking for fear that the other team just goes ok and lets them walk.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
8 years ago

This will become an evolving list, as teams who were contenders on July 31 fall out of contention and decide that selling late is better than never selling at all. Unless the schedule get changed, for example, and the Nats don’t get to play the Mets 50 more times you could see lots more quality names here.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Yeah, but we might see “Gio Gonzalez” type names rather than “Stephen Strasburg” names. Although Gonzalez is probably better than any non-Archer pitcher traded in July.

jmsdean477
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Really? His stats from June onward are pretty awful, and him and Hellickson falling off a cliff since June are one of the main reasons WAS is out of it. Both didnt get moved before the deadline for that reason I believe. They both started really strong and the good first few months make there season stats look much prettier then they really have been for over a month now.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  jmsdean477

He had a bad June. His July was not terribly inspired, but okay. FIP around 4.00 in July.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Gio had 5 starts in July. 2 vs Marlins he gave up 3 er in 12 innings with 8 walks and 8 k’s. In the other 3 vs Philly, Pittsburgh, and Milwaukee he gave up 10 er in 16.2 innings with 10 walks and 13 k’s. Also not sure how an AL team could deal for him- interleague play he had a 5.70 ERA in 5 starts with .309 avg against and 5 hr in 23 innings allowed. And that’s WITH 2 starts vs the Orioles.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oakland or Seattle would probably be interested in Gio.

tb.25
8 years ago

“Woe be unto the teams that recklessly make a claim on a player with a contract they do not wish to have. ”

What a sentence.

jmsdean477
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

anyone want alex rios for 80mm to make him leave?

jimmer
8 years ago

“… with pitchers being the sports equivalent of a vase on a table next to a cat, bad things can happen to pitchers very quickly…”

Love that line. I am stealing it.

CC AFCMember since 2016
8 years ago

I wouldn’t trade for Chris Davis if the Orioles paid his whole contract and I got control of all of Avon Barksdale’s towers

(we all got Chris Davis jokes from now until forever)

southie
8 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Maybe they need to lay out Davis on a pool table for a mock memorial ala Jimmy. Couldn’t hurt

montrealMember since 2022
8 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Good laugh on that comment….referencing the Wire

TOC
8 years ago

Mark Trumbo could be a more realistic target from Baltimore.
I suppose that all depends to what extent a team buys him as an average 1B.
Seems like a Rockies type move

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  TOC

I agree with you up until you said “seems like a Rockies type move.” The Rockies type move is to trade for Starlin Castro so they can move him to first base.

Although, Starlin Castro and Mark Trumbo have similar offensive production this year, so maybe that’s not as bad an idea as it seems.

jmsdean477
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Dude your so wrong Col is going to deal for Inglesias to play 1B.

SteveTheMotivator
8 years ago

With Juan Nicasio looking terrible for Seattle in tight situations, despite having an excellent K/BB, I wonder if a swap for Shawn Kelley might make sense for both clubs if Kelley clears waivers. Could a change of scenery benefit both players and clubs?

Cash could be sent with Nicasio to offset some of the financial difference.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago

How is Matt Harvey still in the Reds? Did no one want him at all?

tigerdog1
8 years ago

One more Tiger:
Take Miguel Cabrera, please!
(he’d have to agree)

LenFuegoMember since 2025
8 years ago

I thought Sergio Romo might make this list, but maybe he would have a hard time getting through waivers.

feslenraster
8 years ago

No Shane Greene, Sergio Romo?

darren
8 years ago

This is a good article and all that, but nothing can top this dek that appeared with it on the main page:

“More things can happen in August than just Baltimore’s mathematical elimination.”

The fault is not in our All-Stars, it is in our ownership.

timprov
8 years ago

Choo is intriguing. He’d be projected as a top-five first baseman in the AL next year, I would expect, given where things are, and a team who could get him on a reasonable contract could do pretty well.

Could be a very nice pickup for the Twins in specific given that they lack both 1B and DH so they wouldn’t absolutely have to move him to first. But there are a bunch of other teams where he could be a good move for 2019-20 at the right price.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago

Tyson Ross and Jordan Lyles!

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

2 guys that got let go by San Diego for absolutely nothing.