Despite Non-Tender and Big Struggles, There’s Hope for a Bellinger Revival

Cody Bellinger
Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

The 2023 free-agent market is crawling with former league MVPs. The recently crowned Aaron Judge is coming off one of the best position player seasons in recent memory. Multiple contenders have already checked in with 2020 AL winner José Abreu, who at age 35 is still quite a productive hitter. The 2011 AL MVP, Justin Verlander, is about to turn 40 but is nonetheless one of the top pitching targets available after a unanimous third Cy Young Award season. Andrew McCutchen seems to have played a thousand careers since his MVP win in 2013 and is on the lookout for a new home after playing out a one-year deal in Milwaukee. And then there’s the youngest of the bunch, 27-year-old Cody Bellinger, who was non-tendered by the Dodgers last Friday nearly three years to the day after his crowning as the 2019 NL MVP. The centerfielder was projected by MLB Trade Rumors to earn around $18.1 million in his final arbitration year in 2023; instead, with a high ceiling at a relatively low cost, he’ll be the archetype of a bounceback candidate wherever he lands.

Bellinger’s struggles since his MVP campaign have been well documented. After a mediocre follow-up season in the COVID-shortened 2020, his production dropped dramatically in ’21, as he hit .165/.240/.302 and was one of 16 players to finish with -1.0 WAR. He’s battled a string of injuries in that period, too, including multiple shoulder dislocations and a fractured left fibula, that led to missed time and a steep decline in contact quality and production; his wOBA fell from .414 in 2019 to .337 in ’20 to .237 in ’21.

Cody Bellinger Career Stats
Season Team Age PA AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+ WAR
2017 LAD 21 548 .267 .352 .581 .380 138 3.9
2018 LAD 22 632 .260 .343 .470 .345 120 3.5
2019 LAD 23 660 .305 .406 .629 .415 161 7.7
2020 LAD 24 243 .239 .333 .455 .337 112 1.4
2021 LAD 25 350 .165 .240 .302 .237 47 -1.0
2022 LAD 26 550 .210 .265 .389 .284 83 1.7

In 2022, Bellinger reversed the course of the drop in production, though he was still considerably below average offensively, with an 83 wRC+ and .284 wOBA in 144 games. On the plus side, his average exit velocity ticked up from the 48th percentile to the 57th, and he hit the ball harder more often, with his barrel percentage increasing from 7.1% to 8.3% and his hard-hit percentage rising from 30.8% to 34.7%. After dropping over six percentage points from 2020 to ’21, his contact rate bounced back from 72.3% to 76.0%. Yes, he was coming off a career nadir in ’21, and his ’22 numbers are still hardly reminiscent of ’19, but his improvements were not insignificant; his .047 increase in wOBA and .087 increase in slugging were each fifth among qualifiers. As far as he still is from his 2019 peak, he was a lot better at the plate this year than last, enough to swing him from a -1.0 WAR player to 1.7 in 2022.

Bellinger from 2021 to 2022
Metric 2021 2022
WAR -1.0 1.7
wRC+ 47 83
wOBA .237 .284
Barrel% 7.1% 8.3%
Hard% 30.8% 34.7%
Contact% 72.3% 76.0%
SwStr% 14.2% 12.0%

That he was able to produce nearly 2.0 WAR with a wRC+ of 83 underscores the value of a player like Bellinger. Ever since he made the improbable shift from first base to center field, he’s been a capable defender at a premium position. He’s graded most favorably by OAA, at +6 this season and +13 since 2020. UZR and DRS found him average this year but agree that he’s been a plus defender over his career in center, including during his Gold Glove 2019 season. Add to that some significant baserunning contributions — his 4.5 runs above average had him in the top 20 in the league this year — and Bellinger demonstrated an ability to generate value even when struggling at the plate. We may have seen his floor in 2021, but if he’s able to remain healthy and productive in the field and on the base paths, that version of Bellinger can be a useful player even if he never returns to the offensive force he was in 2019.

And that’s all before we consider the upside. The real temptation with signing a player like Bellinger is the chance, however slim it may seem now, that he’ll be able to return to his MVP form, or somewhere close. The further we get from that season, the more unlikely it seems; in August, Dan Szymborski noted that the projections gave Bellinger just a 65% chance of posting a wRC+ over 100 again. But given a change of scenery and some sense of a fresh start, there’s still room for adjustments to be made by the 27-year-old that could put him somewhere in the broad gap between the 1.7-WAR player Steamer projects him to be in 2023 and the 7.7-WAR MVP of three years ago.

One potential area of improvement: he’s still swinging the bat a lot more than he used to, which Jay Jaffe pointed to earlier this year as an indicator of pressing at the plate. His swing rate came down a percentage point and a half to 49.8% in 2022, but remained elevated from his 2017–19 average of 44.6%. His strikeout rate ticked up, and his walk rate continued to fall, hitting a career-low at 6.9%. Pitchers took an aggressive approach against him, tossing first-pitch strikes 60.2% of the time and putting pitches in the zone 42.7% of the time – the latter up 2.7 points from ’21. But Bellinger was much better at getting to those balls, improving by nearly four percentage points to an 80.9% contact rate on pitches in the zone. His chase percentage and swinging-strike percentage, meanwhile, came down after upticks in the last two seasons. All told, his plate discipline, and by extension his production, marked somewhat of a recovery from a rough 2021, and if he’s able to continue that more patient approach next season, that could yield more productive returns.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Another reason to take a flier on Bellinger? While it’s not easy to say exactly what kind of league-wide effect banning the shift will have, he has been one of the most shifted hitters in the majors for years now. In 2022, he faced an overloaded infield in 90.5% of his plate appearances, and his .302 wOBA in 52 PA with the shift off was nearly 20 points higher than his wOBA with it on. Nearly everything Bellinger hits on the ground goes to the pull side, and next season, teams will only be allowed two fielders to knock those down instead of three. Is this going to turn him back into the 47-homer MVP of 2019? No, but it could help a good baserunner get on base more often, and that’s added value.

Bellinger’s agent Scott Boras told The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal on Sunday that his camp has already received multi-year offers, but they’re more interested in a one-year deal to give him the chance to re-enter free agency at the age of 28, hopefully having reassured some teams of his capabilities. A team that signs on to a bounceback candidate like Bellinger for a contract like that might be looking for somewhat of a bounceback itself. MLB Network’s Jon Morosi reports that the Blue Jays, who recently dealt an outfielder in Teoscar Hernández, have interest in adding him to a righty-heavy lineup in a homer-friendly stadium. The Giants, who underwhelmed in 2022 after overwhelming in ’21, are said to be in the mix, too, according to the San Francisco Chronicle’s Susan Slusser. All in all, according to Jon Becker’s Free Agent Matrix, as many as nine teams have been reported to have some level of interest in Bellinger so far, just five days after his free agency was announced. That’s some crowd for a non-tender.

The broad interest in Bellinger’s services raises the question of just how much he can garner on a one-year deal. Per Rosenthal’s reporting, Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman explored a trade prior to the non-tender, which suggests that he won’t be able to reach what he would have in arbitration, but I think it’s reasonable that with such robust interest this early in the winter and a scarcity of capable centerfielders, he could end up in the $10–12 million range projected for fellow comeback candidate Michael Conforto and Michael Brantley, neither of whom seem to have excited as much chatter in the early days of free agency. Glove-first centerfielder Kevin Kiermaier is projected by Ben Clemens and our crowdsourcing to earn between $16–20 million over two years; given Bellinger’s offensive upside, he may get those looks first. Struggles aside, a 27-year-old former MVP is available on the open market for a reasonable price, and teams are taking notice.





Chris is a data journalist and FanGraphs contributor. Prior to his career in journalism, he worked in baseball media relations for the Chicago Cubs and Boston Red Sox.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
demilio
3 years ago

It will be interesting to see if he does get a 1 year deal. If I were a GM and had to pay for the potential that he might bounce back, I’d want to benefit from having him for longer than 1 year at a discounted cost should he actually bounce back. Or basically for the all the same reasons that Boras is looking for a 1 year deal are the reasons why a GM should want a little longer.

newsenseMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  demilio

Maybe a team option for a second year at a much higher price: $10M for 2023 and an option for $20M for 2024

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I don’t think it’s that complicated. Bellinger’s injuries took a lot out of him. The big question is whether the injuries have permanently sapped his athleticism and strength forever.

The secondary question is whether playing him in center field will continue to expose him to injuries and prevent a bounce back to (some kind of) form. But of course, unless he bounces back in a really big way the bat won’t play in RF or 1B. A league average bat with good defense is super valuable in CF, but barely passable in RF.

AlbyMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

To frame your comment another way, is it possible that the shoulder is still on the mend?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Alby

Yes. And “will it ever be even sort of fixed?”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I do think it is interesting that Bellinger is most heavily connected to the Blue Jays. Them, the White Sox, and the Cardinals are probably the teams the most in need of a left-handed bat but the Blue Jays are the only one that has an opening in CF (assuming that Springer is now an RF/DH, which would be totally reasonable).

I think the Blue Jays are probably the team best suited to offer him regular playing time in CF and also pay him. The Dodgers are probably second on the list, despite non-tendering him (since they have a hole in CF now). I’d say the Giants are probably third.

After that, I think the options get a lot less appealing. The Marlins or Royals should both be interested but there’s a lot of losing going on there and neither stadium is very hitter friendly. The Tigers seem committed to having Riley Greene in CF despite the long-term prognosis, and also there will be a lot of losing and the stadium swallows power. The Guardians and Reds are cheap, so it’s hard to see them as a fit there even though he makes a ton of sense. It’s hard to say how anyone’s swing plays in Fenway or at Coors, so they are kind of risky choices for pillow deals. The Mets would be on this list if they lost Nimmo, although I assume their first choice is to keep Nimmo and I’m not sure if they think Marte can still play there.

firegrowley
3 years ago

It is always interesting to me how his offense fell off a cliff the year MLB cracked down on sign-stealing. The Belli doth protest too much.

Last edited 3 years ago by firegrowley
Psychic... Powerless...
3 years ago
Reply to  firegrowley

Username really betrays lack of class.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
3 years ago

As a Brewers fan, I’d rather roll the dice every on 10-12 million for Bellinger than the 8.5M we gave McCutchen last year for 0.3 WAR in 580 AB.

jerpinkMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

The trade of Renfroe certainly opens a spot (a spot that most people are already reserving for Frelick or another young guy). Milwaukee is always trying to save in the long-term while competing in the short-term, and Bellinger fits that strategy (as did Mike Moustakis and Yasmani Grandal before him). It could also benefit Yelich. “Yeli” and “Beli” have had similar dips in production since pushing each other for the 2019 NL MVP, so maybe they could push each other on the same team. As a Brewers fan, I’m all for it.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

Okay but that deal for McCutchen was obviously a bad move when it happened. I think the question is less a comparison to McCutchen than it is to other plausible shorter-term moves this offseason such as Conforto, Justin Turner, a catcher of some kind (Narvaez? Vazquez?), another infielder in the case that they trade Wong (Longoria? Brian Anderson? Candelario? Most of these would be pretty cheap). I would have thought Jose Abreu or Josh Bell too but I think they might cost a bit more than Bellinger or any of these guys.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
3 years ago

I don’t think the bat is coming back, but I’d absolutely rather have him than Kiermaier (and I don’t think anyone pays Kiermaier $10m/yr, esp if you can get Bellinger for a similar AAV)

connjc
3 years ago

He needs to close those significant holes in his swing if he wants to bounce back. Maybe there’s a team that thinks he can do it and will pay.

marianosz
3 years ago

I hope he can bounce back to being a productive hitter. But I think that somewhere between the ball not flying like in 2017 and his shoulder issues his days of being really good are way behind him. He´s sacrificing everything for power, and that is not coming back with this ball. Maybe he can reinvent himself somewhere in the middle gorund?

AlbyMember since 2017
3 years ago

Is $10/yr. really “low-risk,” though? It’s not as if he’s been cut and somebody else is paying most of his salary, which is what I think of when I read “low-risk.”

Dmjn53
3 years ago
Reply to  Alby

I’d say so. $10m gets you very little in free agency these days. That’s in the neighborhood of what 1 WAR guys get paid

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

As with anything, it depends on your comparison point. If we’re comparing to Jason Heyward, I would say it’s not low-risk since he’ll cost almost nothing; if we compare him to Brandon Nimmo and his $100-$150M contract, then I would say it is.

I think it probably depends which other free agents are part of a team’s choice set alongside Bellinger. Given that Jason Heyward is probably broken forever and Brandon Nimmo just put up a 5+ win season, I don’t think any team will be interested in both of them to play the same role. But I could see either of them being in comparison to Bellinger.