JABO: Rick Porcello as Young Justin Masterson

The Red Sox clearly have a thing for Justin Masterson. They drafted him with their second-round pick in 2006, then developed him into one of their best young pitching prospects before the Indians demanded him as part of the Victor Martinez trade in 2009. This winter, when he was finally a free agent after spending six years in Cleveland, the Red Sox took the opportunity to bring him back to Boston, signing him to a $9.5 million contract for 2015 despite the fact that he posted a 5.88 ERA last season.

The organization’s affinity for Masterson’s skillset is noteworthy, because this week, the Red Sox signed Rick Porcello to a four year, $82.5 million contract extension on the bet that Porcello is essentially a younger version of this same type of pitcher.

First, let’s do a quick comparison. Here are Masterson and Porcello’s numbers from their age-23 through age-25 seasons, which in Porcello’s case covers the last three years.

Name K-BB% GB% ERA- FIP- xFIP-
Porcello 11% 52% 101 94 91
Masterson 9% 57% 101 97 93

Both Porcello and Masterson were pitch-to-contact groundball hurlers, with Masterson getting a few more grounders and strikeouts at the expense of a walk rate that was significantly higher than what Porcello has posted. They’re not identical, but they’re cut from the same cloth, and heading into their mid-20s, the results were quite similar. By ERA, both were roughly league average starters, though metrics that attempt to eliminate defensive performance from the picture both thought they were significantly above average, with Porcello being slightly ahead of Masterson at the same point in their careers.

Read the rest on Just a Bit Outside.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
holymoly
9 years ago

You say that Masterson’s breakout was due to a huge cut in BB% and HR rate. Since Porcello’s numbers there are already very low, which categories do you see potential forca similar breakout? babip, maybe?

ed
9 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

I’m not Dave, but if you Frankenstein a couple of Porcello’s seasons together, you can sort of imagine what a breakout season from him would look like. Put together his 2013 K% and and GB%, his 2014 BB%, LOB%, and HR/FB, and you’ve got something approaching a poor man’s Roy Halladay season. Or Doug Fister-like.

Now, that’s probably unlikely, but I imagine it’s what a Porcello breakout would be like. Or he could flip out and start striking people out for some reason like Masterson in 2013, but that would be weird.

Damaso
9 years ago
Reply to  ed

yeah that sounds sensible.

looking closer at masterson it seems he had two “breakout” years for entirely different reasons. in 2011 it was huge improvements in BB% and HR/FB%. in 2013 it was K% and BABIP. none of those spikes seem to have been sustainable, but he was good enough where just a couple stat blips like that in any year could turn him into a very good #2 type guy.

looking at porcello, he seems more consistent than masterson. even when he had a spike in K% in 2013 it was balanced out by a HR spike. but even though the fips don’t show it i think we can call last year a legit breakout year, based on his babip finally coming down to average. if that babip stays normal, then yeah any spike in another area could really put him in line for a huge year at some point.

ed
9 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Yeah, I wouldn’t call Porcello’s 2014 a breakout year, either, although one thing Porcello did was get his platoon split under better control. Masterson’s best known problem has generally been his ginormous platoon split, and Porcello has had his difficulties with LHB as well. If Porcello has found a better way to address LHB, like with an improved change or cutter or something, then that could go a long way towards addressing a weakness.

Porcello really stepped up his use of the cutter the last two years, so if he can keep LHB off-balance with that and the change, he might be able to survive with that low K%.