Gerrit Cole’s Resurgence Is Here To Stay

One of my favorite articles from the offseason was Ben Clemens’ piece about Gerrit Cole. It’s a thorough explanation of why and how Cole is still one of the league’s best pitchers, this despite a down year and public perception that several others had surpassed him. Through the first few weeks of the season, we’ve gotten strong reassurance that Cole is indeed still one of the best pitchers in the sport.
Cole has been fantastic through five starts and 34 innings pitched, with a 0.79 ERA, a 2.21 FIP and — get this — zero home runs allowed. That last point is the most important one. Last year, no pitcher in the majors gave up more home runs than Cole (33). It was his kryptonite the entire season. He would be coasting through a game, striking out 29.3% of the batters he faced, and then suddenly a ball would find itself in the seats and his start would blow up in front of him. His longest stretch without giving up a long ball in 2022 was three games, a feat he managed on two separate occasions. But this year, he seems to have turned the corner. The key to Cole’s success during this turnaround has been his fastball. There are a few things contributing to this that tie in with one another, but I’ll start with his four-seam fastball location:


Cole has been excellent in keeping the ball up on his arm side both in and out of the zone. You can see that in the heat maps, but if it helps to know, 32.4% of his four-seam fastballs have been in the upper third of the strike zone, or above and to either side of the upper third. Last year, that mark was only 21.1%, the lowest it has been since before his breakout year in 2018 with Houston. Cole has one of the best four-seam fastballs in terms of velocity and stuff; if he locates the pitch in its ideal spot up in the zone, it’s extremely difficult to hit. The following two pitches are great examples of how hard it is for a hitter to get on top of a precisely located, high-velocity fastball with ride:
Vladimir Guerrero Jr. and Matt Chapman have been two of the best hitters in baseball this year in terms of both hard contact and results. Both are routinely crushing fastballs. Yet neither was able to get their best swing off due to Cole’s location. Even the best hitters can’t square up Cole when his fastball command is on. That’s perhaps an obvious statement, but it’s necessary to point out. It’s why he broke out with Houston and why he has been one of the most productive pitchers in baseball over the last five seasons. The question, then, is how he returned to having great fastball command. For that, I’ll turn to some information on his release point and extension.
| Year | Vertical Release (ft.) | Horizontal Release (ft.) | Extension |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 5.66 | -2.20 | 6.2 |
| 2019 | 5.85 | -2.02 | 6.3 |
| 2020 | 5.61 | -1.91 | 6.6 |
| 2021 | 5.68 | -1.92 | 6.6 |
| 2022 | 5.78 | -1.79 | 6.5 |
| 2023 | 5.90 | -1.68 | 6.3 |
It’s a simple concept. If you want to more precisely target a specific spot in the zone with a pitch you throw half the time, then alter your release point to set yourself up for consistent success. Cole is releasing the ball higher and closer to third base than he ever has in his career, and with the least extension he’s gotten down the mound since his Pittsburgh days. You might be thinking that’s counterintuitive. Typically, a four-seam fastball’s qualities will be the best with more extension and a lower release point, and you’d be right to think so! However, there is some nuance to consider with Cole’s situation.
So far, this is the least amount of induced vertical break (IVB) he has had since joining the Yankees, but a sacrifice in IVB due to an altered release point and decrease in extension has allowed him to have pinpoint command. If you want to learn more about IVB, check out Justin Choi’s incredible piece from last year, but as a quick refresher, it’s essentially the movement that causes a fastball to “rise” relative to a hitter’s expectations. It’s not like Cole’s fastball is suddenly bad — it’s still sitting at 17.6 inches of IVB, a -4.4 degree vertical approach angle (VAA), and 96.8 mph average velocity. The IVB is still well above average. His VAA, the angle at which a pitch enters the zone, is still flat enough to fool hitter’s expectations. And the velo is still top notch! Basically, the sum of the parts still makes for an elite, 99th-percentile pitch, especially when you add the command improvement. The .141 batting average against and -9 run value he’s accrued (-8 last year) prove the sacrifices are paying off.
Cole’s improvements in the top of the zone are having effects elsewhere, too. If I were a hitter facing Cole, I’d be forced to focus my eyes up and nowhere else. You have to pick your spots against a pitcher of this quality. If you don’t hunt the fastball in its most frequent location, you’re going to get beat by it over and over again. Because of that, when Cole does target the bottom of the zone, it’s unexpected — and it’s freezing hitters. He has only thrown 51 total fastballs at or under the bottom third of the zone, but 21 (41.2%) have gone for called strikes. That’s up 10 percentage points from last year and is the highest mark since his 2018 breakout. It doesn’t matter who you are, covering 97 with ride at the top and bottom of the zone is nearly impossible.
Other than the four-seam fastball itself, Cole has made some other tweaks here and there that have contributed to his resurgence. The first is how aggressive he is in 0-0 counts. To put it plainly, he is attacking hitters. The ace has never been within three percentage points of a 70% first-pitch strike rate, but this year, he is at 71.5%. It’s not just from his fastball either; he is using his curve as an 0-0 offering in the zone more frequently than last year. In general, he has continued the uptick in curveball usage that we saw at the end of last year. That’s also in line with Cole’s general willingness to be more adaptable with his pitch usage on a game-to-game basis. This year, he has used his fastball as much as 64.2% of the time and as little as 42.3% of the time. Better command and less predictability keeps hitters honest.
When you’re a great pitcher who hasn’t seen any notable decline in the quality of your stuff, you’re typically a safe bet to regain elite form. At Gerrit Cole’s level of talent, it doesn’t take a dramatic overhaul. A slight adjustment in release point was all he needed to be the top-of-the-zone killer he had been in the previous four seasons. That, along with strategic in-game adjustments, suggests there is no regression coming any time soon.
Esteban is a contributing writer at FanGraphs. One of his main hobbies is taking dry hacks every time he sees a bat.
Love to see it. Seems like a good dude and has gotten a raw deal from Yankee fans that expected Walter Johnson
I’d say that the hate has been way more concentrated from other fans, as he’s hated far more than reasonable especially after the sticky stuff issues, then of course joining the Yanks doesn’t help. There’s about a dozen other guys on the team that gets more hate from their own fans.
When was he not “surgent”? Dude has been an ace since he got to Houston
Anyone else getting an error message on the gifs stating that they do not exist? I am using a Chrome browser by the way.
Weird, not sure why but I’ll look into it!
Good stuff. Cole is an ace in every sense of the word, and it really feels like he’s been so consistently great for so long that people kinda forget who he is. He’s the most durable pitcher of his generation (maybe Nola and Márquez can give him a run for his money there tho) and a true horse for modern standards. The run prevention is great, he pitches deep into games, and he’s one of the very few pitchers in all of baseball I would start in a Game 7 and tell “you got 130ish pitches, go get em” to. The road to 200 wins continues for him.
Durability and reliability is something fans tend to overlook, and that is a big part of Cole’s excellence. Workhorses don’t just provide value with the outs they get, they also provide value for your team on the day before and after their start. It’s so much easier to be aggressive with your bullpen if you have Gerrit Cole going the day after, and you’re so much more likely to have a relatively well rested bullpen the day following a Cole start. This is part of why I roll my eyes a bit at pitcher WAR.
which is why I don’t understand why he’s considered “soft” in NY. He’s the most durable starter in the game, with pristine playoff numbers. I usually roll my eyes at this kind of stuff, but if there’s a “toughest” pitcher in baseball it’s Gerrit Cole
The answer is because many/most Yankees fans suck and many think that anything short of perfection is absolute failure and players who aren’t perfect should be treated poorly. I’m a Yankees fan since 1995 and the spoiled attitude of many Yankees fans had gotten more and more tiresome
I agree with all of this, but pitcher WAR is cumulative—Cole does get credit for the innings he pitches over his peers.
He was a workhorse in Pittsburgh, too, but he was so inefficient—it was frustrating to see him throw 120 to get through 6. Nice that he learned to get over that, pitch deep despite all the Ks, and stay healthy all these years.
His point is that pitcher WAR doesn’t measure the knock-on effect that a reliable 7-inning starter has on bullpen performance.
also, none of these gifs work
I’m sorry, but I’m not buying this at all. The guy has had a weakness for the long ball most of his career, with double digit HR/FB over his past 6 seasons/1070 IP. But now that he’s gone 34 innings without allowing a homer, we decide that he’s permanently leveled up?
I mean, his xFIP is the highest it’s been since he left Pittsburgh; if he pitches exactly as he has, but his HR rate regresses as the weather warms, his RA/9 will end up right around where it’s been the last 2 years. I get that the premise of the release point stuff is that he’s suddenly solved his vulnerability, but we know that his 0.0% HR/9 isn’t sustainable, and so it matters a ton where the inevitable regression stops. I”m betting closer to 1.00 than to 0.00. Granted, 1.00 would be a big upgrade over his post-Pirate career, but given his reduced K rate and increased BB rate (K%-BB% is down from ~27% over 3 seasons as a Yankee to 21% this year), I think it would all wash out and he’d end up where he usually does: one of the very best starters in the league, but not the actual best.
I know all these April articles have to be SSS stories, but at least the Pete Alonso one didn’t lean on his 65 homer pace. Tell me if this is still a story when Cole’s given up 5 dingers, whether that’s in 2 more starts or 2 more months.
well it’s not like this is the first month Gerrit Cole’s been awesome in
You know what else is small sample? The two starts that have lowered his K% were against Cleveland and Toronto. Since the start of 2022, those two lineups are 1st and 3rd in the AL in lowest K%, 1st and 6th overall. He will eventually give up home runs this season, especially considering the division he plays in with the hitter-friendly ballparks and elite hitters therein. Doesn’t mean there’s been no improvement, or that he didn’t also keep Philly and Toronto’s high-SLG lineups in the park when the park is yankee stadium.
Last year, Cole ranked 23rd in WAR, 21st in FIP, and 30th in ERA among all starters. So if he returns to being “one of the very best starters in the league, but not the actual best” this year, how is that not a resurgence? Did I miss the part where the article says Cole is now the single best pitcher alive?
In any event, Cole’s currently running his highest GB% since 2017, his lowest FB% since 2017 (and his highest IFFB% ever), and his lowest Barrel% since 2016. So while he is indeed getting fewer Ks and giving up more contact than he has in recent years, that contact is also notably weaker. Which is to say that while he’s obviously not going to run a 0% HR rate all year, it doesn’t look to me like he’s just run into a lucky stretch so far, but rather than he’s getting a lot more weak contact and therefore a lot fewer HRs.
As a Yankees fan, I’d obviously love Cole to pair all this weak contact with a return to a K rate around 11-12%. And maybe he will! After all, if one expects his HR rate to regress a bit, it seems reasonable to expect his K and BB rates to do the same. But for now, I’m pretty happy with a more earthbound HR rate that doesn’t entirely fall apart when you look under the hood. And if Cole ends the year as merely a 200-inning workhorse sitting comfortably among the top 5-10 starters in the league, well that sounds just dandy.
I don’t disagree with the idea that Gerrit Cole has been one of the best pitchers in MLB again, at least so far. But “he’s here to stay” implies something a bit different than “he’s back.”
Weird how that very first picture looks like Gary Sinise playing Gerrit Cole.
I’ve been thinking that as good as Cole has been, there hasn’t been a “Gerrit Cole season”, I.E., one where he is clearly the best pitcher in MLB. 2019 was close, but, his teammate (JV) was just as good.
He’s always had the stuff. always had the durability. He likely wasn’t happy with how last year went, so made some tweaks to change things.
Would not be shocked if this is the year where he leads the league in a bunch of categories & wins a unanimous CY award.
Nice breakdown!