Carlos Correa’s New New Deal Sends Him Back to Minnesota

Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Ah, yes, another turn in the Carlos Correa saga. After agreeing to a deal with the Giants that fell apart and then agreeing to a deal with the Mets that hung in contract limbo for weeks, Correa is on the move again, back to where he started 2022. As Jeff Passan first reported, Correa and the Twins have agreed to a six-year, $200 million deal with vesting options that could boost the total payout to $270 million over 10 years.

By now you know Carlos Correa the player. He’s been one of the top free agents on the market for two years running, and he’s been one of the most prominent players in the game for half a decade. We’ve written about his free agency plenty of times already. But if you’d like a refresher, here it goes.

Correa has a well-rounded offensive game, the type of hitter you can plug into the middle of your order and not think twice about. He takes his walks and rarely strikes out. He does that not because he has an otherworldly batting eye, but rather because he has a solid sense of the zone and a good feel for contact. It also helps that opposing pitchers prefer to avoid the zone against him, owing to his comfortably plus power. He also plays solid shortstop defense, somewhere between plus and excellent depending on which scout or defensive metric you listen to. Put it all together, and he’s an All-Star level player every year when healthy.

In 2022, he powered the Twins lineup to the tune of a 140 wRC+ over 590 plate appearances. It was his third straight season of qualifying for the batting title, something that seemed to alleviate health concerns that surfaced early in his career when he missed at least 50 games in three straight seasons from 2017 to ’19.

Yeah, about that: Correa’s surgically repaired right leg has been the most reviled limb in baseball this offseason. He fractured it while sliding into a base in the minors in 2014 and had a plate inserted thereafter. He hasn’t missed any time in the majors leagues thanks to that injury, but both the Giants and Mets held up deals with Correa this offseason thanks to concerns about it.

That leg injury reportedly led the Mets to ask for half their deal with him to be only partially guaranteed. That would have made it a six-year, $157.5 million pact with another six years and $157.5 million on the back half contingent on some stringent conditions. His Twins deal guarantees him $200 million over those six years, with the possibility to grow to 10 years and $270 million. In other words, he’s taking a larger guarantee upfront but limiting his upside. In handy grid form, here are the three contracts Correa has provisionally agreed to this offseason:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Carlos Correa’s Contracts
Team Years AAV (M) Total (M) Additional Possible $M
Giants 14 $25.0 $350 0
Mets 12 $26.3 $315 0
Mets (rumored) 6 $26.3 $157.5 $157.5
Twins 6 $33.3 $200 $70.0
Twins (max) 10 $27.0 $270 0

It might seem strange that the Twins deal, despite being signed after the other two and hence presumably being only the third-most-attractive offer, carries the highest average annual value. But no one would dispute the idea that Correa is likely to be a great hitter for the next few years; both the Giants and Mets seemed most concerned about the possibility of the back half of his contract being mostly dead money.

The Twins deal splits the difference in that sense; it guarantees the least money, but pays Correa the most fairly for the first six years of his contract. ZiPS, whose projections I’ll show towards the bottom of this article, would offer Correa $245 million over six years. ZiPS isn’t a leg surgeon – at least, not yet – so it’s missing a key part of the equation here, but the point is that if Correa’s health record were contained to his time missed at the major league level, he’d be in line for $245 million over the first six years of the deal. All three deals are about getting surplus value from Correa now in exchange for paying him like a star in his decline years; the Twins one is the closest to how Correa’s production will actually work out, with more money per year at first and less (and non-guaranteed!) money in later years.

In Correa’s shoes, I’d prefer the Minnesota offer to the reported amended New York offer if all else were equal. His overall earnings potential is $45 million lower, but he’s guaranteed $40 million more. Going from $160 million to $200 million is likely worth more to him than going from $270 million to $315 million, what with the diminishing marginal utility of money and all, which explains the lower headline number on the deal. If Correa wanted to bet on his health, he could have, but I’d take the higher guaranteed amount, too.

As mentioned above, ZiPS thinks Correa will be quite good over the next six years:

ZiPS Projection – Carlos Correa
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB + DR WAR
2023 .276 .355 .472 521 77 144 28 1 24 79 62 117 0 130 7 5.6
2024 .273 .353 .467 520 77 142 27 1 24 77 63 116 0 128 6 5.4
2025 .266 .346 .449 512 73 136 26 1 22 73 62 114 0 122 6 4.8
2026 .261 .341 .436 495 69 129 25 1 20 69 59 110 0 117 5 4.2
2027 .250 .330 .412 476 63 119 23 0 18 63 56 107 0 107 4 3.3
2028 .248 .329 .404 448 58 111 22 0 16 56 53 102 0 105 3 3.0

The exact nature of the vesting options isn’t yet public, but we do know one part of it: if he reaches 500 plate appearances in the sixth year of his deal, he’ll trigger a seventh year at $25 million. That means the last three years are for a combined $45 million, in decreasing fashion: first $20 million, then $15 million, then $10 million, with as-yet unknown vesting conditions. If he plays all 10 years of the deal, ZiPS would offer him $319 million, though there’s obviously some injury contingency here:

ZiPS Projection – Carlos Correa
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB + DR WAR
2023 .276 .355 .472 521 77 144 28 1 24 79 62 117 0 130 7 5.6
2024 .273 .353 .467 520 77 142 27 1 24 77 63 116 0 128 6 5.4
2025 .266 .346 .449 512 73 136 26 1 22 73 62 114 0 122 6 4.8
2026 .261 .341 .436 495 69 129 25 1 20 69 59 110 0 117 5 4.2
2027 .250 .330 .412 476 63 119 23 0 18 63 56 107 0 107 4 3.3
2028 .248 .329 .404 448 58 111 22 0 16 56 53 102 0 105 3 3.0
2029 .246 .326 .397 411 52 101 20 0 14 51 48 95 0 102 2 2.5
2030 .242 .322 .384 372 46 90 17 0 12 45 43 86 0 98 1 1.9
2031 .239 .318 .373 373 44 89 17 0 11 43 42 88 0 93 0 1.6
2032 .237 .314 .371 337 39 80 15 0 10 38 37 80 0 92 -1 1.3

There are early reports that the Twins deal is extremely likely to go through, though of course we’ve heard that one before. If that’s the case and Correa’s winter peregrination is finally over, I’m sure he’ll be disappointed with the lost money, but let’s try to keep some perspective here: he’s already earned $62 million in his career and has another guaranteed $200 million coming his way. He can probably afford to buy some nice headphones if he wants them, or even get his car’s oil changed slightly more often than the manufacturer recommends, instead of significantly less often like the rest of us. I’m sympathetic to the way his negotiations have played out in public – that doesn’t seem fun at all – but he’s still going to land on his feet.

I’ve already written about how not signing someone of Correa’s caliber hurts the Giants – they set their team up around signing a big free agent this offseason and then didn’t. That was the case the second their deal fell through, and it won’t stop being the case just because Correa’s eventual destination changed. Recent developments do make them look less clownish, though; it’s much better to be one of two teams that reached an injury impasse with a marquee player than the only one. The Mets won’t be nearly so hurt by missing out on him. As Dan Szymborski noted yesterday, they look like one of the best teams in baseball even without Correa in the lineup. He was more of a luxury than a necessity there, though I’m sure the rest of the NL East will sleep better tonight knowing the Queens juggernaut is slightly less formidable than expected.

The Twins, on the other hand, must be ecstatic to get Correa for less than the deal they’d initially offered him this winter (a reported 10 years and $285 million). They’re locked in a three-way scuffle for the AL Central crown, with every marginal win potentially representing the difference between missing and making the playoffs. Correa is a huge upgrade for them; after some defensive position changes, they’re basically swapping out a Kyle Farmer/Kyle Garlick duo for Correa, or maybe Gilberto Celestino for Correa depending on how you feel about their roster construction. That’s a massive upgrade, the kind that can turn a season around. Mere days ago, it seemed like such an upgrade was unavailable thanks to the speed of the free agency market, but that doesn’t make it any less valuable for them.

What a strange trip this winter has been for Correa. He was ready to attend a press conference to announce his signing with the Giants. He spent a month in Mets purgatory while Scott Boras cracked wise about martinis and free market capitalism. He’s ending the winter back where he started in Minnesota – well, presumably not in Minnesota, because it’s laughably cold in Minnesota this time of year, but as a Twin nonetheless. When all is said and done, he’s going to have an eight figure net worth. I’m not sure if I’d call it a satisfying end to the saga, but it feels like a conclusive one – at least, pending physical.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

70 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Anon21Member since 2018
3 years ago

Carlos Correa is going to call his own press conference, dramatically reveal that he used fake X-rays in each of the three physicals and actually passed all of the exams, and triumphantly sign his three deals for $935 million total. The Giants will have him on Mondays through Wednesdays, the Mets on Thursdays and Fridays, and the Twins will get the weekends.

Last edited 3 years ago by Anon21
Ukranian to Vietnamese to French is back
3 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

That’s the only scenario that makes sense.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Loaning out of players like in soccer would be interesting

curt schillings ketchup bottle
3 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

They say divorce is hardest on the twins

Chris Metzler
3 years ago

That’s just terrible and I am here for it

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago

If Schilling said things like this more often he would already be in the HOF

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I’m pretty sure this news just means Correa is going to the Braves.

Last edited 3 years ago by sadtrombone
FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Seemed like a perfect storm for AA to swoop in and make an under the radar 1 year $45 mill signing

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Still possible the Twins get cold feet after signing Correa…then AA could probably get him for Lewin Diaz and Hoy Park.

johansantana17Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

That’s Friedman’s music

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

If this actually does pan out–and who knows if it does–this is just huge. Buxton and Lewis are exciting players, but they make Correa look durable. With two of them, they’re serious playoff contenders. With three, they’re the best in their division and among the best in the AL. There will be ups and downs because a lot of the time 2 or 3 of them will be hurt but this gives Twins fans a lot to look forward to.

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One weird feature of the Twins is the number of guys who can play, or at least semi-play shortstop in the event Correa is hurt (not counting Lewis, there’s Farmer, Gordon and Polanco) or just needs to rest as a DH. In fact, right now the Twins overall positional depth and flexibility is a lot closer to what the Dodgers and Rays have had recently than say the Angels. So the Twins won’t necessarily be shot if one of these three is hurt.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

The Twins do have a bit of a logjam if everyone is available. I guess this puts Polanco back at 2B most days, Arraez at 1B, and Larnach back in the OF some days and DH others? Miranda will get a chance to handle 3B.

OF will be Buxton, Kepler, and Gallo. Unclear what this means for Kirilloff or for Lewis when he gets healthy. They probably need to trade someone if they can get an equivalent value reliever, although Alcala’s return could be a solid bullpen boost..

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Kirilloff is probably a 1B/DH if he hits enough and if he doesn’t he’s probably looking for overseas deals. Lewis is trickier. I would probably stick him at 2nd and make Polanco a super sub.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Kirilloff and Larnach both need full time at bats to find out what they are, and a lot of other teams are in a better position to give that than the Twins are right now.

Arraez is a bit of a waste at 1B if there are teams who think he can play second. They have a bunch of interesting parts that don’t necessarily fit together very well on the roster. Of course, spring training and injuries are likely to sort it out if nothing else does.

SenorGato
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Feel free to send Larnach to Cubs

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Too, the investment in Gallo is probably low enough that they can send him to his other natural position (bench) if he looks like he did last year

sterling62Member since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Overly optimistic to me. Twins pitching staff is underwhelming, and this team is basically the same team that finished in 3rd place last year with 78 wins in a weak division. Not even close to Astros and Yankees, and likely well behind Blue Jays, Rays, Mariners, Rangers, Angels, and Guardians.
They have the 10th best odds to win the AL pennant, so a good opportunity to play their upside.

fjtorres
3 years ago
Reply to  sterling62

Also, the White Sox seriously underperformed last year which can’t be counted on despite losing their closer.

They were so focused on Correa and SS (despite having ample choices there) they did very little addressing other areas of more pressing need: pitching, pitching, pitching. Because you can never have enough pitching.

Elsewhere, all the contenders for the AL wild cards got noticeably better.
The Twins have a shot at the division but it’s a thin one.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I disagree. They have Mahle and Jorge Lopez for the whole year, and Maeda back who did not pitch last year. They had terrible luck with injuries down the stretch last year. Cleveland is prooooobably still the division favorite by a plurality, but I don’t think the Twins will be far behind. As you say, the White Sox also underperformed last year.

fjtorres
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Counting on Maeda to be 100% is not guaranteed.
And who plays CF when Buxton goes down? 😱

They still look to be third in a three team race, even if Correa plays healthy all year.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Some combination of Gilberto Celestino, Nick Gordon and Kepler. Royce Lewis if he’s back.

It’s when all those guys are hurt at once and they’re playing Mark Contreras down the stretch that you run into trouble…

If you want to call the Twins third, I guess you can. I don’t think the final projected standings will agree, but they’re likely to all be close enough that no order would really be a surprise.

I see a giant lump of teams that I expect to be pretty close in the AL. NYY=HOU>>TOR>SEA>CLE, MIN, TEX,TB,CHW,LAA>BAL Something like that.

mgraves
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

They’ll also get Ober back. A front four of Gray, Mahle, Ryan, and Ober is pretty good. Winder, Varland, and Woods-Richardson are all waiting in the minors for injuries. There will be no Bundys in this rotation. Granted, there is no “No. 1” starter, but a couple of 2s and a couple of 3s will stack up fairly well against most teams.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sterling62

I think in 2023 you are correct. In 2024–when Royce Lewis, Byron Buxton, and Carlos Correa theoretically are available give them 1200-1300 PAs instead of 850-900, we could see the Twins skyrocket past the rest of the division. Or they could just be the same old team; it all depends on health.

I think that’s the point. If all three are healthy, the upside is enormous. I don’t think all three will be healthy very often, but if they are it’ll be fireworks. This trio gives them upside, whereas before it was pretty limited.

Last edited 3 years ago by sadtrombone
airforce21oneMember since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Over or under on 1000 ABs total for the three of them next year?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

Under. I’d put the over/under on them to be more like 850 or 900 next year, because Lewis is hurt already.

In 2024, though? Over. I’d put the over/under at something like 1200-1300.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d take the over (although not by that much). Lewis should be back towards the end of June. If you can get 500 from Correa, 400 from Buxton, and 200 from Lewis, that would be about par.

The question is how many of Buxton’s are at DH, because those are a lot less valuable.

David Klein
3 years ago

I thought the Arod saga in ‘04 where he badly wanted to be traded to Boston —and was willing to give up money(the mlbpa put the kibosh on that), and ended up with the Yanks thanks to Boone blowing out his knee was crazy! Carlos Correa and the Mets, Giants and Twins are like hold my beer!

David Klein
3 years ago

Carlos Correa should have pulled an Lebron and had the decision on the mlb network this time and three different times.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

“I’m taking my talents to….”

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago

Great news for Twins fans!* I’d venture to guess that Correa returning has more impact on a team’s 2023 playoff odds than any other transaction this offseason.

*assuming, of course, that the deal is actually finalized. How long will this be a standard disclaimer?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

The more I look at this deal the more I like it for the Twins. Vesting that turns into team options for a player of this caliber is huge. Obviously it doesn’t end well if his leg disintegrates in the first five years or so but this offers great protection in case it does later.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

So to clarify: The PA thresholds automatically vest the options. 575PA in ’28 for $25m, 550 in ’29 $20m, 525 in ’30 $15m and 502 in ’31 $10m. If Correa doesn’t meet the thresholds the Twins can choose to exercise the options anyway. I agree, that seems great.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

That is basically better for the Twins than not having the vesting and options at all. Because Correa is probably going to be worth it if he’s playing, but if not it’s a get out of jail free card for the decline years. I suppose this could easily go sideways but unless the leg blows up on him earlier than expected this is a phenomenal deal for the Twins. Maybe the best of
The offseason.

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One reason this structure works for the Twins, unlike the Mets and Giants, is that they’re not trying to manage the AAV of the deal to leave room under the cap. This lets them run a higher AAV during the guaranteed part of the contract while leaving a lot of value in the form of makeable vesting options. The guaranteed part was attractive enough for Correa, and the later year options are super protection for the Twins if Correa’s health fails him.

Like the Buxton extension, very well done by the Twins.

SenorGato
3 years ago

Well played, Uncle Cohen, well played!

butthole25
3 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

Uncle dipshit is more like it.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
3 years ago

He needs to go full consultant and just charge teams by the game. Maybe even in the same game charge by the at bat or inning.

$40k per at bat, $20k per inning in the field. Extra innings come with a 1.5x premium. $2k bonus per home run.

curt schillings ketchup bottle
3 years ago

100k and he’ll bat for the other team for the rest of the game. Full on mercenary status

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
3 years ago

During the seventh inning stretch, each team’s GM can meet on the mound with their sealed bid for the last few innings of CC’s services

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Let’s start a gofundme for a bananaball team to sign him and make this a reality

Sonny LMember since 2017
3 years ago

I’m assuming the real hang up was no one was willing to insure the contract right?

Most teams know the back half is dead money but it’s completely uninsurable they have to think twice.

chipjoshMember since 2019
3 years ago
Reply to  Sonny L

That’s a really good point that I hadn’t considered.

Mike NMN
3 years ago
Reply to  Sonny L

Good point, maybe with a refinement that no one would take the insurance risk without a preexisting condition exclusion for the leg issue.

Shirtless George Brett
3 years ago
Reply to  Sonny L

This is the exact reason. It was reported by, I wanna say Sports Illustrated?

Having said that, Correa would be 40+ in the last years of these deals and its not like even a “healthy” Correa would be good value at that point. So it seems like a weird thing to totally blow up a deal over.

Basically they are saying they are ok paying tons in dead money due to a player sucking but not okay with the idea of paying tons of dead money due to injury. Which kinda seems like moving deck chairs on the titanic. lol.

Last edited 3 years ago by Shirtless George Brett
fjtorres
3 years ago

More likely they consider the ankle a ticking bomb that might go off *early*, making the bulk of the contract dead money, not just the tail end.

Shirtless George Brett
3 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Except it wasnt. The issue was that nobody wanted to insure a 10+ year deal with him. That was the hangup.

The twins presumably had no issue getting his contract insured for 6 years so the idea they were scared of his ankle giving out early doesnt track. It was the later years of the long term deal that was the concern.

Last edited 3 years ago by Shirtless George Brett
fjtorres
3 years ago

You’re saying the same thing, you know.
Basically nobody expects the ankke to hold up for 10 years, much less 13.
With the Mets and Twins only guaranteeing six years, they’re hoping for six but expecting five (hence the vesting for year seven, they see it as unlikely he goes all year six.)

That is less than half the Giants and Mets deals.
Pretty *early* in a 12+ deal.

Jeff in JerseyMember since 2020
3 years ago

I loved the idea of having Correa at 3B for the Mets. But as someone who used to complain about the way the Yankees spent, this seems an outcome that could produce a slightly better baseball universe. And now we can maybe see if Brett Baty is an everyday player.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff in Jersey

IMO I think Baty is going to hit. Not so sure about the D, though.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And if you like third basemen who can hit and not field, wait till you see Mark Vientos! With any luck one of them will figure it out.

Dmjn53
3 years ago

I don’t think even Mark Vientos thinks he’s a 3B at this point

butthole25
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff in Jersey

“If”? How dare you. Baty is the future face of MLB and a first ballot HOFer.

fjtorres
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeff in Jersey

And if not, they’ll bring in Machado for ’24.
Because that’s how they roll.
For now.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
3 years ago

I’m glad he gets to play SS. I wish Alex Rodriguez hadn’t prematurely switched to 3B

Dmjn53
3 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

That was particularly annoying though because it was at the expense of a clearly inferior SS in Jeter. At least Lindor is a premium defensive SS

sbf21
3 years ago

I am honestly shocked the Mets offer was so low. This is a real coup for the Twins. Even at max terms they tend up with Correa for less than the $285/10 they originally offered. A bit of a black eye for Boras.

Shirtless George Brett
3 years ago
Reply to  sbf21

I dont know how much you can blame Boras for teams getting hung up on something that probably wont actually matter.

I mean, plate in his leg or not, were they really thinking 40+ year old Correa wouldn’t be dead money?

Last edited 3 years ago by Shirtless George Brett
SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
3 years ago

I don’t think any of us can judge this until we see what happens. It’s safe to assume the Mets weren’t worried about the ankle in years 9 and 10, because as others have said, you don’t expect much at that point anyways.

More likely they’re worried it could be a problem at any point. Tomorrow, next year, 3 years. Their offer certainly reflects a very cautious outlook.

Shirtless George Brett
3 years ago

Everything I have read says the opposite. The hangup was that no one would insure such a long term deal (Giants or Mets) because they were afraid of what his ankle might be in year 10+ of the deal.

The fact that Correa signed a 3 year deal last year and now a 6 year deal this year with no problem re: insurance backs that up. Its the long term that was the hangup, not the short term.

sbf21
3 years ago

I haven’t seen that alluded to once. I even searched “carlos correa contract insurance problem” and found nothing.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago

This reasoning just doesn’t make sense, so I think the premise about insurance must be faulty. If the deal could be insured, it seems obvious that the Mets would’ve offered more than half of their original total value for the peak-years half of the contract, rather than sticking with the same AAV for half the length. The FanGraphs comment section isn’t the only place in the world where people have figured out that the annual pay in the back half of the deal isn’t “fair value” on an annual basis; every front office knows this too. (Okay, maybe not the Rockies.) I think it’s clear that the Twins just decided to take a bigger gamble on the medical risk than the other two teams.

fjtorres
3 years ago
Reply to  sbf21

The Mets offer basically sets the over/under on the ankle at 5 years and so does the Twins deal, hence the vesting option. If it pops in the sixth year, they’re home free.

D-WizMember since 2019
3 years ago

I greatly appreciate the consistency with which baseball writers writing about this latest deal have ended their articles with some variation of “pending a physical”.

Glevin
3 years ago

ZIPS hasn’t seen his physical.

Lanidrac
3 years ago

He finally passed! The Twins contract is official!

butthole25
3 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Twins fans must be thrilled, knowing how badly he wanted to get out of there

brokenarrowMember since 2023
3 years ago

Genuinely curious if Kevin Goldstein’s current role at the Twins and former role at the Astros was a meaningful factor in the Twins taking the plunge here. He certainly has seen a lot of Correa via both his major league gigs. I’m sure we’ll never know this level of detail, but I’m glad they are reunited, nonetheless.

rogue_actuaryMember since 2016
3 years ago

He probably has an eight figure net worth right now. $100,000,000 is nine figures.

dangledangleMember since 2024
3 years ago

The front loaded nature of the Twins contract also increases its relative value. He is earning significantly more over the first six years.