The 2024 Replacement-Level Killers: Second Base

Today, we turn our attention to the second base Killers. While still focusing on teams that meet the loose definition of contenders (a .500 record or Playoff Odds of at least 9.5%), and that have gotten about 0.6 WAR or less out of a position thus far — which prorates to 1.0 WAR over a full season — I have also incorporated our Depth Charts’ rest-of-season WAR projections into the equation for an additional perspective. Sometimes that may suggest that the team will clear the bar by a significant margin; as you can see by the table below, four of the six teams listed here project to receive more than a win from their current cast of second base options. Even so, I’ve included them here because the team’s performance at that spot is worth a look, and the incumbent may no longer appear to be the best option.
Particularly in light of those projections, I don’t expect every team to go out and track down an upgrade before the July 30 deadline, though I’ll note that some of the players cited within for their poor performance are themselves change-of-scenery candidates; one team’s problem may be another team’s solution, albeit not necessarily an ideal one. Either way, I’m less concerned with those solutions – many of which have more moving parts involved than a single trade — than I am with the problems. Unless otherwise indicated, all statistics are through Sunday.
| Team | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR | ROS WAR | Tot WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Sox | .202 | .257 | .302 | 52 | -21 | -0.3 | -6.4 | -1.4 | 0.9 | -0.5 |
| Cardinals | .199 | .271 | .382 | 85 | -7.2 | -1.1 | -5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Mariners | .199 | .294 | .307 | 79 | -9.3 | -0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Orioles | .220 | .254 | .393 | 81 | -8.1 | 3.1 | -4.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Mets | .247 | .304 | .368 | 95 | -2.3 | -0.6 | -4.9 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| Yankees | .230 | .305 | .343 | 88 | -5.8 | -2.3 | -0.5 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.9 |






