Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week, April 12

The biggest story in baseball this week might be Jackson Holliday’s call-up. If it’s not that, it’s certainly the news that Ippei Mizuhara is set to be charged on allegations, which were detailed in a federal affidavit filed Thursday, that he stole more than $16 million from Shohei Ohtani. Each of those are huge topics, with impacts that will echo through the game far into the future. But a lot of other stuff happened in baseball too this week, so let’s talk about pitchers playing defense and crazy baserunning, shall we?
Welcome to another edition of Five Things, a weekly look into the most entertaining or downright weirdest stuff I saw while doing my day job: watching an ungodly amount of baseball. As always, a big shout out to ESPN’s Zach Lowe, who started writing a similar column years ago and forever changed the way I watch basketball. This is a long one, so let’s get right into it.
1. Elly, Obviously
I mean, did you think anyone else was leading off here? Elly De La Cruz is the kind of player you’d create in a video game, and he was up to his usual tricks this week. You’ve heard about this one already, I’m sure, but he hit the first inside-the-park homer of the year:
If triples are the most exciting play in baseball, what does that make this? Incidentally, that play is a triple for almost everyone. It’s just that De La Cruz is so dang fast. He went home to home in less than 15 seconds, which is absolutely ridiculous. Set a 15-second timer and try to do something around the house. You probably didn’t get very far into what you were doing in the time it took Elly to get around the bases. Just watching him in motion is a joy:
Elly De La Cruz just went home-to-home in 14.96 SECONDS! pic.twitter.com/pTgIYsbPgj
— Cincinnati Reds (@Reds) April 9, 2024
You Aren't a FanGraphs MemberIt looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:✓Ad-free browsing✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles✓Historical & platoon projections✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps✓One-click data exports✓Customizable player-page dashboards✓Dark & Classic site modes✓Weekly Members-only mailbag✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review✓Optional homepage photo removal✓Gift articles to non-members
In fact, De La Cruz is fourth in the majors in average sprint speed so far this year. I mean, obviously he is! Look at him go. The only guys ahead of him are true burners: Trea Turner, currently chasing the record for most consecutive steals; Victor Scott II, who stole 94 bases in the minors last year; and Bobby Witt Jr., one of the best athletes in the majors. Of course, De La Cruz has way more power than that trio, with only Witt coming anywhere near Elly’s level of power.
Oh, right. He hit a massive bomb in this game too:
That’s what 70-grade power looks like: 450 feet, dead center. And I hope the Reds have home insurance because that wall probably needs fixing now. Pitchers are challenging him more this year because he cut down on his swing rate significantly at the end of last season, and he hasn’t yet adjusted by getting aggressive in the strike zone. When he does offer at something, though, he’s making it count. I’m not sure if his approach can stick, but I’m also not sure if opposing teams are going to keep letting him hit mammoth blasts while they find out whether their plan is sustainable. It’s pretty demoralizing to throw strikes to a guy who can casually swat them out of any park in baseball.
Oh yeah, he did this a few days later:
I’m almost at a loss for words on that one. He absolutely destroyed that ball to the opposite field. Across the majors last year, there were fewer than 40 line drives hit harder the opposite way, pretty much all by household names like Shohei Ohtani, Aaron Judge, and Giancarlo Stanton. This one was hit by the fourth-fastest man in the game. It feels vaguely unfair.
To be clear, it’s still not clear how well this will translate into long-term baseball value. De La Cruz is absolutely mashing so far this year, to the tune of a .318/.375/.659 slash line and a 171 wRC+ entering Friday, but he’s also striking out 35.4% of the time, with his line held up by a .458 BABIP. He looks worse defensively at shortstop than he did last year. But he’s only 22, and he just did all those things up above. I’m pretty excited to watch him try to put it all together.
2. Lamonte Wade, Grinding
Most of the plays that catch my eye in baseball are, by definition, eye-catching. They’re Elly at full speed, or defenders making diving stops, or anything else that makes you stop and stare for a while. But most of baseball isn’t those plays. It’s a long season, and most of it takes place without the bases juiced and the game on the line.
Monday night’s Giants-Nationals clash was one of those quiet times. The Nats put together a three-run inning early against Blake Snell and then piled on against the San Francisco bullpen. Washington took a 6-1 lead into the bottom of the sixth inning, with LaMonte Wade Jr. due up first for the Giants. This was squarely into garbage time; per our win probability odds, the Nats had a 95% chance of hanging on.
There’s not a lot of glory to be found when you’re trailing by five runs late. It still counts, though, and Wade never takes a play off. He faced Derek Law, one of those classic “oh he plays where now?” relievers who sticks around thanks to his excellent stuff but keeps bouncing between teams because of his inability to consistently locate it.
On this particular night, Law was on. He started Wade off with the kitchen sink, a cutter/fastball/changeup combo that ran the count to 1-2 in a hurry:
That’s a tough spot for a hitter, but Wade isn’t the type to give anything up. He switched into defensive mode and fought off Law’s next offering, a surprisingly aggressive fastball:
Wade’s game is heavy on batting eye and patience, built to take advantage of lapses in command from the opposition. That paid off as Law briefly lost command of the zone:
That said, the job wasn’t done. Law regained the strike zone and started attacking the upper third again:
And again:
And again:
Fouling these pitches off matters. Even that last one was too close for comfort. If you want to draw walks and stay in counts, you have to do it. But it’s not glamorous, particularly when the pitcher is hitting his spots. Wade is a great fastball hitter, but part of being a great fastball hitter is staying alive when you don’t catch them clean. Surely, Law would eventually break. And indeed he did, on the 10th pitch of the at-bat:
Hitting is hard! Most of what you do is drudge work. No one wants to foul off a bucketful of 95 mph fastballs when their team is headed for near-certain defeat. But if you want to succeed the way Wade does, by controlling the strike zone and ambushing occasional pitches with power, you can’t take an at-bat off. Law would have beaten plenty of batters on an earlier pitch, but he eventually threw a pretty bad one, 91 mph and with far too much plate. That’ll happen when you have to throw 10 pitches to the same guy.
That at-bat didn’t affect the outcome of the game even a little bit. Law retired the next three batters in order, two via strikeout. He threw another scoreless inning after that for good measure. The Nationals won comfortably, 8-1; no Giants so much as reached second base after Wade’s double. But even though this at-bat didn’t matter in the short run, playing like this in the long run is why Wade has been so successful in the majors. When the game is on the line, he’s Late Night LaMonte. When it’s the lowest-leverage situation you can imagine – down huge to a bad team on a Monday night in April – he’s still working as hard as ever. He’s a joy to watch in good times and bad.
3. The Duality of Corbin Burnes
If you watch Corbin Burnes’ mannerisms, you’re liable to get the impression that he’s a great fielder. This smooth catch against the Red Sox last Tuesday was a great, reflexive play:
His celebration was absolutely wonderful: He completely no-sold it. “Oh, me, catching baseballs? Yeah, that’s just normal, I catch ones like that all the time.” This is the self-assured strut of someone who habitually robs hits:
Burnes is a pitcher, though. They aren’t exactly known for their elite glovework. As best as I can tell, he’s somewhere in the middle of the league defensively. Pitcher defense isn’t particularly well quantified, but he looks average by those metrics, average to my eye, and a Google search for “Corbin Burnes defense” turns up a lot of people writing defenses of his pitching and no one talking about his fielding prowess. He was a Gold Glove finalist once, but didn’t win, and I’m not exactly sure how those awards work anyway.
Does he just act cooler than he is, so to speak? That was my impression after seeing that play; maybe he was just feeling particularly good that day and wanted to have some fun with it. I chuckled a little bit at the play – pitchers, what a funny group! – and went back to watching the game without giving it much thought.
But a few innings later, the ball found Burnes again in a much funnier way. This time, it all started with what looked like an innocent popup to second:
The sun was absolutely blinding at Fenway that afternoon, however. As it turns out, Tony Kemp had been completely bamboozled. The ball was actually making a beeline for Burnes as he stood unawares at the side of the mound. Even as Ryan Mountcastle and Gunnar Henderson turned toward the mound, Burnes sat there coolly. But then the ball got too close:
There was no audible conversation on the field on either broadcast, but I like to imagine Burnes giving a yelp as he got out of the way. It’s so classic. The ball finds you when you’re trying to hide, or trying to look more comfortable than you are. The guy who snags the line drive nonchalantly is also the one ducking away from a harmless popup that he lost track of. Also, he’s maybe the best pitcher in the game. Delightful.
4. On The Other Hand…
I know that I just got finished poking fun at a pitcher’s defensive chops, but we’re going to do another pitcher defense item. Why? Because Bryce Jarvis did this on Wednesday, that’s why:
Jarvis is the very definition of an up-and-down arm. He broke into the majors last year with the Diamondbacks as a long man, throwing 23.2 innings in 11 games. He’s back for more of the same so far this year – eight innings in four appearances. He’s not a star, nor does he ever look likely to be one, despite being a first-round draft pick, ahead of both Slade Cecconi and Brandon Pfaadt on the Arizona board.
Draft picks turn into guys like that all the time. You can’t run a big league organization without the Jarvises of the world, in fact. Those innings aren’t going to fill themselves. The teams who develop C-level guys instead of D-level guys just do better in the long grind of the season.
I’m probably digressing too much, though. Jarvis’ story isn’t particularly remarkable; first-round draft picks don’t pan out as often as you’d think. His athletic talents, on the other hand? They were on full display here. Elehuris Montero’s grounder was hit so softly that Jarvis had to be on a full charge to get to the ball at all:
But getting to the ball was only part of the problem here. It’s not like Montero can fly, but he’s not the slowest runner around either. He could smell an infield hit, too; those weak-contact grounders trigger something in hitter’s brains that says, “Get down the line and claim your luck.” Jarvis had to smoothly pivot from a mad dash for the ball into a throw. Or, well, that’s the theory, at least. In practice, Jarvis ended up with what I like to call falling-backwards-shotput form:

Pitchers miss these throws all the time. They miss them more often than not. Managers would prefer pitchers to hold onto the ball there, if I had to guess. An error seems more likely than an out there, and an injury – hamstrings are tricky beasts – is definitely an option as well. Jarvis is living on the fringes of the majors, though. Every game is a chance to prove himself or be found wanting. Every out makes an extended major league career more likely. Some of them are simply more spectacular than others. And while I’m on the subject, Jarvis should probably buy Christian Walker a drink after he absolutely flattened himself receiving the ball at first base.
5. Tim Anderson, Agent of Chaos
Housing costs in Manhattan are ridiculous these days. Whether you’re looking to lease or own, you’re looking at paying double the national average or more. In price per square foot, it gets even wilder. It’s not a problem for Tim Anderson, though, because he’s living rent free in the Yankees’ heads after Wednesday night.
Anderson didn’t figure into the early parts of Miami’s offensive attack; when he came to the plate in the ninth inning, he was hitless but the team was up 4-2. He led off the inning with an innocuous single to right. Then the fun started. The Yankees decided that Anderson was going to run. He’d swiped a base early the previous night, and this was his first opportunity to double up since then. Dennis Santana checked on him almost right away:
Two pitches later, Jose Trevino followed suit:
Bryan De La Cruz flied out on the next pitch, but the Yankees were still shook. Before the first pitch to Nick Gordon, Santana threw over again:
Then Trevino faked a back-pick:
Then Santana threw over again:
Now Anderson had the upper hand, but he didn’t take off. In fact, he almost got stuck in between, with enough of a secondary lead that Trevino took yet another bite at the apple:
That was almost a disaster for the Marlins. Anderson was just hanging out pretty far off the base, and only beat the throw due to a combination of a good slide and a missed tag:
Meanwhile, Santana completely lost track of what was going on at home plate. He walked Gordon on the next pitch, an uncompetitive fastball low. To make matters worse, Anderson got such a good jump that he would have stolen second easily even if the pitch had been a strike.
Now he was feeling frisky, and started dancing off of the base in Santana’s line of sight. It nearly led to a balk:
Anderson finally got a clean jump for a steal. At first, it looked like it might not matter:
But as it turns out, Anderson’s speed drove the Yankees over the edge. Take a second and watch Anderson, and you’ll realize that he took a hard turn around third. He was thinking about more than a single base, and when Anthony Volpe didn’t look him back, he went for it:
From an overhead view, things get even clearer. When Anderson took off, Anthony Rizzo realized he had to make a phenomenal scoop and also fire the ball home in a single motion. He went for it, but failed. Anderson had essentially conjured a run out of thin air:
Anderson is off to a pretty miserable start to the season. He was downright awful last year. But wow, he’s fun to watch, whether at the plate, in the field, or on the basepaths. I hope he continues to terrify opposing defenses for years to come.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Pitcher defense and the gold glove:
I know that the GG award is not held in high regard on this site, and that the award has been improved by being influenced by analytics.
If MLB coaches vote on the award, it seems as if pitcher defense is the most unreliable GG. It is entirely possible that a team, say the Mets, just does not see a certain Padres pitcher during the season. This is especially true when teams play more interleague games and therefore see their fellow NL or AL adversaries fewer times. And even if you do see a certain pitcher, he is unlikely to get a lot of opportunities to make an impressive defensive play.
Perhaps the pitcher GG was the most bona fide during the early years when there were only 8 teams in each league, no interleague play, and pitchers threw a lot more innings.
That said, I think it is awesome that Bobby Shantz won 8 GGs as a pitcher in season where he was mainly a reliever. In only one of those seasons did he start more games than enter as a reliever. I remember reading Keith Hernandez’s book and he mentioned that other teams knew not to bunt on certain Mets’ pitchers, and he included Jesse Orosco, a reliever. I wonder how much scouting information do teams nowadays have on the defensive abilities of various relievers.
Wow, Bobby Shantz is interesting. He is 98 years old and is the third oldest living former MLB player. He is the last Philadelphia Athletic and the last player to play for Connie Mack.
He was only 5’6″. I wonder if being short and left handed aided his fielding? The shortness might help him get those grounders. Being left handed helps him on pickoffs at 1b, but probably makes it harder to throw to 1b for the same reason why lefties don’t play 2b, SS, and 3b. However, Kershaw, Steve Carlton, Fernando Valenzuela, Max Fried (3) have won as lefties. Jim Kaat, Mark Buehrle, and Mark Langston won several. I guess it matters a lot less if the pitcher is a lefty as opposed to a 2b/ss/3b as the pitcher’s infield throws are usually not bang bang plays.
He won his first GG in 1957 when he was 31-32, as that was the first GG, and that first award was for both leagues. He played 7 full season before 1957, I wonder how many GGs he might have won had the award existed.
He won the award in 1962 with two NL teams, and in 1964 with three! It is a good thing he stayed in the NL. I wonder if any other player has ever won any league specific award while playing for three different teams in a season.
His 1964 stats look more than good enough to earn another year in the bigs.
Check out Effectively Wild episode 1848, they interview Shantz and it’s a great time
That was interesting. His mind seems very sharp, even though his body, understandably, is unable to move very well at his age.
Incredibly, he was under 5′ when he graduated from high school, but by age 20 he was 5’6″. In the mid 1950s, Tommy John surgery was suggested for him, but he declined it and was still able to pitch for almost another decade. Clearly it wasn’t called TJ surgery, but it could have been called Bobby Shantz surgery. The Phillies did ask for him to return in 1965, but he declined.
Shantz and Vic Power are good examples of guys who were unexceptional at other aspects of the game getting recognized for something they were really good at.
It’s situations like that Anderson play above where Volpe’s lack of arm strength comes into focus. A dude with a stronger arm can take that extra beat to check 3rd and still make a good play on the batter-runner.
That said, he does make a lot more plays than I’d expect from a guy who hovers around 25-30th percentile in arm strength.
The angle that clearly shows Anderson looking back at Volpe is phenomenal — it really shows just how much he was thinking about trying to scamper home.
I didn’t like the Red Sox defense 🙁
Tip of the hat this week goes to Tony Kemp, who made an incredible catch on a foul pop up all the way down by the tarp in the same Burnes game and was uncerimoniously jettisoned from the roster before the next game for Holliday, but responded by sharing an anecdote about when he first met Holliday when he was in college and wished him luck.
6) Mason Miller making Corey Seager look like an overmatched little leaguer with multiple 103 MPH heaters.
i saw the end of that game and it got my blood pumping. the kid is legit.
he will blow out that arm in less than 2 years.
I dont know whether to downvote because it is sad or upvote b/c probabilistically seems true.
Frelick has not played centerfield in a game since the above miscue and has really looked more suited to a corner all year. Hitting well, though, and has to play somewhere. Will it be him or Perkins tonight? I’m interested to find out.
Brewers ended Chourio’s experience (development?) in CF before it even began. Disappointing, and that decision is giving off a rather “permanent” vibe.
Ben, I thought you were into trading or whatever so I’m surprised you can’t cut bait on EDLC. His contact rates and hit angle scream regression. Oh and he’s on pace for over 60 errors. This is a sell, not a hold or a buy.
Don’t worry, there will be a lot of chances to discuss the more frustrating aspects of his game. He is going to have weeks where he is incredible and weeks where will look terrible. When you strike out that much and walk that little, your game is going to be volatile.
I’m not sure why we can’t just enjoy ELDC. No one has had an original take on the guy in a calendar year, so why not just enjoy the fun baseball stuff? And it doesn’t seem like we do this to anyone else – we can enjoy other non superstar players without having to give caveats of, ‘we’ll this was cool, but don’t you know he really sucks?’ It’s tiresome. And not great for a game that desperately needs to get attention for things other than cheating scandles and gambling related arrests.
I don’t think it’s possible for anyone who enjoys watching baseball to have anything but a deep love for EDLC.
I guess those who view the games as an unfortunate necessity before their spreadsheets update might view things differently.
I’m not in love with the guy. But I do side eye anyone who is “anti” de la Cruz.
Back to my spreadsheet, apparently, because I don’t love Elly.
I can’t speak for others (I’m only ambivalent about EDLC) but I do get tired of people saying that a guy is the next big thing when I think they are wrong. I think I’m ambivalent about Ke’Bryan Hayes for the same reason. I don’t have a real reason to dislike either one, I just think it’s not as big a deal as others seem to.
He is fun to watch, but there’s some fatigue in the constant attention he gets despite not translating his huge tools into star level production (yet?)
Elly’s .328 xWOBA is not super inspiring, despite his .443 wOBA. I never expected to be the Bobby Witt guy, but I guess I am, because he has a .501 xWOBA to go with his ridiculous batting line and is just as fast.
While I appreciate the point that we should just enjoy EDLC, people who care a lot about a thing (the term used to be “nerd” before the 2010s appropriated and expanded the term beyond all recognition for the purposes of capitalism) find the misguided enthusiasm of hoi polloi annoying. It’s an iron law of pop culture.
I try to fight the impulse, but I can’t blame people who really know something about what makes a baseball player valuable for rolling their eyes when a “casual” gets excited about something so superficial.
The problem isn’t the “casual” getting excited about something superficial. The problem is that the exciting thing isn’t valuable.
Basketball before the shot clock and 3 point line placed a far greater emphasis on giant centers overpowering hapless opponents. The “outside shot”, even say 18′ was considered a bad shot. Stephen Curry would have been shouted out of the NBA or relegated to “instant offense” off the bench status. Dunking used to be illegal since it meant touching the ball within the cylinder above the rim.
NFL rules used to value “3 yards and a cloud of dust”. The passing game, and especially running quarterbacks were silly. Josh Allen would have been comparable to Bobby Layne.
Baseball needs to encourage a more entertaining game if it’s going to compete long term.
Agreed on all of this.
I follow golf & Scottie Scheffler is the best player right now. Why? Because he hits his drives in the fairway & then hits his irons within 10-15 feet & makes about 30-40% of those putts, so he ends up 4-5 under par. Rarely the longest drive, rarely out of place, rarely OB, rarely needs a miraculous recovery.
It’s boring..but, that’s how you win.
I know baserunning generally isn’t super valuable from an analytics perspective but there are few things more fun than watching a baserunner conjure a run out of thin air. Particularly impressed by TA’s dive back into first on Trevino’s second back pick attempt, from the second angle you can clearly see that he realized he was probably cooked with a normal slide and adjusted to slide to the outside, that’s the only reason Rizzo’s tag missed. Just a supremely athletic, high baseball IQ play (and this is coming from a guy who cheered for Jose Ramirez last year haha)
Last night I realized that baseball hadn’t had a guy with at least 500 career steals since Ichiro retired in 2019. You might say Jose Reyes, who retired in 2018, is really the last guy as Ichiro stole zero bases in 2018 and 2019 and didn’t really deserve to be in the majors those years, as they were more like favors from Seattle. Only 17 games.
Starling Marte is the current active leader with 341. Jose Altuve and Trea Turner are at 293 and 264. I think that baseball will go the entire 2020s without a guy with 500 steals.
Even with enlarged bases and fewer pickoff throws, perhaps the “500 Steal Club” is just closed.
Just looked it up and learned two things: the 500 steal club is a lot bigger than I expected, and you’re definitely right about it potentially being closed. It seems like the active guy with the best chance to get there one day is Acuna. Already has 184 at just 26 but he could follow the Mike Trout trajectory of just not stealing bases anymore in a few years. I hope he keeps it up and the new rules continue to stimulate base stealing.
If I had to bet, I would bet there will be no new additions to the 500 steal club. It could be for the next 20 or 30 years or whatever.
Young blazers will steal a lot because it is fun, but once they reach age 30 or so, they will stop as it is the thrill wanes. They become less adept at it, it is kind of a pain, it is an injury risk, it isn’t that important baseball-wise, and it does not really help your HOF case that much.
There are 39 members of this club, which does seem high. It seems high because there a lot of 19th century players, and joining this club is not seen as that big of a deal. It is probably the most arbitrary “club” as joining it does not mean much, it certainly does not signify HOF worthiness.
Sez me: Ichiro Suzuki was the last member of the 500 stolen base club. Had the 2019 Mariners not opened that season in Japan, Ichiro would have shared that honor with Jose Reyes, who unlike Ichiro, was stealing bases until the end.
Wow. I just disagree with pretty much this entire take.
Steals aren’t important baseball-wise? I’m not sure this justifies a response, but of course they are. They can be, and often are, the difference between winning and losing a baseball game. They equate to actual, measurable on-field production. They lead to production that isn’t quantifiable yet, like TA above, or any time a pitcher is as worried about the base runner as he is the batter. MLB literally just changed a rule so the pitcher can’t throw over too often, so I don’t think saying they aren’t important baseball-wise is correct at all.
We’re not far from seeing Tim Raines elected to the HOF on the strength of his steals. Lou Brock got in for no other reason. Much was made about Barry Bonds reaching 500/500. Apariciodoesn’t get in without them. Probably the biggest reason that Lofton is seen as such a snub is because of the stolen bases.
I don’t know who pissed in your Cheerios but your entire post seems unnecessarily pessimistic and dismissive, besides the fact that it’s just not accurate.
Not reading his post as particularly controversial or pissy. I think he’s framing the “inaccurate” viewpoints as the perspective of younger MLB players, not as absolute truth. Though I could be wrong.
Bobby Witt Jr. has a good shot to get there, though probably not in the 2020’s. Acuña does too.
CJ abrams is on his way to 500. He might not do it as a star, but he seems like he has a very solid shot to get there.
You never know, and Abrams only has 57 career SBs. He might just stop stealing in volume like Mike Trout did.
The fact that something that is “super fun to watch” isn’t “super valuable” is a problem for a spectator sport. I can appreciate LaMont Wade fouling off 400 pitches and wearing out Derek Law (which rhymes with Brandon Lowe but not Josh Lowe), but a sport where that aspect valued so much more highly isn’t as “fun”.
Watching Corbin Burnes is just so much fun. He’s such a gamer and it’s been a blast so far to have him on my favorite team.
EDLC as a more extreme version of Jonathan Villar was not something I would have predicted. I thought his power was going to be the carrying tool but it’s definitely the speed.
The Anderson section is peak storytelling.
And is one more good thing to happen to him than to the entire White Sox organization this year.
What am I missing re: the Burnes defense?
It looks like he was hanging in, tracking the ball, and bailing as soon as someone clearly called him off.
yeah, Ben’s analysis there doesn’t make any sense to me
You just posted an article a few days ago saying the average throw overs per game is 1.9 and then you post the Anderson sequence.
1.9 can’t be right
Greg Maddux won like 18 gold gloves, they just kept giving it to him, but there’s a blip in the data. Mike Hampton wins one during a year in which he overlapped with Maddux on the Braves’ pitching staff. I think there have been some changes to how the GGs are awarded because of major gaffs by the writers in the past. One year, I think it was 1999, they gave the AL 1B GG to Palmeiro who played all of 28 games at first: https://assets.espn.go.com/mlb/news/1999/1109/161388.html. He cashed a check for like 50k in his contract and said something along the lines of “I have no idea what those guys [the writers] were doing…yeah I’m gonna cash the check.”
I used to love watching Tony Campana absolutely disrupt opposing pitchers, bouncing back and forth.
Base stealers need to be doing a LOT more of it.
It’s unacceptable they do not.
Elly feels like a more hyped Franchy Cordero. Statcast toolshed with some big red flags. Hope he works out because the flashes are exciting but the concerns are real.
Physically there are some comparisons, but Franchy Cordero was poor (in the professional baseball context) at almost all baseball skills.
EDLC is really more like a cross between Byron Buxton and Jonathan Villar, both of whom have excellent physical gifts, and who have had good times and frustrating times. He’s got so much power and speed (like Buxton, and to a lesser extent Villar) and his running instincts are excellent (much like Villar, but faster). But his bat control is really, really bad, like Villar and to a lesser extent Buxton. His launch angle this year 2.2, which 188th out of 195. Last year it was 3.6, which was 208th out of 212 (minimum:400 PAs).
(He can also play shortstop, but badly, like Villar)
Some of his strikeout issues are pitch recognition / approach / stuff that can be fixed, and probably will get better some extent. But I think he’s always going to find a good balance between making contact and hitting the ball at a good angle.
Great article. Typically intelligent and engaging writing from Clemens.
I know that’s often how official scoring does it these days, but how is that de la Cruz hit not a single and a three-base error? We don’t give players doubles when a ground ball goes under the 3B or 1B glove. That’s a fairly routine single played into a “home run”.
Regardless of scoring, it’s fun to watch.
Feels a bit like the scorer got caught up in the moment but it’s also probably wrong to attribute all three bases to the error either.
In the first gif of Elly’s bomb, look at the kid in the front row. Not only does he pop up in celebration instantly on contact, he seems to be leaning forward/getting ready to pop up even before the swing occurs. He saw that meatball.
Was anyone else surprised that after Elly De La Cruz’s hit got past the center fielder, that they would have even made the play at home as close as it was?