Cole Hamels Has Been an Ace So Far With the Cubs
If the pitcher for whom they traded went by a different name, the Cubs’ deadline acquisition of a 34-year-old starter with a 5.20 FIP, 4.72 ERA, and near-replacement 0.3 WAR likely wouldn’t have merited much attention. Even knowing that the pitcher in question was Cole Hamels, one could still be forgiven — in light of the left-hander’s recent track record — for a lack of optimism.
A couple weeks later, Hamels has produced three pretty great starts for Chicago. And while, when the Cubs’ traded for Hamels, there was some thought that a more friendly ballpark, better defense, and easier league would all benefit him — and possibly have benefited him — the fact is that he’s also just pitching a lot better than he did with the Rangers.
To get a sense of this version of Hamels versus the Texas one, consider the numbers from his average start with the Rangers this year relative to the three he’s recorded with the Cubs.
| IP | K | BB | HR | ER | BABIP | LOB% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With Rangers | 5.2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | .296 | 72.4% |
| WIth Cubs | 6.0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | .256 | 82.4% |
Between the relatively high left-on-base percentage and relatively low BABIP, Hamels has probably benefited from a little bit of luck — although the quality of the Cubs’ defense is also a possible factor here, as well. It’s also quite possible the change in park is benefiting Hamels, as he has yet to concede a home run with Chicago after giving up around one per game with Texas.
That said, Hamels has also struck out an extra batter and walked one batter fewer per appearance. That sort of thing probably resides outside the influence of mere environmental changes. And while it might be a result just of random variation, there is some evidence to suggest Hamels is pitching better in his last three games than at any time during the season.

Likely having no direct relationship to the change of scenery is the matter of Hamels’ velocity. As the graph below reveals, he’s throwing the ball harder as a Cub.

Hamels hadn’t topped an average of 94 mph per start since 2016. He’s alerady done that twice in three starts with the Cubs. Added velocity can only help Hamels. Even as he entered his 30s, Hamels put up good marks by this measure, averaging 93-94 mph from 2014 to -16. When he lost some velocity last year, however, his numbers suffered. When the velocity remained lower over the first half of this season, he continued to struggle. He’s throwing harder with the Cubs and, likely as a consequence, has done a better job of getting batters out.
It isn’t just the bump in velocity that appears to have helped Hamels, though. There’s been a change in approach, as well. The biggest difference for the left-hander in terms of pitch selection has been increased usage of the four-seam fastball — at the expense of his sinker, particularly — over the last two starts.

Prioritizing the four-seam over the two-seam seems to have slightly pre-dated the trade Chicago: three of Hamels’ last five starts for the Rangers have a similar disparity. Nor did usage change emerge in any real way during Hamels’ first start with Chicago, either. Over the last two starts, though, the four-seam fastball has been a lot better — and it isn’t just velocity. Hamels has changed the ball’s location, too. The heat map below shows where Hamels was throwing his four-seam to righties with the Rangers and now with the Cubs.

These images are from the pitcher’s perspective. One finds that, with the Rangers, Hamels threw his four-seamer middle and away; with the Cubs, meanwhile, he appears to be making a concerted effort to go inside against righties. Look at the first pitch of the game on Sunday night against Trea Turner.
It’s an inside fastball. Now, look at the second pitch.
Another inside fastball. Now look at the third pitch.
That one was way inside. Hamels then threw a curve down the middle that Turner fouled off. Here is the final pitch of the at-bat.
That pitch was clocked at 96 mph. Hamels threw four fastballs to Turner, and all of them were inside. The harder he throws, the more comfortably he can work inside without the hitter turning on the pitch. And while the sample for Hamels’ secondary pitches remains quite small, he seems to have thrown his changeup out of the zone a little bit more.

Whether this is signal or mere noise, it’s too early to say, but the Cubs’ version of Hamels looks like a pitcher who is attempting to induce more swinging strikes. So far, it is working: Hamels has recorded a whiff on nearly one-third of his changeups with the Cubs. That’s only a bit higher than with the Rangers, but Hamels has given up seven homers on the pitch this year, so pitching further down could help keep the ball in the field of play when contact is made.
Of Hamels’ 23 homers this season, 16 have come against either the change or four-seam fastball, and 22 of 23 homers have gone against righties. The narrative concerning Hamels’ departure from Texas for Chicago centered around the benefits of leaving the Rangers’ ballpark. While we shouldn’t dismiss that narrative entirely, there’s probably more to it than that. Hamels was probably just throwing too many pitches in the middle of the plate, and those pitches tend to get hit the hardest.
Simultaneously increasing the velocity on his fastball and getting the ball inside to righties seems more likely to help Hamels’ home-run troubles than a simply move to Wrigley Field. Keeping his changeup lower should have similar positive effects. A four-seam fastball on the hands and a change low and away leaves a lot of plate for hitters to cover. Cole Hamels seems to have made some early adjustments that have helped him succeed for the Cubs. It remains to be seen if hitters can adjust back. If Hamels is regularly throwing in the mid-90s and hitting his spots, however, those adjustments will be hard to make.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
The thing expected to Darvish -> to Hamels…
And Fall is coming… Cubs fronts are really good business guys..
I would think the fewer walk could easily be a factor of environment- not afraid to go after someone knowing the park will be fair in keeping the ball in the park(and actually higher strikeout rate could be a part of that as well)…
I do wonder if the trade rumors hurt him in those last few starts with Texas. Has to be hard as anything wondering where you’re going to be living in the next few months- with little to no control over it.
This move looks like it could easily be the move of the trade deadline.
Especially with Machado rolling out a Dodger-wOBA lower than most their starting lineup.
Never thought I’d be thinking:
“Man I sure am glad Cole Hamels is starting today for the Cubs over Lester, Quintana, or Hendricks”
on a regular basis, but here we are. Baseball is the best.
An often very good pitcher having bad year (well, a bad July…he was fine otherwise) has three good starts and gives up no homers. Not at all shockingly the underlying performance (location, velocity) during his good starts looks good. SSS for the win.
His next 3 starts aren’t exactly tough either…. @ Pittsburgh, @ Detroit, and Mets. The Detroit start will be interesting- considering what happened the last time he started there….
I think the most fascinating thing to follow with this resurgence if it continues is what the Cubs are going to do with his $20 million team option for next season. My understanding is the Rangers are paying most, maybe all of the buyout if the Cubs don’t pick it up, but the Cubs just need around 2.5 fWAR from Hamels to make it worth it and it isn’t unreasonable to expect this version of Hamels to put that up.
BUT, the Cubs owe Lester 27.5 mil next season, Darvish 20 mil, Chatwood 12.5, Quintana 10.5, Hendricks will likely get around 10 mil, Drew Smyly 7 mil, and Montgomery should get around 2 mil. That is roughly 90 million on the rotation. Keeping Hamels puts them at 110 million, for a very crowded rotation that could easily be ineffective/injured again this year. And it is no secret they plan to go after Harper/Machado while also looking to trade a few of their position players for another starting pitcher this offseason.
Honestly, as a Cubs fan I have no idea how they should handle this. My gut says you keep Hamels assuming he can put up decent numbers for at least a 4/5, hope Montgomery continues performing well and include him in a trade, you try to salary dump Chatwood on anyone who will take him (good luck), and hope Darvish can stay healthy and Lester/Q both rebound (Hendricks has been fine with a 3.38 ERA outside of a rough June).
If the Rangers are on the hook for that last year and don’t want to pay it, could they send a prospect or take some salary back from Chicago in exchange for the Cubs promising to pick it up? Is that something they’re allowed to do as part of a trade?
Is the $6MM conditional on it being used towards a buyout, or is it just $6MM slated to come from Texas towards the Cubs next year? If so, that makes it a $14 MM option essentially, from the Cubs’ POV. That would seem like a no-brainer.
My understanding is it’s not conditional. So the 14M is what would go towards the ‘cap’. It really is a no-brainer, if he keeps this up.
Which position player would get a good, cheap starter back? You’d have give up what the Pirates traded for Archer, or else take a guy with warts like Sonny Gray or Dylan Bundy. They might be no better than Quintana et al.
“Whether this is signal or mere noise, it’s too early to say”
That’s not true. Each predictive variable has a stability rate. In the case with Hamels, the sample size on things like locating his 4-seamer are too small to be a predictive signal yet.
Lots of pitchers have decent 3-game stretches, this new meme that Hamels is an ace is very lazy and seems to cater to low information fans.
I think the 3 game stretch that seems like a fluke is the one he had with the Rangers.
Start of season thru June 19- 3.41 ERA/5.19 FIP/4.29 xFIP
June 25-July 7- 11.81 ERA/5.03 FIP/2.46 xFIP
July 13-current- 3.99 ERA/3.26 FIP/3.61 xFIP
something, something Doug Brocail still has a job…