Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week, May 12

Brent Skeen-USA TODAY Sports

Welcome to another installment of my weekly look at five things that caught my interest in baseball. As always, I’m indebted to Zach Lowe of ESPN for the idea — his basketball column remains one of my favorite reads in all of sports. That’s all the time we have for an introduction today, though, because there’s a lot to talk about. Let’s get to it.

1. Meaningful Baseball in Baltimore
It’s been a minute. The Orioles started a comprehensive teardown in 2017 and doubled down on it by hiring Mike Elias from the Astros after the 2018 season. They’ve finished fifth, fifth, fifth, fourth, fifth, and fourth in the AL East since then. There was a lot to follow on the prospect front, but the major league team looked bleak; the closest they came to first place in that stretch was 15 games out, and that was in the abbreviated 2020 season. Last year there was a glimmer of hope – the team finished 83-79 and Adley Rutschman, a generational catching prospect, impressed in his debut. But that team didn’t quite feel complete; the front office traded players away at the deadline and kept some of its top prospects in reserve.

This year feels different, with this week’s series against the first-place Rays the highest-stakes baseball in Baltimore in quite some time. The Orioles aren’t just second in their division, they’re second in the entire American League. That series was phenomenal, close throughout and well played across the board. The Orioles took two out of three, with an aggregate 6-6 scoreline, and it felt like two good teams trading blows, not one juggernaut and one pretender facing off.

There’s a limit to how excited baseball players can get about a game in May, but the Orioles were right at that limit. They also showed off why they’re so much fun to watch. Yennier Cano, maybe the best reliever in baseball right now (!!), excelled on the mound:

Jorge Mateo, one of the most delightful defenders in the game, was up to his usual tricks:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Rutschman broke out of an 0-for-19 slump to supply some power (and of course, some hugs):

The Orioles probably aren’t this good. Their record so far outstrips their Pythagorean expectation by three wins and their BaseRuns expectation by four. They’ve been one of the healthiest teams in the majors this year, which takes pressure off of their unproven depth. The rotation might be pitching over its collective head. Gunnar Henderson’s early struggles are undoubtedly concerning.

So what? There are a lot of teams in baseball with question marks right now, and most of them aren’t 24-13. Baltimore is an awesome baseball city. Camden Yards regularly drew 30,000 fans per game the last time the team was competitive. That might be a few years off yet, because the scars of tanking tend to linger, but this is undeniably a team on the upswing. The series against Tampa Bay was just a preview; regardless of what happens the rest of this season, Baltimore is finally hosting games with playoff implications again. I love it.

2. J.D. Davis, Picking Machine
The book on J.D. Davis has always been two lines: can hit, can’t field. That earned him sporadic playing time on the Mets, but when they bulked up their offense before the 2022 season and Davis slumped at the plate, they shipped him to San Francisco in exchange for a platoon-ier positionless right-handed bat, Darin Ruf. That trade has been an absolute disaster for the Mets – in addition to sending away Davis, they tossed in two prospects, and they followed all that up by releasing Ruf earlier this year.

But even if Ruf had been great in New York, the Giants would have won the trade. That’s because Davis has undergone a remarkable transformation: he’s turned into a plus defender while posting a resurgent batting line. Seriously, take a look at the best defenders in baseball this year per Statcast:

That’s stunning. This isn’t a good defender taking a step forward; this is a guy who was one of the worst defensive third basemen in baseball. Only five players had a lower success rate added at third base during Davis’ time on the Mets, and one was Vladimir Guerrero Jr., who is famously not a third baseman. Miguel Sanó graded out better!

What is Davis doing right this year? Quite simply, he’s making the easy plays every time. Statcast divides out plays by the estimated likelihood of making an out. On plays with an estimated success rate below 50%, Davis is exactly average. On plays with an estimated success rate above 50%, he’s been incredible, six outs above average in 62 attempts. That’s a big shift from his time in New York, when he routinely botched easy plays, ending up six outs below average on likely outs.

In other words, he’s getting turned around less often, and making the plays that come right at him. He’s always had a big arm; he’s just doing this more frequently now:

And this:

And this:

Any of those three might have been errors last year. This year, he’s just cleaner, and the stats bear it out.

You don’t have to read too much into this. Davis isn’t suddenly Nolan Arenado or Ke’Bryan Hayes. He’s not making impossible highlight plays, and he’s almost certainly not going to finish the year as one of the best defenders in the game. But infield defense is as much about consistently making easy plays as it is occasionally making spectacular ones, and Davis has that down at the moment. He’s been the second-best player on the Giants this year – and hey, for now, he has more WAR than Aaron Judge and Carlos Correa combined. Not bad for a guy who we all thought was DH-only.

3. Akil Baddoo’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day
Akil Baddoo had an afternoon to forget on Monday in Cleveland. No, I’m not talking about his bases-loaded at-bat in the third inning with a chance to break the game open. One out, Tanner Bibee on the ropes, and Baddoo cashed in nothing at all with a pop up to shortstop, on the first pitch no less. A demoralizing strikeout in the fifth also wasn’t great, obviously. Neither was a weak fly out in the seventh. A groundout to Josh Naylor in the ninth capped off a hitless day. But none of those are what made Baddoo’s day so bad. No, that’d be the time he actually got on base.

After a second inning walk, Baddoo tried to create a little offense by stealing second base. On first look, his jump wasn’t good enough to beat a solid throw from Mike Zunino:

A few loops of that GIF, though, and you’ll realize that something seems off. That ball is tailing left to right, far too quickly for Andrés Giménez to pick it so cleanly. In fact, it was tailing so much that it’s hard to imagine how Giménez got a glove on it at all. And why is Baddoo wincing after what was surely a glancing tag?

Unfortunately for Baddoo, he was squarely in the line of fire, and Giménez simply caught the ricochet:

Oof. Talk about adding injury to insult. That’s the worst part of it, or at least one of the worst parts. Baserunners get hit by thrown balls a lot. Here’s Austin Wynns catching one squarely on the helmet on a relay throw gone spectacularly wrong Wednesday afternoon:

That’s the usual outcome of getting hit in any of a variety of painful spots – it almost always ends up with you being safe. It’s hard for the fielder to catch the ball, what with it hitting you instead of their glove and all. But Giménez made a phenomenal split second adjustment, the carom happened just early enough that he had time to make the tag, and Baddoo couldn’t do anything but lie there in pain. Boy, what a bad break:

4. If At First You Don’t Succeed
Brian Anderson made one of the worst baserunning plays I’ve seen this year, enough of a head-scratcher that I featured it in an earlier column. If I were Craig Counsell, I would have torn up that page of the playbook afterwards, and maybe burned it just to be safe. But Anderson wouldn’t be denied; he was up to the same old tricks last Friday in San Francisco. In the top of the first, he drew a two-out walk with a runner on third. I can’t say for certain, but I’d bet that his eyes lit up when Luke Voit quickly fell into an 0-2 hole. Like clockwork, he got picked off of first base:

Terrible baserunning yet again? Nope! This time, he didn’t mess around with trying to entice a throw from the catcher, he just cut out the middle man and goaded Sean Manaea into a throw that led to a run scoring. As Anderson gamely stayed in the rundown, Owen Miller scampered home from third:

Honestly, Miller probably deserves most of the credit on this one. He read LaMonte Wade Jr.’s eyes and broke for home well before Wade released the ball to Brett Wisely. By the time Wisely caught it, Miller was gone; peak Andrelton Simmons couldn’t have received that throw and gotten the ball home in time to make a play.

Or maybe Anderson deserves most of the credit for distracting Wade! Check out this angle:

Anderson is watching Miller the whole time. When Miller breaks for home, Anderson slams on the brakes, as if to say “come and get me.” If he sold out for second base there, he might have made it safely. Wade didn’t have a clean throwing line right away because Wisely was on the wrong side of second base. But that might have reminded Wade to look towards home, and Miller would have been dead to rights if Wade had pivoted immediately. So Anderson did the only thing he could do: stop running and make it obvious that a throw to second would retire him.

You can’t pull this play off too often because good defenses will consistently turn it into an out. If J.D. Davis had crashed harder towards third base (dangit, J.D., I just got done praising you!), Miller wouldn’t have been able to get so far down the line without consequences. If Wade hadn’t double-clutched his throw to second and Wisely had shown greater urgency, maybe Wisely would have had a chance to get Anderson before the run scored (doubtful, but possible).

I don’t think the Brewers will try this again all year — advance scouts have now seen them try it twice. But I hope they do, and that something weird happens. So far this year, Brian Anderson on first base has been a gift that keeps on giving.

5. The Delightful Cubs Broadcast
I’ve been hesitant to write about broadcasts in these articles because it feels navel-gazey. Media writing about media? It’s strange. But broadcast booths are an integral part of my watching experience, and if I’m truly writing about the things I like in baseball, good broadcasting is absolutely one of them. So I’m settling on a compromise: I’ll bring them up rarely, but I’ll try to highlight the occasional broadcast that’s bringing me a lot of joy.

That’s exactly how I’d describe the Cubs broadcast: joyful. Boog Sciambi generally defers to the baseball acumen of Jim Deshaies and Joe Girardi, but he’s not afraid to question them on the finer points of baseball strategy or challenge them on conventional wisdom that misses the mark. Those discussions are one of my favorite parts of the broadcast; everyone involved seems to be interested in learning from each other, which is one of the potential pitfalls in the stereotypical player/stats guy pairing. A discussion of pitch usage might bring all three into the fray over an entire inning while Sciambi interjects play-by-play to keep the discussion from running off the rails.

Deshaies and Girardi bring a wealth of personal experience to the table; Girardi used a recent series against the Cardinals to remember the hardest throwers he caught in his long major league career, interjecting a remember-some-guys exercise (Carlos Zambrano! Kerry Wood!) into an otherwise dry inning. They’ll come back to conversations days later, too: the aforementioned Zambrano/Wood tangent came a day after Girardi first pondered the question, prompted by yet another Cardinal fireballer.

I give Sciambi a lot of the credit here because the booth flows well even with different color analysts. Ryan Dempster handles the role from time to time, and he’s still sometimes shy in the booth, but that just opens the group up for more merriment. “Great questions Demp, way to go,” manager David Ross quipped after Sciambi carried a managerial interview last Friday. But Dempster laughed it off: “I’ve been doing a lot of soul searching, and sometimes it’s just as important to listen as it is to talk.” Then he launched into a discussion of Edward Cabrera’s control issues without missing a beat, all while Sciambi egged him on.

The booth is great, but the ancillary parts of the broadcast might be even better. The camerawork is sharp, the production team finds a good balance of interesting and informative statistics to highlight, and they also avoid the excessive clutter that plagues many broadcasts today. Perhaps because of the network’s affiliation with the team, they frequently feature managerial and front office interviews, and both Ross and Jed Hoyer give more insightful answers than I’m used to receiving from team officials.

Good field-level reporting is an underrated part of good broadcasts, and Taylor McGregor is one of the best in the business. In addition to the injury updates and player quotes the role requires, she banters with the booth and provides a welcome extra perspective on occasion, which prevents the broadcast from veering too old-baseball-y for my tastes.

If it sounds like I’m just throwing praise around everywhere, well, I am. When I’m browsing through the available games, I find myself gravitating towards Cubs games, and certainly towards the Cubs broadcast if I’m going to watch a game involving them. They’re easily in my top tier of broadcasts to watch, which is saying something for a Cardinals fan. If you’re flipping through games looking for a good watch, give them a try.

I hope you enjoyed this week’s batch of five. Until next time, enjoy baseball. Remember, it’s a party out there:





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
legacyofjosefernandez
3 years ago

No mention of Kenley Jansen or Masa Yoshida!!!???

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Only 5 things my dude

proiste
3 years ago

Yoshida had a full article published this week, and I’m sure Kenley will get one soon enough. This column is just about random baseball things, not something to get worked up about

Sum
3 years ago

it’s sure a party out here in Baltimore!

KvnMember since 2020
3 years ago

Great article, but it’s not correct to say Baltimore started tearing down in 2017 (maybe a typo?). I think it seems that way because the 2018 team lost 115 games, but as late as March that year they signed Alex Cobb to a 4 year deal worth over $50MM. The 2018 team began the season with Machado, Adam Jones, Bundy, Gausman, Zack Britton, and an $150MM payroll and they were absolutely trying to win that year, which makes it all the more staggering that they almost recorded the worst record in the modern era.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Kvn

People tend to forget that the Orioles didn’t really intend to tank, they came by their terribleness honestly. People use the term tanking too loosely; even if they did tank (which I’m still not sure about), it certainly didn’t happen until after Elias took over.

David Klein
3 years ago
Reply to  Kvn

Yep everyone was ripping them for not trading Machado in the offseason but they thought they were gonna be competitive in 2018 and the rest is very ugly history.

Max Power
3 years ago
Reply to  Kvn

So like the 2023 White Sox?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Max Power

Like that, but worse.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I am so glad to see JD Davis highlighted here–his turnaround is one of the most amazing stories in baseball this year.

Really, they don’t get a lot of publicity because overall the team is kind of mediocre, but the Giants are the new masters of turning guys that other teams gave up on into good players. Their three best players are Thairo Estrada, LaMonte Wade, and JD Davis. Estrada isn’t this good, but even if you were to say he is on pace for a 4 win season instead of a 6+ win season that’s still an incredible scenario. JD Davis isn’t quite this good but he’s earned those defensive marks and the majority of his batting line so far. And LaMonte Wade is suddenly the new Juan Soto or Joey Votto, an on-base machine with some good pop too. And this doesn’t even count Mike Yastrzemski (who has been around a while), or any of the many pitchers who also fit into this category (Cobb, DeSclafani, Alex Wood).

It’s especially remarkable because as far as I can tell, the Giants can’t develop their own hitters and their higher profile free agent hitters have mostly busted. Can you imagine what would happen if any of their prospects or higher-profile free agents actually panned out?

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Having watched him with the Mets, I am both happy and totally unsurprised to see what Davis is doing in San Francisco. The article is exactly right that his big problem in the field was always making the routine plays look routine — he did a lot of double-clutching and just generally seemed to be collapsing under the time pressure of getting rid of the ball. This was always going to be fixable once he got to a team that had faith in him as a starter. And the bat was never going to be a problem. The guy was the perfect Platonic form of a “change of scenery” candidate.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

The question with the Orioles is exactly the same as it was the last 2-3 years: Are they going to have any starters? Kyle Gibson and Tyler Wells haven’t been obviously terrible but you can’t rely on them long-term. Dean Kremer, contra ZiPS, is still kind of a disaster. Kyle Bradish was only a fifth starter last year and so far he’s not been doing well at all. DL Hall looks like a reliever. Grayson Rodriguez might be the future, I’ve long thought Drew Rom was a back-end guy, and Cade Povich might be a starter but that’s only 3 guys.

Aside from locking up Adley Rutschman to a Wander Franco-ish deal, this team should absolutely be active looking for starters. I doubt they land Ohtani or Urias but IMO they probably need to come out of free agency with someone who can pitch in the playoffs, like Yoshinobu Yamamoto, E-Rod, or Lucas Giolito. They might even consider trading for Giolito now; the White Sox could really use someone like Jordan Westburg, both now and in the future.

KvnMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Not saying this solves all these problems, but John Means should be back this summer which is at least one MLB starter accounted for you hope. Beyond that I agree with most of this, they should be as active as any team in the SP market both in July and in November.

ajake57Member since 2019
3 years ago

I saw the Baddoo play live and couldn’t stop laughing, but I was so transfixed by the ball caroming off of Akil’s poor twig and berries that I never noticed that Gimenez wasn’t even looking as he made the play. Truly incredible.

Blue ShoesMember since 2019
3 years ago

I guarantee the Brewers will try it again. They run the worst baserunning plays in baseball despite it almost never working.

OneearMember since 2018
3 years ago

Boog and JD are joyful to listen to. Dempster and Giradi, not as much; and Sutcliffe is god-awful. Having Boog (and Kasper before him) has spoiled us Cubs fans.

Adam SMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Oneear

Seconded.

Marquee is big on the three-man booth (something WGN the Chicago “cable” affiliate never did) with the third being an ex-player with a Cubs connection. While there are some insightful discussions as Ben noted, the third person detracts overall, especially when it’s Sutcliffe. Would rather hear more sideline reporting. Dempster is perfectly adequate as a fill in and it seems like either Sciambi or Deshaies (maybe both) have missed a number of games, but haven’t paid enough attention to see if there’s a pattern.

The Cubs radio crew is pretty good as well, as long as you recognize they don’t take themselves too seriously.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
3 years ago

I’ll throw in my own Yankee-centric three things:

  1. Domingo German gets no relief. For the second time in three starts, he left a game with a runner on first, then watched the reliever immediately after him (Holmes on 5/1, Marinaccio last night) not only let his runner score, but have a disaster outing. His only other bequeathed runner this season was also allowed to score, but that runner was on third, so I don’t think you can too be upset about it.
  2. The A’s are even worse than I imagined. I follow what’s happening around the league, and I’m know statistically what the A’s have been up to, but hot damn, that team is an utter wasteland right now outside of Rooker and Langeliers. They had heaping helpings of the will-to-lose aura about them. I remember the terrible, terrible Tigers from 20 years ago, and this A’s team feels like they’d get swept by ’em.
  3. Jake Bauers might actually be a thing. Way, way, way too early to say with any actual confidence. But I don’t care who you’re hitting off of, hitting a HR 420ft to the oppo gap in an actual game is impressive. He’s only got 10 batted balls, so microscopic sample size, but his average EV right now is 100.5. He fired a couple of lasers into RF last night for singles. And he looks not awful in the OF.
Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
3 years ago

While looking up that 2003 Tigers team, I found a stat line that just completely broke my brain. Nate Cornejo threw 194.2 IP for that team and struck out 46 batters. Like the one in front of his Ks isn’t missing. A K/9 of 2.1? A K/BB ratio under 1? That’s mindboggling. In 2003! I can’t even.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I have been waiting for a team worse than the 2003 Tigers for a long time. To me, it’s the pinnacle of futility—it wasn’t an expansion team, it wasn’t in an era so long ago we wouldn’t recognize it…it was just a hilariously, comically bad team. There were no excuses. The idea that we might get a team even worse than them is pretty exciting.

Adam SMember since 2016
3 years ago

It’s really hard to grasp how bad this A’s roster is.

Here’s a fun game I often play. Match up “our” team with “their” team position by position and which would you take. E.g., Rizzo or Noda at 1B and so on. I’ve watched a bunch of A’s games this year, and I feel like the A’s win at one maybe two positions each game particularly when you consider how good the player is not their YTD stats.

As a follow up if you made a roster of the best 26 of the A’s and their opponent, how many A’s would you take. Have not really done this exercise in full but feel like for any playoff contender you’d take about 20 of the good team and 6 A’s, though perhaps the A’s win a lot of the bench positions and 6th, 7th, and 8th reliever.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
3 years ago

I remember when Boog was just getting started on Braves broadcasts and thought his jump to ESPN was a huge loss. He’s a great announcer

Brent
3 years ago

I could do without Girardi in the Cubs’ booth, but you are spot on with the rest. Boog and JD are great, and Taylor McGregor is the best field level reporter there is.

speedy
3 years ago

I’m an Angel fan but I like watching Giants, Padres, and Phillies games cause the announcers are informative yet let the sounds of the game play out. Kruk is funny but not overly obnoxious. They don’t complain about every borderline pitch that doesn’t go the home teams way. I prefer to have a position player color analyst cause ex-pitchers can just hit you over the head w pitcher mechanics or spin rates/velocity or pitch selection strategy and you rarely hear about the hitters point of view.

sbf21
3 years ago

As a Yankee fan I’m quite envious of the description of Cub broadcasts. Sounds absolutely wonderful. ***sigh***

MattMember since 2020
3 years ago

The Brewers should!d try that.play every.time Luke Voit steps.to the.plate.

Greg SimonsMember since 2016
3 years ago

That Akil Baddoo play was nuts!

Dan B
3 years ago

The value of a good booth can’t be overstated.
Our Brewers booth, which at full strength is one of the best in the game has been decimated by health and the NBA and we have been getting below replacement level work all season.

gerritcoleenjoyer
3 years ago

Your writing style and humor always did remind me a bit of Zach Lowe. Your take on 5 things definitely holds up to his and I’ve been really enjoying them every week!