Jack Flaherty Returns to Detroit on Two-Year Deal

A key piece of the 2024 Detroit Tigers reunited with the team on Sunday, as starting pitcher Jack Flaherty signed a two-year deal worth $35 million. Flaherty excelled for the Tigers last year, putting up a 2.95 ERA and a 3.12 FIP in 106 2/3 innings over 18 starts, good for 2.1 WAR. With the Tigers seemingly out of the playoff race in July, he was shipped to the Dodgers, with whom he won the World Series. He was respectable over 10 regular-season starts with Los Angeles, but his performance was decidedly mixed in the postseason.
Like many short-term contracts for solid players, this deal comes with its own ifs, ands, and buts. Flaherty’s guaranteed money is front-loaded, structured as a one-year, $25 million deal with a player option for $10 million in 2026 that increases to $20 million if he starts 15 games in 2025. Whether one sees the deal as a two-year contract with an opt-out or a one-year contract with a player option is a “potato, po-tah-to” issue that really doesn’t matter here; in this case, they’re the same functional thing.
What does matter is that Flaherty’s market appears to not have developed as much as that of some of the other top pitchers available. While it shouldn’t raise an eyebrow that Blake Snell and Corbin Burnes got much bigger contracts, Flaherty also received a lighter deal than Sean Manaea, Nathan Eovaldi, and Luis Severino. While Flaherty didn’t miss any significant time due to injury last year — he skipped only a single start with lower back pain in July — questions about his back were enough for the Yankees to have second thoughts about trading for him at the deadline. The Dodgers were happy enough to acquire him, and though his strikeout rate dropped off (32% to 26%), he was certainly a net plus for an injury-thinned starting staff down the stretch.
Both Michael Rosen here and our friend and former FanGrapheteer Mike Petriello have written a lot about Flaherty’s market lately, speculating into some of the reasons for his quiet market. I suspect that the questions about his late-season decline would be easier for teams to dismiss if he had possessed a stronger record of consistent performance in recent years.
In 2019, Flaherty broke out as one of the best young pitchers in the game; he posted a 2.75 ERA, a 3.46 FIP, and 4.7 WAR across 196 1/3 innings, placed fourth in the Cy Young voting, and received down-ballot MVP votes. But then he struggled with injuries and up-and-down effectiveness over the next four seasons (4.42 ERA/4.36 FIP), including the truncated COVID one. He started strong in 2021 (2.90 ERA/3.73 FIP) before straining his oblique while batting during his May 31 start against the Dodgers. He spent 73 days on the injured list, returned for three starts in August, and then strained his right shoulder and missed another month. That shoulder continued to bother him in 2022. He was out until mid-June with shoulder bursitis and a SLAP tear in his labrum, made three starts, and then landed on the IL for another 70 days with a shoulder strain. He was healthy in 2023, and after a rough first seven starts (6.29 ERA/5.32 FIP), he pitched well for his final 13 starts with the Cardinals (3.58 ERA/3.69 FIP) before he was traded to the Orioles at the deadline. But then the rails fell off; he was demoted to the bullpen and finished his Baltimore tenure with a 6.75 ERA and 4.84 FIP.
Those are the reasons to worry about Flaherty, but there certainly are reasons to like him too. His 194 strikeouts and 38 walks last year represent a nice ratio, and he’s essentially been healthy for two full seasons now. The drop-off in strikeouts was more dramatic than you’d expect from the mild deterioration in his contact percentage, and his repertoire data didn’t indicate any game-changing problems. His knuckle curve, a big part of last year’s success, was as good as ever. If you simply ignore four months of really awesome performance and just look at his Dodgers performance prorated over a full season, he still was an above-average pitcher in 2024, and this free agent market is just about out of good starting pitchers.
| Year | W | L | ERA | FIP | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9 | 8 | 3.73 | 3.85 | 25 | 25 | 135.0 | 118 | 56 | 17 | 46 | 147 | 111 | 2.1 |
| 2026 | 8 | 8 | 3.82 | 3.92 | 24 | 24 | 129.7 | 116 | 55 | 17 | 44 | 137 | 109 | 1.9 |
| Percentile | ERA+ | ERA | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 158 | 2.63 | 4.1 |
| 90% | 148 | 2.81 | 3.7 |
| 80% | 130 | 3.20 | 3.1 |
| 70% | 122 | 3.41 | 2.7 |
| 60% | 115 | 3.60 | 2.4 |
| 50% | 111 | 3.73 | 2.1 |
| 40% | 105 | 3.94 | 1.8 |
| 30% | 101 | 4.11 | 1.6 |
| 20% | 92 | 4.51 | 1.0 |
| 10% | 85 | 4.89 | 0.5 |
| 5% | 77 | 5.36 | -0.1 |
ZiPS at least thinks that the Tigers likely got a “just right” deal, with the computer valuing Flaherty at two years, $32 million based on his projection, with his projected innings held down due to his injury history. I suspect the Tigers would be absolutely fine if Flaherty pitches to his 50th percentile projection, even if these numbers are less exciting than what he gave them in 2024. Detroit’s decision to trade Flaherty made sense in July because of where the club sat in the standings, but the Tigers sure felt his absence after they made their improbable push to the playoffs, when they desperately needed a guy to give them innings. Their postseason rotation consisted of Tarik Skubal and a bunch of relievers.
ZiPS currently projects the Tigers as the fourth-best team in the AL Central, around .500, but that’s close enough to be a threat to the top teams in the division. Signing a starter like Flaherty at this point in the offseason is a big get for Detroit, and it really shores up this rotation. Flaherty’s return gives the Tigers a solidly established five-man rotation of Skubal, Flaherty, Reese Olson, Alex Cobb, and Casey Mize. With Flaherty around, they won’t need to spend the spring figuring out whether they trust Keider Montero or Matt Manning to be their fifth starter, and they can comfortably give Jackson Jobe more than two starts at Triple-A before he either forces his way back onto the roster or is needed as an injury replacement.
Does the Flaherty’s signing dramatically change how the AL Central looks? Not really, but that’s hard to do at this point in the offseason. However, his addition addresses one of this team’s crucial needs heading into the regular season, and if the Tigers return to the postseason this year, they’ll have a deeper rotation that should give them a better chance to make it through.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
A 1 year pillow contract in 2024 could give the Tigers:
Jack Flaherty for 4 months where he was a very good.
Thayron Liranzo, Trey Sweeney in a trade
Jack Flaherty again on a larger contract, but, still for only 2 years at most.
They could also get a comp pick if he exercises his opt-out and the Tigers offer a Qualifying Offer. they could also trade him again if the team is out of it, but, he is good.
The only way this can go sideways is if he is bad or gets hurt & then misses most/all of 2026..He’s an SP, so there is a non-zero chance of that, of course…& that is the risk you take with any SP.
They also have a lot of ((alliterative) SP depth all of a sudden- Mize, Manning, Madden, Montero, Madden, Maeda, etc. Wonder if a couple of them get dealt.
To paraphrase Blazing Saddles, why do you have Madden listed twice? “I like Madden.”
Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge.
Clearly Flaherty was signed to give them some degree of M-F platoon advantage.
Given the number of $15 million deals for older 5th starter types (Scherzer, Verlander, Morton, etc.) I’m surprised there weren’t several teams willing to beat this offer, even if you look at it as a 1 year at $25 million.
I’m with you on this one. I’m sure the Mets would love to swap out Montas ($34m for two years) with this Flaherty deal.
Incorrect, the Mets like their rotation of 4th starters and would call this an “asymmetrical contract”
Totally agree. As a Red Sox fan, I would have taken this deal over Walker Buehler’s in a heartbeat too.
+1, Sawx fan here
Calling Flaherty’s postseason “mixed” is misleading, at best. It was awful. 5 starts, 22 innings, 24 hits, 9 BB, and 18 runs.
In the context of that, and the Yankees being scared off last year, I’m not shocked offers were hard to come by.
I think that’s the distinguishing line — teams that see themselves “already in” the postseason (LAD, NYY, NYM, etc.) aren’t going to value him as highly as the WC3ish teams for whom every reg season win will count (Central teams, Baltimore, SDP if they traded Cease, etc.).
Add in the postseason emphasis on low inning, high velo/K performances, and you see why the Dodgers are loading up on 30-60 inning guys who might not be available during a pennant run, but can win you a playoff series.
That said, I wonder what Flaherty and Buehler could do as relievers if they can’t get their starting mojo back consistently…
Flaherty is a great fit for a team who is looking for high Ks in the playoffs…if you get the first half Flaherty from last year.
I think it is telling that the team who saw that version of Flaherty is bringing him back, while the two teams that could really use that high K guy in the playoffs (Baltimore, LAD) but traded for him before are not. Those teams must think he doesn’t have the stamina or can’t be managed to be that guy in October, while the Tigers are much more willing to take that chance.
IOW I think this is a sincere difference in evaluation of Flaherty than something about team fit.
Eh, he pitched in two Game 1’s, which are critical, and had a 1.46 ERA in games his team won. It’s harder for a reliever dependent team like those Dodgers were to dig yourself out of a hole, so at least he did well in the first games.
Eh. You’re taking an already admittedly small sample size of 5 starts, and shrinking it down even further to a couple outings. And as a Mets fan, I can tell you they were down so fast in their game 1, they kind of went into shutdown mode early.
Bottom line, he looked rough in the postseason, velocity was down, he’s already got back issues at 28.
Dodgers are throwing money around like they’re playing Monopoly, and even they had no interest in bringing him back at this price tag to be their 10th starter.
I think Flaherty intimated that he was the one who read the writing on the wall and had no interest in being a team’s 10th starter
This is a bit like the Matt Chapman deal from last offseason, where a whole bunch of teams should have truly regretted not waiting and trying to outbid for him. The difference though is that Chapman had a QO, in this case it’s literally just money that those teams spent somewhere else instead of here.
IMO this probably points to Flaherty and his team mis-playing the market as much as other teams not being patient enough.
A simple 1-year / $25 million deal is significantly more team-friendly than what Flaherty got, so I don’t understand why we’d look at this deal that way.
Is it though? If I wanted a 30 year old pitcher for $25 million this year I would also take his age 31 season for $10 million without knowing how any of it played out.
2026 is a player opt-out with an escalator clause if Flaherty makes at least 15 starts in 2025.
So you only get 2026 for $10 million after quite bad scenarios for Flaherty’s performance in 2025: Flaherty (1) makes < 15 starts *and* (2) doesn’t think he can get more than $10 million on the open market.
Even if Flaherty is hurt for much of 2025 but healthy and effective enough by the end of the season that he thinks he can get >$10 million as a FA, then he opts out.
Point (2) almost certainly excludes getting 2026 Flaherty for $10 million in scenarios such as him being hurt for much of the year and then coming back and pitching well in a few starts later in the season.
“even if you look at it as a 1 year at $25 million”
Or it could be a really bad 1/2 year deal for $35M.
Great win for my Tigers, feels like a loss by Flaherty and his agent. I thought he proved a lot last season, and he has always had dynamic stuff. Excited to have him back to help Skubal, and an overworked pen.
As good as he was last year, he was fifth starter material from 2020-2023, and it sure looks like teams noticed that. With another good season he can dip back into free agency as a 30yo and that stretch of mediocrity will seem like the distant past. If he turns back into a pumpkin he still pockets $35m. Seems like a win to me.
In 2020 and 2023, he wasn’t very good, but in 2021 he was almost as good as he was in the 2nd half of 2019 until he got hurt (in 2021). 2022 was almost entirely lost to injury.
Is this one of the most successful deadline trades of all time for both sides?
Tigers: Got back a very exciting prospect and a player who helped them make the playoffs that year anyway, then re-signed the player in the offseason
Dodgers: Won the World Series
Great business from Scott Harris and the Tigers all-around here. I honestly think this pushes them, if not in the same tier as the Guardians and Twins, very close to it.
You just described the Aroldis Chapman-for-(Gleyber Torres+some other stuff) deadline deal in 2016 between the Yanks and Cubs.
Hah! Was about to say.
So what you’re saying is Trey Sweeney is going to go off on a division rival one season, completely distorting how we view his power potential and forcing that team to alter its field dimensions?
Sign me up for the 2028 Target Field renovation
Say this about Jack Flaherty, he is not shy about betting on himself.
But I think he and/or his agent might not fully appreciate what will happen if he does come back and blow everyone away. It probably means he sticks in Detroit the whole year and gets the QO. Will the extra year be enough to compensate for him being a year older and having a QO? We’ve seen the QO kill player markets unexpectedly; if this is what his market was like without a QO what will it be like with it?
And that’s if he comes back and does well…if he doesn’t…
What are you thinking Flaherty’s alternative offers might have been that this move is a big bet on himself?
Between the structure of the 2nd year player option in this deal (extra $10 million for a modest total of 15 starts in 2025), plus the reports about the Yankees being spooked by his medicals last year, Occam’s Razor is that teams have bigger than typical concerns that injuries will quickly lead to Flaherty being unavailable / ineffective.
My read of the situation is that there probably wasn’t any team willing to offer him a financial guarantee of $70 to $80 million (independent of number of years/structure), because of those medical concerns.
If that’s the case, I think his agent did a good job to get the bulk of Flaherty’s minimum guarantee into Year 1. And to get a better Year 2 player option amount available for Flaherty if he has a season a lot like 2021 (when Flaherty made exactly 15 starts, with peripherals much worse than his shiny ERA).
As for a QO, Flaherty may be a pitcher whose best option is simply to accept the QO if he ever gets one, because concerns about his medicals mean that he’ll always be offered 1 or 2 year contracts.
Based on the other contracts out there I think a 4 year, $80M was attainable. But if not, then I get it.
I don’t think a huge contract is coming his way in the end. He’s thinking about Carlos Rodon, but Rodon was unbelievable for the Giants.
Yeah, look at the contracts Dan mentioned above that got 3 years, $65-$75M.
Is Flaherty a worse bet than Severino? or Manaea or Eovaldi? His injury history is no worse than Severino’s & is likely better. More of a proven track record than Manaea. Almost 5 years younger than Eovaldi (without Eovaldi’s consistency, health or big game chops).
My gut says he asked for too much, like 5 years $110M or so, teams looked elsewhere due Flaherty’s health/consistency history & then when the other 2nd tier guys I mentioned above signed, he realized he had way overshot his market & that the teams willing to give him even 3-4 years had already signed someone else.
In contrast this is a great deal for the Tigers–raises the ceiling for the rotation a lot, with very little long-term risk. A very Giants-like move back when Harris was in SF, signing a guy who didn’t get a QO to a deal where he might get one.
The more I look at what happened in SF and Detroit after Harris left it appears that Harris was the driving force behind things that went right and not Zaidi.
It is looking that way with Harris. As a Detroit fan, I can’t be happier with how the last 2 years have gone. They have 5-7 top 100 prospects, depending on who you talk to. Most of them acquired since Harris took over (all but Jobe & Briceno) & they have also gotten a few pitchers to take big steps forward.
They have also become very good at developing/helping/maximizing pitchers strengths the last couple of years. That’s Harris, too.
Flaherty was practically begging to come back on social media last week. Clear that whatever it was, he liked being in Detroit &/or liked the pitching coach staff & feels he can have another good year to platform back to FA next winter.
Can Flaherty be relied upon for an entire season, especially in October?
Short answer: “yes” with an “if.” Long answer: “no” with a “but.”
Joker Jack has endured a modified blackballing by MLB for being too outspoken and opinionated.
Since when do blackballed players get a $35 million guarantee?
I will always root for Flaherty, seems like a good guy who is fun to watch pitch. The Tigers look pretty interesting again, the AL Central is the division I’m most excited to watch this year.
Twelve short months ago, no one expected to read this sentence anytime soon. How things can change!
$25M for 1 year of “Good Flaherty” plus the QO pick will certainly be a great deal for the Tigers.
Still, I can’t help but cringe at that $10M incentive after 15 starts. Tigers FO better pray with all its might that Flaherty doesn’t blow out his elbow/shoulder after July 20, or they will have paid $45M for half a season of an average-ish SP (and no postseason starts to boot). Heckuva downside.
I would like to thank this contract (and Pirates Ethan) for teaching me about the valley charge for AAV calculations and how the Tigers were able to effectively front-load their CBT number on this deal. This could be a smart way for teams on the rise who may be a year or two away from CBT trouble to keep it at bay.
I should explain. If a player option year is less than 80% of the AAV of the pre-player option contract, the difference between that 80% number and the option is called the “valley charge” and spread across the rest of the contract. (There are some caveats within). As such, Flaherty’s number is $27.5M this year, a year where the Tigers are around $140M or $170M if they get Bregman) with a rebate or discount next year (where maybe they start creeping north of $200M if the core starts to get more expensive) depending on if he opts out.
This is presumably to guard against sham opt outs intended to drive down AAV.