JAWS and the 2023 Hall of Fame Ballot: Billy Wagner

© RVR Photos-USA TODAY Sports

The following article is part of Jay Jaffe’s ongoing look at the candidates on the BBWAA 2023 Hall of Fame ballot. Originally written for the 2016 election at SI.com, it has been updated to reflect recent voting results as well as additional research. For a detailed introduction to this year’s ballot, and other candidates in the series, use the tool above; an introduction to JAWS can be found here. For a tentative schedule, and a chance to fill out a Hall of Fame ballot for our crowdsourcing project, see here. All WAR figures refer to the Baseball-Reference version unless otherwise indicated.

Billy Wagner was the ultimate underdog. Undersized and from both a broken home and an impoverished rural background, he channeled his frustrations into throwing incredibly hard — with his left hand, despite being a natural righty, for he broke his right arm twice as a child. Scouts overlooked him because he wasn’t anywhere close to six feet tall, but they couldn’t disregard his dominance over collegiate hitters using a mid-90s fastball. The Astros made him a first-round pick, and once he was converted to a relief role, his velocity went even higher.

Thanks to outstanding lower-body strength, coordination, and extraordinary range of motion, the 5-foot-10 Wagner was able to reach 100 mph with consistency — 159 times in 2003, according to The Bill James Handbook. Using a hard slider learned from teammate Brad Lidge, he kept blowing the ball by hitters into his late 30s to such an extent that he owns the record for the highest strikeout rate of any pitcher with at least 800 innings. He was still dominant when he walked away from the game following the 2010 season, fresh off posting a career-best ERA.

Lacking the longevity of Mariano Rivera or Trevor Hoffman, Wagner never set any saves records or even led his league once, and his innings total is well below those of every enshrined reliever. Hoffman’s status as the former all-time saves leader helped him get elected in 2018, but Wagner, who created similar value in his career, has major hurdles to surmount. There are, though, fewer hurdles than before: over the past three election cycles, his share of the vote has more than tripled, from 16.7% in 2019 to 51% in ’22, pushing him past the all-important 50% threshold as well. His advantages over Hoffman — and virtually every other reliever in history when it comes to rate stats — provide a compelling reason to study his career more closely. Given how far he’s come, who wants to bet against Billy Wags?

2023 BBWAA Candidate: Billy Wagner
Pitcher WAR WPA WPA/LI R-JAWS IP SV ERA ERA+
Billy Wagner 27.7 29.1 17.9 24.9 903 422 2.31 187
Avg HOF RP 39.1 30.1 20.0 29.7
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference

Wagner was born in Marion, Virginia, on July 25, 1971, into circumstances — as documented in a September 20, 1999 Sports Illustrated profile by Michael Bamberger — that were hardly idyllic. Father William “Hotsey” Wagner, an all-county pitcher, married his 16-year-old bride, Yvonne Hall, on the day he graduated high school. Billy was born 13 months after they wed; two weeks later, Hotsey left for Saigon, where he spent nine months monitoring the urinalyses of U.S. soldiers about to return home from the Vietnam War. His marriage collapsed after he returned home in 1976. Billy and his younger sister bounced around in the care of his divorced (and remarried, and re-divorced) parents and both sets of grandparents. Poverty was a constant, food stamps an embarrassment; “[a] few crackers with peanut butter and a glass of water” was a typical breakfast.

While playing football at age seven, Wagner broke his right (throwing) arm when a friend fell on it; six weeks later, just after the cast was removed, he broke it again. During this time, he learned to throw left-handed, turning his baseball glove inside out and channeling his anger at his instability and grim surroundings into throwing a ball at the side of his maternal grandparents’ house, doing it so hard that pieces of aluminum siding fell off. Finally, just before he turned 15, he went to live with Jack and Sally Lamie, his uncle and aunt, in Tannersville, 19 miles away. By that point, Billy had fallen a year behind in school due to his unstable home situation, but once coaches and administrators at Tazewell High School (the closest high school, an hour away) agreed that his throwing was a danger to his middle-school peers, they “socially promoted” him into high school.

Though he grew to just 5-foot-5 and 135 pounds in high school, Wagner starred as both a center fielder and pitcher whose fastball could reach 86 mph. As a senior in 1990, he hit .451, stole 23 bases, and struck out 116 in 46 innings with a 1.52 ERA. Scouts were put off by his size, so he followed cousin Jeff Lamie to Ferrum College, a Division III school, with the intention of playing football — until the coach saw him throw a baseball. At Ferrum, Wagner grew to 5-foot-9, gained 40 pounds, and boosted his velocity to 93 mph. As a sophomore in 1992, he allowed nine hits in 51 innings and set an NCAA record with 19.1 strikeouts per nine. While dominating the collegiate Cape Cod League, he struck out the side in the league’s All-Star game without allowing a foul ball. The Astros chose him with the 12th pick in the 1993 draft.

By now 5-foot-10 and 170 pounds, Wagner began his professional career as a starter, battling control issues but whiffing more than a batter per inning at every stop and making Baseball America’s Top 100 Prospects list in 1994 (78th), ’95 (17th), and ’96 (14th). In 1995, he posted a 2.89 ERA in hitter-friendly Double- and Triple-A environments, with 9.7 strikeouts per nine in 146.1 innings. All the more impressive was that his performance came amid tragedy, as his wife’s father — who had emerged as a father figure in Wagner’s life — and stepmother were brutally murdered in May, just days after Wagner had been added to the Astros’ 40-man roster in anticipation of a late-season call-up.

Wagner made his major league debut on September 13, 1995 in Shea Stadium; mustering a fastball near 100 mph, he retired the Mets’ Rico Brogna on a fly ball before being lifted for a pinch-hitter by Astros manager Terry Collins. After 12 starts for Triple-A Tucson in 1996, the fire-balling Wagner, 24, joined the Astros’ bullpen in early June and supplanted the injured Todd Jones as the team’s closer after the All-Star break. He converted nine saves in 13 chances, finishing the year with a 2.44 ERA and 11.7 strikeouts per nine (but also 5.2 walks) in 51.2 innings. The Astros carried a two-and-a-half game division lead into September, but a 4–16 tailspin to start the month lost them the division and ultimately cost Collins his job.

Under new manager Larry Dierker and powered by the “Killer B’s” — Jeff Bagwell and Craig Biggio — the Astros made the playoffs in each of the next three seasons, with Wagner emerging as one of the game’s most dominant closers. He saved 23 games with a 2.85 ERA and 14.4 strikeouts per nine in 1997, setting a record for a pitcher with at least 50 innings. Despite missing more than three weeks in 1998 after taking a Kelly Stinnett line drive off his head, he topped that strikeout rate in each of the next two seasons and trimmed both his walk rate and ERA. In 1999, he whiffed 14.9 per nine and walked 2.8 en route to a 1.57 ERA with 39 saves in 74.2 innings. Not only did Wagner make his first All-Star team, but he also tied teammate Jose Lima for fourth in a particularly Houston-heavy Cy Young vote; ex-Astro Randy Johnson won, and Mike Hampton finished second. Wagner’s 3.8 WAR led all National League relievers and nearly topped the 3.9 he had accumulated in the previous three seasons.

It was that September when Bamberger caught up with “the Astros’ smaller-than-life closer” who “would tip the scales at his listed weight of 180 pounds only after a third helping of grits,” exploring his difficult past in an attempt to find out, “Where does he get his heat?”

He throws fastball after fastball, one four-seamer after another, all in the A to A-plus range. The movement on his pitches is wicked. Batters speak of heaters that start at their heads and finish at the knees, on the outside corner of the plate. On Wagner you can guess fastball. (He throws only occasional sliders and changeups.) What you can’t do is hit it.

…It is true that Wagner has superb mechanics, which is amazing when you consider that he is a natural right-hander … It is also true that he drives off the rubber as well as any pitcher since Tom Seaver; his legs are thick and heavy for a man of his otherwise ordinary physique. It is true that he has a remarkable ability to throw first-pitch strikes. But those facts alone do not begin to answer the question.

In February 1999, Wagner had signed a three-year, $10.1 million extension, covering his arbitration years. For as strong as his 1999 was, his 2000 was a near-total loss: Wagner struggled with his control in 27.2 innings before admitting he had been throwing in pain and undergoing season-ending surgery to repair a torn flexor tendon and remove scar tissue. With their bullpen a garbage fire, the Astros sank to 72–90, but both Wagner and the team rebounded in 2001. Wagner made his second All-Star team, saved 39 games, whiffed 11.3 per nine, and finished with 2.4 WAR; the Astros won 93 games and their fourth NL Central title in five years. Alas, they were again ousted in the first round by the Braves, the team that had done so in 1997 and ’99 as well.

By both WAR and ERA, Wagner’s performance continued to improve in 2002 and ’03. In the latter season — his third All-Star campaign — he set career highs with 86 innings and 44 saves en route to a 1.78 ERA, 11.0 strikeouts per nine, and 3.4 WAR, the last of which edged John Smoltz for the lead among NL relievers. On June 11, 2003, Wagner helped to make baseball history when he closed out a combined no-hitter of six pitchers against the Yankees in the Bronx — the first time New York had been no-hit since 1958. Two pitches into the second inning, starter Roy Oswalt had to depart due to a groin injury; relievers Pete Munro, Kirk Saarloos, Lidge, and Octavio Dotel carried the baton to Wagner, who struck out Jorge Posada and Bubba Trammell, then covered first base on Hideki Matsui’s game-ending groundout.

After missing the playoffs in 2002, the Astros battled with the Cubs for the NL Central title in ’03, but a 3–6 record over the final nine games cost them a one-and-a-half game lead. While Wagner took one of those losses, it was only the second time over his final 36 appearances that he allowed a run. After the season, he criticized owner Drayton McLane for the team’s failure to increase payroll to augment their rotation. “It’s going to be a tape job,” he said after the team’s final game, looking to next season. “It’s not like we’re going out there and getting any marquee pitchers.”

Wagner would be proven quite wrong, but he had punched his own ticket out of town. Owed $8 million for 2004 with a $9 million option for ’05, he was traded to Philadelphia on November 3 for a trio of pitchers (Ezequiel Astacio, Taylor Buchholz, and Brandon Duckworth) who combined to deliver -3.5 WAR as Astros. Their sorry production was more than offset by Houston’s marquee free-agent pitchers: Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte. Though the latter was limited to 15 starts in 2004 due to elbow surgery, the former won his seventh Cy Young award. The revamped Astros — who also added Carlos Beltrán for the 2004 stretch run — reached the NLCS that season and the World Series in 2005. “I just wish he’d done this when we were a game out last season,” said Wagner of McLane’s spending.

Though he joined a team that was beginning to assemble the roster that would dominate the NL East from 2007 to ’11, Wagner’s two years in Philadelphia were less than fulfilling. Groin and rotator cuff strains cost him two and a half months in 2004, limiting him to 48.1 innings. He rebounded with another All-Star season in 2005 (1.51 ERA, 38 saves, 2.7 WAR), but his mouth continued to make bigger headlines. Amid a 4–12 July skid, he criticized the team’s intensity, saying that the Phillies quit when they fell behind and that “we ain’t got a chance to get there right now,” in reference to the postseason. While the Phillies finished with 88 wins under new manager Charlie Manuel, they fell one game short of the Wild Card and two short of the division title. Wagner spent the last third of the season in silence after receiving no support in a players-only meeting, then blasted his ex-teammates from afar after departing. Years later, he lamented, “I learned a lot about criticism and how not to be a leader when I was traded … I began to turn into someone I didn’t want to be.”

A free agent for the first time, the 34-year-old Wagner landed a four-year, $43 million deal with the Mets and sparked an inter-borough controversy: His entry song, Metallica’s “Enter Sandman,” was already in use by the Yankees’ Rivera, though Wagner’s 1996 adoption predated Rivera by three years. The song got a workout in Queens: Wagner saved 40 of the Mets’ 97 wins as they claimed their first NL East title in 20 years. Accompanied by a typically low 2.24 ERA, his save total ranked second in the league, the highest he would ever finish, and his 11.7 strikeouts per nine was his highest mark since 1999. He notched the first three saves of his postseason career as the Mets downed the Dodgers and won the NLCS opener against the Cardinals, but he took the loss in Game 2 by allowing three ninth-inning runs, then gave up two runs while protecting a 4–0 ninth-inning lead in Game 6. In Game 7, manager Willie Randolph left setup man Aaron Heilman in for his second inning of work in the ninth inning of a tie game; Wagner could only watch as Heilman served up a decisive two-run homer to Yadier Molina.

That was as close as Wagner ever got to a World Series. Though he pitched very well for most of 2007, saving 26 of his first 27 chances with a 1.28 ERA, he posted a 6.91 ERA from August 21 onward, a span of 14 appearances. That Mets team gained infamy for blowing a seven-game lead with 17 games to go, losing out on a playoff spot on the season’s final day, but Wagner’s only blown save in that span came in a New York win. The team wound up outside the playoff picture on the final day in 2008 as well, in part because Wagner’s August 2 forearm strain led to Tommy John surgery.

When the Mets signed Francisco Rodríguez to a three-year, $37 million deal that winter, the writing was on the wall for the rehabbing Wagner. After making two late August appearances for the team, he waived his no-trade clause and was dealt to the Red Sox, who in turn promised not to pick up his $8 million option for 2010, granting him complete freedom in choosing where to pitch the following season. He was strong in 15 appearances for Boston, striking out 22 in just 13.2 innings for a team that won the Wild Card but was swept out of the first round by the Angels.

In December 2009, Wagner signed a one-year, $7 million deal with Atlanta, and at 38, he pitched as well as ever, posting a career-low 1.43 ERA and striking out 13.5 per nine (his highest rate since 1999) in 69.1 innings en route to 2.5 WAR for yet another Wild Card team that made a first-round exit. That season included two milestones as well. On June 25 against the Tigers, he struck out the side on 10 pitches and became the fifth pitcher to reach 400 saves in his career. On August 27, he struck out Giancarlo Stanton (then known as Mike) for his 1,170th career strikeout, surpassing Jesse Orosco for the record among left-handed relievers:

Despite triggering a vesting option for 2011, Wagner followed through with a decision announced in May to retire at season’s end to spend more time with his family. No pitcher has ever walked away from his career following a season of at least 50 innings with a lower ERA or a higher strikeout rate.

Wagner holds some other distinctions as well. Among pitchers with at least 800 innings, his strikeout rate — whether expressed as 11.9 per nine or as 33.2% of all batters faced — is the best in history, though Kenley Jansen (13.0 per nine, 36.4%) is 31 innings away from 800. Of the pitchers already there, Chris Sale (11.1 per nine), Robbie Ray and Blake Snell (both 11.0 per nine) are the next-closest on a per-nine innings basis, and Sale (30.6%) is next on a percentage basis. Jansen is waiting in the wings, and both Aroldis Chapman (14.9 K/7 and 40.2% in 640 innings), Craig Kimbrel (14.4 K/9 and 40% in 688.1 innings) might overtake Wagner as well if they can get their careers back on track.

At the 800-inning level, Wagner’s .187 opponent batting average is the lowest in history, 12 points lower than the next 20th- or 21st-century pitcher, Tyler Clippard. Wagner’s 0.998 WHIP is in a virtual tie with Jacob deGrom for second all-time behind dead-ball era hurler Addie Joss (0.968). Rivera is the only post-1920 pitcher with a lower ERA (2.21) or higher ERA+ (205) than Wagner’s 2.31 and 187. Among that same group, Wagner’s 2.73 FIP is the third-lowest, behind only deGrom (2.62) and Sandy Koufax (2.69). Wagner’s 422 saves, meanwhile, are sixth on the all-time list behind Rivera (652), Hoffman (601), Lee Smith (478), Rodriguez (437), and John Franco (424).

Is that a Hall of Fame career? As I’ve laid out in connection to the recent cases of Smith and Rivera, with such a limited number of relievers in the Hall — the aforementioned pair, both elected in 2019, brought the total to eight — it’s difficult to say, particularly given the role’s evolution over the past half-century. Hoyt Wilhelm, Rollie Fingers, and Goose Gossage were all multi-inning firemen who racked up higher innings totals than the enshrined relievers who followed in their wake. Bruce Sutter worked multiple innings as well, though generally only when his team had a lead narrow enough to produce a save opportunity. Dennis Eckersley, who spent the first half of his career as a starter, became the model for the one-inning closer we know today. Even excluding his 3,285.2 innings, the other seven relievers elected averaged 1,496 innings, whereas Wagner threw only 903, well below even Hoffman’s 1,089.1 and Sutter’s 1,042. Where the majority of the saves of Wilhelm, Fingers, Gossage, and Sutter were longer than an inning, as were 27% of Eckersley’s, only 9% of Wagner’s were.

While one can certainly make the case that, based on rate stats, Wagner was more dominant than any of them, his shortfall of innings presents a problem when translating to a value measure such as WAR. That said, he was so much more dominant than Hoffman that the two are tied at 23.7 JAWS, with Hoffman’s slight edge in career WAR (28.0 to 27.7) offset by Wagner’s slight edge in peak (19.8 to 19.4). Either way, both are significantly below the standards at the position even if I exclude Eckersley. The other seven elected relievers averaged 35.8 career WAR, 23.6 peak WAR, and 30.1 JAWS. One can’t really justify Wagner’s inclusion in Cooperstown on the basis of those metrics.

That doesn’t mean it’s game over, though. As anyone who has been following me since I introduced the metric that became JAWS for the 2004 ballot knows — at a point when Sutter was still two years away from election, and Gossage four years away — I’ve never been entirely satisfied with the way it handles relievers. Over the years I’ve employed various hybrid metrics in an effort to find a balance between something descriptive (what does this say about who’s in the Hall?) and something prescriptive (what is this telling us about who should be in?). Upon bringing my Hall analyses to FanGraphs for the 2019 ballot, I began using one such hybrid in evaluating Wagner, and with the help of the good folks at Baseball Reference, R-JAWS (Reliever JAWS) was formalized in time for last year’s election cycle, meaning that their computers now do the math instead of mine.

While the version of WAR used in JAWS features an adjustment for leverage — the quantitatively greater impact on winning and losing that a reliever has at the end of the ballgame than a starter does earlier — to help account for the degree of difficulty, it’s not the only way to measure reliever value. Win Probability Added (WPA) is a context-sensitive measure that accounts for the incremental increase (or decrease) in the chances of winning produced in each plate appearance given the inning, score, and base-out situation. For a reliever, single-season WPA scales similarly to single-season WAR, which is to say that it’s rare that one is worth more than three wins in a single year, by either measure. WPA can be additionally adjusted using a pitcher’s average leverage index (aLI) for a stat variably called situational wins or context-neutral wins (referred to as WPA/LI).

Long story short, both of these are now in the sauce. R-JAWS is the average of a reliever’s WAR (including his time as a starter and as a hitter) as well as his WPA and his WPA/LI. Including those last two stats helps to elevate pitchers for what they did as relievers rather than as starters, which is what we’re after, because Hall voters generally aren’t geared towards recognizing swingmen or setup relievers. Not only can you can find R-JAWS on the aforementioned Baseball Reference Relief Pitcher JAWS Leaders page, it’s now the default method for sorting (you can still sort by WAR, WAR7, and JAWS as well).

Wagner, who’s tied for 19th in old-school JAWS, ranks a respectable seventh in WPA at 29.1, and an even better fifth in WPA/LI at 17.9. That puts him right in the mix with the other enshrined relievers in R-JAWS:

Top Relievers by R-JAWS
Rk Player WAR WPA WPA/LI R-JAWS
1 Mariano Rivera+ 56.3 56.6 33.6 48.8
2 Dennis Eckersley+ 62.1 30.8 25.8 39.6
3 Hoyt Wilhelm+ 46.8 30.4 26.3 34.5
4 Rich Gossage+ 41.1 32.5 14.8 29.5
5 Trevor Hoffman+ 28 34.2 19.3 27.2
6 Billy Wagner 27.7 29.1 17.9 24.9
7 Firpo Marberry 30.6 25.9 17.1 24.5
8 Joe Nathan 26.7 30.6 15.8 24.4
9 Tom Gordon 35.0 21.3 14.5 23.6
10 Jonathan Papelbon 23.3 28.3 13.4 21.7
11 Ellis Kinder 28.9 23.8 11.7 21.5
12 Francisco Rodríguez 24.2 24.4 14.7 21.1
13 Lee Smith+ 28.9 21.3 12.7 21.0
14 Stu Miller 27.0 20.5 13.5 20.3
15 Kenley Jansen 19.6 25.6 15.8 20.3
16 Craig Kimbrel 21.8 23.5 13.3 19.5
17 Tom Henke 22.9 21.3 13.9 19.4
18 Dan Quisenberry 24.6 20.7 12.5 19.3
19 Rollie Fingers+ 25.6 16.2 15.1 19.0
20 Tug McGraw 21.0 21.5 13.1 18.5
21 Bobby Shantz 34.7 10.4 10.3 18.5
22 John Hiller 30.4 14.6 9.4 18.1
23 Bruce Sutter+ 24.0 18.2 11.9 18.0
24 Kent Tekulve 25.5 14.2 13.9 17.9
25 Keith Foulke 20.7 20.5 12.1 17.8
Hall avg w/Eckersley 39.1 30.0 19.9 29.7
Hall avg w/o Eckersley 35.8 29.9 19.1 28.3
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
R-JAWS is the average of WAR, WPA, and WPA/LI.
+ = Hall of Famer

Prior to the election of Rivera, Wagner was just 0.1 below the Hall average excluding Eckersley, and while his standing relative to that average has slipped, he’s the top reliever outside the Hall in that combined measure. I think that’s worth a lot in this context.

Those leverage-based measures provide a much stronger basis for voting for Wagner than JAWS. That goes doubly when taken alongside his other accomplishments and overlooking his unsightly 10.03 ERA in 11.2 postseason innings for teams that were generally in the midst of being steamrolled.

At the outset of his candidacy, it was clear that Wagner faced an uphill battle to get to Cooperstown. Overshadowed by Hoffman when the two debuted in 2016 and lost in a sea of qualified candidates at other positions as well, he received just 10.5% of the vote that year, a lower debut percentage than any player elected by the writers since they returned to annual balloting in 1966. He more or less ran in place over the next two cycles, but on the 2019 ballot, as traffic began to thin out a bit, he climbed to 16.7%, then posted gains of 15.0%, 14.7%, and 4.6% over the last three cycles.

Lo and behold, Wagner’s up to 51%. With the election of Gil Hodges via the Golden Days Era Committee ballot last December, every candidate who’s gotten at least 43.13% on the BBWAA ballot since 1966 has eventually gained entry save for (Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Curt Schilling), who “graduated” from last year’s ballot instead of gaining entry due to problems of their own making and are now candidates on the Contemporary Baseball ballot.

In the annals of modern voting (from 1966 onward), just six candidates have landed within eight points of Wagner in their seventh year on the ballot. Three spent another eight years in limbo, time Wagner doesn’t have given the truncation of eligibility windows from 15 years to 10, namely Hodges, Tony Oliva, and Jim Rice; Oliva, like Hodges, was finally elected last December, while Rice was elected in 2009, his final year. The other three are happier stories: Tim Raines and Edgar Martinez were elected in their 10th years on the ballot, and while Smith aged off after 15 years, he was elected in his first year on the Today’s Game ballot. Even better news: Wagner is about 5% to 8% ahead of all three at this juncture, and no longer competing with Bonds, Clemens, and Schilling for ballot space. He still has time to be elected by the writers, albeit in another 10th-year nailbiter, as it’s asking a lot for back-to-back double-digit gains to make up the other 24% in two years instead of three.

I included Wagner on my virtual ballots for 2018 and ’19, then added him to my actual ballots in ’21 and ’22. He’ll be on there again this year. While JAWS guides my process, I’ve remained particularly open-minded regarding its handling of relievers over the years, seeking alternative ways to evaluate them, and Wagner’s dominance in so many categories is difficult to ignore, as is his underdog story. He’s no Rivera, but hardly out of place in a group that includes Hoffman, Smith, Fingers, and Sutter. Particularly with Jansen, Chapman, and Kimbrel all struggling to maintain momentum, Wagner will likely complete the remainder of his run on the ballot as the best reliever outside the Hall. If that’s not worth a long look, I don’t know what is.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jay_jaffe... and BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

91 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cookiedabookie
1 year ago

I’d rather have Buehrle or Pettitte if I’m building a team, yet they have no chance to be inducted while Wagner is on the path to induction. Surprised that even you are willing to vote for him over other, significantly more valuable players

hazelrah
1 year ago
Reply to  cookiedabookie

All about position

3cardmontymember
1 year ago
Reply to  hazelrah

Buehrle and Wagner play the same position. You mean “role.” Honoring relievers, a.k.a. failed starters, is so silly, with only a very few exceptions.

drewsylvaniamember
1 year ago
Reply to  3cardmonty

3cardpedantry, apparently.

Do you like to be recognized for your own hard work?

Lanidrac
1 year ago
Reply to  3cardmonty

Relievers haven’t (mostly) been merely failed starters for at least the last half century!

68FCmember
1 year ago
Reply to  3cardmonty

And all second basemen are failed shortstops, all corner outfielders are failed centerfielders. We understand positional adjustments and peak vs longevity for position players, why wouldn’t it be the same for pitchers? Think of the peak as not as individual seasons, but game/innings/situations. Wagner was significantly better than Buehrle or Pettitte on an inning per inning basis. Maybe you would rather have Pettitte to start a key game, but in the late innings of a 1 run game, you’d rather have Wagner over all but a handful of players in baseball history.

Cool Lester Smoothmember
1 year ago
Reply to  cookiedabookie

Wagner might not have accumulated as much “value,” as defined by WAR, but he was extraordinary when he was on the field, while Andy and Buerhle and Hudson spent their time “only” being very good.

As a reference point (beyond having more RA9-WAR than Smith and Hoffman in 383 and 183 fewer innings, respectively):

It would take Kimbrel more than 3 seasons at his career rate to catch Wagner in WAR.

He’s the single most dominant reliever in NL history.

EonADS
1 year ago
Reply to  cookiedabookie

Is there a stat to quantify how great a player’s strikeout percentage is across eras? Because if so, Wagner probably leads the all-time board in that stat.

Also, a career ERA+ of 187. That’s just insane, even for a reliever. I’m pretty sure that’s second all time behind Rivera, minimum 800 IP.

Last edited 1 year ago by EonADS
grandbranyanmember
1 year ago
Reply to  EonADS

From the FanGraphs +Stats tab on the leaderboard, minimum 800 IP since 1947…

Wagner 190 K%+
Herb Score 188 K%+
Nolan 183 K%+
Randy 176 K%+
Sandy 173 K%+

The All Time K%+ King is Dazzy Vance though at 225 K%+, mostly amassed with the Brooklyn Robins circa 1922-28 when he topped the NL in strikeouts seven straight seasons.

Ivan_Grushenkomember
1 year ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

I’d take Score over Wagner also

Cool Lester Smoothmember
1 year ago
Reply to  EonADS

He’s still the leader with a 500 IP minimum!

Better than Kimbrel.

Ivan_Grushenkomember
1 year ago
Reply to  cookiedabookie

I agree on Pettitte and Buehrle, also Santana and Saberhagen, and wouldn’t vote for Wagner over any of them. But I wouldn’t say that the aforementioned starters have no chance.

MikeDmember
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Every once in a while, my mind wanders to think about things that never happen, but what if they did? What if Andy Pettitte started out of the pen and never left? What if Mariano Rivera stayed as a starter AFTER he developed his cutter. He didn’t have that cutter in the minors and during his few starts in the majors. It almost assuredly would have been a game changer for him as a starter just as it was for him as a reliever. In this never-happened world, would Pettitte, who had a fine cutter of his own, made the HOF as a reliever for a dynasty team, and would we be arguing if Rivera was good enough to be a HOFer as a starter?