JABO: The Cardinals Have Been Historically Clutch

Thursday night, the Cardinals got thumped by the Reds, 11-0. Bad game. One of those games you just toss out and move on from. You might wonder what this has to do with clutch.

Conveniently, Thursday night, the Cardinals found themselves in basically zero clutch situations. For something a little more representative, consider Wednesday’s game, against the Cubs. Nine outs into the game, the Cardinals trailed 3-1. From there, they yielded no more runs; from there, they scored three more, all in the bottom of the eighth. In that way, the Cardinals won a game in which they were out-hit 11-5. They won a game in which they were out-OPSed .650-.526.

The Cardinals haven’t made a habit of that, exactly, but it gets at the idea. As I write this, the Cardinals have the best record in baseball, by a handful of games. Odds are pretty good they’ll reach or clear 100 wins. It makes sense that they also have the best run differential in the National League. Yet, interestingly, we can also consider OPS differential. By that measure, the Cardinals rank fifth in baseball, between the Pirates and the Yankees. That’s still good, obviously, but there’s something going on in between those numbers and the actual team record. Something that’s made the Cardinals look even stronger.

That something is clutch performance. The Cardinals have been clutch, far more clutch than any other team. It’s admittedly a difficult thing to quantify. And, admittedly, there are multiple definitions of “clutch.” The definition being used here is putting on a particularly good performance in pressure situations. You could think of the Cardinals as having had wonderful timing. It’s lifted their record above what you’d expect.

Read the rest at Just A Bit Outside.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cowboy Sweet N' Nasty
8 years ago

tl;dr – the Cardinals are very lucky. Bunch of Mediocre players riding luck to 100 wins. They will be bounced from the playoffs quickly. Though I guess they have a history of winning in the playoffs with crap teams. The GOBs truly hate us all.

Big in Japan
8 years ago

Wishful thinking much? The Cardinals aren’t 100+ wins good, but they’re as good as any team in the playoffs at full strength. And as you said, they have a history of winning with crap teams, so you can’t write them off, just because they’ve gotten a little lucky. They got extremely lucky in 2006/2011. It takes a little luck to win a championship most seasons.

BigDaddyCool
8 years ago
Reply to  Big in Japan

Lucky every year. 2013 – cluster luck. 2015 – cluster luck. I would say 2011 was not that lucky of a year compared to those two. 2006 was just about postseason luck – the regular season team was terrible.

Cmart's cups
8 years ago
Reply to  Big in Japan

“And as you said, they have a history of winning with crap teams”

No, just no. That happened ONE year re the postseason – 2006. 2004-2005 were legit great teams. 2009 was a very good team that got bounced in the first round of the playoffs. 2011 was a good team overall regular season – but was a great team by the postseason with an amazing lineup and Chris Carpenter pitching like an Ace. 2013 was tied for best team regular season with Boston. 2012 and 2014 weren’t great teams, but the weren’t “crap” teams either. And 2015 is still a really good team even if you strip out the so-called “cluster luck.”

This narrative that the Cardinals have just taken crap into the postseason for the last decade and won anyway is just plain wrong, and it needs to die.

olethros
8 years ago
Reply to  Cmart's cups

The ’06 team wasn’t exactly crap, either. They had a record low win total for a playoff team because practically their entire roster spent significant time on the DL. But everyone got healthy at the end, bringing them essentially back up to the quality of the ’04/’05 teams which each won 100 or so regular season games.

Getting great playoff performances from the likes of Jeff Weaver, now, that was pure luck.

RoyHobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  Big in Japan

I’m just curious as to how many years it takes when you can stop calling it lucky.

Even for a whole season? 100 wins and its all luck?

Mark
8 years ago
Reply to  RoyHobbs

Eh, I think the chart at the bottom of the post answers your question.

Antonio Bananas
8 years ago
Reply to  Big in Japan

Even the 06 cards weren’t that bad. They suffered a ton of injuries and got lucky in he sense that the rest of the division was terrible that those injuries didn’t ruin the season.

McNulty
8 years ago

Exactly. The 2006 Cardinals had Pujols, Edmonds, Rolen playing well when healthy. The pitching was good enough given the hitting and the pitching got healthy and pitched better down the stretch and in the playoffs.

Not the best Cardinals team of the era, but better than an 83 win team for sure. Balances out with the 2004 and 2005 teams.

Jimmer Fredette
8 years ago

I live in the St. Louis area and am a huge Cardinals fan. I cannot believe the success they have had and I really have to agree with the first part of your comment. The team is terrible and gets inordinately lucky. I thought we would finish third in the offseason, so this season has really come as a surprise. The only real takeaway from this team is that Matheny really deserves the Manager of the Year award, and may honestly be the best manager in the MLB. Joe Maddon will likely win it, though, because of the Cubs resurgence, and it will be well deserved as well.