Is Acquiring Hill Wise for the Diamondbacks?

The Diamondbacks traded Kelly Johnson to the Blue Jays on Tuesday, getting Aaron Hill and John McDonald in return. Arizona’s motives for the trade are questionable, as the deal could actually hurt their playoff odds.

Eno Sarris covered the deal from the Jays point of view, noting that free-agent-to-be Johnson will likely be used to extract compensatory draft picks this offseason. Johnson is mere percentage points from attaining Type A status — and prior to the trade, he was the highest-ranked non-Type A middle infielder. The Jays employed this tactic last season when it traded for Miguel Olivo on the day before free agency started and allowed him to walk. The Jays again are shrewdly exploiting the compensation system.

Add to that the idea that Johnson is a better player than Hill and the deal makes plenty of sense for Toronto. But does it make any sense for the Diamondbacks, who are in the thick of a divisional race?

First, a comparison of the swapped keystone cornermen. Johnson has a paltry .310 wOBA — in line with his 2009 performance — but he has sustained his power from a year ago, posting a .202 ISO with 18 home runs. Scouts have never raved about his defensive prowess, but UZR speaks kindly of his efforts over the last two seasons. He isn’t a liability on the basepaths and is generally regarded as a solid overall player. He won’t light the world on fire, but a league average player at second base is valuable. Contractually, his cost control runs out after the season as he reaches free agency.

Hill has a far worse .265 wOBA that ranked as the second worst in the American League. His power is also nonexistent, which is surprising given his ~.200 isolated power marks in each of the last two seasons. In fact, he had the ninth-worst ISO among qualifying American League players, at .088, and there is little reason to think that a change of scenery will fix the issue. His line drive rate has increased, but his batting average on balls in play has only gotten worse. Since his contact rate has also increased, it really just seems like Hill hasn’t gotten good wood on the ball for two years now.

His defense and baserunning are generally thought of positively, even if the advanced metrics don’t bear it out, but he isn’t a wunderkind in either area. From a contractual standpoint, Hill has $8 million club options for both 2012 and 2013, and he has no shot of becoming a Type A free agent if those options are declined.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

All things considered, Johnson is the better player, so if the Diamondbacks saw something in Hill that led them to believe he would better aid their playoff hopes, it’s hard to figure out their vision. One possibility was that they went for Hill given his cost control over the next two seasons, and thought that their coaching could make him worth more than the annual $8 million salary. However, that doesn’t seem very plausible, as smart money would have Kevin Towers declining the options after the season. Who in their right mind would want to pay Aaron Hill $8 million per year to hover around the replacement level? Even as a 1.5-2 win player, he could likely be had for much less money on the market.

That both Hill and Johnson will likely reach free agency next season, that Johnson is clearly a superior player right now, and that Johnson will net his employer more valuable compensatory picks puts the swap firmly in favor of the Jays. Johnson wasn’t vying for the MVP Award, but Hill has shown nothing over the course of the last year and a half that he is anywhere near the player he was from 2006-09.

But the deal wasn’t just about swapping second basemen. The Diamondbacks also acquired John McDonald, a super-utility player who, unlike Willie Bloomquist, can field at an above average clip all around the diamond. McDonald can’t hit worth a lick — though he is actually posting a higher wOBA than Hill at the moment — but he gives the Diamondbacks depth at shortstop in the absence of Stephen Drew.

However, the difference between McDonald and Bloomquist is slim at most over one month, so they didn’t exactly make a splash to increase their odds of winning the division. Plus, McDonald is a free agent after the season who, per the presser, fully intends to return to the Blue Jays if given the opportunity.

On the surface, this deal seems completely about the 2011 season, and under that guise it makes very little sense for the Diamondbacks. They downgraded at second base in a more significant way than they upgraded at shortstop, and potentially lost out on better compensation picks in the process. This is a head-scratcher.





Eric is an accountant and statistical analyst from Philadelphia. He also covers the Phillies at Phillies Nation and can be found here on Twitter.

56 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Rufio_Magillicutty
15 years ago

Its sacrilegious to compare Fast Willie to John McDonald

tdotsports1
15 years ago

It’s sacrilegious to compare Johnny Mac to anyone, he has no equal!

Jason
15 years ago

Also, the fact that Hill’s K rate is so much lower than Kelly’s equalizes the fact that he hits for no power.

jaywrong
15 years ago
Reply to  Eric Seidman

although, it does add to the towers story of shipping out high k players.

abreutime
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason

How do you figure???

My echo and bunnymen
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason

This is a head scratcher on par with the Johnson for Hill & J-Mac deal

joser
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason

You’re going to have to show the research supporting this. That’s a claim that would change offensive valuations pretty much across the board.

rdillon99
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason

Hill k’s less because he swings at the first pitch and hits an infield pop-up…. I’m not sure how that is any more valuable than a strikeout.

grady
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason

AH pops up astonishingly often. May as well be k’s.

johnny 5
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason

when hes just beating it into the ground for a double play and popping up the first pitch instead of consistently working counts it doesnt really equalize
hill was looking like a nice first round pick for a few years with the jays but who knows what happened ? maybe he needs his eyes checked, maybe he was a juicing or just started trying to swing for the fences to much cause he has fallen off a cliff !

big league chyut
15 years ago

I think that. though I think Kelly Johnson is easily a better player than Aaron Hill:

a) There’s something to be said about not having your whole team have the SAME weakness, and when the rest of the team K’s so much, I think there’s more of a benefit to the Diamondbacks for reducing K’s than there is for other teams.

b) John McDonald also means less use of Sean Burroughs and/or Cody Ransom. McDonald may not be the biggest upgrade over Willie Bloomquist, but pushing one of those two off the roster is an added benefit that’s glossed over.

c) Ultimately, this is 1.5 months of Kelly Johnson for 1.5 months of John McDonald and Aaron Hill. Neither team looks like it’s going to hold on to the players it’s acquired, so it’s not like it’s a huge steal either way. I think AA, once again, made a very shrewd deal, but I think that it’s not like the Diamondbacks are going to lose the NL West solely on the basis of this deal.

joser
15 years ago

No, they’re going to lose the NL West because in the past week they’ve apparently completely forgotten how to win baseball games.

DD
15 years ago
Reply to  joser

The Giants have forgotten for about a month though…and they NEVER knew how to hit anyway.

Marc
15 years ago

This sucks. But it rests all on the coaching staff to fix Hill. His approach is just so flawed, but a lot of that may rest on Dwayne Murphy’s swing-at-everything-pull-everything approach. Just get hot over the next month, Aaron. I don’t care if you need to BABIP .500 just to hit .280 or something. We just need him to be competent at all costs.

Danny
15 years ago

Really amazing Johnny Mac has a better wOBA than Hill this year…

everdiso
15 years ago
Reply to  Danny

and last year, too. but by an even bigger margin.

The DBacks would be wiser to use JMac as their starting 2B, and keep Hill on the bench.

csawce
15 years ago
Reply to  everdiso

sounds embarassing

cthabeerman
15 years ago

When I hear the names of 2010’s Type A compensation players like Victor Martinez, Adam Dunn, Carl Crawford, Adrian Beltre, Cliff Lee, and Jayson Werth (to a lesser extent Downs and Balfour, as those teams knew their first-rounders were protected), you know what name doesn’t come to mind? Kelly Johnson.

Let’s take a realistic look at what happens if the D-Backs keep Johnson and he makes the Type A ranking. How many GMs are going to give up their first-round pick for Johnson? The answer is perhaps none. He might sign with a team that has a protected first-rounder, but who wants to give up a second-round pick for Johnson? Not too many GMs, either. There’s certainly potential for a rebound there, but he’s still going to cost money and a draft pick besides. There’s plenty of risk involved.

So, without a big market because of Type A locking him down, what can Johnson do but accept arbitration? He could pin the D-Backs for $7-8MM after his raise, a significant portion of the team’s payroll…or they just let him go for nothing. Regardless of their desired path, a Type A designation could end up hurting the team in wrangling an extra pick (or two) out of the draft, or kill a chunk of their budget for a questionable return.

So they trade him away for Hill. Okay, not an upgrade, but Hill’s been a life-long Jay. He could accept arbitration in Toronto after all the time he’s spent with the organization. So it makes sense for the Jays to ship him off, away from potentially accepted arbitration. Hill also gets a chance to play in the postseason, and maybe that’s worth a gentleman’s agreement not to accept arbitration with the D-Backs in the offseason.

That still leaves Johnson’s situation in Toronto to consider. If Johnson gets Type A, he could still accept arbitration, but his salary won’t be as big a dent in the Blue Jays budget as it was in AZ and the position’s open. If he doesn’t accept, AA could get a 1st or 2nd-round pick, although the question of who signs Johnson remains unanswered. Or Johnson could remain a Type B and earn AA a supplemental pick when he moves on. None of these options are particularly bad for the Blue Jays, especially when coupled with the potential of Hill accepting arbitration.

In the end, it’s just a bunch of compensation finagling to get players into a spot in which they can decline arbitration and get their teams picks.

-C

sc2gg
15 years ago
Reply to  cthabeerman

I’m pretty certain that the Jays will not sign Hill after the season. While there is something to be said of team loyalty to certain players in the face of underwhelming performance (hello, Jerek Deter), the Jays haven’t really shown any inclination they’re going to be that sort of a team anytime soon.

Will Aaron Hill help the Jays next season if he’s resigned? Not likely. I hope he gets on track but I don’t know that he’ll really help any team at all unless he gets it together.

The Jays have a ton of flexibility in any way, as well as a very, very deep system that can replace Hill through sign or trade or even magic. If anyone in the league understands that Hill isn’t very good, it’s AA. He won’t be back.

Johnny Mac will be back though, either to perform this same role or as a coach with the team or in the minors.

Charlotte
15 years ago
Reply to  cthabeerman

I don’t believe Hill has any chance of making Type B.

Also, last year didn’t have a lot of middling Type As get signe that I can think of, but the year before both Marco Scutaro and Orlando Cabrera were worth Type A compensation, just to name middle infielders. There’s always going to be someone who desperately needs a second baseman.

Charlotte
15 years ago
Reply to  Charlotte

My bad, Hill’s still hanging onto the bottom of Type B. He wasn’t listed as a potential source of draft picks for Toronto because, you know, he would accept arbitration immediately and enthusiastically.

Mitch
15 years ago
Reply to  Charlotte

KJ would have to be just as much of an Arb risk as Hill is. Problem is KJ is currently a type A and who is going to give up a 1st rounder to sign 30 yo KJ coming off a poor year????

Oscar
15 years ago

“His line drive rate has increased, but his batting average on balls in play has only gotten worse. Since his contact rate has also increased, it really just seems like Hill hasn’t gotten good wood on the ball for two years now.”

What? That means he’s probably getting unlucky, not that he somehow is that mythical hitter who can not only defy his BABIP but also his xBABIP.

Paul
14 years ago
Reply to  Eric Seidman

He may be making reference to the extreme likelihood that this is the first time a FG writer made the “good wood” argument as opposed to the rote luck regression argument.

Apparently Aaron Hill is the offensive Matt Garza. Sabre laws are easily cast aside if they don’t fit the narrative.

Marcus
14 years ago
Reply to  Eric Seidman

Just watch Hill on a consistent basis. Nothing will reassure you more that he is broken.

Slick
15 years ago

Since Hill and Johnson are essentially a wash because of the amount of time left in the season so Arizona gained some bench depth in McDonald. The fact that Johnson may be worth some compensation to Toronto if he leaves, is the cost of doing business. The Jays get something in return for throwing some depth Arizona’s way. Seems fair to me.

chuckb
15 years ago
Reply to  Slick

Except that Hill and Johnson aren’t at all a wash. As the article points out, Johnson is pretty clearly the better player and the addition of McDonald does little to negate that. Add to that the fact that Johnson might be worth some compensation in the offseason and this is a pretty sizable win for the Jays, even if it is for just 5 weeks or so.

Alan
15 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

Johnson isn’t “clearly the better player,” especially given the volatility of defensive metrics. He’s clearly the better offensive player, but the Arizona scouts may have Hill’s defense as significantly better than Johnson’s.

I think both players would be insane to decline arbitration, so all this talk about draft picks seems a little premature. Calling it a “sizable win” is laughable. The deal is pretty uneventful.

everdiso
15 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

Aaron Hill is not a very good defensive player, and has earned every single bit of his negative UZR/150 ratings over the last 3 years.

KKC
15 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

Unless of course you actually watch Aaron Hill play..

Scouts > UZR

everdiso
15 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

I watch Aaron Hill play more than most anyone.

Like I said, he’s earned every bit of that negative UZR. He’s a noticeably below average defender, with no range at all to his left anymore, and fairly poor work on double plays as well. He can still range to the middle and fire the ball over to 1st on the run pretty well, though.

ddriver80
15 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

No range to his left anymore? Wow? that is just wrong in so many ways. I watch every Jays game, and nothing could be more wrong.

gabriel
15 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

They are both probably about average defensively right now. UZR likes Johnson more than Hill, but Dewan’s +/- and TZL have preferred Hill over the past few years.

And to throw another scouting report into the mix, I watch a lot of jays games, and would say that Hill has declined to about average at 2nd.

Marcus
14 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

I watch nearly every Jays game, and yes, Hill is average, at BEST.

That is of course when he’s healthy.

Richie
15 years ago

What Slick says. Arizona’s in a pennant race, and now they got a real actual defensive shortstop. If nothing else, they can use him for late-game defensive replacement.

KKC
15 years ago

Fair trade, but I don’t understand why people are so quickly to write off Johnson signing with the Jays?

Alex had an eye on him ever since the start of the year, and they’ll now evaluate him to see if they want him to be the 2B next year. I think even if he hits .230 he’ll be the Jays starting 2B next year.

Welp
15 years ago
Reply to  KKC

Exactly right. It doesn’t seem plausible to me at all that 1) Johnson turns down arbitration and 2) the Jays want him to.

A one-year deal is good for Toronto and it’s something they couldn’t sign him to if he had stayed with AZ (since he’d just accept arbitration there).

Mitch
15 years ago
Reply to  Welp

This. It seems most likely that AA and Johnson work out a deal that keeps him in TOR for another year or 2. I think there’s too much of an arb risk for them to be in this to try and get picks. Those who’ve said that I think missed what’s going on here.

Moonraker
15 years ago

These articles summarize things pretty well. I’ll still be cheering for Hill and McDonald in Arizona, although I can’t say I think Hill will do well, he’s been putting enormous pressure on himself in Toronto and failing, I’m not sure being in a playoff race will help with that.

Arizona also recently traded Brandon Allen and signed Overbay. D-back fans have got to be a bit scared.

David K
15 years ago
Reply to  Moonraker

no kidding

Joel
15 years ago

Kelly Johnson makes nearly $6 million this year. I actually doubt the Blue Jays would offer him arbitration, given how bad he has been this year. That said, I agree completely that this is a puzzling move from the Diamondbacks’ perspective, as Hill is even worse.

Steve
15 years ago
Reply to  Joel

They will offer him arbitration. If he declines, the Jays get a draft pick. If he accepts, the Jays have a 2B for next year for about what picking up Hill’s option would have cost. Not that they wold have picked up the option, but clearly it is an amount they can afford. The Jays will be in need of a 2B (at least until Hechavaria is ready) next season, so offering Johnson way of filling the gap than signing a FA. Either way, it works out, though I suspect AA would prefer the draft pick.

Someanalyst
15 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Nails Steve. Except that I think AA’s preferred scenario is:
A) Offer abitration
B) Johnson accepts and gets 1yr @ ~$7m.
C) Johnson plays one year of average or so 2B
D) Johnson qualifies as a Type B, is offered arbitration and refuses
E) Hechavarria is ready to push Escobar to 2B and the sandwich round pick is just gravy.

Thatch85
15 years ago

Just a guess regarding Kelly Johnson’s defensive development: Those Dbacks coaches know how to coach. Stephen Drew saw similar improvement in UZR after Kirk Gibson hired Matt Williams full time.

joshcohen
15 years ago

I understand the focus on the Type A status from Toronto’s perspective (the consensus seems to be that it’s win/win for Toronto whether or not Johnson accepts arbitration), but that’s not really relevant to the Arizona side of the deal (because it’s not win/win for them if he accepts). Let’s pretend the choices were A. hold Johnson for playoff run (and not offer arb) or B. trade now to maximize return…which makes the most sense?

I submit that (B) makes sense provided you actually improve your team (and, better still, you do it *before* July 31st when you know Drew is out for the rest of the year). As the article points out, there’s the problem. McDonald > Bloomquist, yes, but, only in a cheery version with rose-tinted glasses will Hill approximate Johnson’s value, yielding a positive expected value for Arizona.

Having said that…
“[Hill’s] line drive rate has increased, but his batting average on balls in play has only gotten worse…his contact rate has also increased…” Isn’t that the sort of thing that makes a GM sound less deluded when they say: “Yes, our coaches can fix this guy!” ?

greenfrog
15 years ago

My theory is that a couple of years ago Hill began styling himself a power hitter, even going with a heavier bat (a Troy Glaus model, if I’m not mistaken). Now he seems too slow getting the bat through the zone, resulting in a ton of popups. At his best, he was a line-drive doubles hitter with a compact stroke. That’s what he needs to get back to.

I’ve also wondered about the concussion issue. He did have one of his best seasons the year after the concussion, but head injuries are weird. It seems possible that it could have affected him in subsequent years.

Subjectively, he now seems like an average defender at best. He used to be an elite defender, but those days are long gone.

Marcus
14 years ago
Reply to  greenfrog

He’s definitely been using a heavier bat ever since that 36 HR season. He’s seems utterly convinced he’s a power hitter. If the D-Backs can convince him otherwise, somehow, they’ll have a good hitter.

As for the concussion, I don’t think its been an issue. His hamstring on the other hand…

Luke
15 years ago

I saw a report a few days ago that said Toronto coaches had worked with Aaron Hill and adjusted his swing significantly. The next day (and his last in Tor) he went 3 for 4 or something like that. Might be some substance to that.

Jade
15 years ago

I think you take a look at Hill’s former power, and if you think you can take advantage of that currently untapped ability in that ball park that’s the only way this deal makes sense.

someguy
14 years ago

Kevin Towers is simply replicating the 2007 Toronto infield. That team was magical.

Sadly, he’ll might have to wait until the offseason to pick Reed Johnson, Alex Rios and Vernon Wells.

Greg W
14 years ago
Reply to  someguy

I’m pretty sure he could have Vernon Wells and Alex Rios right now, for half a bag of balls each, if he’d pay their salaries.

Jaysfan
14 years ago

Only in the NL can an infield consisting of Aaron Hill, McDonald and Overbay be contributors on a playoff team. Must be nice.

Jdub220
14 years ago
Reply to  Jaysfan

Doesn’t really have anything to do with the NL. Most teams don’t have Justin Upton, not to mention the 3rd best offensive catcher in the MLB right now.