Gerrit Cole, Minus His Fastball

It’s tough to get an athlete to say much of substance in a postgame press conference. Without the benefit of a personal, one-on-one setting, and without much time for the player to gather his thoughts and reflect on his personal performance, more often than not a reporter simply could pick the cliché responses they’re most likely to hear out of a hat and arrive at a close approximation of the real thing. I’ve found this to be especially true of a starting pitcher who’s just suffered a loss.

“[Insert pitcher name here], what was giving you trouble tonight?”

“Mostly fastball command. Just wasn’t locating my fastball.”

It’s a boring answer, one that a beat writer hears something like 100 times over the course of a typical season, but it’s also an answer with which it’s usually hard to argue after a starting pitcher struggles through a start. If you really had to boil down the art and science of pitching to a one, most important thing, you might pick fastball command. Pitchers throw their fastball more than any other pitch, by far, and without fastball command, a pitcher will almost always end his night with a high number in the walks or hits column of the box score.

If there’s something you know about Gerrit Cole, it’s that he’s one of the very best pitchers in baseball, largely because he has an amazing fastball. By average velocity, it’s the third-hardest heater in the league. By PITCHf/x run values, it was the second-most valuable fastball in the league. Cole complements that fastball with a great slider and a good changeup, but he largely lives, and subsequently dies, by the fastball.

In Wednesday’s 4-0 Wild Card loss to the Cubs, it was the latter.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Watching Cole’s start, on the day I published a post about Dallas Keuchel finding success by never throwing any pitches down the middle, something stuck out. Given the opposite nature of Cole’s results from Keuchel’s, you might be able to guess where this is going. Just to be sure, I’ve constructed a visual, courtesy BrooksBaseball, that shows every fastball thrown by Gerrit Cole last night, from the catcher’s vantage point:

location.php

You see plenty of pitches in the middle of the plate, and elevated. You see almost nothing in the lower-third strike zone. Granted, Cole likes to work up in the zone with his fastball, but not like this. Working up in the zone, effectively, means working around the edges. You also see a troubling number of pitches that wildly missed their target — essentially wasted offerings. This plot resembles a pitcher without command of his primary pitch.

In the Keuchel piece, we looked at his Heart%, or, the percentage of his pitches he throws down the middle of the plate. Keuchel, essentially, does this less than anybody. Cole, for the regular season, was around league average with his fastball, at 25% going over the heart. That’s fine when you throw as hard as he does. Cole, last night, was different. Cole, last night, threw nearly 40% of his fastballs over the heart of the plate. That felt unusually high, just as it appeared in real-time. I took to BaseballSavant to see how that stacked up against the other 32 starts he made this season.

The answer? Not well.

august_cole

Last night, Cole piped a higher percentage of his fastballs right down the middle than he did in any other start all season. That season is now over.

Funny enough, the actual fastballs that ended up being down the middle aren’t what got him in trouble. But the alarming number of them helps illustrate the overarching point: that Cole just wasn’t hitting his spots.

From the second pitch of the game, we had our first clue:

Cole1

After a first-pitch fastball to Dexter Fowler missed just off the plate to begin the game, Cole wanted to spot a fastball low and away here to get even in the count. Instead, he missed a foot high and fell behind, 2-0.

Two pitches later, Fowler singled, for the game’s first baserunner:

ColeFB1

The idea was the same: fastball, low-and-away. Cole didn’t miss as drastically as he did in the first .gif, but he missed, elevated and inside.

The next batter, Kyle Schwarber, drove in Fowler with a single to give the Cubs a 1-0 lead before Cole had even recorded an out. That pitch, like the one to Fowler, was a fastball intended low-and-away that missed, high:

ColeFB2

Sometimes, hitters hit well-located pitches. This could be viewed as an example of that, as Schwarber was able to flick this pitch the opposite way despite looking inside, but Cole still missed higher than he’d likely prefer.

Of the six hits Cole gave up, five came on the fastball. Maybe you view a couple of these missed locations as nitpicking, and that’s fine, because nobody is perfect, and certainly nobody should be expected to be. But on all five fastballs that went for hits, a common trend exists in catcher Francisco Cervelli moving his glove upwards as the pitch was struck.

On the Miguel Montero single in the fourth, where Cole again missed both up and in:

ColeFB3

On the Fowler homer in the fifth, where Cole missed up and in, badly:

ColeFB4

There’s also the matter of the number of fastballs thrown by Cole that were, as Jessica Mendoza concisely described in Tuesday’s Astros-Yankees game, “non-competitive pitches.” The ability to work outside the strike zone is important, but there’s an outer limit. When a pitch strays so far away from the plate that it would almost never generate a swing, it loses its purpose. Refer back up to the strike zone plot above, and you’ll find a number of these.

Consider this sequence, as Cole tries to put Kris Bryant away after getting ahead in the count, 1-2.

ColeNC1

ColeNC2

ColeNC3

Gerrit Cole, usually, has one of baseball’s best fastballs. Relatively speaking, Cole’s fastball is a big reason the Pirates played a Wild Card game in the first place! In that Wild Card game, though, Cole didn’t have his typical heater. We saw him throw three consecutive two-strike fastballs to Kris Bryant that were nowhere near the strike zone. We saw him throw his fastball down the middle more often than he had all season. We saw him repeatedly miss with the fastball up-and-in, and maybe most importantly, we saw the Cubs hitters take advantage of nearly every mistake Cole made.

Without command of his fastball for an evening, we saw Gerrit Cole resemble a lesser version of himself. Which is really just to say, we saw him resemble someone a step below one of the greatest pitchers on the planet. Still not a bad place to be.





August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Brian Mangan
10 years ago

August – excellent work again. You’re one of the best at taking new data and putting it to actual practical use. This article is a great example of that.

Here’s a thought I had while reading this article — in a WC context, would it make sense for managers to essentially give two SP the starting nod and keep one ready in case the starter is having a bad day?

Cole didn’t look good last night, as you point out, and it was fairly apparent from the first inning that he wasn’t right. It wouldn’t have mattered last night since the Pirates didn’t score, but it might make sense for a manager to have a second starter to take the ball from the 2nd inning onward and try to keep them in it.

It’s weird to think of pitchers “having it” or not but that’s just something that seems to happen to us humans. If Cole went 1IP last night and the Pirates won, he’d likely be available early in the NLDS — and of course, if the Pirates lose, nothing matters. All the 162 games before were for nothing.

WILLIAM
10 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mangan

The interesting thing is that both of the starting pitchers selected by Clint Hurdle are excellent hitters. And excellent bunters.

I suspect that some of the hesitation to put Francisco Liriano in the game may have come from his prior start not being very good. It was much like Cole’s start last night.

And this was a most excellent article. Showing the pitches on the graph in a visual fashion helps people who are not used to watching baseball see what experienced viewers saw last night. Pitch placement was not very good. If the Cubs weren’t swinging fairly wildly, Clint Hurdle would have went to the bullpen much earlier. They didn’t have much success except for the home run swings. I mean that’s not much consolation, but like the article says, the homerun swings came on fairly good pitches.
Who knows? Maybe Liriano tweeked his shoulder warming up for the game. They would never tell us that. So it’s difficult to second guess Hurdle’s decisions.

Brian Mangan
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

Yeah, it’s certainly not to second-guess Hurdle. Nobody would yank their starter after one inning in this scenario, at least up until now.

But if you buy that guys “have it” or don’t… and I do… and maybe August does… then a quick hook to a second “starter” to start as if it was his game might not be a bad move.

Brian Mangan
10 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mangan

Maybe you can, maybe you can’t. Just thinking aloud about it.

The WC game is unique for a lot of reasons. It’s not like an all-hands-on-deck Game 7 in which everyone on your team has pitched their hearts out to get there.

If you are in the WC, you have a minimum of one day off but more likely a week off to set your rotation exactly how you’d like it, plus another day off before your Division Series starts.

All-hands-on-deck is a strategy we’ve seen in baseball forever. Why not something new (and maybe better) for a new Wild Card format?

Maybe the answer is a full bullpen game. Maybe the answer is a second starter. Maybe the answer is deciding on your starter during the warmups. The one thing the answer seems to *not* be, though, is sticking with “your guy” on a night he doesn’t have it, because you don’t have the luxury of waiting to find out.

Eephus
10 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mangan

I wonder how much of it was adrenaline/atmosphere related? One thing pitchers tend to battle is overthrowing in big games like this. Even Arrieta seemed to have more misses up than he usually does. It would be interesting to track a pitcher’s first playoff start against regular season starts to see if there is a pattern.

Jim Price
10 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mangan

Hindsight. He’s your best pitcher, any manager will give him some leash to figure it out.

David K
10 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mangan

But how many times have we seen a really good SP struggle in the first inning, and then “settle down” and be lights-out for many more innings after that. How was Hurdle to know if Cole was going to remain erratic for the rest of the game, or settle down and do better? We’d need to look at the stats from Cole’s other starts in the past couple of years to see if his first innings of work have any indication of what was to follow in successive innings.

Brian Mangan
10 years ago
Reply to  David K

You’re right, we don’t know. I think it’s a question that should be asked, though. Love baseball.

WILLIAM
10 years ago

He’s 25 years old. He had an off night. He learned from the experience. When he becomes a New York Yankee, I’m sure he’ll win World Series with them. Not that the Pirates can’t win, but they simply won’t be able to afford to keep this guy past his initial contract. As a Pirates fan, only do we understand this, we accept it and expect it, and actually take some pride in winning in spite of it. He will be replaced with someone like Mat Latos to the Pirates will help become a master pitcher again, or Tyler Glasnow from the minor leagues. But for now he’s a Pittsburgh pirate, and he’s our guy. Four runs in six innings from a guy who works his butt off and gave us a chance to win is good enough for me. Thank you Mr Cole. Good season guys. See you in Bradenton Florida in the spring

Hurtlocker
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

This is pretty funny, do Yankee fans still believe they can afford any player??

cornflake5000
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

Just to let you know, Cubs fans are keeping their eyes on Cole and McCutchen as well. The Yankees are going to have some competition.

WILLIAM
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

Bob Nutting and Neal Huntington have already said if they don’t believe they can be competitive 4 Cole if he decides to become a free agent. It doesn’t get any more plain than that. Good news is that we have 3 starting pitchers in the minor leagues that are incredibly good. Nick Cannon, Tyler Glasnow, and Jameson Taillon.
It’s like losing Russell Martin. We will survive. Enjoy him while we have him. And you can follow his career afterwards.

Gregory Polanco still has not signed a long term deal with Pittsburgh. He refused a 6 year contract in spring training, similar to the one signed by McCutchen and Marte in their rookie years.

cornflake5000
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

It’s too bad… you guys actually have a great team. In all seriousness you guys had a great season. Congrats and I’m sure there will more in the future!

Pirates Hurdles
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

Geez calm down William, Cole is a Pirate for 4 more years and Cutch has 3 years left.

Well-Beered Englishman
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

[not sure if Nick Cannon is a real baseball player or a joke name]

cornflake5000
10 years ago
Reply to  WILLIAM

I think it might be that guy using the voice text app.

FLORIDA wRONg
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

This is so true. People think that just because the Cubs had a few mediocre seasons in our history that we’re underdogs but actually we’ve always had a Yankees-esque capability to outspend everyone else in our division; ownership has just chosen, usually, not to do so in order to lull the other teams into a false sense of security. But after we hoist the trophy this November, the offseason will be one long shopping spree. We’ll get Heyward, Price, and Cueto…maybe Zobrist, all of them at discount because they will want to share in the juggernaut experience. And the Ricketts’ deal with Governor Scott Walker ensuring a permanent cash subsidy to the Cubs from the state of Wisconsin’s employees union pension fund will be in place to provide the money to sign Cole and McCutcheon by the time they are available. We’re unstoppable. Conservative estimates were for an 8 to 10 year dynasty but with our revenues and farm system I’d modestly surmise it’ll be closer to 15. Montreal will end up getting their franchise from the NL Central because all the owners in it outside of Chicago will be so tried of losing and will want to sell out.

Harold Martin
10 years ago

As anyone could have told you, so much for “playoff experience” mattering. This was not an issue of Cole letting his nerves get to him and Arrieta not doing so. This was an issue that sometimes you have high variance outcomes, sometimes you have low variance outcomes, and often you perform somewhere in the middle. Bad time for Cole to have a low variance outcome, but more proof that “playoff experience” isn’t worth the time it takes to type out when predicting who’s going to have a better game.

troybrunoMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Harold Martin

Based on the chart and point of the article, I think Cole def had a high variance outcome! Also, “variance” might not mean what you think it means…

Harold Martin
10 years ago
Reply to  troybruno

Clumsy usage, but I hear it used relatively often in this way.

Facebook Twitter OMG
10 years ago
Reply to  Harold Martin

It depends on something, eh?

Strawman
10 years ago
Reply to  Harold Martin

??? I didn’t see any mention of playoff experience in the article, are you responding to someone else?

Harold Martin
10 years ago
Reply to  Strawman

Certainly a lot of pre-game commentary about Cole’s playoff experience meaning something and Arrieta’s lack of playoff experience meaning something. On this very site, in fact, in the comments section to the article discussing the quality of last night’s pitching matchup.

troybrunoMember since 2016
10 years ago

Based on the chart and point of the article, I think Cole def had a high variance outcome! Also, “variance” might not mean what you think it means…

Kuz
10 years ago
Reply to  troybruno

Variance is the mean square deviation of a set of data.

mapsamountainrange
10 years ago

“By average velocity, it’s the third-hardest heater in the league.”

Maybe a small point, but I think this should say fifth. Change the filter off of “qualified” and you’ll see Syndergaard and Eovaldi each a full mph faster with about 150 innings pitched.

SKO
10 years ago

Interesting that 4 of his worst 5 games in terms of Heart% came August 17th or later, and 5 of the top ten. Wonder if he just wore down a bit in his first 200 inning+ season. Perfectly understandable if so.

Ma-Ti
10 years ago

What’s MY Heart% ?

spreagadh
10 years ago

I wasn’t able to watch the game, so just going by the gifs now, but it looks to me like he’s short-arming his pitches quite a bit there.
Even more than his usual delivery.
It might also just be the camera angle fooling me, but it sure looks a lot more jagged and choppy to me.

Jimbo
10 years ago

Arietta’s command was not as sharp as he has been lately either, although he did throw alot of strikes. The Pirates couldn’t/didn’t make Arietta pay – although the narrative of the game would be different if just a couple of those hard hit balls would have gotten through the infield when the Pirates had runners in the middle innings.

Look at the pitch chart and you will see numerous of Arietta’s pitches up and out of the zone and up and in the zone, way more than usual lately. And Montero did his share of reaching for pitches as well.

Jimbo
10 years ago
Reply to  Jimbo

*Arrieta* not Arietta.