Crowdsourcing MLB Broadcasters, Part 2: The Central

Here at FanGraphs, we devote a lot of time to analyzing baseball. I flatter myself to think that our analysis, in some cases, helps shape the way you consume the sport. Measured in that way, however, we fall far short of the influence that your local broadcast of choice exerts. We may grace your brainwaves for a handful of minutes every day, but every time you watch a game on TV, the announcers are granted three hours to shape your view and enjoyment of the sport.

In fact, I would venture that no one group contributes more to your enjoyment and understanding of baseball than your most frequently-viewed broadcast crew. Despite that, it has been over four years since we last compiled a ranking of broadcast groups. Starting yesterday and continuing until tomorrow, we will post a series of surveys, one for each major league franchise. We will then use the results of these surveys to compile a comprehensive fan-based ranking of all television broadcast crews.

When you peruse the section for your team or teams of choice, you will find a link to a poll. That poll covers three categories, as well as an overall ranking. In addition, there is a separate space for any additional comments you would like to make. The eventual ranking of broadcast teams will be quantitative, but I will include relevant comments from this section in my writing of those rankings.

The “Analysis” score covers the frequency and quality of a broadcast team’s discussion of baseball. Of note, this doesn’t mean sabermetric or statistical analysis, though some broadcast teams certainly excel in that area. Rather, it covers all the ways in which a broadcast team attempts to inform viewers about the players on the field and the game situation they find themselves in.

Is a color commentator particularly adept at breaking down a hitter’s adjustments? That’s excellent analysis. Does a broadcaster mention a player’s DRS, then use that number without context to explain why someone is a good or bad defender? That’s bad analysis, despite its use of advanced metrics. This category’s score should represent how much you feel you learn about baseball while you watch the game.

The “Charisma” score covers the amount of enjoyment you derive from listening to the announcers. Does the booth’s camaraderie make you feel like you’re listening to a game with friends? Does an announcer’s wistful recounting of his playing days leave you in stitches? Do you find yourself just downright having fun listening to their stories? All of that is contained in this category.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The “Coherence” score was the most difficult category to name. It covers how well the broadcast explains the action on the field as it happens. Is the play-by-play crisp and informative? Do the announcers keep viewers abreast of the count and game situation in discussing team strategy? When a strange situation comes up, do they convey what happened and what it means for the two teams effectively?

The “Overall” score does not need to be an even weighting of each of the three categories above. It is simply a measure of how much you enjoy watching a broadcast. Some broadcasts excel at emphasizing their strengths, focusing on whichever qualities their viewers most enjoy. Others mistakenly emphasize weak points. All of this, and any other factors that influence your experience while watching a broadcast booth, apply here. One note: please do try to separate any feelings you have about the team itself from this rating. A club can have an excellent broadcast even if the product on the field often disappoints, and vice versa.

The second set of 10 surveys covers the teams of the NL and AL Central divisions. The West will follow tomorrow. Please feel free to respond to as many surveys you like, so long as you feel you have watched enough of the broadcast in the past two years to have an informed opinion about it.

One final note: the unique challenges of broadcasting during the COVID-19 pandemic have affected the composition of several booths. I have endeavored to list the most current information available for each broadcast team, but in some cases the personnel mix for 2021 may still be in flux, or I may have otherwise erred in compiling the list of contributors. If your enjoyment of a team is particularly contingent on a single broadcaster whose status for next year is as of yet unknown, please mention that in the space provided for additional comments in the survey.

AL CENTRAL

Cleveland Indians

  • Matt Underwood handles play-by-play duties.
  • Rick Manning provides color commentary.
  • Andre Knott provides field-level reporting.

Click here to rate Cleveland’s television broadcast team.

Kansas City Royals

  • Steve Physioc and Ryan Lefebvre share play-by-play duties.
  • Rex Hudler provides color commentary.
  • Jeff Montgomery occasionally provides additional color commentary.
  • Joel Goldberg provides field-level reporting.

Click here to rate Kansas City’s television broadcast team.

Detroit Tigers

  • Matt Shepard handles play-by-play duties.
  • Kirk Gibson and Jack Morris provide color commentary.
  • Craig Monroe occasionally provides additional color commentary.

Click here to rate Detroit’s television broadcast team.

Minnesota Twins

  • Dick Bremer handles play-by-play duties.
  • Justin Morneau is the chief color commentator.
  • Bert Blyleven also provides color commentary.
  • Roy Smalley and Jack Morris occasionally provide additional color commentary.
  • Marnie Gellner, Audra Martin, and Annie Sabo provide field-level reporting.

Click here to rate Minnesota’s television broadcast team.

Chicago White Sox

  • Jason Benetti handles play-by-play duties.
  • Steve Stone provides color commentary.
  • Bill Walton and Mike Schur will hopefully provide occasional color commentary.

Click here to rate Chicago’s television broadcast team.

NL CENTRAL

Milwaukee Brewers

  • Brian Anderson and Matt Lepay both contribute play-by-play.
  • Jeff Levering and Craig Coshun provide occasional play-by-play coverage.
  • Bill Schroder provides color commentary.
  • Bob Uecker may provide occasional Bob Uecker commentary.
  • Sophia Minnaert provides field-level reporting.

Click here to rate Milwaukee’s television broadcast team.

St. Louis Cardinals

  • Dan McLaughlin handles play-by-play duties.
  • Ricky Horton, Jim Edmonds, Brad Thompson, and Tim McCarver all provide color commentary at various times.
  • Jim Hayes provides field-level reporting.

Click here to rate St. Louis’s television broadcast team.

Chicago Cubs

  • Len Kasper handles play-by-play duties.
  • Jim Deshaies provides color commentary.
  • A dizzying array of guest color analysts includes Ryan Dempster, Mark DeRosa, Lou Piniella, Dan Plesac, Doug Glanville, Jason Hammel, Carlos Peña, Rick Sutcliffe, and Chris Myers
    Myers also provides occasional play-by-play coverage.
  • Taylor McGregor provides field-level reporting.

Click here to rate Chicago’s television broadcast team.

Pittsburgh Pirates

  • Greg Brown and Joe Block handle play-by-play duties.
  • Bob Walk and John Wehner provide color commentary.
  • Michael McKenry, Kevin Young, and Matt Capps may provide additional color commentary.

Click here to rate Pittsburgh’s television broadcast team.

Cincinnati Reds

  • Jim Day handles play-by-play duties.
  • Chris Welsh and Jeff Brantley provide color commentary.
  • Further broadcasting changes are expected this winter.

Click here to rate Cincinnati’s television broadcast team.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Blue ShoesMember since 2019
5 years ago

I have never seen a truer statement than “Bob Uecker may provide occasional Bob Uecker commentary.”

AaronsAronMember since 2024
5 years ago

This was difficult! I think the main issue is that myself, and likely many others, don’t have any reference point of which to go off. As a Reds fan, I watch almost all of their games (although I do miss some here and there). I can speak pretty well to how their broadcasting rates!

I do not see any other team’s local broadcasts, though, for obvious reasons. I see some nationally broadcast games occasionally, but they are few and far between and don’t provide too much reference. I would assume that it is similar for most other people as well.

I might say a broadcast is 7/10, but then if I saw another broadcast consistently, I might change my evaluation of the original product in relation. I’m sure this is something you are aware of already when considering the results, but it is definitely something I thought about when answering.

In addition to already being difficult to answer to begin with, the Reds present a bit of a unique challenge. The Reds broadcasts changed dramatically midseason when Thom Brennaman was suspended. I talked about it more specifically in my actual response to the survey, but there was a definite shift in the style of the broadcast, and I wouldn’t be surprised if that shift continues and develops more into the coming years as well.

I answered the survey attempting to grade the current crew (post-Brennaman), although it was difficult due to lack of sample size and trying to filter out the memories of prior to the suspension. I wouldn’t be surprised if their is some bias in the results from the Brennaman seasons, as it’s still so recent and difficult to separate in one’s mind.

Sam Lecure also went from being strictly a pregame/postgame show guy in the studio to helping out during broadcasts during the past season as well. I am not sure if that is supposed to continue into next year, or if that was pandemic and/or Brennaman related.

Less certainly, Tommy Thrall also did a few games if I recall correctly, although again the reasoning and the permanency I am not sure.

AaronsAronMember since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  AaronsAron

Sorry, it was a bit awkward to respond in the survey, as the box was small, there were no paragraphs, and I could only see a few words at a time. I apologize if my response seemed a bit disjointed because of that! I tried to give a reasonable response, though!

thestatbook
5 years ago

I put all zeroes on the Tigers out of protest until they bring Rod Allen back. Allen’s voice was smooth, and made me feel like I was watching the game with a friend.

BRING BACK ROD ALLEN, COWARDS!

PC1970Member since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  thestatbook

Rod Allen does have a great voice. Unfortunately, his actual commentary was very lacking. He espoused lots of 1980’s truisms like intentionally walking guys, bunting, etc.

That said, he’s much better when compared to Morris & Shep. (I.E, while his comments may have been behind the analytical time, at least he didn’t put you to sleep)

brettMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  thestatbook

The current Tigers TV crew is genuinely bad. I’ll overlay the radio broadcast or switch to the opponents’ crew almost every time 🙁

PC1970Member since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  brett

I would expect them to be near the bottom, if not in last place, of this exercise.

BryzMember since 2019
5 years ago

Fortunately (in my opinion), Bert Blyleven has been eliminated for color commentary for the Twins. I know fans love his stories and he can be entertaining, but his analysis has been repetitive for over a decade and loved to compare present-day players to guys that he played with in the ’70s and ’80s.

3cardmontyMember since 2025
5 years ago

Cubs easily have the best TV team in MLB. Hopefully they stop adding a third person which only encourages off-topic podcast-type commentary, the kind that pollutes every Cardinals broadcast. (I say this as a fan of the Cardinals.)

Psychic... Powerless...
5 years ago
Reply to  3cardmonty

Counterpoint: Cubs don’t have the best TV team in Chicago.

jillingsMember since 2020
5 years ago

I listen to far more games than I watch in the regular season. Will you do the same survey for radio?

mopete12Member since 2023
5 years ago

The best thing I can say about Underwood and Manning is that they could definitely be worse.