Henderson Alvarez Almost Has Felix’s Changeup
Felix Hernandez’s changeup is one of the best pitches in baseball. How can we actually know this? You could, if you wanted, look at the assigned run values. Those’ll tell you what happened on Felix’s changeups, specifically. But, those run values get complicated, since all pitches are inter-related. One pitch has an effect on another pitch, even if it’s of a different type. Yet there’s a very simple solution to this. How do we know Felix’s changeup is amazing? Felix is amazing, and he uses his changeup a third of the time. So it stands to reason the latter has a lot to do with the former.
A year ago, I was talking to a major leaguer, and when we somehow got to the topic of Henderson Alvarez, the player remarked that Alvarez seemed like he was one little tweak away from becoming a superstar. That much is easy to understand — Alvarez is still very young and he still throws very hard, and all of his pitches have life. It’s easy to see the upside in Alvarez’s repertoire. Maybe he’ll never reach his ceiling, but because of his ability, his ceiling is higher than almost all others.
I was reminded in my chat earlier today that Alvarez has something in common with Felix. Actually, he has a lot of things in common with Felix. That would be another indication of Alvarez’s upside. If you’ve watched Alvarez, and thought to yourself he has an ace’s arsenal of pitches, you haven’t been wrong. He just hasn’t yet made the most of it.
I wanted to have a little fun with the Baseball Prospectus PITCHf/x leaderboards. The goal was to compare pitches to Felix Hernandez’s pitches, so I isolated right-handed starters in 2014, and looked at pitches thrown at least 100 times. I narrowed categories down to velocity, horizontal movement, and vertical movement, and — using z-scores — I calculated differences between different pitches and Felix’s pitch. I started to see a lot of Henderson Alvarez’s name.
Take sliders, for example. Alvarez throws his slider in the mid-80s. Ditto Felix. The movements are comparable. Alvarez is separated from Felix’s slider by 1.9 total standard deviations. This ranks his the fifth-most comparable slider, out of 96 candidates.
Move on to four-seam fastballs. Alvarez is separated from Felix’s four-seamer by 1.2 total standard deviations. This ranks his the ninth-most comparable four-seamer, out of 153 candidates.
Sinkers? Alvarez is separated from Felix’s two-seamer by 0.8 total standard deviations. This ranks his the third-most comparable sinker, out of 120 candidates.
And at last, we arrive at the changeup. Alvarez is separated from Felix’s change by 0.6 total standard deviations. This ranks his the first-most comparable changeup, out of 87 candidates. The next-closest is more than twice as far away. Felix averages a 90mph changeup. Alvarez averages a 90mph changeup. Both of them have the same tail. Both of them have almost the same sink. That Felix change is one of the league’s truly outstanding pitches. Its signature characteristic is being hardly separated at all from the fastball. Alvarez is as close a comp as you’ll find. The rumors are true: Henderson Alvarez throws Felix Hernandez’s changeup.
And it’s not an accident. From Juan C. Rodriguez:
Typically, pitchers strive for a 10-mph differential between their fastball and change. Alvarez used to be among those. During a game against fellow Venezuelan Felix Hernandez in 2012, Alvarez took note of his changeup velocity.
“I told myself, ‘He throws his changeup 90-91, I can do the same thing,'” said Alvarez, whose fastball per PITCHF/x averages 93.6 mph, just 4.6 mph faster than his average changeup velocity. “From that time I started throwing it harder and it’s given me good results. It’s a hard changeup, but if it has a lot of action it’s good, too…The change and the sinker are my two biggest strengths. Without them I’m not a pitcher.”
From Brooks Baseball, here are Alvarez’s relevant pitch velocities before and after that game opposite Felix:
| Pitch | Before, mph | After, mph |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Seam | 94.8 | 94.7 |
| Sinker | 93.8 | 94.0 |
| Changeup | 86.6 | 89.6 |
It really did just click. Alvarez has thrown the same fastball, and the same sinker, but he’s kicked up his changeup a full three miles per hour. And it’s not like Alvarez was working on some lousy, tertiary offering; his changeup was a scout favorite as he advanced through the minors. Observers liked Alvarez’s change. Then he tweaked it to be more like Felix.
And, just last season, Alvarez finished with a 2.65 ERA in almost 200 innings. That’s promising, and a hell of a lot better than what Alvarez did in an abbreviated 2013. Yet, obviously, Henderson Alvarez isn’t Felix Hernandez. Alvarez finished with almost league-average peripherals; Felix nearly won the AL Cy Young. Alvarez, for whatever it’s worth, generated slightly worse-than-average results with his changeup. Felix’s change was almost 25 runs better than average. By pitch characteristics, Alvarez’s change and Felix’s change are one and the same. So why doesn’t Alvarez’s change measure up?
Usage Patterns
Here’s the simplest way to look at this — for 2014, some changeup rates:
| Split | Alvarez | Hernandez |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 21% | 32% |
| RHB | 12% | 33% |
| LHB | 29% | 31% |
| RHB, 2 strikes | 24% | 55% |
| LHB, 2 strikes | 36% | 36% |
Now, this doesn’t explain the results. If anything, the results explain what you see above. But think of these as indicators of trust, along with usage. Against lefties, Alvarez throws just as many changeups. Against lefties with two strikes, it’s the same story. Against righties, though, they almost couldn’t be more different. Felix throws a few more changeups to righties than he does to lefties, which is unusual for any right-handed pitcher. Alvarez trims his changeup usage against righties to roughly one per eight pitches. With two strikes, the split is also large: for Felix, the change is a putaway pitch. For Alvarez, it’s one out of four. Felix uses his changeup a lot more against right-handed hitters. So, he has a lot more confidence in it against right-handed hitters. Alvarez, perhaps, should throw his changeup more. Or, there are reasons why he hasn’t yet. We continue!
Release Point Consistency
This is going to be a little less intuitive, but the numbers in this table are in units of feet. Again, this is for 2014. H refers to horizontal release point, where a negative number means the pitch was released that many feet toward the third-base side of the middle of the rubber. V refers to vertical release point, and that number means the pitch was released that many feet above the rubber.
| Pitch | Alvarez, H | Alvarez, V | Hernandez, H | Hernandez, V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-Seam | -2.07 | 6.52 | -2.21 | 6.22 |
| Sinker | -2.15 | 6.44 | -2.28 | 6.19 |
| Changeup | -2.36 | 6.30 | -2.23 | 6.16 |
Maybe it would help to look at the Felix side first. You see incredible consistency in the fastball, sinker, and changeup release points. The spread in horizontal release is less than an inch. The spread in vertical release is also less than an inch. Now look at Alvarez. The spread in horizontal release is more than three inches. The spread in vertical release is almost three inches. All these pitches are supposed to be thrown from the same angles, with the same motions. That’s a big part of what makes a changeup so deceptive — out of the hand, it looks like a fastball. Alvarez’s release points haven’t been wildly inconsistent; he just hasn’t disguised his changeup as well as Felix. The arm has dropped a little bit, relative to the fastballs, and if Alvarez had his way, this wouldn’t be the case.
I’m not suggesting that hitters can pick up on a difference of a couple inches from 60 feet away. Maybe they can and maybe they can’t, but what this implies is just that Alvarez’s overall throwing motions are more different than Felix’s are, between pitch types. Alvarez doesn’t perfectly mirror his own mechanics, so it makes sense that his changeup would perform worse than one of the best changeups anywhere.
Location
Here, the differences stop being subtle. This is a table of average vertical pitch locations. The numbers are in units of feet, where 0 refers to the vertical middle of the strike zone. So, a positive number means a pitch was usually in the upper half. A negative number means a pitch was usually in the lower half. Comparing, again, fastballs and changeups:
| Pitch | Alvarez | Hernandez |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Seam | 0.10 | -0.15 |
| Sinker | -0.30 | -0.41 |
| Changeup | -0.60 | -1.25 |
Alvarez’s average changeup was almost eight inches higher than Felix’s average changeup. The changeup, as you know, is a pitch you want to keep down, at the lower edge of the zone or below. That’s not always true, but that’s usually true, and an elevated changeup tends to be a mistake. More importantly, look at the separations between sinker heights and changeup heights. Alvarez’s average changeup was lower than his average sinker by fewer than four inches. Felix’s average changeup was lower than his average sinker by more than 10 inches. That’s how you get hitters to swing over the top of a change if they misidentify it as a two-seamer. With less of a gap, a hitter can still make contact by focusing on the same area.
A much simpler changeup table:
| Location | Alvarez | Hernandez |
|---|---|---|
| In Zone | 39% | 21% |
| Out Of Zone | 61% | 79% |
As suggested by the first table, Alvarez throws a lot more changeups in the strike zone. That’s fine, sometimes, but it’s often not the intent. The two pitches get about the same number of swings, more or less, but in Felix’s case, there are more swings at balls, which is the perfect outcome for a pitcher.
Let’s isolate just strikeout situations, so, here are two-strike frequencies:
- Alvarez: 45% changeups low, below the zone
- Hernandez: 73%
Felix has been a master of burying his changeup where hitters can’t do anything with it. Alvarez, not so much. When things go right, this happens:
But, the numbers speak for themselves. Against Alvarez’s two-strike changeups last year, opponents batted .188. Against Felix’s, .057. It’s not that Felix never makes mistakes — he did allow four two-strike changeup home runs — but usually, with a changeup, Felix doesn’t give the hitter much of an opportunity. Hitters against Alvarez’s change have more of an opportunity. He doesn’t bury it nearly so much, and he throws it pretty close to where he throws his sinker.
By the usual identifiers, Henderson Alvarez essentially throws Felix Hernandez’s changeup. Which is extra interesting, because he also almost throws Felix’s four-seamer, two-seamer, and slider. Yet there’s throwing a pitch and there’s using a pitch, and while Alvarez’s changeup behaves like Felix’s, generally, it doesn’t quite behave the same, specifically. Alvarez’s throwing motion is a little different, and his locations are a little different, and because of this or perhaps not because of this, Alvarez doesn’t throw his changeup nearly so much against same-handed hitters. At the same time, you can see the promise in Alvarez, and you can see the gap between where he is and becoming an ace.
The good news: Alvarez isn’t yet 25. He’s a little over three years into his big-league career. Felix says that he mastered his changeup in 2009, when he was a little over three years into his big-league career. Henderson Alvarez, already, is a perfectly useful groundball starting pitcher. But he remains just one or two little tweaks away from becoming a superstar.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.


If the pattern sticks, I am guessing a little known blogger covered this exact subject in great detail a week earlier.
If you’re going to make an accusation, just make the accusation, so that we may proceed to me asking you why the actual fuck I would steal content from some other baseball blogger somewhere who is presumably in charge of a site and monitoring the content at FanGraphs. That would very literally be career suicide!
Good write Jeff, but DAMN you! I had Alve on my sleeper list.
Don’t know what all the fuss is from some of these guys. But to be sure, don’t even give them any credibility by responding to them. That’s what they want. They don’t even deserve our energy for a negative click. Keep up the good work. Just don’t tell too many people about my favorites.
He could be talking about me. I had an article almost done about the same thing titled ” Henderson Alvarez: The Felix Hernandez Starter Kit” and asked you if you noticed it in a chat I believe.
But I am certainly not blaming you for being more hard working than me and finishing an article in a day, not a week.
Oh, I definitely get ideas from chats. The chats can be incredibly helpful. Very thankful for chats! Though in this case now I feel a little bad. Don’t want to derail your own progress.
Banished to the Pen is on the map !!! woo!
I’m somewhat gobsmacked by the gushing of love, but even more by the claim it was “a year ago” that you and the major leaguer secretly declared Alvarez was a bona fide “superstar” in the making.
Your fangraphs expert brethren didn’t exactly share the same tone a year ago…
Karl de Vries, 2/18/14: “The main reason why Alvarez will be a forgotten man in most leagues in 2014 is because the unsightly 5 K/9 he posted last year actually improved his career mark. And while that 3.59 ERA might look swell against a 3.18 FIP, it sits alongside an alarming 67.7 percent strand rate and a 22 percent line drive rate that, while not terrible, suggests that a .271 BABIP was charitable (and this is especially important for a guy who pitches to contact so frequently). When you take away his no-hitter, the ERA over 16 starts suddenly stands at 3.94, which sounds a lot more like the guy sporting a career 4.25 mark. True, Alvarez has a strong ability to generate ground balls, and his commitment to challenging hitters has resulted in historically low walk rates. But if WHIP help is the best case fantasy scenario for him, keep in mind he’s likely to cough up base hits at a more frequent clip in 2014.”
http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/marlins-rotation-jose-fernandez-and-the-also-starters/
Dave Cameron, 3/26/14: “Henderson Alvarez still doesn’t miss any bats, and I’m pretty sure we can expect serious regression in his 2.6% HR/FB rate from 2013.”
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/2014-positional-power-rankings-starting-pitchers-16-30/
Chris Cwik, 4/30/14: [while placing Alvarez dead last in the dead last tier]: “Alvarez lack(s) upside.”
http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/nl-starter-tiers-may-2014/
Which of course led me, the good student, to pen my draft day note: “Hendu- great spring but Fangraphs hates”…
So a small request, next time you’re talking to a major leaguer in the definitive conversation of the Second Coming of Cy Young (or at least King Felix) … how about letting the rest of us wet our beak a little?
(Oops, hopefully this doesn’t sound too bitter, I appreciate the article and the research, it’s an excellent read — just venting while smacking myself on the head for missing out on drafting him!)
To be clear, the comment wasn’t that Alvarez was a superstar in the making. It was that he had (and has) the potential to become a superstar, because the weapons are present. He obviously has a high ceiling, but he’s paired that with relatively underwhelming statistics, which cannot be ignored. Oftentimes, pitchers fail to make all the adjustments necessary to become front-line starters.
the part of the article that I found most interesting was your comparison of their slider. This surprises me a lot, as Alvarez’ breaking ball is what I would consider a work in progress
Really enjoyed this analysis
Your article is a limited yet ample basin which fills me with enough Alvarez refreshment until a spring training refill arrives.
Great article. Very interesting analysis. Goes to show why they say baseball is a game of inches. A mere inches in release point and location make a significant difference in pitch performance, as your analysis shows.
I enjoyed this piece. The presentation of the release point data struck a chord with me with respect to the way that inconsistency might manifest. Clearly, the mean release points of each pitch type do not align, but does that make them inconsistent in terms of the batter’s perception. In other words, how much variation in release point occurs within each pitch type? Perhaps, Alvarez has a generally inconsistent release point, such that the release point per se may not necessarily telegraph pitch type.
As a tangent, while release point consistency is often talked about as a key to command and control, does a high variability in release point of all pitches make it more difficult for the batter to pick up the incoming projectile and induce more bad swings and poor contact?
JEFF!!! MY BOY!!! HATERS CANNOT RELATE!! YAH TOO STELLAR!!! KEEP SMACKING EM WITH THAT, BOY!!! FIEND HOSING THAS WHAT WE UR FANS DO. AINT NOBODY GONNA SAY SOMETHIN BOUT JEFF WITHOU BEIN SPRAYED. AMEN
Seeing Alvarez live as much as I do, I actually mentioned that his changeup kind of looked Felix-like at times last year. Its always nice when you’re thinking about stuff like that, and then get to see an article on fangraphs about it. Not the first time this has happened. One of the reasons I love this site. Good article
Whoever woke Mr. M. today should remember this, “The serpent, the king, the tiger, the stinging wasp, the small child, the dog owned by other people, and the fool: these seven ought not to be awakened from sleep.”
Chanakya
Sucks the Jays had to trade this dude in the deal. Coulda had a guy with Felix’s changeup and a guy with Halladay’s sinker pitching on back to back days 🙁
Fascinating article. Really highlights how weird/frustrating baseball can be sometimes. Which is also kind of what makes it awesome.
Great article, do you think we’ll see a spike in K% ala Cliff Lee? He is learning to control/trust that change. He is the best pitcher I would never draft but I wouldnt be surprised if he starts striking out people at a much higher clip.
First of all I want to say I love this article as a former college/pro pitcher. One thing I would like to see thrown in here is the usage of the fastball inside between the 2 pitchers. Pitching hard inside and controlling that inner third is key to making a changeup most most effective. Alvarez’s inconsistent release point between pitches makes a huge difference in his performance. His release point drops significantly from his fastball to changeup which in turn tells you his elbow is dropping keeping his fingers from staying on top of the ball and ends up pushing it more keeping his ball higher in the zone more often. The more downhill you throw the more action you will get. But honestly overall he needs to work more downhill on all of his pitches. Felix has almost perfected his mechanics which shows up in the difference in their numbers. Love watching Felix and Fernando Rodney throw their changeups. Pedro Martinez still has the best changeup I’ve ever witnessed.