Fluke or Breakout: Is Cedric Mullins’ 2021 Success Sustainable?

There might not have been a bigger surprise performer in 2021 than Cedric Mullins. With just over 400 plate appearances spread across parts of three years prior, he had put up a cumulative 72 wRC+ and accumulated -0.4 WAR; this season, he pushed his wRC+ up to 136 and posted 5.3 WAR, the 14th highest mark among all position players. He also became just the 11th player to reach 30 home runs and 30 stolen bases in a single season over the last decade.

The catalyst for his breakout season was quite simple: Mullins quit switch-hitting and began batting exclusively from the left side. That discussion had begun all the way back in 2018, his debut season, when then-Orioles manager Buck Showalter suggested it to him. After struggling to establish himself in the majors for three seasons, he finally decided to rely on his natural swing during the offseason. “It was getting difficult to try and create two different swings,” he told MASN’s Steve Melewski in March. “I know my left-side is my natural side, so trying to develop my right-handed swing at the highest level was challenging.”

Switch-hitting has always been a scarce skill, but the number of players who can swing both ways has dwindled in recent years. In 2021, just 17 qualified batters (13.1%) were switch-hitters, right in line with the league-wide average over the last decade. Compare that to the decade between 1986 and ’95 (excluding the strike-shortened 1994 season), when more than one in five qualified batters (21.1%) hit from both sides, with a peak of 24.8% in ’89. With modern baseball strategy so heavily emphasizing the platoon advantage, it’s surprising to see so few switch-hitters these days. Giving up that advantage in every at-bat is a radical decision, and there’s barely any precedent for it.

The number of players who have dropped switch-hitting after making their major league debuts is tiny. J.T. Snow did it in 1999, halfway through his career. So did Orlando Merced in 1996. Shane Victorino flip-flopped between switch-hitting and batting right-handed after injuries forced him to give up left-handed batting at various points during his career. More recently, Tucker Barnhart gave up switch-hitting in 2019. But those previous examples were all players who had already established themselves in the majors. Mullins could have seriously damaged his chances of having a productive major league career if his decision went wrong.

Looking at his platoon splits, it’s clear he was struggling badly from the right side of the plate. During the first three seasons of his career, he posted an ugly .211 wOBA against left-handed pitchers as a right-handed hitter. His performance against right-handed pitching was much better, though still not great: a .303 wOBA, giving him a 92-point split. Under the hood, the difference becomes even more clear.

Cedric Mullins, handedness splits
Season, Split PAs Avg EV Barrel% Hard Hit% xwOBAcon Chase% Z-Contact% SwStr%
2018–20, as RHB 111 79.4 0.0% 20.3% 0.207 26.4% 75.0% 11.0%
2018–20, as LHB 307 85.2 3.5% 29.9% 0.299 28.3% 82.4% 9.1%
2021, as LHB 675 88.1 8.1% 38.9% 0.382 27.6% 82.8% 9.4%

Even though he had accumulated just a handful of plate appearances against left-handed pitchers as a right-handed batter, it’s clear that his batted-ball and plate discipline peripherals were extremely poor. But his peripherals as a left-handed batter through the first three seasons of his career don’t indicate that an impending breakout was brewing.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

One of the reasons why Mullins’ batted-ball data took such a dramatic turn for the better in 2021 was because he spent the offseason tinkering with his left-handed swing. Unburdened from maintaining two different swings, he focused on making his one more consistent. He described those changes to David Laurila in an August interview:

“If you put a side-by-side of my swing in 2019 versus now, the approach itself is relatively the same, but I’m standing a little more upright than I used to, [and] I have my barrel flatter as a starting point as opposed to more vertical. Those small adjustments helped make my swing more consistent, just more useful in games.”

Here’s those two versions of his swing, side-by-side:

Both changes Mullins pointed out in his interview are evident in that image above: he’s standing more upright in the box, and his bat is held parallel to the ground. His hand position, in particular, is much more engaged. With his old stance, there was a lot of movement with his hands to get them into a good position to swing. Now, they’re far more direct to the ball once he starts his swing.

Those tweaks he made to his swing certainly paid off. Looking back up at the table above, all of his batted-ball metrics significantly improved in 2021, as he set career highs in all of them. His batted-ball mix saw some noticeable gains, too:

Cedric Mullins, batted ball splits
Season, Split LD% GB% FB% IFFB%
2018–20, as RHB 7.0% 56.1% 36.8% 19.0%
2018–20, as LHB 16.7% 46.7% 36.7% 16.9%
2021, as LHB 19.9% 39.0% 41.1% 12.4%

During his first three years in the majors, Mullins was among the league leaders in pop-up rate. His flatter swing path helped him cut down on the amount of automatic outs he made on the infield and also decreased the number of ground balls he put in play. His sweet spot rate, which measures batted balls hit with a launch angle between eight and 32 degrees, increased from 23.4% to 35.1%. All that additional elevated contact at optimal launch angles resulted in an explosion of doubles and home runs.

His plate discipline splits didn’t noticeably improve as a left-handed hitter, but simply cutting out the poor swing decisions he was making as a right-handed hitter ensured his overall plate discipline metrics improved to career-bests as well. Because Mullins is naturally left-handed, giving up switch-hitting still allowed him to face the platoon advantage in the majority of his at-bats. While facing the platoon disadvantage for the first time in his career, he was surprisingly productive, posting a .339 wOBA against left-handed pitching in 2021, and his strikeout rate against southpaws was nearly the same as it was against righties.

With a dynamic skill set unlocked by his decision to quit swinging from the right side, Mullins quickly established himself as a key piece for the Orioles to build around. But can he repeat the success he enjoyed in 2021? Here’s his ZiPS projection broken down into various percentiles:

ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Cedric Mullins
Percentile BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SB OPS+ WAR
90% .293 .361 .557 584 92 171 37 9 33 77 59 42 145 6.3
80% .282 .347 .515 588 89 166 34 8 29 70 55 34 131 5.2
70% .276 .339 .495 590 86 163 34 7 27 67 53 32 124 4.6
60% .271 .333 .472 591 85 160 32 6 25 64 52 29 117 4.1
50% .265 .326 .457 593 83 157 30 6 24 62 50 27 111 3.6
40% .261 .321 .443 594 82 155 29 5 23 59 49 25 106 3.2
30% .255 .312 .422 597 80 152 27 5 21 57 46 23 98 2.5
20% .249 .306 .406 598 78 149 26 4 20 55 45 21 93 2.1
10% .238 .292 .378 601 75 143 25 4 17 50 42 18 81 1.2

His 50th percentile projection (the projection that showed up in the Orioles ZiPS projections that ran last week) is good, but it would represent a pretty significant step back for him. A repeat of his breakout season would fall somewhere between his 80th and 90th percentile projection. With such a small sample to pull from as an exclusively left-handed hitter, the computer probably has a hard time reconciling his past struggles as a switch-hitter with his massive success this season. Some skepticism is probably warranted, but many of the improvements he made look like they should be sticky.





Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Kevbot034
4 years ago

I thought Fluke for a month or so, but he just kept spraying line drives all over. If he regresses, he won’t be an embarrassment. Now the question is if the awful CF market makes the Orioles trade him high or build around him?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

That probably depends on what they get offered. But if the Marlins rolled up with a deal involving both Max Meyer and Edward Cabrera I’d engage for sure. That alone wouldn’t be enough, but it’s a good start. Not sure there’s anyone else with both the prospects and motivation to make it worth the O’s time.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Way to much for Mullins.

EFF51
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Agree.

Kevbot034
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d say the Yankees would be a great team for it, but they wouldn’t end up trading in division like that. And they’re stuck hoping Aaron Hicks might reach 60 games ever again anyway.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Someone should come up with a list of players whose careers are on the rocks and probably shouldn’t switch hit anymore. Billy Hamilton is the name that always comes up, and it looks like at some point this year he did stop switch hitting, having about as many PAs against right-handers swinging lefty as righty. But based on this he’d probably need a full offseason to work with it to see improvement. Is there any way to create a leaderboard of switch hitters? Other switch hitters who really struggled in 2021 were Willi Castro and Jonah Heim.

For prospects, I went over to the board and sorted by guys who had a projected hit tool of 40 or less and switch-hit. I expected to find a few but there were about 20 guys there. Some are young enough that it might be difficult to convince them, like Robert Puason. But for guys like Shervyen Newton and Logan Davidson and Buddy Reed, who are now 22+ and unable to hit much of anything, wouldn’t it make more sense for them to try just hitting on one side?

kylerkelton
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I wish so badly that the switch hitting vs sticking to one side thing could be studied without messing with a player’s career. I’d love to see what Ozzie Albies’ numbers would be like just hitting right handed. He’s decent from the left side but he’s exceptional from the right side. Average and top end exit velocities are higher from the right side.

Johan Camargo is an example of a fringe player that should consider ditching switch hitting and just hit right-handed.

travis0548Member since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

can’t think of a better candidate than Albies. 52% difference in his right and left side wRC+.

Mahoney
4 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

If I were running the Braves, I’d have Albies go full time as a right-handed hitter and put up with a year or two of growing pains on his hitting RHP from the right side.

It’s certainly tough to hypothesize what would happen, or what would have happened, without switch hitting. Probably the toughest point for natural RHB is that the development curve from the left side moves twice as quickly as from the right side, so it’s quite possible that switch hitting hurts the batter’s performance from both sides in the early years of their MLB career. (Look at Bernie Williams’ platoon splits early in his career – he improved much more from the left side year-to-year so by his late 20’s his platoon splits were fairly mild).

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

Anecdotally, it would seem that hitting a baseball is wildly difficult, and perfecting a swing to hit said baseball is an incredibly complex task. One would assume that perfecting swings from both sides of the plate is at least twice as difficult

marianosz
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Oh yeah, imagine if Mickey Mantle existed today

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oswaldo Cabrera (NYY) across AA/AAA hit .290/.350/.612 vs RHP as a LHB and hit just .227/.277/.333 vs LHP as a RHB. It’s just 142 plate appearances vs LHP but with a platoon advantage that’s pretty terrible. He’s a star vs righties though. Too early to give up on it, since he’s still just 22 but something to monitor.

MikeSMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Hamilton quit switch hitting after an IL stint for an oblique strain, so it was at least partially due to injury and an inability to swing comfortably from the left side. Not sure if he is planning on going back to it next year but he was apparently considering it even before he got hurt.

http://www.mlb.com/amp/news/billy-hamilton-switch-hitter-role-white-sox.html

Lou BrownMember since 2017
4 years ago

Whether or not his success is sustainable should also include an analysis of why his wOBA significantly outperformed his xwOBA. Even a 50th percentile outcome would not be a significant step back based on his quality of contact, and somewhere between his 60th and 70th percentiles would be expected if he experiences no regression at all.

Dmjn53
4 years ago

I would hammer the under on a repeating a 136 wRC+, but I don’t see why he can’t be a 4 win player as a league average bat with a elite (based on OAA) CF defense

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

His defense was not that great. Fangraphs has him at a negative number. Uzr/150 in center was -4.9 last season and -6.8 career.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

The big problem is his arm, which OAA does not account for. You can still be good enough in CF with enough range if your arm isn’t good (and his OAA definitely is encouraging on that front). But it’s unlikely he’ll ever have Juan Pierre like range to compensate for the arm, so I’m not really seeing elite defense in the cards.

Still, even then, ZiPs and Steamer both see him as roughly 10% above average, and given that there’s been a huge shift with everything with his batting I would guess 15%, which would also be more or less what would happen if his offense regressed to his batted ball statistics. That would put him pretty solidly as a 3.5 win player over 600ish PAs with good baserunning and average defense. So that’s probably where I’d set the over/under.

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Just a personal preference, but I value range much more than arm strength. Not discounting arm at all, but I feel like plays that require plus range are far more frequent then bang bang plays at a base/home plate

dl80Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

It’s more about the threat of his arm keeping guys from trying to take the extra base in the first place, I think.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago

Cedric Mullins is a passable CF now, but in a few years it’s likely he moves to a corner where his bat is less impressive. The Orioles should trade him now cause he is really just a 2-3 WAR corner OF player in the long run. The next playoff Orioles team is to far away for him to be a major piece unless they get really lucky on pitching prospects beating expectations and quickly.

rjq13
4 years ago

as on orioles fan that watched him a lot he may not go 30/30 again but I would not expect a huge drop off. When he stopped switch hitting he changed into a different hitter and never showed signs of regressing to his former self. Just look at the side by side of his stance you can see his newfound confidence just from that. If he keeps using the whole field then camden yards will allow him to rack up numbers. He also hits lefties extremely well after going to just hitting from the left side.

I think reasonable expectations are 20+ HRs 30+ SB a .285+ average and great defense which would be good for me.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  rjq13

IDK about “great defense”, he’s got fantastic instincts and range but that arm is a Johnny Damon-level wet noodle. I still like him as a 3-3.5 win CF with potential for more in a good year though

bdcb58Member since 2025
4 years ago

His 2021 wRC+ was 150 in the first four months and 108 thereafter. Maybe 108 is more likely to be his future ?

miltonfriedman
4 years ago

Word around Baltimore is that he was juicing

newhavenravens
4 years ago

Two interesting switch hitting stories not mentioned here that I just note for fun: Rajai Davis was a switch hitter in the minors before giving it up in the bigs and Pablo Sandoval gave it up for a spell (part of 2015) before starting back up.

Jeff in JerseyMember since 2020
4 years ago

Great look at a breakout. It’d be fun to see Fangraphs keep rolling these out–looking at breakouts and disappointments & what they mean. As a Mets fan, I’d love a smart Fangraphs article on whether Jeff McNeil looks like a good bounce-back bet….

pedeysRSox
4 years ago

Personally I’d feel comfortable projecting him somewhere between his 50th and 60th percentiles with an OPS at or just under .800.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
4 years ago

He probably was a bit lucky but still his xWOBA was. 344 which is really good. Not quite like the 372 wOBA which puts him right next to Stanton, Jose ramirez, Max Muncy and Paul goldschmidt but still in the same category as Javier baez, Tim Anderson and Joan moncada.

If he can produce a 340 wOBA next year that would be great (about top50 hitter in all majors and that as a very fast CF).