Bregging the Question

Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports

We are now just over a week from pitchers and catchers reporting to spring training, and while there are still a lot of moves left to make, we have a basic idea how teams will be fundamentally constructed for the 2025 season. Our free agent tracker still lists 124 remaining free agents, as of Monday evening, but most of these players aren’t likely to have major impacts on their new teams. Only 15 of the players are projected on our Depth Charts as being worth one win, and only three players are projected at two wins. But one player remaining, Alex Bregman, stands clearly above the pack, at least as the mean old computers judge the situation. (Sorry, Polar Bear.)

A famous Scott Boras client in his early 30s remaining unsigned due to underwhelming offers in free agency has become a common refrain over the last few years. Unlike with some of their departing free agents over the years, the Astros have made more than a token effort at retaining their star, extending a six-year, $156 million offer in December. The general belief around baseball is that the deal is still on the table, and both the front office and his teammates would be very happy to have him return. But from a baseball standpoint, is Houston necessarily the best place for Bregman? And if it isn’t, which teams should be seriously pursuing him?

Fellow Fangraphéen Michael Baumann discussed the Bregman to the Astros scenario recently, and concluded that given the team’s needs and the acquisition of Isaac Paredes, it would be hard to get the maximum value out of Bregman’s return without doing something shocking, like trading Paredes before the start of the season. Since I’ve completed the initial run of ZiPS projections, I’m now equipped to do some (very) preliminary standings projections. I projected the Astros both with and without Bregman, using the normal methodology I use, which attempts to deal with team upside and downside scenarios and injuries.

ZiPS currently projects the league with a level of parity that appears, at first glance, to be greater than in the typical season. While the Dodgers are projected at 97 wins, the Astros are the only other team projected with an over/under number of 90 wins. That doesn’t mean there will be only two 90-win teams – in fact, you should expect quite a few more teams to reach that threshold — just that there’s a lot of uncertainty in a baseball team’s performance, and currently only two clubs have enough depth across their rosters to avoid the disastrous downside scenarios that are built into this projection system.

At 90.2 wins on average, reconfiguring a healthy Astros team to play Bregman at third, Paredes at second, and Jose Altuve in the outfield (the latter has been discussed), adds 2.8 wins (again, on average) to the bottom line in the ZiPS projections. That’s enough to bump the team’s playoff probability from 69.9% to 78.0%. A gain of just over eight percentage points is solid, to be sure, but how does that compare with the rest of the league?

To answer that question, I redid the simulation an additional 29 times, adding Bregman in turn to each team to see how his presence would change its playoff probability. It’s a bit more complex than simply replacing a team’s existing third baseman because in most cases, Bregman would cause a significant reshuffling of the roster roles. I tried to keep Bregman at third base wherever possible and shift others around him, and I completely avoided implausible scenarios, such as a team signing him to be its starting catcher. So, how’d it shake out?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
ZiPS Playoff Probability – Signing Alex Bregman
Team Current Playoff Odds Playoff Odds With Bregman Change
Kansas City Royals 39.7% 54.3% 14.6%
Detroit Tigers 31.2% 43.6% 12.4%
Cincinnati Reds 26.2% 38.5% 12.3%
San Diego Padres 51.7% 63.7% 12.0%
Arizona Diamondbacks 50.4% 61.9% 11.5%
Boston Red Sox 45.3% 56.1% 10.8%
Philadelphia Phillies 65.5% 75.9% 10.4%
Seattle Mariners 53.0% 63.2% 10.2%
Cleveland Guardians 51.3% 61.4% 10.1%
Pittsburgh Pirates 21.9% 31.8% 9.9%
Minnesota Twins 49.6% 58.2% 8.6%
St. Louis Cardinals 27.7% 36.1% 8.4%
Milwaukee Brewers 51.8% 60.0% 8.2%
Houston Astros 69.9% 78.0% 8.2%
New York Mets 61.3% 69.3% 8.0%
Texas Rangers 49.9% 57.8% 7.9%
Teampa Bay Rays 32.6% 40.5% 7.9%
New York Yankees 60.7% 68.4% 7.7%
Toronto Blue Jays 40.7% 47.9% 7.2%
Atlanta Braves 68.8% 75.2% 6.4%
Washington Nationals 5.7% 11.4% 5.7%
Baltimore Orioles 61.4% 66.7% 5.3%
The Athletics 8.9% 14.0% 5.1%
Los Angeles Angels 5.8% 9.8% 4.0%
Miami Marlins 3.2% 6.8% 3.6%
Chicago Cubs 55.8% 59.4% 3.6%
San Francisco Giants 21.4% 24.2% 2.8%
Los Angeles Dodgers 87.8% 89.8% 2.0%
Colorado Rockies 0.8% 2.6% 1.8%
Chicago White Sox 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

There are basically two questions here for projection systems to answer: 1) How many wins would Bregman add? 2) What are the utility of those wins? Bregman would represent a massive upgrade for the White Sox, but they are extremely unlikely to be relevant enough for those wins to actually matter. (Bregman would help the Pale Hose avoid rounding to zero, skyrocketing their playoff probability to 1-in-1,455!) Their rivals on the North Side, the Cubs, also rank very low on this list for the opposite reason: ZiPS already sees the Cubs as having a very strong offense. Sure, marginal wins are valuable for any team, but it’s hard for the Cubs to really leverage Bregman without one of those downside scenarios occurring, such as underperformance from guys like Matt Shaw or Seiya Suzuki, or a rash of injuries to key players. If there were a pitching equivalent of Bregman available, the Cubs would likely be at the very top of this list.

The Astros are only in the middle of the pack in terms of playoff improvement with Bregman. But two other teams that have been rumored at times to be in the mix would see a major surge in their postseason odds if they were to sign him: the Detroit Tigers and Boston Red Sox. The Tigers are in a position where the extra wins they’d get from Bregman would translate into a huge playoff probability boost, and though ZiPS thinks Jace Jung would be solid at third, signing Bregman would trigger a roster shuffle that would tighten up right field and the short side of Detroit’s DH platoon — the team’s two weakest positions, according to ZiPS. There’s been some speculation that Bregman could play second base for the Red Sox, but as ZiPS sees it, Boston would get more value from keeping Bregman at third, moving Rafael Devers to first, and letting Triston Casas and Masataka Yoshida fight it out at DH. This alignment would require prospect Kristian Campbell to be on the roster and filling the team’s current hole at the keystone.

But the best place for Bregman, at least in the ZiPS projections, is another AL Central team: the Kansas City Royals. While the corner outfield scenario is absolutely brutal, especially if MJ Melendez and Hunter Renfroe get the vast majority of the playing time in left and right field, respectively, ZiPS sees merit in shifting Maikel Garcia or Michael Massey into one of the corner spots on the grass, with Bregman taking over at third. ZiPS also thinks Bregman would provide a terrific resolution of the hot corner questions in Cincinnati, though there’s probably even less of a chance the Reds would actually do this than the Royals. The Padres likely don’t have enough payroll flexibility even to offer Bregman a short-term deal with an opt out, but if they could find room in their budget, sell him on playing second base, and shift Jake Cronenworth to left field — or even convince Bregman to play left — there would be more high-end scenarios in which San Diego could make the Dodgers uncomfortable.

My gut says the Tigers will be the team to land Bregman, and likely very soon if it happens. They just shored up the rotation with the signing of Jack Flaherty at an extremely reasonable price, and as the projected fourth-place team in the AL Central right now, they have a lot to gain by adding a legitimate All-Star. There’s a way, but is there a will?





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

62 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sandwiches4everMember since 2019
1 year ago

The Guardians clock in with a 10%+ boost, but I assume Bregman isn’t dislodging Ramirez from third. What arrangement would that be? Putting Bregman at second?

EonADSMember since 2024
1 year ago

Probably. Juan Brito has upside, but he’s not getting a better projection than Bregman. Bregman was drafted and developed largely as a shortstop, and still seems to have good range, so handling the position wouldn’t be a surprise.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  EonADS

That’s this year.
And when Bazzana is ready?

EonADSMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  fjtorres

There’s enough skepticism that Bazzana will end up in the outfield that it would still be justified if they could afford it. I personally think he can make it at second, but if he finds a home in the corner outfield, he’ll be fine with his bat. Dude’s like peak Kipnis but better, at least offensively (127 is Kip’s career high in wRC+, I see that as an expectation for Bazzana, with more upside).

Brito likewise has some positional versatility, he can at least cover all four infield spots and looks decent in the outfield corners. And Kwan should probably just be in CF, so the corners would likely be open at that time (yes, DeLauter is there too with Chourio the Younger coming up, but still, having depth is not a bad thing).

All of that is moot because the Dolans would rather commit murder than pay a contract worth what Bregman is asking for. Ramirez’s contract is a miracle.

Last edited 1 year ago by EonADS
fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  EonADS

Chourio is projected for CF. (In case he doesn’t hit like his brother.)
Kwan hasn’t signed an extension so he is likely gone next year.

So, regardless of “What’s on second”, Brito or Bazzana are headed for LF, Chourio or somebody else for CF and DeLauter for RF or 1B if his foot problems are chronic.

(That assumes they can hit. Not a certainty in the Cleveland outfield.)

So no, I don’t see Cleveland forking over big bucks for a free agent of. Or pitcher. Or anything.

folzpatMember since 2021
1 year ago

Likewise, the Padres are projected as one of the teams that would benefit the most from Bregman, despite their infield being pretty full to say the least. I’m very curious what that configuration would look like — Bregman to 2nd, Cronenworth to the bench? And/or, someone to the OF?

Philip ChristyMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  folzpat

Maybe Bregman would be better than Bogaerts at SS? Or play Manny there?

96mncMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  folzpat

Bergman 2nd.
Cro 1st
Arraez dh

ajake57Member since 2019
1 year ago

Ramirez has averaged about 30 games per year at DH. You’d have to think Bregman would cover those games and the few full days off he gets. So 35 or so games at 3B, 95 or so at 2B and 30 at DH I think would be the end result. While Bregman hasn’t done much DH’ing I’m just guessing that would be the organizational philosophy.

Jewish PacheMember since 2020
1 year ago

It’s February… 6/156 to keep hitting toward the Crawford boxes doesn’t seem like a bad outcome.

Hope Detroit lands him though

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

Don’t say “Crawford” and long-term deal around Red Sox fans!

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

Argh.

TheFightingBurkhardts
1 year ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

Yeah, the longer this lingers I think the Astros become more and more likely. It seems unlikely at this point that someone is going to offer drastically more than the 6/156m.

I don’t think it is just PR / lip service that the Astros publicly commented being still involved, and evaluating things like Altuve to LF (even if that is suboptimal). They could easily just say “no, we’ve moved on”.

Both sides seem open to it, and Bregman is very, very settled in the Houston area, so I would think if the Houston offer is still there, it would need to take a good deal more term to go elsewhere, which just doesn’t seem to be happening.

Benjamin Kouchnerkavich
1 year ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

Seriously. Holding out hope for an AAV of more than $26M at this point is getting a bit silly. Though I’m prepared to eat my words if he ends up scoring higher than that.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

I agree on hoping that Detroit lands him. but jumping from a 104 payroll last year to what would be something like 170 after bregman does feel like a lot to ask.

I’m not saying they shouldnt do it. its just soooo hard to see a team turning on that type of spending THAT quickly.

BigO
1 year ago

Love this, thanks! Can’t help but wonder why a team like the Nats doesn’t get involved, though, even though they are low on this list. Their playoff chances are meant to double (!), and climb over 10%. To me, this would make them a competitive (if not necessarily contending) team this year, with all the benefits conferred for the youngsters developing at the major league level. Just another way to look at these great numbers.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  BigO

It may increase their playoff odds now, from 5.7% to 11.4% but I’m guessing it would equally, if not more so, decrease their playoff odds 4-6 years from now. For a team that is very young and just now hoping to get to a window of contention, I think they would be much wiser to not burden themselves with an aging veteran just so they can have an 88% chance of not making the playoffs.

BigO
1 year ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

I hear you. That’s for sure the measured approach. I’ve just been noticing how Astros players are bending over backwards to try to get the guy back, and it makes me think about his potential influence on a talented young team that’s going to be learning to win in the next couple of years. (And yes, I remember the sign-stealing, so it’s clear we’re not talking about a guy with impeccable character.)

boomstickMember since 2024
1 year ago

Phillies want to hang with the bigs in the NL?
Better get on the Bregman train and continue the talent shift to the NL from the AL.

ajake57Member since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  boomstick

Honestly they really should. I don’t think the money they’ve got on the books 3-4 years down the road is going to matter too much when all of their stars start declining and they can’t keep up. Might as well go for broke while there’s still a reasonable chance to win. Trade Bohm or something, just make it work.

KyleMember since 2024
1 year ago

Clearly the White Sox have the most to gain here. From 0.0 to 0.1%. Bergman literally can make the impossible possible!

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Kyle

Infinity times better with him!

Expo27Member since 2016
1 year ago

Really surprised the Jays aren’t higher here. They ought to be on a very high leverage part of the win curve, and while Ernie Clement did a pretty solid job last season, he’s still Ernie Clement.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Expo27

Probably it’s just really hard to move up the win curve in the AL East.

Edit: Better way of phrasing it would be that they are far enough away from the playoffs that this is not going to help that much.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
g4Member since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Expo27

I thought the same for the Brewers due to their gaping hole at 3B/middle-of-the-order bat, but I think sadtrombone’s logic also applies to them, in reverse. The meek NL Central gives Milwaukee a higher starting point playoff odds-wise than its actual roster strength merits.

Now, change in World Series odds? That might be a different story.

I Like Big BuxtonMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  g4

At this point in the year, most of the difference in World Series odds is due to the difference in just making the playoffs.

Jeff in JerseyMember since 2020
1 year ago

I wish I had the hope in Brett Baty that ZIPS does.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

The thing that wasn’t mentioned here and I would like to know more than anything else is the offensive projection for Bregman in different stadiums. While has not shown a pronounced home / road split in ISO for his overall career it sure looks like there is one between 2022 and 2024.

With the short left porch in Houston, I really want to know where he would benefit from his batted ball profile. His expected home runs by park at Statcast look favorable in Houston, Philadelphia, Cincinnati, the Chicago White Sox, and Colorado, but almost everyone homers more in Philadelphia, Cincinnati, and Colorado.

He does okay with the Blue Jays, Twins, Nationals, Brewers, Dodgers, and Padres. But he does terribly in Seattle, Cleveland, Kansas City, Atlanta, Detroit, and Pittsburgh. Also the Orioles (but they’re changing the left field wall), Athletics (but new minor league stadium). And the Red Sox, but I would love to know how many fly outs would turn into doubles there due to the Green Monster.

Looking at this, it is really hard to make the case that the Royals, Mariners, Guardians, or Tigers should be going all out for him no matter what these numbers say. I think you could make a case for the Twins, Brewers, Blue Jays, and Astros, but the latter two are the only ones who are going to spend that kind of money right now (or for the next few years), with the Red Sox a wild card.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I suspect the lion’s share of the reason for the system liking Bregman for the Royals/Tigers/Twins/Guardians is the current parity in the division and the high value of a marginal win, fit be damned.

I’d say I generally agree with your analysis here, but with the addition that if I were one of the AL central teams I’d definitely be inquiring about the possibility of a 1 year pillow deal for big dollars.

hayz11Member since 2021
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

For what it’s worth, Bregman’s career slash line at Fenway is .375/.490/.750, so it clearly is somewhere he is comfortable hitting.

fjtorres
1 year ago

No mention of the third question about signing Bregman: what about the rest of the six years?

Sure, he can be helpful to a fair amount of teams…this year. But down the road? Is he blocking a cheap prospect? Can the team budget handle his price in year 4, to say nothing of 5&6 when he’s likely to be…less useful?

I doubt Houston is terribly interested in in bringing him back under those terms.
If anything, they’d be better served by picking up a couple of the remaining outfielders on minor league deals or 1-year make good contracts.

Now, if they were assured he’d take the opt-out in nov, that’s a different story. But if the interest has been so low so long, how is it going to be better after the season?

The OP does a nice job of listing the pros but the cons are not insignificant.

Last edited 1 year ago by fjtorres
darren
1 year ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Three-year ZIPS:
3.8 WAR
2.8 WAR
2.1 WAR

That suggests years 4-6 are going to be worth something like 3 WAR, making the contract $156 mil (or more for someone to outbid Houston) for ~12 WAR. That’s not terrible, but it’s not good either, especially since so much of it comes in the form of a below-average player. Even given the specific needs of the teams at the top of the list above, it doesn’t seem like a great investment.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

$13m per WAR?
Chapman got $151m for 16 WAR, partly for his glove: $9.4m per WAR. From a team desperate for a name FA.
So no, not a great investment.

GreggMember since 2020
1 year ago

Dan, I’m bregnant.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Gregg

Breg, I’m greggant.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

i never considered this

bubblesMember since 2024
1 year ago

Does this look roughly the same if you did it with Arenado? Arenado has a 0.4 lower WAR projection. 6 years at $150 million or 3 years at $60 million if the Cards chip in a little and maybe a mid tier prospect or two. I’m questioning which one I prefer as a team. Either way, some teams that don’t get Bregman should be all over Arenado. Detroit and Boston could really use either.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  bubbles

If the Cards are willing to pay down to 3/$60m AND add prospects, I’d go with Arenado.

I think it’s more likely the Cards are looking for either trading his full contract (3/80 or so?) for marginal return or trading paying down a bit to get something decent back. In that case, I think I still want Arenado. The downside with Bregman just feels much worse.

bubblesMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

Yeah sorry the way I worded that was not great. I was thinking more along the lines a 45+ FV and maybe a 40FV from the trading team for Arenado + some cash. Not the Cards giving up Arenado, cash, and prospects. Arenado will still have some value on the market even with his contract.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  bubbles

Ah okay, that’s a lot closer to what I would think.

Erick
1 year ago
Reply to  bubbles

Great point bubbles. Arenado would be cheaper in terms of prospects too, since Bregman has the qualifying offer attached, he would cost a team a pick. So cost is:

6 years/150 million and loss of draft pick
or
3 years/74 million and a low level prospect/lottery ticket
(Sounds like the Cards don’t want to take on salary, so it probably rules out an Arenado for some like Starling Marte, DJ LeMahieu, Mitch Haniger, or a Jordan Montgomery sequel – but I’d consider that too. Also, why don’t teams consider trading deferred contracts – trade Arenado for the remainder of Bobby Bonilla or Chris Davis’s deferred contracts? Wonder if that’s allowed.)
I think I am with darren and talking myself into Arenado. Plus, if he bounces back, you may be able to sell high on him at some point (assuming he’d waive the no-trade clause). But back injuries are tricky, so you may end up with a mediocre DH.

darren
1 year ago

I’m a little surprised not to a see a 6-year ZIPS projection here. The immediate impact is important, of course, but if he’s not at least fairly valuable for 3-4 years, that long of a deal still doesn’t make sense.

I’m also curious how concerned ZIPS is with the effects of his drastic change in approach last year.

(I guess we do get a hint from Bregman’s 3-year ZIPS projections on his page: 3.8 WAR, 2.8 WAR, 2.1 WAR.)

Yirmiyahu
1 year ago

For the Red Sox, did you consider an alignment of Bregman 2B, Campbell LF, Duran CF? That would be the likely plan if they were to sign Bregman and promote Campbell. Moving Rafaela to a super-utility role makes a lot more sense than benching Yoshida or Casas.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

That would mean moving Rafaela out of the position he is most valuable, and having Campbell and Bregman learn new positions. That seems like a good way to make your defense really bad and possibly mess up Campbell’s development.

Yirmiyahu
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

The Sox have publicly and privately committed to keeping Devers at 3B (it was part of his extension discussions). Rafaela is definitely most valuable in CF, but it makes more sense to bench him than Casas or Yoshida. As for Campbell, OF isn’t a new position for him, and plenty of evaluators think that’s where he’ll end up anyway.

And regardless of the logic of it, this alignment is far more likely than what Dan suggested. The entire offseason, every report about the Red Sox / Bregman connection has been about him playing 2B.

synco
1 year ago

An aside, but Bergman seems like a guy who the ~4 or 5 WAR he lost in 2020 could prove to be the difference in making the Hall or not.

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  synco

Cheating scandal aside, he would need a heck of a back half of a career to even get close to the Hall of Fame IMO

synco
1 year ago

He’s at 40 WAR through his age 30 season (both fWAR and bWAR, interestingly enough). Unless he gets hit by a bus he should be able to put up (at least) 10-12 WAR from here on out.

At that point (around 50 WAR) each WAR starts becoming very significant to his HOF chances. The different between being at 52 vs 56, due to having lost a handful of WAR due to COVID, could matter a lot. Particularly since standards have softened a bit toward players in the mid 50s range over the last few years.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
1 year ago

Devers has always struck me as someone who would hate moving off 3B. I worry such a move would impact his production.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

There have been a ton of rumors that the Red Sox promised him they wouldn’t move him. It doesn’t matter quite as much at the moment because they don’t have a starting caliber third baseman to take over for him. If they signed Bregman that would no longer be true.

I have a hard time seeing the Red Sox top the Astros’ offer for Bregman anyway. He’s still a good player today but the arrow has been consistently trending down.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

There’s too many questions about him to bet long.
(including his power.)

If he moved down to say 4 years plus vesting options he might get a bite.
But six years?
I’d be surprised if that is still on the table.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I hadn’t heard the rumors about the promise to stay at 3B, that seems like a foolish promise. I do remember that when they were negotiating they were using Olson (a 1B) as a comp, telling Raffy that it made sense since he would eventually be moving to 1B.

Whatever has been said in the past, I hope that he and the team both realize that moving him in the near future is a good way to improve the team’s defense.

hayz11Member since 2021
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’ve been confused a bit by the seriousness of the Red Sox interest in Bregman. He makes some sense as a short term option, but he’s on the downslope of his career and would block Campbell and/or Mayer if he plays at second and risks angering their franchise player if he moves Devers off third. I think that would probably leads to a trade of Casas as well – I’d rather have him for the next 6 years than Bregman.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
1 year ago

It bothers me that the Royals are so obviously the spot for him and seemingly have no interest.

They offered Hosmer 7/147 in 2018. Why not 6/165 for Bregman today?

Last edited 1 year ago by RoyalsFan#14321
fjtorres
1 year ago

New owner who learned the FO game in Cleveland.

darren
1 year ago

As a non-Royals fan who doesn’t follow them closely, it seems like they’ve been spending more lately. They did spend on Wacha and Lugo a bit, and locked up Witt and Perez.

Am I giving them too much credit?

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

Royals already spending 18 more than what they spent last year. I understand wanting them to land him and thinking it makes all the baseball sense in the world, but adding another 30ish to that with bregman to become +48 does sound like a pretty tall task.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

I think the next step of this exercise would be to add a column for “implied spending power remaining” for each team. like. this is imperfect, but maybe a delta between last year’s payroll and current payroll.

Looking at the top 10 or so results in this chart:

Royals… +18 vs last yr
Tigers… +38
Reds…. +15
Padres… +36
Dbacks…. +22
Red Sox…. -13
Phillies…. +40
Mariners…. +8
Guardians… -8
Pirates…. -7
Twins… +12
Cardinals…. -35

So… if you ask me who i’d put money on for Breggy, i’m saying Boston

Last edited 1 year ago by JayGray007
JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

I dont see the tigers, royals, reds, padres, dbacks, and phillies adding another 30 or so to those numbers that already exist.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

just making it clear that a positive number means that the team is currently spending more than last year. for example, signing bregman would probably take the Tigers to +68 or so.

i really dont think its gonna be the tigers

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

The other thing the Tigers need to consider is Skubal is a FA in a couple of years (after 2027, IIRC). If you have the Bregman contract, how does that affect the budget to sign him?

They will also be looking to extend Riley Greene, too.

Not saying they can’t fit these 3 players under whatever salary constraints they have, but, they aren’t The Dodgers. At some point, they WILL have to choose who they want to keep. Bregman would make that choice harder.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

Mariners would be so fun and reasonable