| 11:44 |
Dave Cameron: Welcome to the first chat of trade season. We’ll still do questions on all (non-fantasy) related things, but I’ll probably focus more on trade questions during July than in other months of the year. So, if you want to talk Ricky Nolasco, this is your big chance.
|
| 12:00 |
Comment From rja3If the Angels put Mike Trout on the trade market but insisted that the other team take Pujols along with his entire contract, how much would they get back? What if the team had to take Pujols and Hamilton?
|
| 12:02 |
Dave Cameron: Pujols isn’t worthless, so let’s say that the $210 million or so left on his deal is an overpay of about $100 million. Clearly, you’d pay $100 million to get 4+ years of Mike Trout, no question. Add Hamilton’s contract to the mix and you’re probably talking about another $50 million or so of dead money, maybe even $75 million if you think he can’t come back from this. That’s getting to the point where you’re taking on $40 million per year for Trout. He’s probably worth it, but it’d be close.
|
| 12:03 |
Comment From RomanHomer Bailey is a top __ starting pitcher in baseball.
|
| 12:03 |
Dave Cameron: 20, maybe 15. 10 would be pushing it. He’s good though, no question.
|
| 12:03 |
Comment From JayWho should the Reds get for LF? Is this still their biggest need?
|
Read the rest of this entry »