BABIP and Home Field Advantage

With several recent discussions (here and here and here and here) on home team advantage (HTA) – which began with Tobias Moskowitz’s and L. Jon Wertheim’s new book Scorecasting – I decided to see if I could find any reasonable causes for the advantage. I decided to look into areas that I thought home teams may have an advantage, namely errors (not much – about 2 wins league wide) and base running (some), but the number that caught my eye was the differences in batting average on balls in play from the home and away team. Here are the differences in BABIP for the home and away teams over the last few years:

As you can see, there is an average difference of about 0.007 BABIP difference between the home and visiting team. This difference is quite substantial when looking over an entire season, working out to about 230 hits per season for the entire league. Using an average of 0.54 runs created per non-home run hit (thanks Tommy), the run difference works out to be 123 runs or about 12 wins across the entire league. This effect accounts for about 17.5% of total home field advantage.

There are many potential causes for the difference – for instance, the away pitchers may be squeezed by the home plate umpire, leading to hitters counts and more hard hit balls. Another theory is that the home team’s defenders know the park better and can make more plays on balls hit into the field which lead to more outs. To answer these questions I used Retrosheet batted ball data from 2006 to 2009 (I have not yet updated my retrosheet data with 2010 info yet) to look for possible differences:

The main difference in the percentage of batted ball data is that the home team hits more line drives versus the away team, who tend to hit more fly balls. This will explain some of the overall difference since line drives are more likely to end up as hits. By adjusting the away team’s batted ball distributions to be the same as the home team’s distribution, the visitors BABIP raises to 0.299.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

I am not sure of the exact cause of the difference, but here are some questions that could be explored: Do home pitchers feel comfortable throwing pitches that will end up as fly balls knowing that the ball will stay in the park? Could it be the same as the previous reasoning with the home town hitter knowing what they can’t hit out of the park and settle for line drives or ground balls instead? Could it be that the home hitters are able to take advantage of their home park’s dimensions, or are General Mangers just specifically compiling rosters to take advantage of how their parks play?

The rest of the difference in BABIP is shown by the differences in the rate that the batted balls become hits. BABIP for both pop ups and flyballs are the same between the home and away teams. The home teams have a nine point advantage with ground balls and a five point advantage with line drives.

The reasoning behind this difference can’t be easily explained. Is it the pitcher having to throw more pitches in the heart of the plate? Do the away infielders not know the infield well enough to predict all the possible bounces a ball can take? Do away fielders have a more difficult time seeing hard hit balls leaving the bat? Is there a home town bias in scoring different batted ball data?

I feel like I am just beginning to scratch the surface, but I am working on filling in the gaps. For one, I am looking into getting the home and away defensive splits, especially for the infielders vs. outfielders. I would like to see which fielders are being labeled as responsible for these extra hits (all infielders?, 70-30 with the outfielders?). Second, I am looking at taking the single month’s worth of Hit F/x data publicly available and checking to see if there are any differences in batted ball speed and distribution. While I set out to answer a few questions about home field advantage, I feel that I have raised just as many, if not more, questions. This is a subject that simply requires more research.





Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Not Actually Dave Cameron
15 years ago

Is there no honor on the internet!

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/babip-splits/

Albert Lyu
15 years ago

+1

skipperxc
15 years ago

Aw, that’s cold — that article’s a year old. Statute of limitations and such. Besides, this extends the work a fair deal.

skipperxc
15 years ago
Reply to  skipperxc

That said — well played.

xdog
15 years ago

I’d like more information on differences in error rates. If home hitters have fewer errors on balls in play, that would increase their BABIP, yes?

chuckb
15 years ago
Reply to  xdog

This was my guess as well — that some of the difference may be attributed to favorable home team scoring vis-a-vis errors called hits (or vice-versa). Based on Jeff’s comment above, however, that doesn’t appear to be the reason at all. Interesting.

bill
15 years ago

Being used to the hitting background might help hit a few more line drives (the old, “seeing the ball better”).

kp
15 years ago

My personal theory: batters hit more line drives at home because they’re used to the center-field-area background and can pick up pitches earlier, making more solid contact.

kp
15 years ago
Reply to  kp

dang. 9 minutes too late.

APE
15 years ago

Home mound vs. Away mound. That little discomfort for the visiting pitcher might translate into hitter’s making more solid contact on LD, GB and FB’s.

John DiFool
15 years ago

There’s a pretty huge triples gap between home and away (last year it was 484 vs. 382). Combined with the fact that away teams hit MORE doubles (!) (14 more), then that’s substantial evidence that familiarity with the home park strongly affects triples rates.

Nate
15 years ago
Reply to  John DiFool

Yes, triples rate has always been the most obvious home advantage, almost certainly due the home outfielders being very familiar with what the wall will due to a given gapper.

Steve Phillips
15 years ago

How much does the asymmetric nature of 9th inning affect this? Looks like this was pointed out (but not evaluated) before: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/babip-splits/#comment-64037

Y’all should read the comments in DC’s article–lots of interesting ideas and possibilities for further reading.

Linuxit
15 years ago

Another thing to factor in is the game situation and sample size. The home team doesn’t even bat in the 9th inning if they already have the lead, which prevents them from facing the away team’s closer in a save situation. The 9th inning pitcher had a .290 BABIP average in 2010. The BABIP for a closer in a save situation is probably even lower than that, but I don’t know where that number can be found. Anyways, this could decrease the BABIP for the away team. How much I don’t know. Also since the home team didn’t bat, their BABIP would have a smaller sample size in where they didn’t face a closer in a save situation, this would help the BABIP for the home team somewhat.

Where can I find relief pitching splits for save and non-save situations?

Steve Phillips
15 years ago
Reply to  Linuxit

Hmm…interesting…Has anyone checked to see if there are systematic lineup differences between home and away games? Do players on aggregate show the same splits, or is this partially due to the quality of players that the manager sends out there for H/A games? Likewise, is the manager more likely to “give up” on a game when on the road, subbing in earlier or with lesser players?

AJS
15 years ago
Reply to  Linuxit

Why should closers have a significantly lower BABIP than the the average pitcher? Does this trend hold across all seasons?

Linuxit
15 years ago
Reply to  Linuxit

I found the BABIP stats that I was searching for.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/split.cgi?t=p&lg=MLB&year=2010#outco

saves: .229 BABIP
save situations: .292 BABIP
non save situations: .300 BABIP

Another thing that is huge is winning vs losing
The winner has a .251 BABIP
The loser has a .352 BABIP
A no decision has a .297 BABIP

Steve Phillips
15 years ago
Reply to  Linuxit

LOVE pages like that.

Interesting: 9th inning has the lowest BABIP of any inning.

I wonder how much of the game-situation splits are due to sampling bias. For example, we see that non-save BABIP > save BABIP. But skilled teams are going to have more save situations than less-skilled teams (I think), so that’s going to skew the BABIP numbers. Same with the ahead/behind splits (where pitchers pitching with the lead have a .005 advantage in BABIP). I’d love to say that splits like this point to a “teams try harder when they’re at home/leading/etc,” but I’m afraid that most of the differences in these splits (at least the game-situation ones) is due to sampling bias.

Tweets that mention BABIP and Home Field Advantage | FanGraphs Baseball -- Topsy.com
15 years ago

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sky Kalkman, Mike Fast. Mike Fast said: Some interesting thoughts here about HFA by @jeffwzimmerman, esp. like idea of looking at HITf/x data. http://bit.ly/f9C24x […]

Archangel Statues | ANGEL COLLECTION
15 years ago

[…] Shui In Home – Protecting The Home With Feng […]

Ratwar
15 years ago

Unless you eliminated inter-league data, that may be inducing some of the difference. In AL parks, NL teams need to use a pinch hitter as a DH, who is probably worse than his equivalent on the AL team so he’d hit less line drives. By the same measure, in NL parks, some AL teams try to start their regular DH in the field and sacrifice some defensive ability (especially at first base). I don’t think this would account for all of the difference in the BABIP, but it might account for some.

neuter_your_dogma
15 years ago

I blame the Pirates for the disparity:)

lex logan
15 years ago

No one has mentioned the crowd. I’m quite certain the crowd explains virtually all the home court advantage for basketball, and I expect it has the biggest effect in baseball, football, and other team sports. I recall hearing of a study on home court advantage in basketball, 20 or 30 years ago. Anecdotally, the University of Kentucky has always enjoyed a home court advantage in their once-a-year game in Freedom Hall (Louisville, away from Rupp Arena in Lexington, not counting games against the University of Louisville.) More telling, the Wildcats had one of the highest home court advantages in Southeast Conference play at Rupp Arena until a period in the late 80’s – early 90’s where, for various reasons, student attendance slumped and all student tickets were moved to the upper arena. I attended games in person both in the late 70’s when Rupp would explode in deafening noise and in the 90s when it was so quiet you could hear the sneakers squeak. The Cat’s home record slumped; they played better on the road some years. Then, the University moved some student seating back to the lower arena, the noise level returned to deafening (the students would fire up the entire crowd of 23,000) and the Cats resumed being a tough place for a visiting team to win (measured by conference games, which controls for quality of opponent.)

So, did the A’s of the low attendance Charlie Finley years have a home field advantage?

Nathaniel Dawson
15 years ago

Am I reading something wrong?

The main difference in the percentage of batted ball data is that the home team hits more line drives versus the away team, who tend to hit more fly balls.

Looking at the table, it shows the same percentage of FB for both home and road. Away teams seem to hit more groundballs than the home team.

Dan
15 years ago

Is .007 really a significant difference in BABIP, even given the large sample size?

lex logan
15 years ago
Reply to  Dan

Do you mean “practical significance” or “statistical significance” ? JZim discusses the practical significance in the second paragraph, BABIP accounting for about 17.5% of home field advantage. As for statistical significance, I might faint if anyone on Fangraphs bothered to compute a confidence interval or p-value, but I estimate the total sample size to be around 160,000 with an estimated margin of error of .0025 (for a 95% confidence interval), so yeah, .007 looks like it is statistically significant (i.e., unlikely to occur simply by chance.)

jacob
15 years ago

“or are General Mangers just specifically compiling rosters to take advantage of how their parks play?”

i think this point hits the nail on the head.