What’s the Matter With Jack Flaherty?

Brad Penner-Imagn Images

It wasn’t supposed to go down like this. After a sensational contract year — striking out 30% of hitters, posting the lowest walk rate of his career, bedazzling his jewelry cabinet with a World Series ring — Jack Flaherty looked like he was set to make a boatload of money. Days after his 29th birthday, we here at FanGraphs ranked Flaherty eighth among our Top 50 Free Agents, one spot behind his former high school teammate, Max Fried.

Early in December, Fried blew away expectations, inking an eight year, $218 million deal with Yankees. And he wasn’t the only one. Starters from Blake Snell to Luis Severino landed surprisingly lucrative contracts; when Ben Clemens checked in last week on his free agency projections, he noted that he’d under-projected the deals for starting pitchers by about $17 million on average. His takeaway: “Pitchers are getting paid this winter.”

Not all of them, it turns out. As the calendar creeps uncomfortably close to the start of spring training, the youngest available starting pitcher in free agency finds himself without an employer. Every couple weeks, a sparsely sourced rumor about Flaherty bubbles up on MLB Trade Rumors — there’s “mutual interest” with the Orioles, the Tigers have “some interest” in a reunion — but for a large part of the offseason, it’s been silence on the Flaherty beat.

The most substantial of these rumors flowed from the estimable pen of Ken Rosenthal over the weekend. Rosenthal and Will Sammon reported in The Athletic that Flaherty was “open to considering” a “short-term deal” with a “high average annual value.” The hot market for starters and the comparatively cool market for Flaherty suggest that, unlike the rest of the nominal “front-end” starting pitchers at the top of the market, something about him scares teams. All of this leads me to ask: What’s the matter with Jack Flaherty?

One obvious answer is the track record. On some level, teams are going to be somewhat hesitant to commit serious resources to anyone whose last healthy and effective season before 2024 came prior to the pandemic. Rosenthal and Sammon wrote in their report that “teams perhaps want to see Flaherty put together two consecutive seasons of elite performance.” And there are the shoulder issues in 2021 and 2022 that limited him to just 114 1/3 innings over that two-year span.

But I don’t think the track record tells the full story. I think the weak Flaherty market comes down to concerns about his 2024 season itself. Specifically, I think teams are worried about his fastball.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

They get there in different ways, but the three pitchers who received $200 million (or thereabouts) contracts this winter all have plus fastballs. Snell throws the prototypical ace four-seamer, averaging 96 mph with 19 inches of induced vertical break. Corbin Burnes’ cutter is one of the signature pitches in baseball, capable of missing bats and neutralizing contact quality against hitters on both sides of the plate. Fried is a bit of a different case — his fastball averaged just 93.9 mph last season — but the shape is totally bizarre relative to his arm angle, resembling Burnes’ cutter from the left side. Fried also throws five other pitches, minimizing the importance of his four-seamer.

Free Agent Fastballs
Pitcher Arm Angle Fastball Velocity (mph) Induced Vertical Break (in.) Horizontal Break (in.)
Blake Snell 59° Four-Seamer 95.9 18.7 5.8 (Arm Side)
Corbin Burnes 44° Cutter 95.3 12.5 2.4 (Glove Side)
Max Fried 48° Four-Seamer 93.9 11.0 0.1 (Glove Side)
Jack Flaherty 28° Four-Seamer 93.3 15.4 4.2 (Arm Side)
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

Flaherty’s fastball was the slowest of these four primary offerings, averaging 93.3 mph. In September, that dropped all the way to 92.6 mph. At below-average velocities, even a half-tick of heat loss can be brutal. And while the shape of the fastball is unusual — Flaherty throws from a low slot and gets just four inches of horizontal movement, meaning the pitch unexpectedly cuts in a funky fashion — it doesn’t have the sink that allows Fried’s and Burnes’ fastballs to burrow beneath barrels. Also unlike Fried, Flaherty in effect throws just three pitches: his four-seam fastball and the two breaking balls. (He also flashes a changeup and sinker, but last season he used each of those pitches less than 3% of the time.)

Given the mediocrity of his fastball, Flaherty must aim for fine locations. His success can vary. (I want to caveat the following with the fact that the Dodgers have a strong organizational preference for where their pitchers locate their fastballs, which may or may not be the way Flaherty will pitch with a new team.)

I’ll start with his matchups against left-handed hitters, because these were the majority of hitters that Flaherty faced in 2024. After his trade to the Dodgers in late July, the target for his fastball was almost exclusively set up in one location: Low and away.

A handful of times per start, Flaherty tried to climb the ladder, aiming for swinging strikes at the top of the zone. But in the three starts I watched in full, he almost always targeted his fastballs low and away when facing lefties.

Now, as the plot below of his fastball location to lefties shows, his execution wasn’t perfect. Aiming a baseball is really hard. But I’d venture to say that it was pretty good — he hardly yanked any of his fastballs to the glove side, and most of his misses drifted harmlessly off the plate. In any case, the plot tells a clear story: Flaherty was looking to paint with his fastball rather than challenge hitters over the plate.

This sort of nibbling quality with the fastball is perhaps not what teams want to see from their high-paid free agent starter. Snell, Burnes, and even Fried to some extent can throw fastballs with a large margin for error. Flaherty’s margins are thinner.

This is especially true against right-handed hitters, where his glove-side command is not as good. Against righties, Flaherty also frequently targeted low and away. But as the plot below of fastballs to righties shows, Flaherty doesn’t have the same level of command to the outer edge of this side of the plate. Note the lack of dots in that low-away corner compared to the yanked misses off the plate:

To lefties, Flaherty has the luxury of his misses generally drifting off the plate for balls. When he misses his target to righties, however, the miss tends to drift middle-middle. And when you’re missing middle-middle with 93-mph four-seamers, it’s generally not going to turn out well for you. (This might explain part of Flaherty’s reverse splits last season.)

When executed well, the low-and-away target serves an important function — it sets up his two nasty breaking balls, a harder gyro slider at 85 mph and a loopier knuckle-curve at 78 mph. As this pitch plot shows, these two pitches blend together in a deceptive manner, forcing hitters to guess which one is coming:

Flaherty is at his best when he’s mixing in the low fastballs with the two breakers right below the zone. Check out this two-pitch sequence to Ryan O’Hearn. He nails his 0-0 target to get ahead:

On 0-1 — the perfectly executed fastball fresh in O’Hearn’s head — Flaherty buries a curveball right below the previous location, getting O’Hearn to swing way over the pitch:

After a couple of breaking balls in the dirt, Flaherty punches O’Hearn out on a high fastball. With hitters laser-focused on the bottom of the strike zone, that occasional late-count high heater leads to a ton of whiffs. It’s a pretty combo when it works.

But if Flaherty falls behind, there just isn’t a great option to induce weak contact. When the early-count fastball execution is less than perfect, he tends to back himself into a corner. And when he’s forced to come over to the plate with the heater, he can be vulnerable to the long ball. Just ask O’Hearn:

If Flaherty’s fastball velocity remains in that 92-93 range, it will likely be a tradeoff between giving up a few too many walks due to nibbling (as he did early in his career) or risking extra-base damage by coming over the plate.

So, yes, there are reasons to be concerned about Flaherty. But overly fixating on his fastball risks ignoring his upside.

That two-breaking-ball attack works against both righties and lefties; when he gets ahead in the count, there’s almost nobody better. That strikeout rate is no illusion. So the question becomes: How can Flaherty reliably get ahead of hitters?

One option is pitching backwards. Flaherty’s fastball usage in 0-0 counts is roughly 50%. (On the plot below, red represents the four-seamer, gold represents the slider, and blue represents the curveball.) Given the frequency of his slider usage in 3-1 and 3-2 counts (50% and 44.8%, respectively) it follows that he has the confidence to throw it for a strike when he needs it. Mixing in more breaking balls in early counts could take some pressure off the four-seamer.

Credit: Baseball Savant

Flaherty could also use his sinker more often. If his problem at present is mostly with right-handed hitters, the sinker could give him a weak-contact option and a pitch that he feels comfortable throwing on the inner-half of the plate. Notably, the sinker grades out fine by stuff models — PitchingBot, for example, gives it a 56 on the 20-80 scale.

It’s also not impossible that some of his velocity could return. Maybe he no longer can regularly dial up 95-96 mph as he did in his early 20s, but it’s also possible that his late-season swoon can be chalked up to his posting his highest innings total in five years. In the range of velocity that he sat in the later months of the season, every half-tick is crucial, but if he can consistently live at 93-94 mph with the ability to touch 96, that softens many of the concerns.

Concluding this article definitively is challenging. On the one hand, the skittishness of the clubs is perfectly understandable. But plenty of contending teams need starting pitching, and an industry-wide fear of Flaherty’s weaknesses could cost clubs their chance to add someone who just performed like one of the best hurlers in the game.





Michael Rosen is a transportation researcher and the author of pitchplots.substack.com. He can be found on Twitter at @bymichaelrosen.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
robd2343Member since 2019
1 year ago

this is a fascinating article with great detail. But the biggest elephant in the room with Flaherty, in my opinion, was not addressed. I won’t claim to know much about him as a human, but he has displayed some odd public behavior in press conferences and interviews- or should we just mention the Joker inspired hype video he made for….himself? I don’t think the reluctance has anything to do with his skills

EonADSMember since 2024
1 year ago

Idk if this is what it boils down to, so much as track record and injury concerns. Flaherty has a history of injury and apparently his medicals kept several teams from trading for him at the TD, iirc. He’s talented, no question, and I’d love it if my team could scoop him up for cheap (without trading multiple pieces off the roster in the process, Paul Dolan), but I’d be wary of a larger/longer contract as well.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  EonADS

This was my first thought. He may be a case where whatever the Yankees flagged wasn’t enough of a concern for the Dodgers to nix their trade for him but is enough of a concern that teams don’t want to give him a large guarantee.

hahigginsMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  EonADS

Right, this. Way more likely to me that the question marks are around the fact that he was, for a six year stretch: Extremely Good, Not Good, Not Good, Not Good, Good, Pretty Good. With injuries thrown in to muddle the signal further. Evaluating that is hard to do!

Lunch AngleMember since 2016
1 year ago

I’d be scared of paying Flaherty a boatload too. It seems like his success hinges around having enough oomph on the fastball to make it something hitters have to worry about besides his nasty breakers. And it seems like that line is both fine and stark. At 94, he dominates. At 92, he gets lit up. Would you bank on Flaherty pumping 94 for the next couple seasons?

johndarc
1 year ago
Reply to  Lunch Angle

Yeah we all just saw the best and worst he has to offer during the postseason. When he has the stamina, he’s pretty good. When he doesn’t? Batting practice.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago

It seems like teams in general would rather fail by spending less than their budget than fail by using their whole budget in ways that might not be a great use of dollars. For example why wouldn’t the Giants or Orioles or Mets or Blue Jays or Tigers want him? Seattle could sign him and trade Castillo more comfortably.

The only thing I can think of is that maybe he’s incapable or unwilling to adjust to worse velocity as he ages or the season progresses. But even with lower velocity he was fine in the postseason.

As the article says he can just mix up his pitches more randomly.

The objective is maximize your chances of winning pennants within your budget. It’s not to avoid unproductive contracts.

Last edited 1 year ago by Ivan_Grushenko
cashgod27Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

He had a 7.38 ERA in the postseason, which doesn’t strike me as “fine”

tdmocMember since 2023
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Yeah there were a couple of games where he truly got blasted off the mound. It’s that that I’m worried about. Better than doing nothing, of course, if it’s just 3/$80m.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

No it’s actually terrible. I think I confused him with Walker Buehler in my memory

Last edited 1 year ago by Ivan_Grushenko
Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

He looked absolutely gassed in Sept/Oct, so if you’re a contending team that’s thinking about the postseason, do you want to spend your money on a guy who you’re not confident will even be 80% of himself by that point?

johndarc
1 year ago

The Dodgers were just acquiring glass cannons and hoping to find the innings somewhere in October. I assume other teams would expect volume from whoever they sign.

hudsukkaMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

M’s current lineup seems to indicate they want pitchers with fastball’s that are close to elite or interesting because they’re released from an unusual angle.

This seems to play especially at home given the questions around the batters eye and a higher number of strikeouts. With the points raised in the article, doesn’t seem like Flaherty would fit that mould.

Sonny LMember since 2017
1 year ago

Watched a few of his early starts in Detroit and he still had his heat when he needed it but seemed to be making a concerted effort to dial it back for command, length, whatever it might have been. Reminded me of Burnes in that way.

Suppose that’s true and it’s a mid career pitcher working towards longevity and durability it’s kind of the exact thing everyone says they want from modern pitchers. I get teams wanting him to prove it again (Gausman had to do this recently) but at some point this approach, when it’s as successful as Flaherty’s 2024 was, needs to be rewarded by FOs for it to catch on across the player pool.

markakis21
1 year ago

I think it’s hard to not consider the clubhouse implications.

When the Athletic did their player poll, he was one of the most popular answers for “most overrated”

In STL he feuded with his manager, with reporters, and with teammates.

In BAL he fought with the pitching coach, and generally moped about, putting in the bare minimum.

Dodgers fixed the pitching, but even the dodgers can’t fix a person.

CC AFCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  markakis21

The Tigers fixed his pitching, if anyone. And going by the players’ overrated poll is like Woody Johnson’s kids using Madden ratings to squash trades

basically baseballMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Actually it is not. The players poll is a real reflection, albeit only one aspect of his standing among players. The madden rating is one persons made up crap. Plus he is certainly a player who has caused issues, for a variety of reasons. No players are out there begging their team to sign him from any reported info unlike many free agents.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think often human aspects completely get dismissed. Let’s say a team owner calls a couple of their players, and the players say they aren’t a fan of him…that could be it. If it’s real, if he’s a prick, whatever, doesn’t matter. Word gets around and you hear the same thing all the time, it doesn’t really matter if it is true or not.

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  carter

As they say, the rumor has raced halfway around the world while the truth is still putting its shoes on.

(Or in our terms, the rumor is Rickey Henderson and the truth is Rich Garces)

Last edited 1 year ago by Jason B
The GuruMember since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Yep…its was the Tigers that fixed it….tigers are the #1 pitcher fixers right now by far. There Catcher, Pitching Coaches, and analytics dept are on top of it.

olethrosMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  markakis21

The clubhouse implications, player poll, and “feuds” are all down to one simple fact: the majority of MLB on-field personnel are unapologetically right-wing Christians, Flaherty is very much not that, and he is unique in that he doesn’t hide his disagreements with that way of viewing the world. He was utterly vilified by a large chunk of Cardinals fans specifically for his political and social opinions even while performing admirably, if somewhat inconsistently, on the field.

At his age he’s probably on the back half of his career, but again speaking as a Cards fan, letting him go was a stupid move and retaining him would have made the team demonstrably better than they’ve been since his departure.

JayMember since 2023
1 year ago
Reply to  olethros

I don’t think this is true. Flaherty was very well-liked in STL until he spent 3.5 seasons hurt/not performing. That’s not necessarily his fault but by the end I think a lot of people were just ready to be done with him. I’m sure there were some fans who disliked his politics but the main reason the fans turned on him was his underperformance and drama with his teammates

The Duke
1 year ago
Reply to  olethros

There’s nothing here in your analysis that is true.

Flaherty had one good half a season and then was hurt or compromised most of the rest of the time and clearly wasn’t 100% when pitching.

His lackluster results is what people were upset about as with any under -achieving ballplayer

markakis21
1 year ago
Reply to  olethros

Were his political beliefs the reason he snapped at media every time they mentioned his fastball?

Because of course the baseball media, beat reporters in particular, are notably right-wing and Christian. (/sarcasm)

Last edited 1 year ago by markakis21
didaceMember since 2024
1 year ago

Or maybe, he and his agent are overestimating his value. People always want to (mostly) blame teams when free agents aren’t signed. But it’s not like they are shopping at a store with price tags on the items.

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  didace

On the contrary, I’m hoping for them to do like they used to do at the end of Wheel of Fortune, where the winner had their game winnings to spend.

“Alright Deborah you won $3,250. What would you like?”

(floor pivots to show a living room filled with fabulous prizes)

“Well Pat I’ll take the Barcalounger for $800, the exercise bike for $650, the bumper pool table for $900, and the rest in cash!”

“Alright Steve Cohen, you’ve got $1.7 billion to spend, what would you like?”

(floor pivots to show a living room filled with fabulous players)

“Gee Pat I think I’ll take the Juan Soto for $765,000,000; the Sean Manaea for $75,000,000; the Clay Holmes for $38,000,000; the Frankie Montas for $34,000,000; and the rest in cash!”

david k
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason B

How many people here are actually old enough to remember them doing that? Or when Chuck Woolery was the host?

I think they stopped the shopping stuff in 1988, so you’d have to be at least 45 years old to have seen that, FYI.

Last edited 1 year ago by david k
biggestdummyMember since 2020
1 year ago

Perhaps its my lack of experience or intelligence, but I’m looking at the “FF” charts, and I’m not seeing the patterns described in the narrative.

Certainly, I see a skew toward the outside on both charts, but I’m not seeing more low than middle or high. And I’m seeing similar proportions of middle-middle in both charts, when the author talks about misses to lefties going outside and misses to righties floating over the middle.

I’m not trying to be passive-aggressive here. I assume that I’m missing something. Just trying to see whether others can explain to me what I’m missing.

johndarc
1 year ago

I figured it was his low velo and back injury thing? We saw him get lit up in some postseason starts, dominate in others. The Dodgers could afford to be risky in getting him. Other teams like the Yankees could/would not.

Also maybe he thinks he deserves Fried or Burnes type money when he’s only getting Severino type offers.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

The comments covered most of what I wanted to say, but I think it’s worth summarizing it.

1. This was his first good year in a long time and he faded hard down the stretch and in the playoffs. Which pitcher are you getting?

2. He had a medical that led the Yankees to nix the trade for a rental. Maybe other teams are fine with the medical for a year or two but not for four or five?

3. He may be asking for a number much larger than teams are comfortable with. They call his agent, they find out he’s looking for five years and $150M and they decide to move on. Heck, they could hear he is looking for five years and $100M and they could decide that is too much.

4. Whatever you think of Flaherty’s personality he is definitely a strong personality and has rubbed some people the wrong way. Teams may worry if they give him a big guarantee that it will blow up on them.

david k
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

(4) sounds like the Colin Kaepernick effect.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  david k

I literally cannot find any information about his political beliefs, except for people saying that he expresses them and it pissed off some conservatives.

But he definitely is not shy about expressing his opinion about other things, so I imagine he would share those if he has them too.

johndarc
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

IIRC he spoke out about black lives mattering and people really didn’t like it. I remember a reddit thread where someone was asking why he was so opinionated since he wasn’t black, then being surprised when they found out he was.

You know, the stuff “fangraphs reader but woke” is referring to but refuses to say outright because he’s being a coy dick.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  johndarc

Baseball is a very conservative sport. Owners are majority conservative if you look at political contributions. Most white men are conservative too. A lot more Latino players are conservative than people think too, and I would imagine that only increases with money. I would imagine our guess on how conservative the mlb is, is actually quite low. It is probably 10-20% higher than what people think.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  carter

All you need to consider is the number of openly gay players on active rosters.

The culture of the game is “Shut up and play.” About about everything but the game. At least in public: it’s part of what they consider professionalism.

And its actually quite common in the business world, albeit less than it used to be.

(In the Video game world there are multiple ongoing catfights from divisive online comments by mid-level staff. The result is showing up in the bottom line.)

Last edited 1 year ago by fjtorres
Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  johndarc

fwiw the dodgers had a pretty happy clubhouse with MAGA “blaQe treinen” and Jack Flaherty’s BLM outburst. I’m old enough to remember Kershaw and the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. Didn’t seem to cause any friction with him, the fans, or the team in the end. I don’t think chemistry is fake, but it sure isn’t the sum of the observable parts, either.

(again wonders how Dave Roberts wasn’t even a finalist for MoY)

Last edited 1 year ago by Smiling Politely
TimD56Member since 2019
1 year ago

This is pretty simple. Flaherty pitched great for the Tigers. He wasn’t near as good for LA, and he got smoked in the postseason (18 ER in 22 IP). He threw more innings than he had since 2019. He had a chance to lock up a big deal with a strong postseason. It went decisively the other way, to the point where people are questioning his endurance and ability to put good years back to back. He’s going to be a bargain again and I would love to see the Tigers get him back.

YabaDabaBaddooMember since 2021
1 year ago
Reply to  TimD56

I would love another starter since there are some big question marks behind Skubal and Olsen. A medium term (3-4 years) with an opt out after year 1 would intrigue me.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  YabaDabaBaddoo

I don’t see why several teams wouldn’t be interested at those terms

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  YabaDabaBaddoo

Not sure what the big question marks are behind Skubal? He didn’t miss a single start.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  LMOTFOTE

I’m pretty sure the question marks are Mize, Cobb, and Jobe (and Matt Manning, and Gipson-Long, and Madden). Mize is a 4th starter, Manning looks like a 5th starter, Cobb has health concerns, Madden and Gipson-Long have inexperience concerns, and Jobe has both health and inexperience concerns.

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  TimD56

He had a chance to lock up a big deal with a strong postseason. It went decisively the other way

Ah, the Sam Darnold effect. He went from potential #1 seed and “Minnesota should franchise him and/or trade McCarthy” to “GET THAT BUM OUTTA HERE” in two weeks. TWO WEEKS! Even Greg the Bunny lasted longer than that.

david k
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason B

Yeah, that was crazy, wasn’t it?

JDO
1 year ago

As a Dodger fan who watched him in the last half of the season and the playoffs I think he’s good enough to beat a team the first time through, hitters facing him 2-3 times. But as we saw in the playoffs he has problems facing players more than three times, it maybe that his stuff is not varied enough and he suffers from recency bias, but both times in the Mets and Yankees series he pitched well the first time and got hammered the second time he pitched. Bottom line is I’d sign him but would never pitch him multiple times in a playoff series. and IMO I think he do well in the regular season as long as he’s not pitching against the same team within a week or so.

JayMember since 2023
1 year ago

I think teams just aren’t convinced he’s very good. He’s not the same pitcher that he was when he first came up and dominated with the Cardinals. He’s lost significant velo since then and it hasn’t come back even when he’s been effective. Basically his ceiling now looks like the ~3 WAR he put up last year while his floor is still essentially zero due to injury concerns and the very recent history of him being ineffective. If he’s holding out for big money it’s not that surprising to me that nobody has bitten.

johndarc
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay

But the weird thing is that that type of pitcher is still valuable. He must be asking for the world for teams to not see eye to eye with him

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  johndarc

MLBTR predicted 5 years, $115 million. That seems like 10-12 WAR maybe. Is he really worse than that? He’s only 29.

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I guess it depends on what teams believe is a realistic starting point.

If his WAR totals go 3.0 / 2.7 / 2.3 / 2.0 / 1.7, that’s 11.7 WAR over five seasons and a fairly useful piece over the life of a 5-year contract.

If last year was more of a dead-cat bounce and he goes something like 2.2 / 1.7 / 1.3 / 1.0 / 0.5, that’s 6.7 WAR and decidedly less appealing to throw nine figures at.

stanMember since 2019
1 year ago

There’s a glaring reason why he’s getting the cold shoulder, and it has nothing to do with his pitching. That’s that his health has been shaky- that that the health seems to have a lot to do with his contract. He has been pretty open about the fact that he’s not going to pitch unless his body feels 100% because he doesn’t want to risk his monetary future. It was entirely predictable that he would have a resurgent year in his contract year and it seems that MLB teams have picked up on that.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  stan

Who else we got in contract years for 2025 (pitchers)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  carter

Cease is the biggest name and best bet to be a front-line playoff starter. Gallen and Michael King are probably the next best but their track records aren’t as long. Probably Framber Valdez after that, and then #5 is probably Senga. I’m sure some teams have different orders of #2-#5, but that’s the big group.

Ranger Suarez is also pretty good, but probably not in that top 5 group. Same with Eflin and Nestor Cortes. Maybe Merrill Kelly or Jordan Montgomery or Tyler Mahle if they bounce back, but again hard to see them in the Top 5.

And then you’ve got a big platter of “former frontline pitchers with injury woes” (Verlander, Woodruff, Bieber, Buehler) who could burst back onto the scene if they string together a good year. This was IMO kind of where Flaherty was when he signed with the Tigers, although I don’t think it’s likely that Verlander will be in line for another multi-year deal now that he’s in his 40s unless he puts up a year like 2022 again.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
Brian JohnsonMember since 2017
1 year ago

Love the article and analysis of his fastball. I don’t think his fastball is the reason he remained unsigned. I think the most likely explanation is that Flaherty and his agent overplayed their hand early in the off-season and turned down large offers that are no longer on the table after teams moved on to other players. Flaherty and Max Fried are good friends and share the same agent. It’s very possible that Flaherty and his agent had a warped sense of his value because he was comparing himself to Fried.