Anthony Rendon Is a Los Angeles Angel
One of the last unsigned stars available, third baseman Anthony Rendon found his new home Wednesday night, signing a seven-year, $245 million with the Los Angeles Angels as first reported by Jon Heyman. Rendon, who finished third in the National League MVP voting and made his first All-Star appearance in 2019, hit .319/.412/.598 for 7.0 WAR in 2019, all career bests. A key member of the World Champion Washington Nationals, Rendon’s departure leaves a giant hole in D.C.’s lineup.
That Rendon has achieved this much is a fantastic comeback story given the obstacles he faced early in his career. While it’s hard to characterize a first-rounder as a true underdog, Rendon had multiple ankle surgeries in college from injuries and partially broke his other ankle in his second professional game for the High-A Potomac Nationals in a non-contact injury. But since 2015’s knee and abdomen injuries, he’s managed to stay healthy and crucially, the injuries didn’t appear to thwart his development. Over the last four years, Rendon’s only averaged 15 missing games a year. That’s not Ripken-like, but it’s enough to put the injury worries on the back-burner.
Among position players, Rendon has been fourth in WAR over the last three years, behind only Mike Trout, Mookie Betts, and Christian Yelich.
Rendon’s contract with the Angels is a whopper, guaranteeing him $35 million a year. It does come with a certain amount of risk, as there’s a very real difference in the future outlook of a free agent who is going to turn 30 versus one who’s only 25 or 26. Seven years — rather than the 10 years the Angels gave to Albert Pujols — reduces the risk at the back-end of the contract. And unlike Pujols, Rendon also wasn’t showing signs of decline before signing his deal.
The Angels missed out on Gerrit Cole, and wisely turned instantly to the next-best player on the market rather than bemoan losing a bidding war to the Yankees. If Rendon had signed with the Dodgers, that team would have had to do considerable shuffling to get the most from Rendon, moving a perfectly good player in Justin Turner off of third base. The Angels, a team with a number of holes, don’t have any roadblocks to just sticking Rendon in the middle of the order and letting him help the team stop wasting Mike Trout’s prime. An infield of Rendon, David Fletcher, and Andrelton Simmons might single-handedly suppress the league-average for BABIP on groundballs.
The ZiPS projections for Rendon feel a little light; that’s the case for a few reasons. The first issue is that people tend to overrate just how healthy a player will be in his 30s, so a lot of the missing WAR is ZiPS hedging its injury bets. In this case, it’s purely based on age and position; Rendon’s early-career injuries are too far back for the computer to care about. ZiPS also uses a mix of defensive stats rather than just UZR in its WAR. I’d still take the over on the projections, but they’re not as crazy-bearish as first glance might suggest:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | .276 | .363 | .499 | 525 | 89 | 145 | 35 | 2 | 26 | 97 | 68 | 92 | 5 | 131 | 5 | 4.4 |
| 2021 | .273 | .359 | .493 | 499 | 83 | 136 | 34 | 2 | 24 | 92 | 63 | 87 | 5 | 128 | 4 | 3.9 |
| 2022 | .270 | .356 | .481 | 478 | 78 | 129 | 31 | 2 | 22 | 85 | 60 | 81 | 5 | 125 | 3 | 3.4 |
| 2023 | .263 | .347 | .461 | 456 | 71 | 120 | 28 | 1 | 20 | 77 | 55 | 76 | 4 | 117 | 2 | 2.7 |
| 2024 | .258 | .339 | .440 | 430 | 64 | 111 | 25 | 1 | 17 | 68 | 49 | 68 | 4 | 110 | 1 | 2.1 |
| 2025 | .252 | .329 | .408 | 404 | 56 | 102 | 22 | 1 | 13 | 59 | 43 | 59 | 3 | 99 | -1 | 1.2 |
| 2026 | .245 | .318 | .387 | 375 | 48 | 92 | 18 | 1 | 11 | 50 | 36 | 51 | 2 | 91 | -2 | 0.6 |
Given Rendon’s age, the contract is likely a bit of an overpay from a pure value standpoint, but as I’ve noted repeatedly in the past, any team with Mike Trout on the roster is essentially “pot-committed” to winning games. The team has done a generally lousy job of assembling a roster around Trout, and getting a superstar third baseman is a nice way to remedy the situation. The Angels still need to upgrade their rotation, which is in the bottom third of the league, so they ought not to consider the offseason complete quite yet.
But when it comes to Rendon, my thumbs are firmly locked in the upright position.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
“big nice.” -Jon Heyman. Couldn’t put it any better myself.
I’m sorry that he won’t be coming back to the Nationals, but I am glad he is going to the Angels. Of course, they need a lot more than Rendon to be competitive.
As Dan points out they need SP, like a couple of #2s since there are no #1 FAs out there. The rumor of the Halos asking Cleveland on the availability of Kluber would be a nice start.
He’s going to be the worst contract of this offseason. An above average player who had been injury prone recently who had a great contract year with a juiced ball. It’s laughable to put him in the same category as Betts, Lindor or Trout.
Lol
Didn’t realize they only put the juiced balls in play when Rendon was hitting. Thanks for the heads up.
No, no it’s not.
Congrats on achieving the rarely seen -50 comment rating!
Rendon just killed any chance he had of ever winning an MVP. Should have given us a hometown discount 🙁
Should have just worked for a few million dollars less than his actual worth. Is that so much to ask a person?
I’m also a Nats fan, but another way to look at this is that the Nats could have signed Rendon to this deal and just snuck in under the CBT, per Sportrac. Filling out the rest of the roster would have put them over, clearly, so they would have had to cut salary elsewhere or accept the hit, but it’s doable. Maybe they prefer to spread that money around, but man, I wish they had re-signed both Stras and Rendon. If a crazy-rich ownership group in a decent market won’t pony up to keep homegrown superstars coming off a WS win…
I actually think signing Strasburg instead of Rendon (assuming they could only keep one) works out better for them, given the presence of Kieboom. I think it might even make sense to move Turner off shortstop (to 2nd or 3rd) and let Kieboom start there.
I’m also excited about Kieboom, and if the Nationals intend to spend all the Rendon money elsewhere then I can see how that might have been a factor in their decision making.
Anthony Rendon is now one of Los Tres Angeles
An excellent sentence: “An infield of Rendon, David Fletcher, and Andrelton Simmons might single-handedly suppress the league-average for BABIP on groundballs.”