Jake Arrieta Gets His Celebration

Not all no-hitters are thrown by No. 1 starting pitchers. And, not all No. 1 starting pitchers eventually throw no-hitters. This is a crucial truth — randomness always plays a significant part, so a no-hitter can be meaningful without being predictive. Yet, when a No. 1 starting pitcher does throw a no-hitter, it feels a little like validation. It feels a little like a stamp, cementing the reality that said pitcher is an ace. Jake Arrieta spun a no-hitter on Sunday, after having made several earlier attempts. Arrieta was a No. 1 before the weekend, but now he’s more widely recognized as part of the group. Doesn’t need to work that way, but that’s the way it works.

And it’s never a bad time for a reminder of just how good Arrieta has been. See, this can benefit everyone. People who didn’t know Arrieta before now know that he’s good. And people who did know Arrieta before might be less inclined to underrate him. This has gone on for some time. Since the start of last season, Arrieta is tied for second in baseball in ERA-. He ranks third in FIP-. He’s fourth in xFIP-. If you add all the numbers together, Arrieta ranks second in the resulting statistic, sandwiched by Clayton Kershaw and Chris Sale. No-hitters are always a little lucky, but the bigger point is Arrieta required less luck than most. Because, simply, he’s far better than most. It’s been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Arrieta struck out the side in the bottom of the ninth, picking up his 10th, 11th, and 12th strikeouts. That total was a season-high, as Arrieta didn’t want to leave anything to chance. This part is obligatory, though — by what margin did Arrieta preserve the no-hitter? Later in the game, this happened:

Easily could’ve been a single. Earlier in the game, this happened:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Also easily could’ve been a single. It was ruled an error at the time. The ESPN broadcast openly questioned it. After the game, some of the Dodgers questioned it. Even Arrieta himself acknowledged it could’ve been a hit, and such a judgment wouldn’t have been wrong. Beyond his own pitching, Arrieta’s no-hitter was most aided by a judgment call, and that’s a different sort of pitching-independent than we’re used to. It’s the same story as always: look how easily a no-hitter could’ve been spoiled!

But it wasn’t spoiled. And even if it had been spoiled, it would’ve changed nothing about the quality of Arrieta’s performance. The stellar pitcher threw a stellar game against a quality lineup, on the road, so this is a little different from when Chris Heston no-hit the Mets. That effort was no less of a no-hitter, but this one felt more like what a no-hitter is supposed to be.

As an interesting fun fact, according to PITCHf/x and Baseball Savant, Arrieta on Sunday threw a season-high 11 pitches middle-middle. That’s not where anyone ever wants to throw the baseball, so you don’t expect to see that after such a performance, but here’s another way to look at it: Arrieta grooved seven pitches the first time through the order. The rest of the way, he grooved just four. Three of those pitches down the middle came in one at-bat against Chase Utley, in the first. Three more came two batters later, against Andre Ethier in the second. That’s about when Arrieta stopped putting pitches there. It wasn’t a game-long issue.

In some ways, Arrieta’s game was symbolic. Most obviously, Arrieta is a great pitcher now, so a no-hitter is fitting. That’s the first level of it. But, for example, one thing people have pointed to in allowing for Arrieta’s breakthrough is a much-improved slider that sometimes resembles a cutter. Focusing in on that weapon, Arrieta on Sunday used it to miss 12 bats. That’s his highest career swinging-strike total on the pitch. It’s appropriate that Arrieta’s grand achievement would feature such a sub-achievement.

There’s another thing. Arrieta worked through 29 plate appearances. All but five of those were against left-handed hitters. Arrieta threw 93 pitches against lefties, and his previous high as a Cub was 81. Arrieta, you’ll recall, is very much right-handed. So, the Dodgers shoved a bunch of lefties in Arrieta’s face, and he didn’t have any problems with them. The big story of Arrieta’s career turnaround is polishing his delivery to be consistent, but his success is most visible when you consider what he’s done to left-handed bats.

He’s gotten better, of course, across the board. From 2010 – 2013, against righties, Arrieta allowed a .306 wOBA. The last two years, against righties, he’s allowed a .251 wOBA, equaling a drop of 55 points. He’s controlled righties better than almost anyone. That’s great! That’s made him more effective.

But, from 2010 – 2013, against lefties, Arrieta allowed a .360 wOBA. That ranked him in the 11th percentile. The last two years, against lefties, he’s allowed a .232 wOBA, equaling a drop of 128 points. It dwarfs the improvement against righties. Here are the best pitchers against lefties, since the start of 2014, with a minimum of 100 innings in the split:

  1. Jake Arrieta, .232 wOBA
  2. Johnny Cueto, .250
  3. Carlos Carrasco, .252
  4. Garrett Richards, .253
  5. Zack Greinke, .264

Obviously, most lefty pitchers won’t make this list, because lefty pitchers who kill lefties don’t get to face many lefties, but Arrieta has been phenomenal, standing out from this particular group. For the 11 months of baseball or so, Arrieta’s operated with a reverse split, and this year he’s getting lefties to put more balls on the ground, without sacrificing any strikeouts or walks. Few can do what he’s done. Few have done what he’s done. When Arrieta was a rookie, he allowed lefties to slug .505. This year, he’s allowed them an OPS of .470.

You can trace it all through. Arrieta became more consistent with his delivery. That consistency allowed him to be more consistent with his slider. It made the slider more dangerous, because the fastball was better. It made the slider more dangerous, because Arrieta could more easily add and subtract. A better slider made for a better pitch against left-handed batters, because a lot of the time the pitch looks like a hard cutter. These have been the general keys to Arrieta’s emergence. Sunday, everything was on display. The Dodgers lined up a bunch of lefty hitters, so Arrieta came at them with good command and a quality slider, and the Dodgers finished without a hit. Many of them struggled to put a ball in play.

Sometimes, a no-hitter stands as a symbol of baseball’s small-picture unpredictability. This one’s a symbol of baseball’s bigger-picture unpredictability. It wasn’t unpredictable that this version of Jake Arrieta would have such a game. It was unpredictable that the old version of Jake Arrieta would become this version of Jake Arrieta. For this version, a no-hitter made complete and utter sense. This version might just go on to throw another.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BigDaddyCool
10 years ago

not good enuf!

Greg
10 years ago

In hindsight, this guy probably should have been named an all-star.

CalvoMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg

He has been the best pitcher on the Cubs all year long.

Dovif
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg

Best so on the Cubs ain’t saying much. The pen is horrible, Lester is more a no 3 with his non contract year stats, the rest of the sp are disaster. Being the best pitcher in the Cubs is like being the best player on the phi

richdanna
10 years ago
Reply to  Dovif

Wrong… Lester had a stretch from June 14th to Aug 13th where, over the course of 11 starts, he posted a 2.20 ERA, 2.11 FIP, 2.85 xFIP, 0.24 HR/9, 9.65 K/9.

Take away the first month of the season, which was basically like his Spring Training, and he has a 3.08 ERA the rest of the season, including the two eggs he just laid against the Tigers and the Dodgers.

He’s been the recipient of horrible run support all season.

But I assume you’re looking at his W-L record, which, of course, trumps everything that I just pointed out.

Dr. James Andrews
10 years ago

So many sliders…..

wiggly
10 years ago

I think this voice was a little too strong in the ears of the Orioles’ pitching coaches….

BigDaddyCool
10 years ago

Very good piece, Jeff. Good to hear Arrieta being acknowledged as one of the best in the game. For me, it’s Kershaw, Sale and then Arrieta. I think he gets overshadowed a lot because of Lester, who is a great pitcher in his own right, and the tremendous amount of talent the Cubs have in Bryant, Rizzo, Schwarber, Russell, Soler, etc.

This guy needs to be talked about more, not because he threw a no-no, but because he has one of the greatest stories out there. Comes from a franchise who has no idea how to handle pitchers in the Orioles and finds redemption in Wrigley.

durn
10 years ago

I can’t wait until there’s a no hitter/perfect game and the pitchers’ line is all zeroes.

IP:9 ER:0 R:0 H:0 BB:0 K:0 HR:0

Waaaaaaaht?

Phillies113
10 years ago
Reply to  durn

If, and only if, the pitcher records that line on 81 pitches, then maybe I’d be impressed.

durn
10 years ago
Reply to  Phillies113

even better would be 27 pitches. 27 infield flys in a row. the greatest pitching feat ever.

Also, Brendan Fraser completed the perfect, 81 pitch, all strikeout perfect game in Game 1 of the World Series against the Cardinals.

Phillies113
10 years ago
Reply to  durn

AND he hit two home runs!

durn
10 years ago
Reply to  durn

He’s the best I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen all the greatest!

AB
10 years ago
Reply to  durn

I’d settle for even a complete game shutout with 0 K and 0 BB, hits be damned. Maybe something like that could have happened deadball era?

TFFJ
10 years ago
Reply to  AB

Porcello did this just last July against the Tigers, 4 hits allowed on 95 pitches. It was the first time in 25 years, but there have been about 75 instances since 1914. Clemens did it in 1987, which I never would have guessed.
Closest thing to an all zero perfecto was Bucky Walters in 1944 who allowed one hit, losing it in the top of the 8th. Pitch count unknown, but time of game was an 1:23. http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CIN/CIN194405141.shtml

Otter
10 years ago

Another interesting thing about Arrieta… he’s hit his career high in innings. So we’re also entering some uncharted territory, but so far so good.

Mike Rizzo
10 years ago
Reply to  Otter

So does that mean he’s through for the season?

durn
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike Rizzo

yeah, shut him down. had a good run, but we’ll get em next year boys.

Otter
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike Rizzo

Does he play for the Nationals?

joser
10 years ago
Reply to  Otter

Clearly not, else this speculation would be accompanied by grousing from the Nationals’ broadcast team to “suck it up” and “Stop crying, go out there and pitch. Period.”

durn
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike Rizzo

Watch him go down with an elbow injury next start and we’ll all feel really bad.

joser
10 years ago
Reply to  durn

But unlike Rob Dibble, we won’t be fired.

joser
10 years ago

“Sub-achievement” is such an odd phrasing.

dtpollittMember since 2016
10 years ago

I’ve been having an interesting discussion with some of my Cubs friends–do the Cubs start Arrieta or Lester in the WC game?

The easy answer is Arrieta, but if I’m looking at the playoff schedule correctly, whoever starts the WC will most likely only get one NLDS start. So if they roll with Jake vs the Pirates, Lester goes twice vs the Cardinals but Jake only once. THAT SAID, the Pirates do not appear to have any significant LHP/RHP splits, whereas the Cardinals are somewhat worse vs LHP, so perhaps it is easy to say start Arrieta in the WC and Lester in the NLDS if things shake out like that.

Buctober
10 years ago
Reply to  dtpollitt

I think the Cubs will start Arrieta in the WC game but don’t think it will cost them in the NLDS because the PIRATES ARE GOING TO WIN THE WORLD SERIES!!!!!!

Vic Romano
10 years ago
Reply to  dtpollitt

The easy answer is the correct answer. Arrieta definitely needs to start the WC game, simply because Lester’s problems with baserunners are more amplified in a one-and-done series as compared to a 5-game series.

Rational Fan
10 years ago

Shouldn’t have been a no-hitter, since the ball to Castro was a hit, but who cares? Absolutely dominant.

Funny to remember many Cub fans thinking Lester was their ace at the start of the season; Arrieta was clearly their #1 then and is now.

The cross body action with all those sliders is supposedly a danger for the arm, but I don’t think injuries are predictive. A huge mistake by the O’s letting this guy go.

A top 10 arm in the game, and getting better and better.

Darkstone42
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

I only saw the .gif, but it looked like an error to me. It was hit pretty right at him.

Captain Tenneal
10 years ago
Reply to  Darkstone42

It was hit right at him, but it was a very difficult short hop. To Arrieta’s credit, he admitted in the postgame interview that he thought it was a hit. Watching live, I thought it was probably a hit, but in the replays I saw it completely eat up Castro and couldn’t really decide if it was a hit or an error.

Vic Romano
10 years ago

I’m not sure Arrieta saying that he thought it was a hit is indicative of anything really, because I think it’s pretty unlikely that he would throw his teammate under the bus and say “Yeah, Starlin definitely made an error on that one.”

I think it looked a lot like an error. That’s a play that should be made, regardless of how hard the ball is hit.

Zman
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

A muffed ground ball or one hopper DIRECTLY at a MLB infielder should NEVER be considered a hit.

just lurking
10 years ago
Reply to  Rational Fan

Castro misplayed the hell out of it. he tried to glove a hard short hop instead of blocking it and making a play. Very easily could have and should have been an out.

Orsulakfan
10 years ago

What does Arrieta say about the difference between his time with the Orioles and his time with the Cubs? I have rooted for Jake since he left the O’s, but I am also frustrated that he blew up right when he left. Is it really so simple as the difference in coaching? What is the story here?

Derek Lowe
10 years ago

Derek Lowe has a no-hitter and a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from Duke. Does Arrieta have a Ph.D.?

Read my blog.

That Guy
10 years ago
Reply to  Derek Lowe

Die.

Dovif
10 years ago

The Cubs has been the luckiest team in ml this year, they are +22 in runs and manage to hold onto a playoff spot so far, the giant is +60 and even a mediocre team like Washington is +30. Facts are Chicago is not a top 6 team in th nl. They are just lucky they overachieved by more than 10 games. They have been lucky so far, but they are choking at the wrong end of the year

CalvoMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Dovif

Or maybe, the projections were too conservative on a young team that it didn’t have a lot of information about? How you could possibly say that with any conviction is beyond reason.

Zman
10 years ago
Reply to  Dovif

That’s because of Joe Maddon!!!

Maverik
10 years ago

They also aren’t choking. The lost something like 2 in a row then they faced Kershaw and MadBum. So while it looks like they’re choking and lost 4 in a row (which they actually did) really two of them were against perennial powerhouses. It was just unfortunate schedule sequencing.

Maverik
10 years ago
Reply to  Maverik

Whoops, meant to be a reply to Dovif.

Zman
10 years ago

I don’t think a muffed line drive one hopper hit directly at a MLB infielder should ever be considered a hit, IMHO.

Kevin Orie
10 years ago

My play should have been called an error…