Red Sox, Yankees, and Wild Card Fairness

It seems possible, maybe even likely, that a 100-win team will face off against a club with more than 10 fewer wins in a one-game Wild Card matchup. With the Yankees now 6.5 games back of the Red Sox, they are likely to get to 100 wins and play either the Mariners or A’s in the Wild Card game. In the format used 10 years ago with four playoff qualifiers, the team could’ve coasted to the finish and guaranteed entry into the division series. In the format used 25 years ago, they wouldn’t even make the playoffs without catching the Red Sox. It raises questions not only as to whether the current format is fair to the Yankees this year, but also whether it is fair in general.

First, let’s look at the standings in the American League.

American League Standings
Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L
Red Sox 76 34 .691 0 106.3 55.7
Yankees 68 39 .636 6.5 102.4 59.6
Astros 69 41 .627 0 101.7 60.3
Athletics 64 46 .582 5 90.2 71.8
Mariners 63 46 .578 5.5 90.0 72.0
Indians 59 48 .551 0 93.7 68.3
Rays 56 53 .514 19.5 80.4 81.6
Angels 54 56 .491 15 78.9 83.1
Twins 49 58 .458 10 77.4 84.6
Blue Jays 49 59 .454 26 75.7 86.3
Tigers 47 62 .431 13 69.2 92.8
Rangers 47 63 .427 22 70.7 91.3
White Sox 38 70 .352 21.5 60.7 101.3
Royals 34 74 .315 25.5 56.8 105.2
Orioles 33 76 .303 42.5 53.4 108.6
Blue = Division Leaders
Orange = Wild Card Leaders

In discussing fairness, which is the tougher beat, it is unclear which is worse: winning 100 games and playing in a one-game playoff, or winning 90 games and not having any shot at all? I’m not sure there is a correct answer, but both are likely to happen this season in the American League. Perhaps more unfair is that Mike Trout will once again miss the playoffs, but it isn’t clear what league intervention could change the situation. It’s worth noting that a 90-win season or even a 100-win season in the American League isn’t as impressive as it typically might be with five teams projected to lose at least 90 games and three teams on their way to triple-digit losses. The bottom seven teams are expected to average 96 losses, leaving a lot of wins out there for the better teams in the league.

For comparison’s sake, let’s consider a few alternative playoff scenarios. First, under the old method, the Yankees would feel pretty good about their chances of making the divisional round with a 5.5-game lead over the A’s. This scenario would have multiple negative effects on the season. First, the Mariners and A’s might not feel great about their chances of catching either the Astros or the Yankees, and those teams might have chosen not to add at the trade deadline or potentially sell. There would be no Wild Card race. Worse, the Yankees and Red Sox might not have made the same types of effort to improve their teams knowing a division title wasn’t worth all that much.

Another alternative I’ve heard is to go with the current number of teams in the playoffs, but to seed them by record. That would present an interesting scenario this year with the Red Sox, Yankees, and Astros likely nabbing the guaranteed spots with Cleveland, Seattle, and Oakland fighting for the Wild Card. Making Cleveland compete for a Wild Card spot since their division is bad has some merits, but it might have a drawback competitively as well. If Cleveland knows the best it can possibly do this season is the Wild Card game, do they still give up a top prospect in Francisco Mejia to get Brad Hand and Adam Cimber? Certainly those relievers are helpful in the regular season, but do they pay that high a price if they know the bullpen might only help in a single playoff game? Perhaps the same would be true for their acquisition of Leonys Martin. Teams make trades to get to the playoffs and for the playoffs, and sometimes different players meet different goals.

If the goal for this season is to have as many competitive races as possible without diluting those races to include undeserving teams, somehow rewarding the Yankees for their 100-win season doesn’t really accomplish that. The reward for winning the division is doing exactly what it set out to do, and if the Yankees can go on a run, a big September rivalry between the Yankees and Red Sox would generate a ton of interest and provide a great bridge to the postseason. That we also have a potentially great Wild Card race from two teams not expected to make the playoffs is another positive under the current format.

Of course, everything isn’t just about the Yankees and the American League. These are your National League standings.

National League Standings
Team W L W% GB Proj W Proj L
Cubs 62 46 .574 0 92.9 69.1
Brewers 63 49 .563 1 88.5 73.5
Phillies 60 48 .556 0 87.3 74.7
Dodgers 61 49 .555 0 91.7 70.3
Braves 58 47 .552 0.5 85.2 76.8
D-backs 60 50 .545 1 86.6 75.4
Rockies 58 50 .537 2 84.3 77.7
Pirates 56 53 .514 6.5 83.0 79.0
Cardinals 56 53 .514 6.5 82.5 79.5
Nationals 55 53 .509 5 86.2 75.8
Giants 56 54 .509 5 81.1 80.9
Reds 48 61 .440 14.5 71.2 90.8
Marlins 46 64 .418 15 66.7 95.3
Mets 44 62 .415 15 70.9 91.1
Padres 43 68 .387 18.5 64.3 97.7
Blue = Division Leaders
Orange = Wild Card Leaders

There are 11 teams expected to finish with at least 81 wins and none expected to go higher than 93 wins. Everyone is close and the Wild Card race will not just be a clever name. It’s not really clear how these races could possibly be made better. Given the parity here, removing a playoff team seems unfair because there are already teams that might deserve a shot at October baseball being left out. It’s possible re-seeding might get the Brewers an automatic pass to the divisional round based on these projections, but it isn’t really possible to say they clearly deserve it when the standings are so tight. If the standings actually looked like this every year, there would probably be more arguments for expanding the playoffs.

The Yankees’ season isn’t going to be looked upon favorably by fans if the team wins 100-plus games but then fails to win the Wild Card. Perhaps it seems like that isn’t fair to the Yankees. Unfortunately for them, what is best and fair to the Yankees isn’t always best and fair for baseball. The current playoff setup produces considerably more regular season excitement for a lot more teams — including the Yankees — than it would with an alternative scheme. The American League is incredibly lopsided this season, with only six teams really in the race for the playoffs. Despite that imbalance, we still see several important races and teams winning the division investing in this year’s playoffs because they know it won’t be a one-game gamble. In what is supposedly a prime example for the necessity of changing the setup, we actually have the opposite in a justification of the current format.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

121 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alice Cooper
5 years ago

Not many tears were shed when the 98 win Pirates had to play in a Wild Card game… against the 97 win Cubs.

But one of New York or Boston has to do it?! Oh the humanity!

Suck it up Buttercup. Win your division.

Pirates Hurdles
5 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

Not to mention that the 2015 Bucs had the 2nd best record in all of MLB, Cubs 3rd. Freakin’ Yankees fans.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshotmember
5 years ago

Freakin’ MLB. I’m hearing/reading stuff that if the Yankees are a Wild Card then that means rule changes to eliminate the 1 game playoff. That’s as bad as the NBA rumors now that LeBron is in the West just seeding all teams 1-16 and eliminating conferences.

Outta my way, Gyorkass
5 years ago

Also not to mention that we’re not *all that* far removed from the days where if you didn’t win your division straight up, you didn’t even play in the postseason, and older fans among us were alive where if you didn’t finish with the best record in your league, you stayed home.

“Suck it up Buttercup. Win your division” – pretty much my thoughts here too. Sometimes tough situations happen, and if that’s the case, like Al Davis said – just win, baby.

dodgerbleu
5 years ago

Oh yes, those days.. Was especially fun to lose the NL West to the Atlanta Braves..

MorboTheAnnihilator
5 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

More specifically, those three teams had the three best records in baseball, and all but one was eliminated by the end of the Division Series.

There is one proposal I would make for changing the way the playoff bracket is constructed. Currently, the team with the best record in baseball plays the winner of the wild card game on the assumption that the wild card team is the weakest team in the playoffs, an obviously faulty assumption.

I think that the preferable alternative is that the team with the best record in the league plays the team with the worst record that made the playoffs in the Division Series whether its the wild card team or another divisional winner and the other two teams play each other. It wouldn’t be overly complicated and would result more often with the best teams(by record) playing each other in later rounds of the playoffs.

Chris
5 years ago

Or how about this – let the team with the best record in the league chose their division round opponent after the Wild Card game is played. That would be fun, no? (most likely the team would choose the team with the worst record, but there may be some scenarios like travel or match-ups that could lead to something different.)

johansantana17
5 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Oooh I like this

dl80
5 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Totally agree!

LofSkrif
5 years ago
Reply to  Chris

used to be in hockey, the better team could choose the schedule, 2-3-2 format… most people would go for 4 home games, but the good teams figured home sweep + one road win = 5 game series.

Jon L.member
5 years ago

It’s not just based on the assumption that the wild card winner would be the worst team in the playoffs – it also rewards the team with the best record by pitting them against a team that had to deploy its top pitchers in a winner-take-all.

mikejuntmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

This advantage was on display last year when the Dodgers clobbered a Dbacks team with a screwed rotation because of the WC game.

rbemontmember
5 years ago

As a cardinal fan, that was the issue to me. These 3 teams fought it out all year and were 1,2 and 3 in the NL. So by design, only 1 of the top 3 teams would be playing in the NLCS.

Im not bitter about losing the playoff series, only that the 1-2 teams played in the NLDS instead of the NLCS.

tz
5 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

The only part that needs a change is how they would handle a tie for first in a division, when both teams have a record that would qualify them for a wild card spot. It would be a logistical disadvantage for the loser of the one game division tiebreaker to have a second straight do or die game against a rested wild-card opponent. I’d rather have a an NFL style tiebreaker system for which team takes the division and which goes got the wild-card game.

stiljo24member
5 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

I’m a soxfan so I’m shedding no tears here, but that matchup was way more fair than what’ll llikely happen to the yanks this season.

2 very evenly-matched teams had to flip a coin. That’s fair. The yankees needing to flip a coin against a team ~10 games worse than them is a rough shake.

Moatemember
5 years ago
Reply to  stiljo24

The Mets finished with 7 fewer wins didn’t have to get involved in the coin toss at all in the scenario because they won an inferior division by 7 games.

Nogginmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

You used to be such a sweet sweet thing til they got ahold of you.

Joey Butts
5 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

This assumes that no one was empathetic to the plight of the Pirates, or that anyone outside of New York is demanding playoff format changes. Neither is true.