If Cal Raleigh Does It, When Will It Be?

Cal Raleigh is hot. Thumping three homers in a span of two days has put Big Dumper at 56 on the season with 11 games left to play. That binge gives him a realistic shot at hitting a nice round 60 on the season, a threshold that only an elite few sluggers have ever reached. He’s doing it as a catcher, which is absurd. He left the old single-season home run record for catchers in the dust a long time ago.
As I learned all the way back in first grade, 62 is only two more than 60. Given Raleigh’s predilection for blasting bombs in bunches – he hit six in six games earlier this year, and nine in a separate 11-game stretch – Aaron Judge’s single-season AL home run record (and for some people, though not me, the “true” home run record) is definitely in play.
As is tradition at FanGraphs, when someone goes for a home run milestone, we forecast when it might happen. Whether it’s Judge’s quest for 62, Albert Pujols’ push for 700, or Shohei Ohtani’s bid for 50/50, it’s fun and useful to predict when the actual milestone game will occur. I’ll start with the methodology, but if you’re not into that, there are some tables down below that will give you an idea of when and where Raleigh might hit either his 60th, 62nd, or 63rd homer.
I started with our Depth Charts projection for Raleigh’s home run rate the rest of the way. That’s based on neutral opposition, so I also accounted for park factors and opposition. Since Raleigh is a switch-hitter, I used the specific pitchers the Mariners are expected to face to determine whether he starts each game batting lefty or righty, and also used those pitchers’ home run rate projections to determine opponent strength. I used a blend of projected starter, home run rate, and observed bullpen home run rate to come up with a strength of opposition estimate. That let me create a unique home run environment for each game. I also told the computer to randomly select how many plate appearances Raleigh receives each game, with an average of five most likely but some chance of four or six.
The Mariners might give Raleigh a day off, but it’s far from certain. He hasn’t had an off day in the last month, for example. I modeled a 5% chance of a rest day on each game of the two series that surround their regularly scheduled day off, but capped it at a single rest day; after he rests once, the program assumes he’ll play every single day the rest of the way. I also included a factor that makes Raleigh’s home run rate fluctuate around his projections, which means that in some simulations he hits home runs in 9% of his plate appearances, while in others he hits them 5% of the time. I simulated the remainder of the season a million times to get the likelihood of his 60th homer happening in a given game:
| Day | Opponent | Home/Away | Odds of 60th Homer | Cumulative Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/17 | Royals | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/18 | Royals | Away | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| 9/19 | Astros | Away | 0.38% | 0.45% |
| 9/20 | Astros | Away | 0.73% | 1.17% |
| 9/21 | Astros | Away | 3.09% | 4.26% |
| 9/23 | Rockies | Home | 5.73% | 9.99% |
| 9/24 | Rockies | Home | 7.02% | 17.00% |
| 9/25 | Rockies | Home | 8.32% | 25.33% |
| 9/26 | Dodgers | Home | 6.20% | 31.53% |
| 9/27 | Dodgers | Home | 6.86% | 38.39% |
| 9/28 | Dodgers | Home | 6.77% | 45.16% |
That top-line number isn’t particularly surprising; we’re projecting him for 59 home runs right now, so I’d be shocked if his odds of reaching 60 were above 50%, but it’s definitely close either way. The home series against the Rockies, and the last game against the Astros (he faces Hunter Brown and Framber Valdez in the first two of that set), are his best opportunities for homers. T-Mobile Park suppresses offense, but it’s not particularly tough for lefty home runs, and the Rockies are scheduled to start three replacement-level righties in that series. The last series of the year against the Dodgers is another fruitful time to see no. 60; it’s not that those games are particularly easy, but the Los Angeles bullpen is a disaster right now and this is an accumulation game; in plenty of these simulations, Raleigh does most of his damage against the Rockies and then hits the capping 60th homer in the last series.
Adding the individual games up, the Rockies series is the best one to attend if you can only go to one and want to see the 60th home run. The Dodgers series is a close second, though, and it’s better for the next statistic I’m going to show you, the odds of Raleigh hitting his 62nd homer in a given game:
| Day | Opponent | Home/Away | Odds of 62nd Homer | Cumulative Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/17 | Royals | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/18 | Royals | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/19 | Astros | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/20 | Astros | Away | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| 9/21 | Astros | Away | 0.17% | 0.19% |
| 9/23 | Rockies | Home | 0.64% | 0.83% |
| 9/24 | Rockies | Home | 1.32% | 2.15% |
| 9/25 | Rockies | Home | 2.30% | 4.44% |
| 9/26 | Dodgers | Home | 2.28% | 6.73% |
| 9/27 | Dodgers | Home | 3.10% | 9.82% |
| 9/28 | Dodgers | Home | 3.71% | 13.54% |
Hey, 13.5% isn’t half bad. If you’re trying to see this particular milestone, though, you’ll need to go to Seattle, and probably for the last series of the season. Even then, six homers in 11 games is a steep enough hill to climb that when he does it in the simulation, it’s most frequently in the very last game. These odds are particularly volatile right now, though; if Raleigh hits another home run or two before the weekend, the path to 62 opens up far more. If he doesn’t, it’s almost impossible. If I tell the model that Raleigh will hit two homers in the next four games, it gives him a 25% chance of reaching 62. If I instead give him none in those four games, the odds fall to 4%. In other words, he won’t reach the milestone in the next few days, but they still matter tremendously.
Finally, for the sake of completeness, what about the odds of Raleigh getting to 63 and setting the new AL record? It’s going to be tough:
| Day | Opponent | Home/Away | Odds of 63rd Homer | Cumulative Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/17 | Royals | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/18 | Royals | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/19 | Astros | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/20 | Astros | Away | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 9/21 | Astros | Away | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| 9/23 | Rockies | Home | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| 9/24 | Rockies | Home | 0.42% | 0.61% |
| 9/25 | Rockies | Home | 0.89% | 1.50% |
| 9/26 | Dodgers | Home | 1.04% | 2.54% |
| 9/27 | Dodgers | Home | 1.53% | 4.07% |
| 9/28 | Dodgers | Home | 2.05% | 6.12% |
The TLDR of all of this: If you want to see Big Dumper hit a historic home run, you’ll need to be in Seattle. Depending on whether you’re into round numbers or Marisiana, you might prefer the Rockies series or Dodgers series. If I could only go to one game, though, I’d pick September 26 against the Dodgers. It has a nice spread of likelihoods for each milestone. There’s also some chance that the Mariners could clinch the AL West that day, and Clayton Kershaw is scheduled to pitch for the Dodgers. That’s a lot of cool things all lined up at once — and maybe, just maybe, one of those cool things will be a home run that you’ll be able to tell your friends you saw in person for the rest of your life.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Glad you say the 26th is the game to attend, I have tickets. Fingers crossed!
Thanks for doing this, Ben!
I have tickets to 27th and 28th. Can’t go on the 26th but might add the 25th to my schedule! Go Mariners and go Cal!!
This article should have a forward by O.J. Simpson.
I’d put way more emphasis on the HR milestones than the clinch or seeing a Kershaw start. With 9/28 having the best cumulative odds that one of those happens, that’s got to be the game to go to. Also, it’s the day he has the best chance to pass the “AL record” for HR, which I’d place way above seeing #60 and a fair amount above #62.
It has been just announced that Kershaw is retiring, so his last ever regular season start is probably at least slightly noteworthy…
While his only real shot to hit these latter milestones is in Seattle, Colorado is what is going to determine whether he has any shot at all. When Raleigh gets to about 60 or 61, teams are going to stop giving him any useful pitches at all. That’s what happened to Judge when he got to about 59 in 2022.
At that point, most of the homer opportunities he’s going to get from that point forward are going to be mistake pitches. And there’s no better place to get mistake pitches than in Colorado. Tanner Gordon and Kyle Freeland might not make quite so many mistake pitches, but Bradley Blalock and McCade Brown will. As will much of the Rockies bullpen.
FWIW – the series against Colorado is also in Seattle. Hoping that staff can still make mistakes in a friendlier environment!
Whoops. I definitely misread that.
I mean, Bradley Blalock and McCade Brown will probably still make mistake pitches, just not nearly as many.
Would love to see the Dumper hit dinger #60 and I’m going on the 25th! Woo hoo! FYI: the cost difference between going to one of the games versus the Rockies (all three are value games, with tickets starting at $11) and a game versus the Dodgers is considerable. For 300 level tickets, it’s about a $75 difference.
I find it extraordinary that he’s even close to 60 homers. From Judge, Ohtani, Schwarber, etc. you expect them to give it a shake every so often, but this is bordering on surreal.
I know Judge should win the AL MVP hands down, but c’mon, if Dumper gets to 60, surely they are giving him the award? And Seattle is finally going to make the playoffs after missing out for awhile, that has to count for something?
I don’t think Judge has a lock on it even if Cal doesn’t get to 60. What he’s doing as a catcher is unprecedented. What Judge is doing is amazing, but it’s not singular.
Agreed. I think FanGraphs readers see Judge ahead of Cal in WAR about 5 times a day, which makes it feel like a no-brainer. But voters aren’t bound to WAR, and even then their WAR is pretty close.
8.8 to 8.4 as of 9/17. That’s not a huge difference. Who knows how voters will weigh the extra work/responsibility Cal has as a catcher.
I also think sometimes voters bias towards “something that’s never been done before” vs. “something slightly better that happens at least once every 15-20 years”.
Judge’s advantage on Baseball Reference’s WAR is substantial: 8.6 to 6.7. At least as many people are seeing that metric. But I think there’s a good chance Raleigh will win.
I’d probably give it to Raleigh, because Rule of Cool, but I would point out that FanGraphs readers are more likely to think it’s close than folks who use B-Ref and ESPN to get their stats – Judge has a 1.9 WAR lead in rWAR.
I think the voters are specifically looking for reasons to not give it to Aaron Judge. He’s on track to win a batting title while he hits 50-something homers and the collective reaction seems to be “so what?”
Aaron Judge is likely the first underrated Yankee ever. This will be the third best offensive season since the steroid era ended, but since he also had the first two nobody cares. And people were awfully bored-sounding last year too when he was having one of the literal best seasons of all time.
Yes, I think Cal Raleigh is going to win it. And it’s not like he hasn’t had an MVP level season, this is a pretty amazing year he’s had. But Judge is so good that sportswriters can no longer comprehend what he’s doing. If you rewound the clock to 2021 and said “there’s a guy who batted .325 and hit 51 homers and is worth 9.5 wins and he lost the MVP” they would wonder what sort of horrible thing he had done to deserve that snub. This would blow people’s minds four years ago.
Judge’s real problem is that he hit already hit .311 with 62 HR and .322 with 58 HR in 11 WAR seasons. I honestly don’t know what he has thinking. The poor sap just set himself up for failure.
“He only leads the American League in two of the three triple crown categories. Which he already did. Boring! I can’t write a column about that.”
-Sportswriters
The biggest problem with the Judge for MVP 2025 campaign is that he’s unfortunate enough to be the one person we feel comfortable holding up to the standard of “should be as good as Aaron Judge.”
The surprise factor relative to writer expectations does contribute to awards voting – I think today more than ever.
We are absolutely desensitized to the stuff that Judge is doing.
Here’s a fun little fact: Despite Cal Raleigh leading the league in homers, Aaron Judge has a higher ISO than Raleigh because he’s hit 7 more doubles and 2 more triples.
Which is nuts, because his batting average is also 80 points higher.
I know Cal Raleigh’s value on the defensive side is far greater because a 55 or 60 grade catcher is just way better to have than a 55 or 60 grade right fielder, and that the rational case for Raleigh’s MVP case is tied up with his defensive position. But that’s not what most people are talking about.
Look at Michael Jordan. He was clearly the best player in the league every season he played in. He should have been MVP every year, but won it less than half the time.
I think Judge wins it. But I think it’s close. Draftkings has Raleigh at +240. That sounds about right to me
Man 63 would be awesome! From a catcher even more so!
I admire the lengths to which savants will go
just to figure out what a .247 hitter will do in
the waning days of the baseball season, as
the sun sets on the fallen empire of libertines.
While sabrmetrics has all the trappings of an
advanced science, it isn’t necessary to enroll at
MIT or CalTech to calculate the odds of this or
that event happening. Cal Raleigh is a case
in point. He has hit 56 homers in 149 games.
That’s an average of 0.376 HR/game. If he
maintains that pace for the last 11 games of
the season, he will hit 4 more homers—60 in
all, give or take. The margin of error for this
crude calculation is based on the square root of
the sample size: 4/√149 =0.328, which means it
could be off by 1/3 of a homer, either way. Not
bad for a first approximation, absent further data.
The rest is Bayesian, moving from a priori (bare-
bones assumptions, based on a few simple stats)
to a posteriori probabilities, based on everything
from the opponent, the ball park, the opposing
pitcher, the time of day or night, whether Raleigh
will be hitting from the left or the right side of the
plate on any given at bat, whether he will catch or
be the DH, the weather conditions at the ballpark,
what Cal had for breakfast, how much sleep he got
the night before, the particular bat he is using, how
many runners are on base, his place in the lineup,
whether his big toe is aching, and whatever else is
pertinent for the computer to “model” (that is, turn
into a set of polynomial equations whose solutions
yield a specific value for the propositional function
y = f (x) where x = CR and y = (e.g.) Sept. 30, 2025.
For this you need a PhD? No, though it helps, esp.
if you want to work for Elias Sports Bureau, or be a
sabermetrician. Meanwhile, I’ll stick with the crude
calculations, rub a little tobacco juice on my 1962
Elvin Tappe card, and be proud of the fact that “El”
never hit a home run in his entire career, spanning
six seasons as a catcher with the Chicago Cubs
(who else?), thus qualifying him to become the
manager—one of four in the rotating “college
of coaches” who led the Cubs to a 9th place
finish (59-103), 18 games ahead of (who else?)
the Original Mets, down under Casey Stengel.
You don’t need a slide rule or an abacus to
figure out what’s going to happen next—just
divide the number of homers by the number
of at-bats (562). In Cal’s case, that’s easy—
one every 10.04 AB. With 11 games left, he
should get about 44 more AB, so . . . he’ll hit
~~4.4 HR—give or take. What did I tell you?
Four one way, four the other, with a margin
of 4.4/√44 =0.663 in either direction, which
means 3.737—5.063—in short, either 4 or 5;
almost certainly no more than 5, and (in the
worst case) no fewer than 3. Those aren’t
facts; they’re probabilities, no different from
weather forecasts, election predictions, and
thousands of other examples in everyday life.
It’s child’s play—even Donald Trump could
figure it out . . . well, maybe not, but then,
he had a little help with the forecast, and
made sure of the prediction, beforehand.
Call it global warning—but don’t say you
weren’t notified, a priori and after the act.
So, genius, what if he doesn’t hit 60? So
sue me—I’ll be happy to pay off, provided
you can tell me how many days we have
left before democracy is pronounced dead.
Is there a soul doctor in the House or Senate?
Even Pascal wouldn’t take that wager—and
if I were his bookie, I wouldn’t bet against the
White House fixing Jacob’s Ladder, either.
Raleigh ‘round the AL West flag, then lower it
to the ground, before the world series starts,
and the world ends, like an old boy of winter.
Algorithms away: select Charlie Hustle for
the Hall of Shame, by unanimous con men.
Science isn’t everything, but it beats graft.
Everybody else is either praying or preying.
Say it ain’t dough, Rose. Say it ain’t dough.
You should take a road trip to Seattle, Ben!
It’s now Monday and Cal has 58. I have tix to Tuesday, Wednesday and Saturday. Looking forward (crosses fingers) to seeing Ms clinch AL West and bye, and Cal reaching 60+.
The latest forecast for 62:
Analysis of the ABSOLUTE probability of the 62nd HR occurring:
Game Odds of Milestone Cumulative Odds
1 0.05% 0.05%
2 0.85% 0.90%
3 2.94% 3.84%
4 3.37% 7.21%
5 4.79% 12.00%
6 5.77% 17.77%
60!!!!
Looks like September 24th was the winner!!!
Wow. Never in my life did I think a catcher would hit 60 homers. This is truly extraordinary
Will the Dodgers pitch to him?
Matt Martell predicted the Raleigh MVP before the season: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-fangraphs-2025-staff-predictions/.
It’s also fun to look back some of the other bold predictions in https://blogs.fangraphs.com/excuse-me-our-bold-predictions-for-the-2025-season/.