Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week, August 11

Cavan Biggio
David Richard-USA TODAY Sports

Another week, another chance to look around baseball and see something that amazes you. That’s part of what I love about the game: weird and wonderful things are always happening. As always, I noted a few that particularly tickled my fancy, and now I’m going to write a bunch of words about them in the hope that you like them too. Shout out, per usual, to Zach Lowe, who came up with this idea for a column years ago and became my favorite basketball writer as a result. Let’s get going.

1. Cavan Biggio’s Instinctual Brilliance
When the Jays’ trio of legacy-admission prospects were breaking into the majors, I was highest on Cavan Biggio relative to industry consensus. I’ve definitely been wrong in that assessment. Bo Bichette and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. turned into stars, but Biggio is more of a luxury backup. He can play a lot of defensive positions, but none of them particularly well, and he’s a league-average hitter. That’s a perfectly serviceable addition to your team, but it’s hardly going to set the league on fire, and he’s been worse than that in 2023.

But my Biggio crush is still around, and you better believe that I’m going to highlight his fun plays. Let’s set the scene: Monday night in Cleveland, a scoreless game in the top of the eighth. Biggio drew a start at second base, and with Daulton Varsho on first, he clubbed a no-doubter to dead center to give the Jays a 2–0 lead. Hey! Biggio heads, unite, he’s back in business.

But the Jays couldn’t keep that momentum going. The Guardians came out swinging in the bottom of the inning. With one out, they hit three straight singles to cut the lead to 2–1. The situation was precarious for Toronto: first and third, one out, and perhaps the ideal batter coming to the plate in Steven Kwan.

Kwan doesn’t strike out. He’s hard to double up. If you want to score a run from third with less than one out, those are the exact skills you need. The Jays were going to need something special to hold onto the lead Biggio had given them. And what do you know, they got something special:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Off the bat, I thought there was little chance of that ball turning into a double play. It wasn’t hit hard enough for a throw to second to get back to first base in time. Kwan was booking it down the line. The old standard — throw to first, then get Bo Naylor in a rundown — wouldn’t work, because it would allow the run to score. You have to record the third out on a force play to stop the run from counting.

Biggio knew all that before the play; years of practice and experience make major leaguers pretty good at those kinds of things. But he probably hadn’t turned a double play quite like this one before. Luckily, the path he took to the ball pointed him in the right direction. Look at poor Naylor, frozen like a deer in headlights thanks to the conflicting demands of avoiding a tag and avoiding a forceout:

Only one play could prevent the tying run from scoring, and Biggio didn’t hesitate. He ran a direct line to first base, adjusted to tag Naylor out, and beat Kwan by half a step to turn a virtuoso double play and preserve the lead. Ninety-nine times out of 100, that play turns out differently; the Guardians almost always get a run in, somehow. But Biggio’s moment of brilliance stymied them. He knew it, too:

2. The Greatest Showman
Baseball is entertainment, and Julio Rodríguez knows it. This item isn’t a lot more complex than that. Tuesday night, Fernando Tatis Jr. laced a ball to deep center. Rodriguez went back. The ball was in that perfect gray area where only a spectacular catch could prevent a home run, but a spectacular catch was at least possible. And then:

Did he catch it? Julio wasn’t saying. He came down and took a few nonchalant steps, the disappointment starting to creep into his gait:

We’ve all seen that reaction before. Oh well, he missed it. Tough play, them’s the breaks. Logan Gilbert, who had surrendered the blast, stalked around the mound looking upset. Tatis broke into a home run trot. But wait! Rodríguez had something to add:

What a delight — at least, if you’re not a Padres fan. That cheeky grin, that sly reveal; the play was impressive enough, but the presence to play up the drama afterwards is spectacular. I want my baseball to be fun, and it’s hard to imagine it being much more fun than that. More sleight of hand, please. More Julio doing pretty much anything, please.

3. Announcers Discussing No-Hitters
As you might have heard, Michael Lorenzen threw a no-hitter on Wednesday night. Since time immemorial, a no-hitter has come with a superstition: don’t talk about it. That’s more of a players in the dugout thing, but announcers are often former players, which means they carry on the tradition all the same. It leads to a lot of amusing moments where one announcer obeys the unwritten rule while the other doesn’t.

The first example: John Kruk, naturally. In the eighth inning, play-by-play man Tom McCarthy noted that this was the deepest Lorenzen had gotten into a start without allowing a hit. Kruk, normally loquacious, went silent for fifteen seconds. After a pause, McCarthy cut back in. “Hey, why are you looking at me like that?” he prodded Kruk.

“You know, I try to help you and educate you, and it just falls on deaf ears,” Kruk finally responded. He didn’t even say what he meant; the meaning was implied. You can’t say anything about the fact that there are no hits. It’s a rule! You could feel Kruk’s indignation in his delivery. He carefully avoided saying anything else, McCarthy let the matter drop, and the rest is history.

I got a giggle out of that, but I wouldn’t be writing about this if it weren’t for another example. Tuesday night, Mets minor leaguer Mark Vasil took a no-hit bid into the ninth inning. Now, I won’t lie to you: I watch a lot of baseball, but I’m not watching the Syracuse Mets on a random Tuesday night in August. But you know who does keep tabs on what’s going on in Syracuse? The big league broadcast.

When Vasil finished the eighth inning, field level reporter Steve Gelbs hopped onto the broadcast to deliver an update. “I’m back for something that people will get very angry with me if it changes,” he noted, and you could tell right away what was coming next. “Through eight innings in Triple-A, Mike Vasil… let’s just say, he has not allowed something.”

Gary Cohen took the bait immediately. “Like a hit?” Gelbs toed the party line, though. “I didn’t say it!” he exclaimed, and refused to discuss it any further. The big league Mets inning ended shortly after that, which cut the discussion off there, but you could tell the whole booth was ready to pile on Cohen, and maybe needle Gelbs a bit in the bargain.

Vasil didn’t complete his no-hitter, and Cohen noted it in the next inning. Gelbs had a retort ready. “Hey, you said the no hits thing, I didn’t,” he cracked. The Mets booth being what it is, they managed to stretch the bit out into a long back-and-forth between Gelbs and Keith Hernandez, but that’s just a regular Tuesday night for them. The no-hitter whispering is less a Mets special and more something woven into the fabric of the game.

I completely understand not mentioning a no-hitter in the dugout. The guy throwing the no-hitter needs to concentrate on pitching, not thinking about history. It’s always funny to me when announcers get in on it, though. Clearly, they aren’t affecting the outcome. Baseball is just a game of superstition, I suppose. This one in particular always gives me a good chuckle.

4. Sneak Attack Fastballs
You hear a lot about ambush hitters. I bet you know exactly what I mean when I say those two words together: a hitter sits on a particular pitch in an advantageous count, and when it comes, they attack. Maybe it’s a first-pitch fastball, or a 3–0 fastball — okay, it’s probably a fastball. But either way, it’s a popular idea, and a fun one: you get some awesome highlights that start with fastballs with hit-me signs on them.

I love watching strikeouts, so my interests also run in the opposite direction. I love when pitchers weaponize that crushable fastball by throwing it in unexpected counts. It’s a visual spectacle; here comes the perfect pitch to hit, and the batter pins the bat to their shoulder and watches it fly by. It’s even better if it’s a strikeout.

Watch Zach Eflin cook:

Phil Bickford can do it, too:

Poor Christopher Morel was giving Mets pitchers target practice:

I could keep going with these all day. Everything in this segment happened in the last week. Here’s a lollipop that Robert Stephenson lobbed past Jake Rogers:

Logan Allen threw a 91-mph fastball past the Home Run Derby champion like it was nothing:

Look, maybe you’re not a baseball weirdo like me. Maybe you want to see colossal home runs and nasty curveballs that scrape the clouds before bouncing in the dirt. There’s just something about seeing a pitch in the most hittable location in baseball and watching professional hitters freeze in their tracks even though they know there are two strikes. I’m not saying this is a good strategy, but it’s one I’m always happy to see.

5. Just Throw Strikes
You’ve heard it. A reliever comes out of the bullpen wild, falling behind the first batter 3–0 and eventually walking him. He gets behind 2–0 on the next guy. “Hey, throw strikes!” Some wise guy in the crowd will inevitably yell it. Obviously! The pitcher isn’t out there trying to miss the strike zone. They just can’t get a feel for their pitches.

It’s surely a miserable for that reliever. You know you’re going to hear it from the crowd. You know your team is thinking it, too. But somehow, you can’t execute. Maybe you slept poorly the night before, or got a foot cramp jogging out to the mound. Whatever it is, your command is gone, and the game shows no mercy.

The Brewers had one of the worst versions of this nightmare I’ve ever seen on Tuesday night. The Rockies loaded the bases against Andrew Chafin with nobody out thanks to a walk and a bunt single. Then, the bad times started:

Two walks in three batters, including four straight balls with the bases loaded? Gross. It was time to go to the bullpen and let Chafin hit the showers. No big deal, happens to everyone once in a while. One run isn’t a disaster with the zombie runner in effect. Even two runs isn’t disqualifying. The reinforcements could hopefully pick Chafin up.

Only, uh, Abner Uribe came in and racked up a pitch timer violation before throwing his first pitch. That’s not exactly how you’d draw it up at home. He followed that up in a way that you probably predicted based on the name of this item:

Oof. Just, oof. It’s cruel to bring a reliever into the game with the bases loaded, and particularly cruel to do it to someone with Uribe’s questionable command. This game was getting out of hand quickly, and there were still three outs to scrounge up. Surely, Uribe could turn things around against Ryan McMahon:

Whoops. Three runs home on 12 pitches is not how you draw it up in the clubhouse. The Milwaukee crowd was shellshocked; a few boos rained down, but mostly there was just stunned silence. Uribe recovered to throw a strike on the very next pitch, to a huge roar from the fans, but it was too late. Milwaukee lost, 7–3. Just throw strikes, indeed.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahoney
2 years ago

Logan Gilbert’s cardiologist strongly dislikes #2!!

Also, is there a better old school/new school name than Abner Uribe?

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago

Ask the Padres how they feel about throwing Mookie Betts a strike on 3-0 with the bases loaded last week

frankenspock
2 years ago

My favorite part about that was Lugo claiming the Dodgers were stealing his signs. My man, you just lobbed a ball middle middle to a man who sees baseballs arrive in slow motion.

andrewpaulMember since 2026
2 years ago

The Orioles’ relievers had trouble just throwing strikes too. I was wondering: are they trying to nibble or are they literally just trying to throw a meatball across the plate and it ain’t working? I assumed a pitcher could throw a basic, albeit hittable strike whenever they wanted

tdouglas
2 years ago
Reply to  andrewpaul

I mean, we are all humans. I don’t think it’s mental, because these pitchers have been in big situations before. I think sometimes, your body isn’t warmed up enough. Your muscles and joints don’t want to move the way you want them to. It only takes one tiny muscle misfire for a strike to become a ball. Also, maybe their release point is slightly off. The bullpen mound is different from the field mound, so maybe the difference takes a bit longer to acclimate to some days. I guess it takes 10 or 15 pitches for a reliever to get comfortable, sometimes.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think he still wouldn’t have beat Biggio there, but sliding definitely slowed Kwan down. It makes sense with all the traffic around the base to slide and avoid the collision, but running straight through has to have been faster.

whatmonster
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

I always get annoyed when guys slide into first – running through is always faster than sliding. As soon as your feet leave the ground you start slowing down.

That said, I also understand when players do it so they don’t get injured in a collision. Is there a rule (similar to the catcher-blocking-the-plate rule) about who has the “right of way” around first base? Does the runner have a “right” to run through, or are they obligated to try and avoid a fielder in the baseline?

hughduffy
2 years ago
Reply to  whatmonster

The fielder attempting to field a ball or field a throw has the right of way. Other than those situations, fielders cannot interfere with a runner. If a fielder is in the baseline, the runner has to avoid them if they are attempting to make a play on the ball, otherwise they are out for interference. Otherwise, the fielder could be called for obstruction if they are not attempting to field the ball or a throw.

Glengarry Glenn Braggs
2 years ago
Reply to  whatmonster

Several years back Alan Nathan or someone studied guys diving (not sliding) into first and came to the conclusion – which stunned me at the time – that a well-executed dive is marginally faster than running through the bag.

Mike Petriello looked at it a few years ago using Statcast data (albeit in very small sample sizes) and came to the conclusion the time to first is negligible (again, if the dive is executed perfectly).

I think given that there’s not much speed difference even if done optimally – then add in the injury risk (of course you can hurt yourself straining to land on the bag with your feet, but I imagine diving head-first is always more perilous to your bones and ligaments) – it seems it’s best to always run through.

Doug LampertMember since 2016
2 years ago

I think it was Wakefield when announcing for the Red Sox on a possible no-hitter who when asked about his willingness to discuss it said something like: “If I could make things not happen just by talking about them, I would not waste that power on a baseball game.”

Conversely, I’ve heard opposing announcers all but come out and say, “Have I mentioned that there are NO HITS yet, that he’s got a NO HITTER going, no one has managed to get a hit on this guy. Isn’t that amazing that we’re watching a possible no hitter.”

The dugout makes some sense; the stadium announcer, sure; the TV and radio coverage? Not so much.

Baseball is full of superstitions, because people want things to make sense, they want things to have a reason, and so much in baseball is effectively random. I strongly suspect that even the “don’t talk about it in the dugout” is superstition, if knowing about it or thinking about it really hurt pitcher performance, then the opposing team would be shouting about it from the rooftops. But I can see going with the don’t talk in the dugout or on the stadium loudspeaker, because there’s a POSSIBLE causal mechanism, and who in the dugout wants to mess with his team having a no-hitter in progress?

But for TV and radio, just cover the game, and part of what’s happening in the game is a possible no hitter. If you genuinely think saying something is happening will stop it from happening, then I suggest swapping jobs and becoming a war correspondent.

frankenspock
2 years ago

Vin Scully was notoriously anti-superstition on no-nos, and when asked about it he would point out that one day the pitcher would be watching the tape of him performing the feat and felt it was his duty to actually document the history unfolding on the mound instead of pretending it didn’t exist. Which is a great point; does Kruk really think a pitcher is going to enjoy watching his no-hitter 30 years from now where John Kruk furiously emotes silence and occasionally mentions the weather while the dude on the mound is six outs away from the hardest thing for a pitcher to do in baseball?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  frankenspock

The pitcher might actually. I find it amusing whenever announcers start preaching hokum. If I were a pitcher watching old tape of my no-hitter I would laugh at announcers going out of their way to avoid talking about it.

fbMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  frankenspock

Came here to mention Scully as well. From the LA Times via SBNation:

“It’s insulting the listeners to make them think they’re silly and superstitious enough to believe my telling them that a no-hitter is going will affect the game.”

Always agreed with him. Do enjoy some of the announcers saying it and others not on the same broadcast though.

https://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2014/6/19/5824546/vin-scully-no-hitter-jinx

Last edited 2 years ago by fb
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I saw the Syracuse Mets this week. I wish I had seen Vasil start, because I didn’t get to see anyone on the Mets’ side who was interesting except Mauricio. You want to know a minor league team without a lot of talent? The Syracuse Mets fit the bill.

They were playing the Yankees’ affiliate (the Scranton Railriders). You know who had a lot of trouble against the Mets and their disaster of a AAA team? The Railriders. Some of those guys have a long way to go.

Man, seeing Vasil would have been nice.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago

It’s not at all clear that announcer verbal blunders don’t affect the outcome of a baseball game. Next you’ll be telling me that where I sat and how many times I chewed my pizza was not crucial in Ramon Hernandez’s Walk Off Bunt

Sleepy
2 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I was visiting my parents in the suburbs of Chicago and listening to Hernandez’s walk-off bunt in my childhood bedroom while simultaneously trying to talk my then-girlfriend into fooling around.

Good times!

Spin
2 years ago

The thing I liked and didn’t like this week was the brawl.

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Spin

Agreed.
Baseball should never get that personal.

That said, who knew Ramirez had that good a hook?
Given his history and size, maybe he got some “practice” earning respect in the dominican?