Despite the Drama, Freeman Has Been the Dodgers’ Steady Freddie

Freddie Freeman
Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports

In the wake of Freddie Freeman’s starring role in the Braves’ championship run, the sequence of events that landed him in a Dodgers uniform was swift and shocking. Three months later, the 32-year-old first baseman still appears to be searching for closure, but for all the drama and the concerns about where his loyalties lie, he’s remained exceptionally productive even while the Dodgers’ offense has cooled off.

Freeman spent 15 seasons in the Braves’ organization, 11 as their regular first baseman (five times an All-Star, once an MVP), and last fall helped them win their first World Series since 1995. While most of the industry assumed he and the Braves would find a way to remain together once he reached free agency, on March 14 the team pulled off a blockbuster to acquire Oakland’s Matt Olson, abruptly closing the door on the Freeman era and underscoring that by quickly agreeing to an an eight-year, $168 million extension with the ex-Athletic. The suddenly jilted Freeman agreed to a six-year, $162 million deal with the Dodgers on March 16, returning him to his native California via the team that faced his Braves in the NLCS in each of the past two seasons. For as celebratory as the occasion should have been, in his introductory press conference Freeman described himself as “blindsided” by the Olson trade, adding, “I think every emotion came across. I was hurt. It’s really hard to put into words still.”

“I thought I was going to spend my whole career there, but ultimately sometimes plans change,” he said.

It didn’t take long for Freeman and the Braves to cross paths again. The two teams squared off for a three-game series in Los Angeles starting on April 18, with the first baseman punctuating the reunion by homering in the first and third games of the series and going 4-for-11 as the Dodgers took two of three. Not until last weekend did the two teams meet in Atlanta, providing the Braves with the opportunity to present the former face of the franchise with his World Series ring. Ahead of the ceremony on Friday, a teary-eyed Freeman said in his press conference, “I don’t even know how I’m going to get through this weekend,” and had to pause several times to collect himself when discussing his time with the Braves. After the team paid tribute to him, and manager Brian Snitker presented him with his ring, Freeman teared up again while addressing the Atlanta crowd:

It was, perhaps, a bit much for the Dodgers to stomach. In discussing the Freeman tribute with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Clayton Kershaw hinted at his teammates’ impatience when he said, “It was very cool (to see Freeman’s reception Friday night)… He’s obviously been a big contributor for our team. And I hope we’re not second fiddle. It’s a pretty special team over here, too. I think whenever he gets comfortable over here, he’ll really enjoy it.”

Freeman didn’t homer during the series but he he did survive the weekend, going 4-for-12 with three walks and an extra-innings RBI double in Sunday’s rubber match as the Dodgers again took two out of three.

On Tuesday, ESPN’s Buster Olney reported that Freeman’s lingering anger over the negotiations with the Braves led to him fire Excel Sports Management, the agency that represented him. Normally, agency moves are inside-baseball stuff, of scant interest to the general public except when a pending free agent signals his intention to play hardball by joining up with Scott Boras. But Freeman apparently has unfinished business. In a statement to MLB.com, he said, “Last weekend in Atlanta was a very emotional time for me and my family. I am working through some issues with my longtime agents at Excel. My representation remains a fluid situation and I will update if needed.”

Central to the drama is the blow-by-blow of the negotiations with the Braves. In ESPN’s telling, where Freeman’s ire was previously directed at general manager Alex Anthopoulous, after speaking with him he now feels that it was Excel and lead negotiator Casey Close who wronged him:

The Braves made a $135 million, five-year offer that was still on the table in the first days after the owners’ lockout ended. As reported in March, Close — the lead negotiator for Excel — contacted Alex Anthopoulos, the head of baseball operations for the Braves, and presented two proposals on behalf of Freeman significantly higher than that $135 million offer, giving the team an hour to respond. The Braves bumped their offer to $140 million, not close to Close’s proposals.

When that deadline passed, sources say, Close and Anthopoulos agreed that there were no offers on the table. The Braves — believing that Close’s deadline meant that Freeman was about to conclude a deal with another team, likely the Dodgers, quickly pivoted.

From the outside, Freeman’s relitigation of his final days as a Brave all seems a bit ridiculous. While there was possibly some miscommunication or misunderstanding before the Braves turned the page, that doesn’t mean that clear communication would have resulted in a deal given the monetary gap between Close’s proposals (reportedly one for five years and the other for six), Atlanta’s final offer, and the contract he received from the Dodgers, which with deferrals has a present-day value of “only” $148.2 million. While you or I can say we’d be perfectly willing to work for our second-choice employer for that kind of money or take perhaps tens of millions less not to do so, the decision isn’t ours to make.

Prior to Tuesday’s game, Freeman told reporters that he and Kershaw discussed the “second fiddle” comment and that “things are all good between the two.” Furthermore, Freeman said, “There needs to be closure. It’s time. I’m a Dodger for the next six years and that’s where my focus lies… I’m happy to be a Dodger.”

All of this is yet another reminder that players are human beings with real emotions rather than stat-generating robots. Yet when you look at Freeman’s slash stats and monthly splits, you’d be hard-pressed to make the case that this turmoil has affected him — and that’s with Freeman recently lamenting, “I haven’t gotten hot at all this year.”

Steady Freddie Freeman
Period AVG OBP SLG wRC+
2019 .295 .389 .549 137
2020 .341 .462 .640 186
2021 .300 .393 .503 135
2022 .306 .388 .486 146
April ’22 .299 .382 .468 142
May ’22 .306 .405 .486 149
June ’22 .310 .373 .500 146

His MVP-winning 2020 campaign aside (and remember, that was just 60 games, 13 fewer than he had played this season), Freeman’s performance has barely wavered in recent years, and he’s been extremely consistent from month to month this year. A closer look will show that his June walk and strikeout rates (8.2% and 27.3%) are out of line relative to his April and May ones, and that his monthly groundball-to-fly ball ratios have fluctuated, but still, that’s some impressive consistency. Even his Statcast data is clustered within a narrow range, 2020 excepted:

Steady Freddie Freeman, Statcast Version
Season EV Barrel% HardHit% AVG xBA SLG xSLG wOBA xwOBA
2019 89.7 11.7% 42.4% .295 .294 .549 .569 .387 .397
2020 92.4 14.7% 54.2% .341 .343 .640 .663 .456 .466
2021 91.4 11.5% 45.7% .300 .320 .503 .583 .379 .416
2022 91.5 10.8% 47.4% .310 .316 .486 .596 .377 .413
April ’22 89.6 13.8% 38.5% .299 .303 .468 .598 .372 .416
May ’22 92.7 9.3% 47.4% .306 .328 .486 .625 .381 .431
June ’22 91.6 10.0% 55.7% .310 .312 .500 .551 .377 .389
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

Freeman’s 2022 numbers are a ringer for his ’21 ones, and both are very consistent with his ’19 numbers. And that’s even while he’s among the many sluggers getting hosed by this year’s deadened ball; his 106-point shortfall in wOBA puts him in the 84th percentile among qualifiers. On a monthly basis this year, there’s some variation in his barrel and hard-hit rates, but all of his expected stats are still within a reasonably narrow range.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

For all of his consistency, it’s not unreasonable to suggest Freeman has gotten hot lately. In his past 12 games dating back to June 15, he’s hit .400/.474/.680 (220 wRC+) in 57 plate appearances. Via Baseball Reference’s Stathead tool, his eight highest OPSes over any 10-game span intersect with that stretch, with marks ranging from 1.133 (.385/.467/.667 from June 9–21) to 1.273 (.385/478/.795 from June 11–23). Meanwhile his coldest stretches more or less abut his hottest ones; he had a .455 OPS (186/.222/.233) from May 29 to June 8, and six other stretches with an OPS of .645 or lower with end dates stretching as far as June 12, which is why his monthly numbers are still on par with April and May. But even his hottest streak of this year can’t hold a candle to those from 2020 (when his 10-game peak OPS was 1.563 in September) or ’21 (when he peaked at 1.498 in July), and the same is true if you expand the search to 20- or 30-game spans. He’s set a high standard for himself.

If you’re looking for an area where there’s contrast between Freeman’s 2021 and ’22 performances, it’s in his results by different pitch types. On four-seam fastballs, for example, last year, he hit .336 and slugged .594, whereas this year he’s down to .296 and .418. His xSLG on four-seamers has dropped from .723 (his third straight season at .700 or better, including a .947 mark in 2020) to .543. On sliders, he’s dropped from a .322 average and .511 slugging percentage to .211 and .368, but in this case his xSLGs haven’t varied by as much (.505 and .449). On curveballs, he’s dropped from .273 AVG/.614 SLG to .231/.423, but there, his xSLG has actually increased from .593 to .633. Over the course of his career, there’s been a lot of variance in his annual pitch splits, which aside from four-seamers and sinkers haven’t exceeded 110 plate appearance-ending pitches in any season. In general, I don’t think we can read much into them, though over a larger sample, his results against four-seamers might hint at waning bat speed.

While Freeman has performed well in June, the Dodgers have not, splitting their 24 games to date as their lead over the Padres has been cut in half, from three games to 1.5. The team has scored just 4.08 runs per game this month, down from 5.51 in April and May. The loss of Mookie Betts to a cracked rib hasn’t helped, but he had struggled at the plate in the games leading up to his June 15 collision with Cody Bellinger, going just 3-for-39 with one walk and eight strikeouts. He’s hardly been alone, as Bellinger (64 wRC+) has slumped, and the season-long woes of Justin Turner (65 wRC+ in June, 80 overall) have continued. Neither Max Muncy nor Chris Taylor have been as productive as usual, though both have still been in the vicinity of league average, and the former is slowly trending upwards after dealing with ongoing elbow woes dating back to his season-ending UCL tear.

Long story short, for whatever distractions that Freeman’s saga may have brought to the Dodgers, they don’t appear to have carried over into his play. The NL West leaders have their problems, including the injuries to Walker Buehler, Blake Treinen, and Daniel Hudson as well as the erratic performance of Craig Kimbrel, but their big free-agent trophy from this past offseason isn’t one of them.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
4 years ago

Miss you Freddie 🙁

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Wonder if chipper and Olson are friends. Probably just isn’t the same.

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago

By the time deferred pay, state taxes & cost of living are included, I’m not sure the ATL offer wasn’t pretty close to what ends up netting in LA.

You wouldn’t necessarily expect a player to understand that (or maybe even care), but, his agents should have made sure he did understand it. Pure speculation, of course, but, if they didn’t, that may piss someone off enough to change representation.

Sure sounds like all things being equal, he would have preferred staying in Atlanta.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

If the Braves went to $140M and that’s where he really wanted to be, and then he wound up settling for $148M (in present day value) in (pretty much) the highest income tax state then it sure looked like his agents didn’t figure out the best place for their client. I would be pissed off at them too if I were him.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Cost of living? Freddie has never lived anywhere but Southern California. If anything, moving to the Dodgers lowered his cost of living. All those flights and other travel costs for his family are a thing of the past.

But that doesn’t matter. You don’t even have to get cute here. If the Braves were willing to give him $140 million for five years, then they’d have given him some amount more for six years (even if just $10 million) as that would let them spread the cost longer and obviously there is *some* value in Freddie’s 2027 season. Unless there is something else to the story, this is a major screw up by Freddie’s agent. You don’t need the minutia of state taxes or other fringe issues to see that.

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Don’t athletes pay state taxes on where the games are played? If so, Freeman went from 15-20 games a year in California to 100 or more.

I’ll bet that difference is a significant amount.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Not really. Georgia has a state income tax too, it’s just a little lower (also, my comment specifically was about cost of living consideration, not income tax). They also have higher property tax. I’d bet good money that Freeman’s desire and decision making process has nothing to do with a couple percentage points total in tax avoidance possibilities. A ~2 percent difference in effective salary could be made up in all sorts of ways, including quality of life considerations, endorsement possibilities, and living down the road from your home ballpark.

I think many of you are missing the main point of what Freeman wanted. He wanted a contract he deemed fairly representative of his contributions and he wanted to play in Atlanta. He wasn’t filling out spreadsheets with assets and liabilities like some accountant.

After all, there are tons of people out there who are not tied to baseball teams or anything else and could live anywhere they want and choose to live in states with higher income tax. It’s almost like people don’t live their lives on a spreadsheet.

Last edited 4 years ago by TKDC
Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

A little lower? It’s less than half of California’s

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I agree with your overall point, but it’s hard to avoid getting hung up on the details. So I’ll just lay it all out…

45 years ago, California passed a referendum (Prop 13) that capped how much property tax assessments could rise year-over-year at an absurdly low amount unless the property itself changed hands. The public messaging was around retirees not getting priced out of their homes. In practice, it fundamentally distorted a lot of market processes in CA. If you own the same house for 30 years you pay only a fraction of the actual value of the property. This, in turn, led to incentives to not sell the house, screwing up the housing market more or less permanently. And, consequently, it led the state of CA to impose income taxes far, far higher than any other state. It’s 2.5 points higher than NY and HI, 3.5 points higher than Minnesota or Oregon, and a whopping 7.5 points higher than Georgia. If you move from one state to the next, it’s

Given that Freeman already owned a house in Newport Beach and lived there in the offseason, he already paid the absurdly high CA real estate prices and is benefitting from the fact that the tax assessments on his house are considerably less than the latest surge in real estate prices would warrant. So that part didn’t change. And cost of living doesn’t really matter either given that he already lived in CA in the offseason, the largest cost for almost everyone (housing) is already addressed, and the fact that it seems unlikely that most luxury goods are much more expensive in SoCal than in Atlanta. But as far as I can tell, the taxes make it so that the actual $ number of the contract he signed in LA ($148M present day value) less than the $140M one he was offered in ATL, beyond any CoL concerns which are likely irrelevant.

Speaking of irrelevant: Potentially none of this matters since getting more money at his level of compensation for pro ballplayers is at least as much an ego thing as it is an actual how-much-I-get-paid, and also he clearly wanted to be in Atlanta. So sorry everyone, just had to get that out there.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That is basically a rewrite of exactly what I said (other than the history lesson).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Eh, I write stuff that other people on the internet don’t understand either. Best to roll with it.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I didn’t realize he lived in Newport. Getting from there to Chavez Ravine is a TREK. I’m also sure their practice facility isn’t exactly convenient either.

Last edited 4 years ago by dukewinslow
sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Apparently, he’s renting a place in Studio City for this exact reason. He’s from Orange County, although I’m not sure where.

Personally, if I’m renting a place solely to minimize my commute, I’d live in Silver Lake or Los Feliz and be super close. But I bet more of his celebrity friends live in Studio City. Gotta uphold the lifestyle.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Wait wouldn’t athletes (like any other person who works in one state and has permanent in another) be beholden to file tax returns in both their state of permanent residence and the state they work? Freddie has always lived in SoCal, even with the Braves, so he would be responsible for CA state tax (with what he paid GA tax being deducted as a credit) if he stayed in Atlanta.

So unless he moved to GA full-time, in his particular case I don’t think the amount of taxes he’d pay would really change.

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

That’s assuming he actually loved in Atlanta, I think I read that he already lived in California. Given that you’re really only spending 81 days a year in the city you play in, you really don’t need to live there

MikeD
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

I don’t believe there was any indication he wanted to leave. The Braves, for whatever reason, just moved on. Maybe the lockout created extra pressure time wise, and the Braves front office didn’t want to risk getting outbid by some other team for Freeman while watch as the A’s then trade Olson to another team. The lack of communication that seemed to be going on may very well have been caused by Freeman’s agents, although I’m just as surprised AA didn’t reach out directly to Freddie.

Freeman’s age was a huge part of the narrative, but in the end, Freeman’s contract takes him through his age-37 season, while Olson’s deal takes him through his age-35 season. Are those two years the reason the Braves tossed aside Freeman, and did so while also trading prospects? Not even bothering to take into account what he means to the fans and the team? I think Freeman’s hitting style will help him remain productive as he heads into his mid-30s. How Olson’s approach will age is more of a question.

I’m neither a Braves nor Dodger fan, so I don’t quite care where he plays, although as a baseball fan I do like “face of franchise” players. They make the game more interesting by adding personality to teams, so my preference was Freeman stay a Brave. I’m fine with Trout remaining an Angel, although it would be nice if they can build a team around him. I wanted Betts to remain a Red Sox. I want Judge to remain a Yankee. I don’t understand what happened in this case. More perplexingly, it seems Freeman doesn’t either.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

The Braves, for whatever reason, just moved on.”

If the ESPN article is correct, that reason is that The Braves made an offer, Freeman’s agent countered, the Braves upped their offer slightly, it was still not acceptable to the Freeman camp; with both parties agreeing there was no offer on the table, the Braves, worried that they would lose out on having ANY premier first baseman – made an offer to Matt Olson instead.

In other words it sounds like the Braves made at least two offers to their Plan A, but there was still a pretty wide gulf between their offers and what Freeman’s agent was wanting, so they were forced to move on to Plan B.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Clearly, the agents thought (1) they had an equivalent offer on tap from the Dodgers, or (2) the Braves were just bluffing and would come back to them, or (3) both. (1) is technically true in numbers terms but wasn’t what their client wanted; (2) was obviously false. In the end, the agents got their client a good deal, but it wasn’t the deal their guy wanted.

diamonddores
4 years ago

is Bellinger slumping or is he really just not a good hitter anymore? 2019 seems light years ago at this point

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  diamonddores

.647 OPS since 2020 with 850+ Pa’s. I’d say he’s just straight up bad now.

bigchizz
4 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Giants fan, so I watch Bellinger as an opponent a lot. It’s gotten to the point where I note his spot in the lineup as a soft spot when watching the game. He just looks completely lost at the plate a lot.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  diamonddores

I have a theory that playing the outfield has taken a physical toll on Bellinger that makes it so he can’t rotate with the same ferocity he did before (I also have this theory with Yelich). I wonder if Bellinger (and Yelich) would be better at the plate if he moved back to first base. But with Freeman there I think we would only find out somewhere else. Unless he DH’d or something.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Is outfield more taxing than it used to be? It’s an interesting theory, I just don’t know how to square it with other guys being really productive in the OF for a really long time. But it is crazy to see how the 2018 and 2019 NL MVPs (and 1-2 MVP finishers in 2019) have just fallen off a cliff.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

I don’t think it’s any harder than it used to be. I just think that (1) Yelich and Bellinger have some chronic injuries that have sapped their ability to hit like they used to, and (2) it’s quite possible that playing the outfield makes managing those chronic injuries harder. I’m about 90% certain on (1) and about 40% certain on (2).

That said, even if they would improve not playing the outfield, I don’t know if first base would be any easier for them or if they’d have to DH.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think what’s more likely is his shoulder injury that bogged him down in 2020 just permanently cooked his goose. Shoulder injuries in particular can do that with hitters

howieloader
4 years ago

We still love ya, Freddie. I will always cheer for the guy while hoping the Dodgers lose every game.

sweepcut
4 years ago

dude we get it you loved your time as a brave but you play for the dodgers now so quit crying and show some respect

Mike NMN
4 years ago

Interesting, so Freeman’s story is a non-story story. The Face of the Franchise thing only goes so far, and eventually this is a business and sentiment becomes secondary to dollars and cents. This is probably better for all three parties. Braves because they remain competitive and aren’t stuck with a longer contract than they felt comfortable with, Dodgers because they a star-centric and Freeman remains a legitimate star, and Freeman, for getting paid after losing a major suitor. Just play ball from here.

Dmjn53
4 years ago

I’m struggling to see why this is such a big story. Freeman is hardly the first star player to change teams, and he certainly won’t be the last. Freeman got $160m, the Braves got Matt Olson. Everybody won here

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago

You don’t fire your agent if the negotiations went the way you wanted them to. It is clear that Freeman, I am talking about Charlie, would definitely rather have his dad playing in Atlanta. This is all on Close and Excel.

JohnThackerMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Yeah, there’s a lot of words on all sides, and the agents are disputing the most explosive allegations, but firing your agents speaks much louder than anything anyone says.

miltonfriedman
4 years ago

Chipper-“Scott Boras brainwashes clients”

Anon21Member since 2018
4 years ago

It’s bad for baseball and the Braves that Freeman left. Decisions like this tend to weaken the bonds that bind fans to their teams. I definitely lay some of the blame with the Braves, who certainly could have afforded to extend a somewhat larger offer to keep a guy who’s meant so much to the team around for the rest of his career, but it seems like the agent also seriously screwed up.

Without much understanding of the NBA’s luxury cap or salary rules, I believe they have some kind of incentive for stars to re-sign with the team that they started with (or with their current team?). It would be to the league’s benefit to create a larger incentive for reunions in cases like this–the QO is clearly not sufficient. Allowing some portion of the salary to be deducted from the team’s luxury tax bill would be a decent start, although insufficient for the many teams who never get close to the tax threshold anyway.

68FCMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

The NBA allows larger max contracts for resigning homegrown stars so they can get more money from the team that drafted them than they can in free agency. It doesn’t really work as intended since it just causes more salary cap issues for the smaller market teams since they don’t have the cap room to build around the stars. Most of them seem to end up as either the star demanding a trade (which is more damaging than them just leaving in FA to the fans imo) or them getting dumped as an underwater contract (see Russell Westbrook or John Wall).

JohnThackerMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  68FC

The NBA is also in a situation where endorsement deals are worth more than the capped salary at the highest end (whereas the combination of less of a cap at the high end plus less endorsements makes that not true for MLB.)

So for the stars, the salary per se isn’t the top concern even if they do want to maximize income. But again, that doesn’t really help the small markets, because getting on a team in a big media market (and a winner) can be seen as a way to get bigger endorsement deals.