On Second Thought: Giants Sign Free Agent Luis Arraez

After getting what amounted to replacement level production at second base last season, the Giants have a new man for the keystone. The good news is that he’s a three-time batting champion, and he’s not outrageously expensive. The bad news is that lately he hasn’t been an incredibly productive hitter despite his high batting averages, and what’s more, second base could be a stretch. However it shakes out, on Saturday the Giants agreed to terms with free agent Luis Arraez on a one-year, $12 million deal.
Arraez, who will turn 29 on April 9, spent last season and most of the previous one with the Padres after being acquired from the Marlins in a May 4, 2024 trade. While he won his third straight batting title in 2024 and made his third consecutive All-Star team, his time with San Diego was one of diminishing returns on both sides of the ball. Last year again he led the NL with 181 hits, but his .292/.327/.392 slash line only amounted to a 104 wRC+, the lowest mark of his career and down from a 109 wRC+ (on .314/.346/.392 hitting) in 2024. By comparison, he hit for a 130 wRC+ (.316/.375/.420) when he won the AL batting title with the Twins in 2022 and a 131 wRC+ (.354/.393/.469) when he won the NL batting title in ’23. He slipped from being more or less a three-win player (6.1 WAR in 2022–23) to a one-win player (2.0 WAR in 2024–25).
Arraez is an odd duck, an anachronism in that the things he’s best at don’t fit this historical moment particularly well. At a time when home run and strikeout rates are near their all-time highs and batting averages closer to an all-time low, he’s the game’s most contact-oriented hitter, as well as the active leader in batting average (.317). That makes him a fun player to theorize about, as colleague Davy Andrews did when he recently pondered the possibility of Arraez signing with the Rockies, whose spacious ballpark would’ve provided him with the most room to run up his batting average on balls in play by dumping single after single in front of outfielders playing deep.
Arraez’s skill set makes him a player of statistical extremes. Last year, he whiffed and struck out less often than any qualified hitter (5.3% and 3.1% of the time, respectively) while also squaring the ball up more frequently than anyone (42.6% of all swings). But one problem for Arraez — who’s not a big guy, listed at just 5-foot-10 and 175 pounds — is that he didn’t put a charge into the ball very often. His 62.6-mph average bat speed was the majors’ lowest among qualifiers, as was his 16.7% hard-hit rate. His 1.1% barrel rate didn’t make it out of the first percentile either, and his 86.1-mph average exit velocity placed in just the sixth percentile. He was in similar territory in 2024, but in ’23 he mustered a bit more oomph, averaging an 88.3-mph exit velo (29th percentile) and 3.5% barrel rate (ninth percentile). While those aren’t terribly impressive numbers, they produced an expected batting average of .327 and an expected slugging percentage of .461; last year he was down to a comparatively meek .287 xBA and a .358 xSLG.
| Season | Team | Bat Spd | Sq Up % | BBE | EV | Brl% | HH% | AVG | xBA | SLG | xSLG | wOBA | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | MIN | — | — | 507 | 88.9 | 3.6% | 30.2% | .316 | .288 | .420 | .408 | .350 | .333 |
| 2023 | MIA | 63.8 | 45.2 | 544 | 88.3 | 3.5% | 25.7% | .354 | .329 | .469 | .458 | .369 | .354 |
| 2024 | MIA/SDP | 63.1 | 43.3 | 611 | 86.3 | 1.6% | 23.7% | .314 | .310 | .392 | .400 | .323 | .325 |
| 2025 | SDP | 62.6 | 42.6 | 618 | 86.1 | 1.1% | 16.7% | .292 | .287 | .392 | .358 | .313 | .300 |
The main reason Arraez went unsigned until the end of January is the combination of his defense and his fit onto a roster. During his seven-year major league career, he’s played all four infield spots, but he’s moved down the defensive spectrum rather quickly. He spent most of his tenure with the Padres playing first base or DH — I’ll get to the details below — but in his first trip through free agency, he specifically sought out a landing spot where he could return to second base on a regular basis. According to the San Francisco Chronicle’s Susan Slusser, “San Francisco landed Arráez with assurances he would play second base; he turned down multi-year offers from clubs that pegged him as a DH.”
Even at his 2025 level of offense, Arraez’s bat is a good fit for second base. Major league second basemen combined for just a 90 wRC+ in 2025, so a 104 wRC+ is near elite there; only five teams got a 104 wRC+ or better out of their second basemen. The Padres, still with a lineup made mostly out of shortstops, didn’t need a second baseman; they already had a very competent one in Jake Cronenworth, so they used Arraez there just 14 times last year, compared to 117 at first base and 29 at DH. Since the bar for offense is much higher at first base (where major leaguers averaged a 109 wRC+) and DH (110 wRC+), Arraez’s bat wasn’t as valuable as it might have been elsewhere.
The real problem is that no matter where you put him, Arraez’s glove is something of a liability, and has been for some time. Here’s a look at his defensive metrics over the past four seasons, at three different positions:
| Season | Team | Pos | G | GS | Innings | DRS | FRV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | MIN | 1B | 65 | 60 | 529 | 4 | 2 |
| 2023 | MIA | 1B | 12 | 11 | 90 | -2 | -3 |
| 2024 | MIA/SDP | 1B | 69 | 61 | 533 | -3 | -4 |
| 2025 | SDP | 1B | 117 | 112 | 993 2/3 | 3 | -4 |
| 2022 | MIN | 2B | 41 | 31 | 277 2/3 | 3 | 1 |
| 2023 | MIA | 2B | 134 | 129 | 1,124 | 4 | -8 |
| 2024 | MIA/SDP | 2B | 42 | 39 | 339 | -3 | -5 |
| 2025 | SDP | 2B | 14 | 10 | 82 | -2 | -1 |
| 2022 | MIN | 3B | 7 | 4 | 40 2/3 | -3 | -6 |
That’s not pretty. A closer look at the Statcast numbers shows that as a first baseman, Arraez has struggled on plays to his right, with -7 outs above average when moving laterally toward third base last year, and -4 in the same category in 2024. At second base, his big issue has been coming in on the ball, with -10 OAA in that category in 2023, and -6 in ’24. (He was average in last year’s very small sample.) His issues are compounded by a lack of a strong throwing arm; according to Statcast, his arm strength based on the average speed of his competitive throws placed him in just the 26th percentile, and he’s been in the 35th percentile or lower each of the past four seasons. He was in the 90th percentile circa 2021 while splitting time between second and third base, but for one reason or another just hasn’t been the same since.
The Giants went 81-81 last year while using four players at second, namely Tyler Fitzgerald, Casey Schmitt, Christian Koss, and Brett Wisely. That quartet combined for a sickly 73 wRC+ and 0.3 WAR, both of which ranked 27th in the majors. None of the four players distinguished himself as a second baseman, though Schmitt, a 2020 second-round pick, did hit .237/.305/.401 (98 wRC+) with 12 home runs overall while also spotting at first and third. He’s likely ticketed for a utility role that could include taking starts at second against lefties — the lefty-swinging Arraez has just a 90 wRC+ for his career against them, compared to a 126 mark against righties — and serving as a late-inning defensive replacement.
With Rafael Devers and Bryce Eldridge both on the roster, the Giants already have first base and DH covered, and appear to be banking on new infield coach Ron Washington to help Arraez man a more difficult position (Tell him, Wash). During his second go-round as an infield coach with Oakland in 2015–16, he helped current Giants third baseman Matt Chapman, then a top prospect, become one of the game’s elite defenders at the hot corner. (He’s since won five Gold Gloves and one Platinum one). Washington also molded future Gold Glove winner Marcus Semien. In his first stint with the A’s (1996–2006), Washington helped third baseman Eric Chavez win six Gold Gloves. He also spent seven seasons (2017–23) as the infield coach of the Braves, and Atlanta third baseman Austin Riley has credited Washington with turning him into a plus defender (by DRS anyway, as Riley has +20 DRS for his career at third but -21 FRV). While I wouldn’t expect Arraez to join that honor roll, I wouldn’t dismiss the prospect of Washington’s guiding him to some improvement.
At least on the offensive side, the projection systems are optimistic about an Arraez rebound, with our Depth Charts forecast projecting him for a .302/.343/.397 (109 wC+) line and 2.5 WAR. That would be a great return for the Giants’ $12 million investment. For what it’s worth, Arraez ranked 37th on our Top 50 Free Agents list in November, with Ben Clemens estimating that the three-time batting champ would wind up with a one-year, $11 million deal, while our median crowdsource came in at two years and $28 million.
All told, while Arraez may be a bit of an awkward fit for second base, the particulars here are enough to help mitigate the risk. In the big picture, the Giants chose this winter to steer clear of long-term free agent deals while trying to stay under the first competitive balance tax threshold of $244 million. All six free agents they’ve signed to major league deals have been on either one-year contracts (starter Tyler Mahle, relievers Jason Foley and Sam Hentges, and Arraez) or two-year ones (center fielder Harrison Bader and starter Adrian Houser); per RosterResource, that’s left them with a $232.7 million tax payroll, giving them about $11 million of space before bumping up against the threshold. Those aren’t bad moves — San Francisco’s 84-win ZiPS projection is the second-highest total in the NL West — but they’re not high-impact ones. We’ll see if they’re enough for a Giants team that has finished within four games of .500 in five of the past six seasons to mount a challenge for a playoff spot.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
A right side of the infield of Arraez and Devers good luck with that 😜
Devers is a below-average but perfectly functional 3B – he figures to fit quite well at 1B.
Figures to, but it’s Devers.
Poor Logan Webb
Was thinking exactly the same thing.
Tony Vitello will (presumably) not be obligated to play Arraez at 2B when Webb, or any other pitcher with a high GB%, is on the mound.
I believe most of their rotation doesn’t miss much bats besides for the top two, so we’ll see.
The Giants do seemed to have promised him a chance to play 2B. We’ll see what that’s worth. Webb, Houser and even Roupp are fairly high GB% guys, and Mahle allows a lot of contact.
I just can’t get behind this signing at all. His projections are not far enough ahead of Schmitt ‘s to justify the hit to the defense. Especially when you’re relying on 230 IPs from Logan Webb and just signed 2 high-contact SPs to fill out your rotation. You can hope he’ll be merely a bad 2B, but I don’t think you can expect it. That’s a shitty plan.
Oh come on. Luis Arraez is Tony Gwynn-esque, according to this site
I don’t know what you mean by “according to this site”, but my best guess would be what the writers here think, and I feel like FG staff pretty consistently put him down has “huge outlier on several traits that adds up to an average regular.” See: the article above.
“Something had to be done, and if that something gets a Tony-Gwynn-esque player to San Diego atop the lineup, so much the better.”
-Ben Clemens, May 6th, 2024
“However, I would remind you of the difference in their eras. The other plus stats make an eloquent argument for Arraez as Gwynn’s rightful heir. You may be surprised to learn that, relative to his era, Arraez is actually better than Gwynn at hitting for average.”
-Davy Andrews, September 11th, 2024
“If this is the tact he takes, he can follow the example of franchise icon Tony Gwynn, to whom he’s often compared….”
-Dan Szymborski, June 11th, 2025
So that’s three writers “on this site” that, at least to my apparently limited brain, appear to be saying more than he’s a “huge outlier”, including one writer who literally wrote what I quoted.
Perhaps you can tell me what I’m missing, asb123?
This site? Evidence?
“Something had to be done, and if that something gets a Tony-Gwynn-esque player to San Diego atop the lineup, so much the better.”
-Ben Clemens, May 6th, 2024
“However, I would remind you of the difference in their eras. The other plus stats make an eloquent argument for Arraez as Gwynn’s rightful heir. You may be surprised to learn that, relative to his era, Arraez is actually better than Gwynn at hitting for average.”
-Davy Andrews, September 11th, 2024
“If this is the tact he takes, he can follow the example of franchise icon Tony Gwynn, to whom he’s often compared….”
-Dan Szymborski, June 11th, 2025
Any other evidence you need?
This is the point in the offseason where we start to see who is desperate. And the Giants are desperate to have literally anyone other than who they have on the roster at second base.
There is no real reason to be out there signing Arraez to play second base. Why would you do that to yourself with the number of pitch to contact guys on their staff?
There had to be a better solution than this.
Start Arraez as often as possible especially against right handed pitchers. His career OPS+ against righties is 107, OPS+ against lefties is 93. If the Giants are ahead in late innings, sub in Casey Schmidt. If they are behind, keep Arraez in the lineup and hope for a comeback. With Arraez in the lineup, innings will get stretched out. Last thing, I expect that Oracle will play to his hitting strengths.
Does a deep park really help him much? Maybe if he gets an additional base if he burns an outfielder, but he’s also not really fast enough to take much advantage. Looking at his career splits, I don’t really see any signal that stands out for performing better in larger parks.
I think the idea is that OF play further back in a deep park, allowing more of his soft liners to fall in as singles. That was the argument in the Arraez-to-Coors article
Couldn’t they just adjust by not playing as far back for him?
Oracle might play to his strengths just by not hurting him as much as other batters.
It’s just not that useful to him, since he almost never finds the gap. His XB hits come almost entirely from the left field line and the far right field bleachers.
They do not play further back on Arraez.
How does Oracle help him? He has one of the slowest bat speeds in the league and hits the softest line drives in baseball. All of his doubles, basically, came from pinging the left field line, and fielders played an average of 15 feet closer in on him than the average player because he simply does not possess power to the gaps (his only real power comes to far right field.)
It’s malpractice if his agent allowed him to turn down multi-year offers just so he could sign on to play a position for which he’s clearly unsuited. Arraez had one shot at financial security in his career, and he blew it, in my opinion.
He’s made 47 million so far in his career. I think he’ll be okay.
Handshake promises to keep playing a defensive spot you are no longer acceptable at go really well : R. Devers
Sounds like a good move – if Arraez can spend all his time working on being a good 2nd baseman without trying to shuffle around too much, I think he can improve!
Yeah I didn’t like this signing but I generally like the idea of teams trying to use their development strengths (in this case, employing Ron Washington as an infield coach) to get some value the rest of the market can’t/won’t.
I think his offense will be a big boost since the Giants seemed to (unfortunately needed to) have given up on Lee as a leadoff man. Arraez will do well in front of Adames, Devers and Chapman. I gotta believe that RW will help his glove enough to compliment his bat and keep him batting first.
I don’t see the allure of Arraez for the team, given the focus on defense, but I expect him to be used similarly to how Pat Burrell was used: start most games, get replaced defensively after 3-4 PA, depending on the game situation . Also, with Ron Washington around, they likely are hoping to improve his defense enough that his elite hitting (for 2B) is what shines. I also would think that they have some ideas on how to get him back closer to his two great offensive seasons.
Also, I think Devers has shown enough, given how new he was to the position, that with more experience plus coaching from Wotus and Washington, should make him okay defensively at first base. So the right side wouldn’t be as good as the left, but it would not massively hurt the defense, either. Especially after adding Bader to the OF, and shifting Lee to RF, those moves alone could add 2-3-4 wins defensively (Lee was just that bad in 2025; Bader is just that good).
Overall net with Bader and Arraez is that the offensive likely gained over 2025, especially with Devers here all season (team RS went from 4.4 to 4.7 after he started hitting normally in SF), and so did defense, with the Bader-Lee moves.
Plus SP has improved with Houser and Mahle. The Giants rose to the NL West leadership due to the great pitching of Webb, Ray and Roupp, as the offense and defense was pretty below average. And that SP hopefully continues in 2026. Verlander, Hicks, Birdsong and Harrison did not pitch well at all during that run up, so getting even average pitching from Houser and Mahle would be an improvement.
Biggest question mark is the bullpen, now that Rogers and Doval are gone, and Rodriguez is recovering. Hentges hopefully will be a good add, and maybe Peguero can take a step up. Foley returns mid-season, hopefully as well. And I think Butto and Walker will be good enough components of a competent bullpen. The Giants will need some guys stepping up here, among the young prospects: Birdsong, Whisenhunt, Harris, ,Peguero, McDonald, and others.