Oakland A’s Add to the Familia

Whereas the first notable reliever acquisition of the trade deadline saw Cleveland receive, in Brad Hand and Adam Cimber, two pitchers who will remain with the club for future seasons, the Athletics this afternoon have performed a swap with a more traditional rent-a-player flavor, getting Jeurys Familia from the New York Mets in exchange for right-handed reliever Bobby Wahl, third baseman William Toffey, and an unspecified pile of international slot money, the 2018 version of a player-to-be-named-later.

There’s an argument to be made that, at this point, Familia may be slightly underrated among relievers. The extra couple of walks per nine that Familia picked up in a 2017 season mostly ruined by surgery to remove a blood clots from his shoulder have disappeared in 2018. Familia’s not relying on his hard, heavy sinker as much as he has in the past — especially against lefties — but given that the A’s have an infield whose four primary players, Matt Chapman, Marcus Semien, Matt Olson, and Jed Lowrie have all been above average by UZR (Lowrie a couple of runs in the negative in DRS), I’d be happy to see him go to that well a bit more often again. Even without relying on the sinker, Familia’s pitching as well as he was in 2016, which was enough to earn him an All-Star appearance and a rather odd MVP vote. Familia is in the top 20 of relievers in WAR and among the top 30 in FIP, so it’s a real upgrade to the A’s bullpen. Blake Treinen will remain the closer, which I believe is absolutely the right tack to take.

ZiPS Projection – Jeurys Familia
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
ROS 2018 2 1 3.00 25 0 24.0 21 8 1 10 25 137 0.7

Despite Sandy Alderson’s insistence earlier this season that the Mets have no plans to go full-scale rebuild, the team’s at least been listening to offers on pretty much the entire roster. Familia doesn’t necessarily indicate a stronger organizational willingness to go that route, of course, as he was likely to be traded anyway given his contract and the team’s position in the standings.

Bobby Wahl is an interesting flier for the Mets to take. It’s hard to characterize a 26-year-old reliever as some kind of top prospect — and I won’t — but Wahl throws in the upper 90s, has an effective slider (that really feels more like a slurve to me), and can change speeds at least tolerably well. His control’s been an issue at times, though not on the Bobby Witt scale, and one of the reasons he’s not been a bit higher in the pecking order is that he has a long history of injury, losing parts of most years with varying ailments, most recently surgery for a thoracic outlet issue last season. He was fine by spring training and, as far as I know, hasn’t had any significant issues along those lines since.

ZiPS Projection – Bobby Wahl
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
ROS 2018 1 1 4.58 15 0 17.7 21 9 3 10 23 85 0.1
2019 3 3 4.07 45 1 48.7 37 22 6 30 71 98 0.3
2020 3 2 3.97 40 0 43.0 32 19 6 26 63 101 0.3
2021 3 2 3.85 40 0 44.0 32 19 6 27 65 104 0.4
2022 2 2 3.98 35 0 38.7 28 17 5 24 57 101 0.3
2023 2 2 4.03 33 0 35.7 26 16 5 22 53 100 0.3
2024 2 2 4.01 31 0 33.7 24 15 5 21 50 99 0.3

Prospect-watchers tend to like Will Toffey more than Wahl, and ZiPS agrees that he’s a bit above-average defensively, placing him at about two runs per 150 games better than average based on the rough estimates ZiPS makes from play-by-play data. I’m really not sold on his bat: 23 is just too old for a player not in the middle infield or catching to not be killing the ball in the California League. While there’s obviously more time for Toffey to develop into something more than Wahl, I think the latter is more likely to actually contribute to a major-league team. The Mets’ squadron isn’t that deep in relief pitching and I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to see him in the back end of the team’s bullpen in April (or even this year!) depending on what other moves the Mets make.

ZiPS Projection – Will Toffey
Year AB BA OBP SLG H 2B 3B HR BB SO SB CS OPS+ DR WAR
ROS 2018 189 .217 .267 .289 40 7 1 2 15 50 1 2 52 1 -0.3
2019 508 .211 .276 .297 107 19 2 7 44 138 3 5 56 2 -0.8
2020 488 .209 .280 .307 102 20 2 8 46 137 2 4 60 2 -0.6
2021 490 .208 .281 .310 102 20 3 8 48 140 2 4 61 3 -0.5
2022 486 .208 .284 .313 101 20 2 9 50 142 2 4 63 3 -0.3
2023 482 .205 .285 .311 99 20 2 9 52 144 2 3 63 3 -0.4

It’s interesting to see Oakland positioning themselves as buyers, at least in the bargain section. To find the last time Oakland was the team trading prospects for a veteran rather than vice-versa, you actually have to go back to the 2014 Jeff Samardzija trade, which saw the team give up Addison Russell, Dan Straily, and Billy McKinney to the Cubs for Samardzija and Jason Hammel. (They picked up Jon Lester later in that month, but you’d be hard-pressed to describe Yoenis Cespedes as a prospect.) While one doesn’t really think of the A’s as front-line, top-tier contenders, the fact is they’re essentially in a two-team race for the second Wild Card with the Mariners, a team that only has a Pythagorean record of right around .500 and likely isn’t as good as their seasonal record when you talk the rest-of-season projections. Even four games back, that it’s a two-team race is quite important: I’d rather be four games behind one team than two games back and fighting with seven other teams. But the 2018 National League is highly competitive one and the American league, the bifurcated stars-and-scrubs league, a flip of the situation a few years ago.

I’m not a believer in going all-in for a Wild Card unless it comes with a significant chance of also capturing the division title, but with what Oakland is giving up, they’re not going all-in, but simply making an incremental addition to enhance their Wild Card odds. Being less risk-averse with Familia is better in this situation than rolling the dice with Wahl would be. In all, the A’s add a significant part of their present without giving up a significant part of their future.

Wins on both sides here, with both teams getting what they need from this trade. I daresay that I’d be happier with Familia at this price than Zach Britton at the price he eventually fetches.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
5 years ago

Really? “Wins on both sides here”? This seems like a steal for the A’s and a clear botch by the Mets.

dl80
5 years ago

I’m not sure that Wahl can’t be a very good reliever as soon as this year. Maybe not as good as Familia, but not too far off (assuming the Mets don’t break his arm like they do to everyone else).

Ivan_Grushenkomember
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Wahl might be a good reliever at some point, but he isn’t yet. His control is a problem.

Psychic... Powerless...
5 years ago

Keith Law on Twitter: “the Mets get an embarrassingly small return”

I’d be curious to know what Eric and Kiley think.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
5 years ago

Jeff Passan’s latest: “the trade of closer Jeurys Familia to Oakland for what nearly every evaluator saw as a subpar return”

hopbittersmember
5 years ago

You have to grade on a curve for the Mets. Nothing exploded yet = win.

Psychic... Powerless...
5 years ago
Reply to  hopbitters

Given that Wahl’s recent past includes surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome, he should fit right in.

sadtrombonemember
5 years ago

I don’t like this trade from the Mets’ side either (I’ll explain why in a second), but this kind of feels like the Melancon-Vazquez (nee Romero) trade that was terribly panned by everyone, but turned out to be great for the Pirates. Both Vazquez and Wahl had/have crazy arm strength and command issues and Familia is probably in the same category as Melancon was at the time of the trade. But Wahl’s secondaries are nowhere near as good as Vazquez’s were. So I don’t like the return either, although Will Toffey is an interesting FV40.

But I also thought that the Royals walked away without much to show for Kelvin Herrera. This appears to be a market where buyers aren’t very interested in paying for a “proven closer” like the deadline where Melancon and Miller and Chapman were fetching enormous returns.

My sense is that the Mets could have played this better, perhaps waiting a little closer to the deadline to play chicken a bit longer. But my understanding is that it’s kind of a GM-by-committee right now with Alderson out, so who knows if they had the leadership to pull that off.

dl80
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The problem is that Familia is not as good as either Miller or Chapman, and Miller had multiple years of control instead of just being a rental. I think the Mets did well enough here, considering the market. I would have rather had a lottery ticket starting pitcher instead of a reliever, but Wahl might be a trade chip in the future if he can come up and show something. The important thing is that the Mets really need to rebuild now. Trade DeGrom and Syndergaard and start over.

sadtrombonemember
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

No, but he is in the same league as Melancon was, and I think it’s pretty easy to say that a lot of the reliever deals that deadline were overpays.

I think teams just aren’t as desperate for “proven closers” right now as they were a couple years ago.

LHPSU
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree you have to be realistic about what you can get for reliever rentals, but Rivero had a considerably better track record at the time of the trade.

snood
5 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

to expand on that, Nationals-Vazquez threw 98 innings over parts of 2 seasons with a 3.67 ERA/2.96 FIP. he was already a decent MLB reliever when he was traded.

Ivan_Grushenkomember
5 years ago

This seems like a great deal for Oakland. If the reason Cleveland had to give up Mejia instead of the low tier prospects Oakland gave up was the more years of control for Hand and Cimber, why not just make this kind of deal every year instead of giving up a real prospect ever?

Turd Furgeson
5 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Idk it’s probly hard to find the exact player fitting familias situation you actually want to aquire.plus Miller/Allen are f.a.
In general maybe the price is also somewhat depressed by supply of relievers avail.

RoyalsFan#14321member
5 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Accounting for reliever volatility, this is a fantastic point…