Keeping Up with the AL East’s Prospects

Without a true minor league season on which to fixate, I’ve been spending most of my time watching and evaluating young big leaguers who, because of the truncated season, will still be eligible for prospect lists at the end of the year. From a workflow standpoint, it makes sense for me to prioritize and complete my evaluations of these prospects before my time is divided between theoretical fall instructional ball, which has just gotten underway, and college fall practices and scrimmages, which will have outsized importance this year due to the lack of both meaningful 2020 college stats and summer wood bat league looks because of COVID-19.

I started with the National League East, then completed my look at the American League West and Central. Below is my assessment of the AL East, covering players who have appeared in big league games. The results of the changes made to player rankings and evaluations can be found over on The Board, though I try to provide more specific links throughout this post in case readers only care about one team.

Baltimore Orioles

Starting in the top 100, I’ve left a 50 FV grade on Ryan Mountcastle but moved him up within that tier from 101st overall to 84th. He’s now right next to Nationals second baseman Luis García and Dodgers catcher Keibert Ruiz, who are players who also get away with being overly aggressive at the plate because they have great barrel control. Mountcastle has more power than either of them, but also is the worst defensive player by a long shot. I still see Mountcastle as being on the Nick Castellanos track.

I’ve upgraded Keegan Akin from the 40+ FV tier to the 45 FV tier due to increased confidence that he can start based on his ability to attack righties with both his plus changeup and a back foot breaking ball. He’s either got two distinct breakers now or is adding and subtracting enough from his slurve to create a camelback velocity distribution for that pitch, but in either case he’s creating enticing angle on his glove-side breakers against righties and his slot helps him flummox lefties. Akin has not regained his 2018 velo (he was 92-95, up to 98 that year, then down in 2019) but showed a spin rate increase in the big leagues. I now have him turned in as a 1.5-to-2 WAR starter rather than a power reliever.

I’ve made a similar move with Dean Kremer, who had a little bit of a velo bump this year, averaging 93 mph with his fastball after he sat 90-93 in the minors last season. I think Kremer’s curveball is going to be an early-count weapon rather than a put-away pitch, but I still consider it plus. His little mid-80s cutter/slider is command-dependent, but despite bad walk numbers over a small sample, which were largely due to a single meltdown outing, I think he executes his slider location enough that it’ll be effective.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Hunter Harvey still hasn’t exhausted his rookie eligibility, even though this year’s September days now count. He continues to deal with intermittent injury while exhibiting high-leverage relief potential when healthy. In the brief look we had at Harvey this season, he threw fewer splitters and used more varied, in-zone fastball location rather than constantly attacking at the letters.

I buy that second baseman Ramón Urías has above-average feel to hit that makes him an above-replacement player with some sneaky trade value. Even at age 26, Urías has some roster flexibility thanks to two remaining option years and a service time clock that just started. He’s not a good defender and doesn’t have much power, but he puts the bat head on the ball consistently and can play second base, though not especially well. He’d be an interesting, small-trade depth target for a contender this winter, similar to Mark Mathias last year.

He lost prospect eligibility during the year, but it’s worth noting that the enigmatic Dillon Tate had a bit of a velocity bounce back this season.

Boston Red Sox

Tanner Houck worked with a two-seamer, four-seamer and slider across three starts, with his fastballs sitting in the 90-96 mph range. I have him projected in relief but think his velo could climb in short outings. Lots of relievers who present a sidearm look like Houck’s end up in 40 FV middle relief roles and very few of them have the kind of velocity Houck does, let alone what he might have in single-inning work, so I’ve slid him up from the 40 FV tier to the 40+ FV tier, indicating he has late-inning potential.

I’m leaving Bobby Dalbec in the 45 FV tier and comfortably out of the top 100 because of his strikeout rate (42%), which has been disconcertingly high since college.

New York Yankees

Deivi García will stay toward the middle/back of the 55 FV tier. He was 91-95 touching 97 last year, 90-95 touching 96 in 2020, but his changeup took a step forward and though his fastball command was a little loose at times, he executed his slider with consistency. All three of García’s secondaries had above-average swinging strike rates against big league hitters this season and he doesn’t turn 22 until next May. His future is very promising.

I haven’t resolved what to do with Clarke Schmidt, who had been in the 45+ FV tier, sixth in the org behind García and four young hitters who I think have monster ceilings. In his three appearances (two short relief outings and a four-inning start) Schmidt worked with two different fastballs (a sinker and four-seamer, both harder than the 91-95 range he sat in last year), a power-sweeping, mid-80s breaking ball, and the occasional changeup. His sinker is hard and has nasty tailing action while the four seamer isn’t as crisp. Schmidt has also added 400 rpm of spin to his breaking ball since 2019 (2700 rpm in ‘19, 3100 in 2020) giving it a rare spin/velo combo for a curveball, only comparable to Dustin May’s. This development was enough to shuttle Schmidt into the back of the top 100 amid James Karinchak, Brusdar Graterol, and Brailyn Marquez, all of whom I have projected as high leverage relievers. Based on Schmidt’s age, long arm action, and injury history, I do think he has a good bit of relief risk.

I don’t think Miguel Yajure pitched enough to glean anything from his brief, erratic big league tenure, so he’ll remain a 45 FV. Nick Nelson and Michael King, both 40 FV, retain their role projection as a middle reliever and longman/fifth starter types.

Tampa Bay Rays

Aside from the white-hot Randy Arozarena, all the Rays prospects who were in the big leagues this year have either graduated from the list or are out with injury and have already been moved. But let’s talk about Arozarena, who was on the pre-season Top 100 but evaluated as a well-rounded, tough-nosed everyday player rather than someone with impact power, which he appears to have developed during quarantine. I think this is a real, relevant change and I’ve moved Arozarena up into the 55 FV tier and to 42nd overall. Is the sample too small to make a confident change? If you’re just talking about his triple slash line, a star-like .281/.382/.641 in the regular season and God-like .500/.538/1.042 in the playoffs, yes. But I’m not. The relevant data point here is Arozarena’s max exit velo, which was 109 mph in 2019 and is up to 113 mph this season. For reference, if we were to 20-80 scale max exit velocity as a proxy for raw power, the scale looks like this (from Future Value):

Max Exit Velo on 20-80 Scale
Grade Max Exit Velo (mph)
80 118
70 116
60 113
55 111
50 110
45 108
40 106
30 103
20 100

This is a measurable change in physical ability, the reason for which is well-publicized and which is supported by a change in the visual evaluation of Arozarena’s physicality. I’m sold. And I’m not too worried about the sudden uptick in Aronzarena’s strikeout rate because that has not only occurred in a small sample but is way above his career norm of 18.5% (I’m avoiding recency bias), and the circumstances surrounding it (Arozarena rolled out of quarantine bed and faced big league pitching for the longest stretch of his life) are odd.

Toronto Blue Jays

I’ve previously covered the changes to some of the Jays pitching prospects, so all that’s left is a reconsideration of Nate Pearson after his return from elbow tightness, and a look at Alejandro Kirk. Pearson threw out of the bullpen upon return and his fastball velocity was back to his prospect peak, albeit over just two innings of work, so he’ll remain a 55 FV and among the top 25ish prospects in baseball but I’m not moving him back into the 60 FV tier because I don’t think he can live in the upper-90s as a starter.

Kirk moves into the Top 100. The concern surrounding him is that he’s already such a husky guy at age 21, but he’s no bigger than Christian Vázquez or Roberto Pérez and is a better hitter than both of them by a substantial margin. I suppose there’s still risk of him approaching physical decline earlier than his peers because of his physique, but he might have All-Star offensive output before that happens. He moves next to Twins catcher Ryan Jeffers on the overall list, but one of my offseason priorities is to consider more deeply how electronic strike zones will impact my catcher evaluations, so players at that position are the ones whose rankings are most subject to change.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gtagomoriMember since 2017
5 years ago

Thanks for continuing this series. These are incredibly enjoyable to read. And since it’s all about young players it also changes the readers frame of reference to thinking about the future – which is a relief in the current atmosphere.

jwalkn37
5 years ago

Where does MLB currently stand on electronic strike zones?

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
5 years ago

Good stuff, Eric! I’m very intrigued by Arozarena. He’s looking like a stud now and the powers seems legit.

As for Kirk, saying he’s no bigger than Perez and Vasquez may be a little generous. According to their player pages, he’s 2 inches shorter than Perez and 25 pounds heavy than Vasquez. He does make for a slightly svelter Willians Astudillo though (same height but 5 pounds lighter).

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
5 years ago

How do the Rays consistently hoodwink the other teams? They just seem to know who can play and who can’t before most of the other 29 clubs do. Liberatore better be great or you can add the Cardinals to the list of teams of teams that have been played for a fool. It is looking more and more like Jesus Sanchez has a very big hill to climb, Nick Solak didn’t show much, all the while Nick Anderson was unhittable, Pete Fairbanks was averaging 13.5K/9 and the less that is said about the infamous swindle of the pathetic Pirates the better.

D-WizMember since 2019
5 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

I agree it’s remarkable how successful most of their trades seem to turn out, but they certainly aren’t infallible. Even from this past offseason, giving up Pham and Cronenworth for Renfroe and Xavier Edwards seems like it’ll turn out to be an L for them (though I am fully prepared to eat crow when Xavier Edwards turns into a Hall of Famer…). But yeah, while I think the whole “Rays never lose a trade” thing is a bit overstated, they definitely know what they’re doing!

Manco
5 years ago
Reply to  D-Wiz

Moving Pham wasn’t a loss by any means. And Cronenworth, while giving his success its due, wasn’t projected to break into the infield for the Rays. Renfroe hasn’t had the batting average they expected though he improved his walk rate and lowered his strikeout rate; they still have control over him for a few more years.

It definitely has benefitted the Padres, but I don’t think this trade amounts to an ‘L’ for the Rays. It happens to one of the few instances where the Rays’ sacrifices have success for their new teams. Most of the deals, retroactively, are the result of a good player the Rays’ give up not living up to their expectations. Chris Archer is an example that comes to mind. The Rays definitely make those gambles for future control because they can’t afford to pay players…

Connor Grey
5 years ago
Reply to  D-Wiz

I mean, I have to think that if the Rays knew that Cronenworth was capable of putting up offensive numbers like he did for San Diego this year they would have moved Joey Wendle instead to open up playing time for Cronenworth on the big league infield. Although, they’re always trying to thread the needle with their 40 man roster crunch so maybe they still have no regrets since Edwards isn’t Rule-5 eligible until December of 2022. It’s gonna take a really long time before I feel comfortable saying Tampa definitely regrets making that trade or not.

Dmjn53
5 years ago
Reply to  D-Wiz

Well it certainly looks like they made the correct decision to trade Pham, who was terrible this year and at his age probably isn’t going to be a productive player again, although making Cronenworth a roster crunch casualty doesn’t look good with hindsight

JoserMember since 2021
5 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

How much of this is the Rays having success developing players, and restarting the development of the players they get in trades, while the ones they trade away stall out or even fall back without the DevilRays Developmental DevilMagic guiding them? It really seems like other teams break the guys they get from the Rays, and the Rays un-break the guys they get from other teams. Though it may also be true that the Rays are willing to trade away the guys they think are already stalling or at risk of breaking (and are good at identifying the players on other teams they have a good shot at fixing).

What I’m saying is: maybe the trades are fair, but it’s what happens afterwards — what each team does with the pieces they get — that cause us to retroactively view the deal as a steal for the Rays.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

The Rays make a lot of deals, and people tend to remember the ones that turned out well. The later Pham deal is going to be a loss unless Xavier Edwards is much, much better than Cronenworth (which, based on what we’ve seen so far, is pretty unlikely). They gave away Rengifo for Cron, who they non-tendered the next year. I am less convinced about Solak and Fairbanks too; I think that one has a lot of time to go the other way. They lost the Odorizzi trade too. Forsythe for de Leon was probably also a loss, although Forsythe was also pretty bad for the Dodgers. They didn’t get anything for Tim Beckham, either.

(and if we go back to the pre-Neander era, they lost both Wil Myers trades and both Corey Dickerson trades)

Of course, they hit it big with those two trades with Cards (Pham and Arozarena), the big one with the Pirates, and with the Anderson trade. Ryan Yarborough was a good get too. Yandy Diaz and Beeks were also wins, although somewhat more modest.

Looking over it, the trades that stand out are those first four: First Pham, Arozarena, the Pirates, and Nick Anderson. Pham was kind of a weird situation because the Cards decided they had to get rid of him and most teams didn’t even know he was available. That’s doing a good job diligently checking in. The Arozarena deal was them taking advantage of a guy who, for some reason, wasn’t seen as a starter for their team and they just decided to bid high enough to get him. Pirates deal was a bidding war–there were a whole bunch of teams who wanted him, including at least two in the same division, so they just kept going until they got what they could. The Marlins deal was, frankly, taking advantage of a team that had no idea what they had or what they were getting–Sanchez was a mess but for some reason the Marlins liked him.

So at least in two cases–Arozarena and Anderson–they saw teams that didn’t appreciate what they had and weren’t shy about bidding for them. The Archer-Pirates deal was just them playing a strong hand well. The Pham deal was an excellent case of diligence paying off. Both of the latter two are taking guys with tons of talent who didn’t quite fit on their current rosters for whatever reason and were more or less major league ready.

So, no, I don’t think the Rays always make good deals. Probably they “win” not that much more than they lose. But those four winning trades are so much more dramatic than their losses

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think I’ll add one more point to this, because I forgot it and it is important: It seems like virtually all of the Rays’ bad decisions revolve around a player who has gotten too expensive in arbitration. They traded Pham, Dickerson, Cron, Odorizzi…in almost every single case, they had this idea that the guy they had was too expensive in arbitration so it was time to move on.

When you look at it this way, you can break the Rays deals down into two buckets: The first is when they think their own player is overvalued in arbitration, and rather than pay the arbitration raise they decide to dump him for whatever they can. These deals disproportionately end badly. In the other situation, they are value hunting–searching for guys who they think the current org doesn’t appreciate, are basically ready for the majors, and they are willing to pay the price–or have a guy that will start a bidding war. These deals disproportionately end well–very well. I think it’s as simple as the fact that the Rays win deals when they make trades because they think they are getting good value on guys, and lose the deals when they feel they have to do something (although that “something” is a little different than most teams). In that way, they’re not that different than other teams.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think most deals can be seen as some type of trade off. One side or the other gets a better deal but not something like the Pirates steal, swindle, hold up where the Rays got prime beef and the Pirates got what comes out of the end of the steer. While no team gets the better of every trade it does seem as if the Rays are able to pull off more extremely one-sided deals than other clubs and they are able to do that when the other club knows that the Rays have to get rid of their players before they become too expensive for the terrible market that Tampa is.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Well that’s where the distinction matters. Those four trades:
-The trade with STL for Pham
-The trade with STL for Arozarena
-The trade with PIT involving Archer
-The trade with MIA for Anderson

Not a single of those were “must have” or “must-do” deals. The Rays make a lot of must-do deals because the guy is getting too expensive in arbitration. They don’t win those deals. Every single one of those four deals–four of the best deals any team has made in the last few years–those were cases where either the other team really wanted something done (Pham, Archer) or where they were able to see value in the trade. They could have walked away from any of them.

The Rays make a lot of deals because they think they can’t afford the players, and maybe they can’t, but those aren’t the ones where they’re winning big.

Spa City
5 years ago

Just based on my admittedly amateur eye test… Alejandro Kirk looks like a very good prospect. If he was more traditionally athletic looking, I bet he would be considered a top 40 or 50 prospect. With his swing, he is going to hit for power, and I would bet he does so as early as 2021.

hombremomento
5 years ago

There’s nothing not to love about Kirk. 5’8″ 265 pound dude who doesn’t strike out, hits for distance, and smacks the ball all over the yard.