Better Late Than Never: The Hall Calls for Dick Allen and Dave Parker

Tony Tomsic and Malcolm Emmons-Imagn Images

DALLAS — The collision of human mortality and baseball immortality is a jarring one that has resonated throughout the history of the National Baseball Hall of Fame, and Sunday night’s announcement of the voting results of the Classic Baseball Era Committee was yet another reminder. Four years after dying of cancer at the age of 78, and three years after falling one vote short for his second straight ballot, Dick Allen finally gained entry. Also elected was 73-year-old Dave Parker, who has been rendered frail while waging a very public battle with Parkinson’s Disease in recent years.

The two sluggers were the only candidates from among a slate of eight elected by the 16-member committee, which met on Sunday at the Winter Meetings here in Dallas. The panel was charged with considering candidates from an overly broad swath of the game’s history. By definition, all eight candidates made their greatest impact prior to 1980, but weighing the merits of John Donaldson, who pitched in the major Negro Leagues from 1920–24 (and for Black baseball teams predating the Negro Leagues as early as 1915), against the likes of Parker, whose major league career ran from 1973–91, is a nearly impossible task, particularly within the limitations of a format that allows each voter to choose a maximum of three candidates from among the eight.

Parker, who had fallen short on three previous Era Committee ballots, received the most support from the panel, totaling 14 votes out of 16 (87.5%), while Allen received 13 (81.3%). Tommy John received seven (43.8%) in his fifth Era Committee appearance. The other five candidates — Ken Boyer, Donaldson, Steve Garvey, Vic Harris, Luis Tiant — each received less than five votes, according to the Hall.

To these eyes, Allen was the most deserving of the non-Negro Leagues candidates on this ballot. In a 15-year-career with the Phillies (1963–69, ’75–76), Cardinals (’70), Dodgers (’71), White Sox (’72–74), and A’s (’77), he made seven All-Star teams; led his league in OPS+ three times, in home runs twice, and in WAR once; and won NL Rookie of the Year and AL MVP awards (’64 and ’72, respectively) while hitting 351 homers and batting .292/.378/.534. Among players with at least 7,000 plate appearances, his career 156 OPS+ is tied with Hall of Famer Frank Thomas for 14th all time.

Allen accrued just 1,848 hits, and so he joins 2022 Golden Days honoree Tony Oliva as the only post-1960 expansion era players in the Hall with fewer than 2,000 hits. The marker has served as a proxy for career length, for better or worse, and in doing so has frozen out players whose careers were shortened for one reason or another, as well as those who built a good portion of their value via on-base skills and defense. BBWAA voters have yet to elect one such player, though Andruw Jones (1,933) is climbing toward 75%, and Chase Utley (1,885) made a solid debut on the 2024 ballot.

Not a particularly adept defender, Allen bounced from third base to left field to first base while traveling around the majors. He accrued his most value while playing third; he’s 17th in both WAR (58.7) and JAWS (52.3) at the position, slightly below Boyer (62.8 WAR, 54.5 JAWS), who had the advantage of a much less controversial career.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Allen’s career was shortened by what seemed to be a constant battle with the world around him, one in which the racism he faced in the minor leagues and in Philadelphia played a major role. Six years after governor Orval Faubus called in the Arkansas National Guard in order to prevent the court-ordered desegregation of Little Rock Central High School, the Phillies sent the 21-year-old Allen to become the first affiliated Black professional baseball player in the state. Faubus himself threw out the first pitch while picketers carried signs with slogans such as “Don’t Negro-ize baseball” and “N***** go home.”⁠ Though Allen hit a double in the game-winning rally, he was greeted with a note on his car: “DON’T COME BACK AGAIN N*****,”⁠ as he recounted in his autobiography, Crash: The Life and Times of Dick Allen.

The Phillies themselves — the NL’s last team to integrate, 10 years after Jackie Robinson debuted — were far behind the integration curve, as was Philadelphia itself. Allen quickly became a polarizing presence, covered by a media contingent so unable or unwilling to relate to him that writers often refused to call him by the name of his choosing: Dick Allen, not Richie.

Allen rebelled against his surroundings. As biographer Mitchell Nathanson wrote in God Almighty Hisself: The Life and Legacy of Dick Allen, “He refused to pander to the media, refused to accept management’s time-honored methods for determining the value of a ballplayer, and, most explosively, refused to go along with and kowtow to the racial double standard that had evolved within Major League Baseball in the wake of the game’s integration in 1947.”

Allen struggled for support during his 1983–97 run on the BBWAA ballot, never reaching 20%, and he similarly lagged in the voting of the expanded Veterans Committee from 2003–09. However, thanks in part to a grassroots campaign by former Phillies groundskeeper Mark Carfagno, he received a fresh look from the 2015 Golden Era Committee and fell just one vote short of election. The change in Era Committee formats meant that his case wasn’t scheduled to be reconsidered until the 2021 Golden Day Era Committee ballot, but the COVID-19 pandemic led the Hall to postpone that election. In a cruel blow, Allen died of cancer on December 7, 2020, one day after his candidacy would have been considered. Crueler still for his family, he again fell one vote short when the committee finally met in December 2021. Thus his election is a bittersweet moment, one that would have been greatly enriched by his being able to enjoy it.

Whatever quibbles there are to be had with the election of Parker, we can be grateful he’s still around to savor it. A five-tool player whose power, ability to hit for average, and strong, accurate throwing arm all stood out, he spent 19 years in the majors with the Pirates (1973–83), hometown Reds (’84–87), A’s (’88–89), Brewers (’90), Angels (’91), and Blue Jays (’91). He hit 339 homers and collected 2,712 hits while batting .290/.339/.471 (121 OPS+) and making seven All-Star teams, and at his peak, he was considered the game’s best all-around player. In his first five full seasons (1975-79), he amassed a World Series ring (in the last of those years), regular season and All-Star MVP awards, two batting titles, two league leads in slugging percentage, and three Gold Gloves, not to mention tremendous swagger and a great nickname (“The Cobra”).

A 14th-round draft pick out of Cincinnati’s Courier Tech High School — he fell from the first or second round due to multiple knee injuries that ended his pursuit of football, his favorite sport — Parker debuted with the Pirates in July 1973, just seven months after the death of Roberto Clemente. He assumed full-time duty as the team’s right fielder a season and a half later, and appeared to be on course to join the Puerto Rican legend in Cooperstown, but cocaine, poor conditioning, and injuries threw him off course. While he recovered well enough to make three more All-Star teams, play a supporting role on the 1989 World Series-winning A’s, and compile hefty career totals while playing past the age of 40, his game lost multiple dimensions along the way.

Parker debuted with just 17.5% on the 1997 BBWAA ballot and peaked at 24.5% the next year, but only one other time in his final 13 seasons of eligibility did he top 20%. In appearances on the 2014 Expansion Era ballot and ’18 and ’20 Modern Baseball ones, only in the last of those did he break out of the “received less than X votes” group; he got seven (43.8%) that year.

Because his defense declined to the point that he was relegated to DH duty, Parker ranks just 41st in JAWS among right fielders (38.8), 17.9 points below the standard. Still, this is not Harold Baines Redux. While Baines collected 2,866 hits — and might have reached 3,000 if not for the two players’ strikes that occurred during his career — he never put up much black ink or finished higher than ninth in MVP voting, spent the vast majority of his career as a DH, and ranks 77th in JAWS among right fielders (30.1). He was never close to being considered the best hitter in the game, let alone the best all-around player. His 2019 election was a shock, and a result that felt engineered given the makeup of the panel.

As I noted in my write-up of Parker, the contemporary whose case bears the most resemblance to his is that of Dale Murphy, for as different as the two were off the field — and you can’t get much further apart than the distance between Parker’s drug-related misadventures and Murphy’s wholesome, milk-drinking persona. A two-time MVP, Murphy — who fell short on the 2023 Contemporary Baseball ballot and will be eligible again next year — had a peak that’s vaguely Hall-caliber, but he’s ranks 27th in JAWS among center fielders, 14.4 points below the standard, because myriad injuries prevented him from having much value outside that peak.

I had Allen atop my list as the most deserving non-PED-linked position player outside the Hall. While I was lukewarm on Parker, it’s impossible not to feel some amount of empathy for his hard-won wisdom — his autobiography Cobra: A Life in Baseball and Brotherhood, written with Dave Jordan, is frank and poignant — and his battle with Parkinson’s, not to mention his prominent role in raising money to fight the disease. Again, it is far better that he is alive to enjoy this honor than to have it granted posthumously, as would have been the case for Tiant, who died in October at age 83. Boyer died in 1983 at age 52. John is 81, Garvey 75. For as tiresome as it may sometimes feel to see their candidacies reheated every three years or so, one can understand the desire to honor them while they’re alive — but then again, the same goes for the candidates they’re crowding off the ballot.

The most frustrating aspect of this election is how little traction the two Negro Leagues candidates had, as they were the top returning members from the 2022 Early Baseball ballot, with Harris — the most successful manager in Negro Leagues history — having received 10 votes (62.5%) and Donaldson — a legendary pitcher who spent most of his playing years barnstorming endlessly out of economic necessity — getting eight (50%). The 16-member panel did include two bona fide Negro Leagues scholars in Larry Lester and Leslie Heaphy. However, in my opinion and those of many Negro Leagues experts, it would be far better for a full panel of such researchers and scholars to consider these candidates and the unique and difficult context of their careers without having to battle for attention and space with much more famous players from a relatively recent past.

Appointed by the Hall’s board of directors, this ballot’s 16-member committee consisted of Hall of Famers Paul Molitor, Eddie Murray, Tony Perez, Lee Smith, Ozzie Smith, and Joe Torre; major league executives Sandy Alderson, Terry McGuirk, Dayton Moore, Arte Moreno, and Brian Sabean; and veteran media members/historians Bob Elliott, Steve Hirdt, and Dick Kaegel as well as Heaphy and Lester. In contrast to years past, this group had far fewer obvious connections to candidates, with Torre having played with Allen in St. Louis in 1970, Alderson serving as the general manager of the A’s when they traded for John in mid-’85 and Parker in December ’87, and Sabean in the scouting department of the Yankees when John had his second go-round with the team starting in ’86. [Update: As readers have pointed out, I missed that Perez and Parker were teammates in Cincinnati from 1984–86, and Molitor and Parker were teammates in Milwaukee in ’90.] Where both the 2023 and ’24 Contemporary Era Committees (the latter for managers, executives, and umpires) had just three media members/historians, this one had five.

The Era Committee process is an imperfect one, and by some measures these were imperfect candidates. If they weren’t, they probably wouldn’t have been relegated to Era Committee ballots in the first place, though not necessarily through their own fault. The voting results won’t please everyone, but hopefully even critics of the process can see some value in Sunday’s result.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
g4Member since 2020
1 year ago

RE second-last paragraph: Molitor and Parker were teammates for a full season in 1990. Not the strongest connection, though I’d also presume Molly would be more forgiving than most with respect to Parker’s cocaine use.

raikuraMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  g4

Parker and Perez were teammates from ‘84-‘86.
You can also loosely connect him to Murray and Ozzie post career. Parker was one of Murray’s coaches in ‘97 and Parker and Ozzie both worked for St. Louis in ‘98, though Ozzie wasn’t a coach.

booondMember since 2019
1 year ago

Happy for them and their families. As a small Hall guy, Parker doesn’t have a real case for entry and it would open up room for many others but it is what it is and for a short period of time he was a great player.

RMD4
1 year ago
Reply to  booond

Right. Allen being as ‘Yes’ and Parker being a ‘No’ are both open and shut.

pitts1971Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  RMD4

Absolutely correct.

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago
Reply to  booond

Even most big Hall people would agree with you re: Parker. Yet here we are…

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  booond

Even as a medium-to-large Hall guy, I don’t think Parker qualifies.

Randy HEatonMember since 2020
1 year ago

I loved Dave Parker as a fan and went to watch him (basically) everytime the Bucs came to SD… that being said he is just slightly short to me of HoF. Yes he was best all around hitter (and player probably) in baseball for 4-5 years and after that he was still an all star caliber for many years so he is not a total Baines.

This will not be in the highlights of Parker, but he hit the hardest ball I have ever seen, a low line drive about 3-4′ high right at SD second baseman who literally did not have enough time to get his glove up and the ball skimmed the side of his head into RF, he remained down for quite awhile. Had that ball hit him square we might have had a death on the field.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Randy HEaton

I am rooting for “a total Baines” to catch on.

“That guy worked here for a long time and he did a good job, but no way should he have been promoted. He’s a total Baines.”

bigpizzamanMember since 2019
1 year ago

Players with higher fWAR than Dave Parker:

Moises Alou, JD Drew, Nomar Garciaparra, Carl Crawford, Carlos Delgado, Dustin Pedroia, Ian Kinsler, Jose Reyes, Torii Hunter, Ben Zobrist, Hanley Ramirez, Brian Giles, Mark Teixeira…

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago
Reply to  bigpizzaman

Or on the ballot itself: John, Tiant, Boyer.

The Duke
1 year ago
Reply to  bigpizzaman

Parker suffers greatly from the Sheffield penalty on defense and base running. Look at his lines from 1986 and 1989 and tell me this is a “scratch” ballplayer.

You get rewarded for offensive output in MLB which is why he stayed around so long. 2700 hits with his peak is a lot better than the bWAR and fWAR math indicates. There’s only handful of non discredited players with more hits that isn’t get in and none of those players had his majestic peak.

He’s not inner circle but he clearly belongs

apbadogsMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  The Duke

His “peak” was 5 years (I get the HoF monitor thing using “peak”) and then he dropped off a cliff for 12 years accumulating numbers. He does not belong.

Last edited 1 year ago by apbadogs
TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
1 year ago
Reply to  apbadogs

Today, fellow Pirates outfielder Andrew McCutchen found out he’s a future hall of famer. There’s no reasonable case for including Parker and excluding him. Congrats to Cutch!!

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

Rocky Colavito passed away yesterday. Higher career WAR and JAWs ranking than Parker. I await his election to the HOF…

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago
Reply to  The Duke

If Parker was neutral in baserunning and defense, he’d have about 55 career WAR. Do the same with Sheffield and he’d have about 90 WAR. Not really the same thing.

Left of Centerfield
1 year ago

Two reforms I’d really like to see to the Era Committee:

1) More members. You simply can’t get a reliable outcome with only 16 members. The BBWAA is far from perfect but they do a MUCH better job partially because they have so many voters.

2) A limit on how many times you can be on the ballot. After a while, they have to move on and consider other candidates. We’ll call it the Gil Hodges rule for lack of a better name.

pitts1971Member since 2024
1 year ago

Interesting proposals, I agree with both and especially favor number two.It seems that most candidates whose career began before WWII, Wes Ferrell,Bill Dahlen, Jack Glasscock, etc have already been eliminated.

Although I favor the selection of Glasscock, Dahlen, Ferrell, Chalie Keller, Ken Boyer & Luis Tiant, among others, it doesn’t very likely that any of them will be inducted a time soon. I also fear that eventually Steve Garvey will make the HoF, iafter Harold Baines was stunningly voted into the HoF, almost anything is possible.

Last edited 1 year ago by pitts1971
Left of Centerfield
1 year ago
Reply to  pitts1971

A time limit is a bit of a double-edged sword. On the one hand, there are so many quality candidates to consider. Yet they seem to keep voting on the same people over and over again. And as we’ve seen with Hodges and Parker, if you give them enough chances, eventually they’ll get in. The downside is that they may vote in unworthy people if they know it’s their last chance.

The Duke
1 year ago
Reply to  pitts1971

Hordes of people decry the PED users but bristle at Baines’ election. Now, it’s possible Baines used PEDs, but almost everyone agrees he didn’t. If you really believe PED guys were getting an advantage and should be ex-communicated then Baines is one of the best players of his era.

Baines is a vote for the guy who did it the right way and I’m happy for him

pitts1971Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  The Duke

I fail to see the connection between P.E.D. users and Harold Baines, and don’t care about the issue. Baines is certainly not close to being one of the best players of his era.

The selection of Harold Baines to the Baseball Hall of Fame was an egregious act, pure and simple, that’s why many people bristle at his selection.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
1 year ago

It’s a little silly to impose an artificial hard limit on how many times a player can be considered since they can just change that later if they feel like it. A preference for fresher names makes some sense, but as long as they have the 3-vote maximum, there will be a lot of luck of the draw included in who makes it and who doesn’t.

The Duke
1 year ago

Arguably they should just stop considering players from pre 1965 ish (except for negro league ) and maybe institute a rule that once your playing career is more than 50 -60 years in the past, the process is over.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I’m a peak over longevity guy when it comes to the Hall but the guy basically only had six good seasons, with only five of them were above 5 fWAR.

At least Allen got in, that’s good news.

Baltimore, MurraylandMember since 2020
1 year ago

I’m a big hall guy, in part because I sense that big-hall thinking *contributed* to the doors opening for Dick Allen, and before him, on the writers’ ballot, Raines, Walker, Edgar, et al. The advanced stats made much of the case for them, sure, but does that kind of case win over the sizable rump of traditional voters who are also small-hall voters? Probably not. You probably need the help of WAR-skeptical big-hall voters. The same is probably true on small committees, maybe even more so. That is, given the real world of voting, I accept that Parker, McGriff, et al, are the cost of Allen et al. Allen, Raines, Walker, and Edgar belong even in a small hall, but it took a big-hall vote to get them in. Just my sense. Jay probably knows the actual story.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
1 year ago

Lumping McGriff with Parker isn’t really fair.

jgrub7
1 year ago

Allen’s induction is great news! It is long overdue and should have happened while he was alive to enjoy it.

Mitchell MooreMember since 2020
1 year ago

I try not care too much about this stuff, but Dave Parker?, really? I have no concept what goes on with these Era Committees. At least Parker seems like a good fellow.
Thank goodness justice is finally done by DICK ALLEN. Welcome to the party, voters.

Rich Allen and the EbonisticsMember since 2024
1 year ago

Finally!
Tiant should’ve made it too.

Johnnie TMember since 2024
1 year ago

Allen is a tolerable HOFer and Parker, well, I used to say that there is a man who snorted away an entry into the HOF. Guess I can’t say that anymore.

But really, these Veterans Committees rarely elect guys who REALLY need to be in the HOF (like Grich or Whitaker) and sometimes pick some pretty lame choices. I think baseball should cut back on them severely.

pitts1971Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

Allen is a deserving inductee, Parker is not.

You are correct that the recent Veteran’s Committees selection have left something to be desired. Luis Tiant & Ken Boyer, deserving candidates, received scant support, while Dave Parker waltzed in. Bobby Grich, unsurprisingly, was not even on the ballot, not to mention the following:

Sal Bando
Bobby Bonds
Graig Nettles
Rick Reuschel
Reggie Smith
Jim Wynn

pitts1971Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  pitts1971

Also Thurman Munson

LaBellaVitaMember since 2018🏆 MVP
1 year ago

For the Allen family, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” Sometimes, it picks up hitchhikers along the way.

And for the HOF historians, would you say that the selection of Jim Rice doesn’t look so surprising anymore?

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  LaBellaVita

I don’t think it was ever surprising. Rice and Parker both excelled at what was valued during their era. They hit for high averages, hit home runs, and drove in runs.

I think the complaint about Rice and Parker is more that they really aren’t as valuable as they appeared to be at the time. And that players who were actually far more valuable are being passed over.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

But Parker was passed over by the writers. It wasn’t even close. This happened when the baseball world was essentially still valuing things the way they did in Parker’s playing days. His inclusion at the expense of several of the other players, perhaps even all of them (except Garvey) is inexplicable and honestly has a whiff to it, even though it’s hard to come up with the “why.”

apbadogsMember since 2026
1 year ago

Parker is not a HoFer, sorry. He’s last 12 years were pathetic. He had 4 good/great years in a 19 year career. Dick Allen I have no problem with him getting in.

Last edited 1 year ago by apbadogs
darren
1 year ago

The problem with Parker’s selection isn’t just how he measures up against other players in baseball history. Just among OF from his era, there are several similar or better candidates who are not in the Hall:

Much Better
Dwight Evans
Reggie Smith

Better
Jose Cruz
Jack Clark
Willie Davis
Cesar Cedano
Fred Lynn

Similar/Arguably Better
Roy White
Dale Murphy
George Foster
Rusty Staub (surprisingly similar totals and career shape!)

That just doesn’t seem great enough to warrant election.

The Duke
1 year ago

It’s astounding that two people got picked and that can likely only be explained by the group deciding, as a group, to do so. 16 members with 3 votes is 48 votes. Allen and Parker got 27. With Tommy John’s 7 that means 34 of the 48 potential votes were clustered. The five other guys got a maximum of 14 votes if everyone voted for three (which isn’t assured )

I think it’s fair to say that their cases were pretty similar so the group must have decided to make sure the two preferred candidates got in

Kudos to them for doing so after the HOF rigged the process to only let one person through a year.

And good luck to Tommy John in three years who will most certainly be “next man up”

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  The Duke

What do you mean about their cases being similar?

pitts1971Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  The Duke

Their cases are not pretty similar, don’t know wy you would think that.

The HoF did not rig the process to allow only one candidate a year through, both the BBWAA & the various Veteran’s Committees have elected multiple candidates several times in the last few years.

Both Ken Boyer & Luis Tiant need good luck more than Tommy John since they are both less likely to be selected and, simultaneously, more deserving.

Christopher SchaffnerMember since 2021
1 year ago

N.B.: Dave Parker’s High School was Courter Technical High School, not Courier Tech.