Outfield Free Agent Signing Roundup

Kyle Ross-USA TODAY Sports

Two of the outfielders I would have been most interested in signing this winter (as high-quality backups) both agreed to deals last week. Normally, that wouldn’t be a big deal; that’s what offseasons are for, after all. But both of them signed roughly two weeks away from Opening Day, and for meaningfully less than I would have predicted. That means that you can’t disconnect their deals from the context in which they were signed. That also means they get wrapped up into one article, so here we go. This will be a three-parter: Michael A. Taylor’s signing with the Pirates, Adam Duvall’s signing with the Braves, and the market forces behind both moves.

Taylor to the Pirates
This one was so obvious in retrospect. The Pirates have a lot of interesting young players, but one thing they didn’t have was a complete outfield. They have Bryan Reynolds and Jack Suwinski, both potential pieces of the future and interesting players right now in their own right. But that’s only two outfielders, and Suwinski is more of an emergency center fielder than an everyday one. The options after that – Edward Olivares, Connor Joe – felt more like platoon pieces than everyday starters.

Taylor, who signed a one-year deal worth $4 million, makes the whole picture look a lot better. He’s an elite center field defender, regardless of which system you’re grading him on. That lets Suwinski and Reynolds handle the corners, more natural positions for both. It also means the Pirates won’t have to make a tough decision against lefty pitching: either to play the lefty-hitting Suwinski — who before the Taylor deal was their best defensive center field, even though isn’t really suited to play that position full time — despite the platoon disadvantage, or sacrifice defense. Now they can mix and match far more easily.

Taylor’s offensive game has always been his weak link, and that absolutely limited his market. He’s a career .239/.294/.389 hitter, good for an 82 wRC+, which spells out his upside pretty clearly. He’s an average overall player, give or take a rounding error, so long as he’s an elite defender. In each of the last three years, that’s been almost exactly what happened; his defense has carried him even when his offense hasn’t. When he smacked a career-high 21 homers last year, his production boomed, and he racked up 1.7 WAR in only 388 plate appearances.

We’re projecting a return to career norms for Taylor’s offense, and it’s not hard to see why. He posted easily the best power production of his career, and in a way that doesn’t feel sticky. Before last year, he’d hit 113 doubles and 74 home runs over his first nine seasons. He had 14 doubles and 21 homers in 2023, a meaningful deviation from his normal output. That all comes down to an impressive barrel rate and more aerial contact than ever, but I think it’s reasonable to project a return to career norms there, and Pittsburgh is a terrible park for righty power, which should push that even a bit lower.

If the Pirates are looking for a repeat of last year’s offense in a full-time role, they’ll likely be disappointed. But they absolutely don’t need that. He brings the floor of their outfield up significantly, to a roughly average unit. We think the Pirates will get nearly as many WAR from their outfielders (6.6) as the Mike Trout-led Angels (7.0) — partly because Angels right fielders are projected for 0.4 WAR, the worst total in the majors — with less injury risk. And all of that for $4 million! I love this signing for a team on the fringes of the playoff race thanks to the paper-soft NL Central.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Duvall to the Braves
Now for a signing that will matter far less in the regular season. The Braves signed Adam Duvall, who last year with the Red Sox put together his best season on a rate basis but dealt with plenty of injuries. He’s making $3 million on a one-year deal.

Duvall is the archetypical boom/bust hitter. He strikes out roughly 30% of the time, even in good years. He doesn’t walk a lot. What he does do is put the ball in the air at an absurd rate, and with authority. His career barrel rate, 11.8%, is in the top 10% of all hitters in the Statcast era. If pitchers hang ’em, he can definitely bang ’em.

I’d say that Duvall’s .284 ISO in 2023 was an unsustainable caricature of his offensive game, but his career mark is an also-outrageous .240. He’s never going to get on base much, but his power is as real as it gets, even as he enters his age-35 season. He truly doesn’t do anything else – his career OBP is below .300, a woeful number for a theoretically offense-first outfielder – but I can’t emphasize enough how real his power is.

The Red Sox put Duvall in center field in 2023, which caused some excitement about his ability to move up the defensive spectrum. I didn’t completely buy it, though, and it seems like teams didn’t either. At best, he’s a backup to the durable Michael Harris II. The real reason Duvall is headed to the Braves is insurance for their high-risk plan in left field. Atlanta moved a lot of pieces around to bring in Jarred Kelenic over the winter. The ceiling is high for the former top prospect, but let’s be realistic: the floor is unfathomably low.

Kelenic has a lot of prospect shine, but he’s a career 85 wRC+ hitter in 1,000 plate appearances of big league playing time. He’s been one of the worst hitters in baseball this spring, for whatever that’s worth. He has huge platoon splits; he’s been unplayably bad against lefties in a limited sample. I think that the Braves will give him a chance to hit against everyone and establish himself as an everyday player, but there’s no guarantee that he will.

Signing Duvall means that there’s an off ramp if things don’t work out with Kelenic. Until they added him, the alternatives were so bad that Kelenic might have retained his job even if he were to play quite poorly. Now, there’s a limit to how bad that position can get, because Duvall feels like a bankable option. He doesn’t have huge platoon splits, though he’ll surely be taking some of Kelenic’s playing time against tough lefties. But he can also just take playing time, period, if Atlanta decides its gamble isn’t paying off.

That’s really smart team-building, as far as I’m concerned. The Kelenic experiment isn’t a high-leverage one for the Braves, who figure to run roughshod over the NL East regardless of what their left fielders do. But when it comes to building a World Series winner, patching potential holes for cheap in March is a lot better than doing so for a premium at the trade deadline.

Why So Little Money?
Both Taylor and Duvall landed in my top 50 free agents list this offseason. The crowd and I both missed pretty badly on our estimates for both. I had Taylor down for one year and $9 million; the crowd called for two years at $7 million per. I did worse with Duvall; I had him pegged at one year and $10 million, while the crowd went for one year and $8 million. Neither player even got half the guarantees we estimated for them.

It’s all part of the same story that’s been going on in free agency for years. The middle class is getting squeezed. Teams prefer to look internally for roughly average options, confident in their ability to develop cheap alternatives who aren’t much worse than those available in free agency. That doesn’t work for stars – it’s a lot easier to find a minor leaguer who’s 90% of Taylor than one who’s 90% of Mookie Betts, obviously – so great players still sign big deals, but solid regulars feel the pinch.

I’ve tried to account for that in my contract projections by changing the scale that I use to convert WAR into salary. I’ve made the first 1.5 wins progressively less valuable over time to reflect the way teams are behaving. For what it’s worth, I think that behavior is completely logical; in a game of limited resources (an assumption completely worth challenging, but outside the scope of this article), pouring your money into chasing stars and then trying to replicate role players is a good strategy.

These two deals squeeze that distribution down even further. It’s hard to imagine Taylor or Duvall finishing less than a win above replacement, even in a part-time role. Fitting a curve to account for these salaries as well as some of the bigger deals signed in free agency would require making the first win almost completely worthless, even lower than I’ve forced it in recent years.

The question, then, is whether to use these contracts or most of the other contracts signed this offseason as benchmarks of what to expect going forward. You could throw Amed Rosario’s deal into the mix; $1.5 million for a rotation infielder is even a bit cheaper than these two. But then you’ve to contend with Joc Pederson’s getting $12.5 million, Kevin Kiermaier’s getting $10.5 million, and Isiah Kiner-Falefa’ getting two years and $15 million.

I’m going to handle these contracts in my future free agency prediction endeavors by hedging. I’ll use the data points, of course, but I think it’s reasonable to look at both of these as casualties of circumstances rather than perfect harbingers of the new normal. It’s hard to predict which free agents will get squeezed ex ante; every year, someone ends up sitting on the vine longer than expected because there aren’t quite enough teams looking for veterans.

I’m going to resist taking too broad of a lesson here, though. Taylor and Duvall are both outfielders with only one carrying tool, but players like that signed earlier this winter on more reasonable deals. The middle class is still getting squeezed, without a doubt. I just wouldn’t take these two deals as evidence of an acceleration of the trend. More likely, they’re victims of timing who will be huge bargains for the clubs that signed them.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago

“But then you’ve to contend with Joc Pederson’s getting $12.5 million, Kevin Kiermaier’s getting $10.5 million, and Isiah Kiner-Falefa getting two years and $15 million.”

Thank you for reminding us Jays fans that not only did they not land any top-shelf free agents this offseason, but they are paying premiums for the middling talents that they did sign.

It would be hard to score fewer runs in the two wild card games that they did last year, but they seem intent on trying! (Of course, to put up zeroes in the postseason you’ve got to make the postseason…)

Last edited 2 years ago by Jason B
OkraMember since 2016
2 years ago

2 of the 3 guys who stand out as highly paid middle class free agents (Kiermaier and Kiner-Falefa) were signed by the same team. I’m sure even the Blue Jays have learned their lesson and regret these deals.

I think it’s generally safe to assume these types of guys get even less going forward. Also, I believe teams know they can really wait these guys out in free agency until their price drops … because even if the worst case is you sign none of them – your season won’t be ruined if you don’t sign Adam Duvall.

rickdugo3000
2 years ago
Reply to  Okra

the very same team that just last offseason traded a top-5 prospect in baseball, who subsequently showed out in the postseason, for another middling outfielder. maybe they’re just dumb?

hughduffy
2 years ago

The Braves already announced plans to platoon Adam Duvall with Kelenic for now.

On the one hand, I’m shocked that Duvall was available for so little. On the other hand, his past two seasons that had freak injuries probably had something to do with it.

I’m just glad that AA didn’t wait until July to acquire Duvall, like he did in 2021… and 2018.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  hughduffy

Just my opinion. But it sort of feels like Kelenic has anxiety or yips but at the plate. Wouldn’t shock me to see him out of baseball earlier than people expect, only to demolish Indy ball and be back and put up a couple solid years in his 30s. As a true lefty, mental health is something like 10x more likely to be a factor. I see mental health issues with him, like Meadows for example. It seems a lot more likely in left left guys. It’s pure speculation but to me it seems like it’s his head holding him back, not something else. This in anecdotal, but I once played a high level volleyball tournament that I certainly wasn’t good enough to play and missed every single serve. I probably miss 1 in 100 serves normally, but a step up in competition I missed something like 15 in a row. It’s just a mental block. That’s how I see him. The talent is there, he just looks like he is pressing. Watched him in Seattle a lot live and he has an entirely different demeanor in the on the deck circle than anyone else. Nearly everyone is relaxed, not him. He looks stressed

Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

We’ll see what happens, but I’m kind of low on the 83-part transaction chain whose primary result was Kelenic while the Braves rotation remains shaky. Fair to look at this as an incredibly strong roster and decline to break the bank on upgrades, but I don’t love that they went for bankshots instead of clear solutions at two positions of need (rotation and LF).

Last edited 2 years ago by Anon21
hughduffy
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

The Braves wanted another left handed hitter for the outfield, and they didn’t want to pay them a lot of money. Kelenic fit the bill, he’s young (24 years old), and he still has time to develop.
I think it’s fair to call Kelenic a bankshot, but the Braves traded Vaughn Grissom for Chris Sale and signed Reynaldo Lópezas a free agent with the idea he might make the rotation. I thought that was a clear enough attempt to upgrade the rotation.

I don’t know what’s so shaky about Fried, Strider, Morton, Sale, and Lopez. Are they all going to pitch 32 complete games? Of course not. Do I worry about health? Sure, that’s why you have depth.

Over the past three years, the Braves have given starts to at least 10 different starting pitchers each year, with 13 different starting pitchers having starts in 2023. That’s not even counting relievers who lead off bullpen games. And on the depth chart, you have Bryce Elder, AJ Smith-Shawver, Dylan Dodd, Darius Vines, Allan Winans, and Hurston Waldrop. Huascar Ynoa is coming back from Tommy John, and Ian Anderson will be coming back from it mid-season. At least some of them will be capable of making good enough starts that will hold up with the lineup the Braves have.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago

It’s even a better deal if one considers that Taylor is more likely to exceed 3 WAR as a CF than Pederson is as a DH. One could consider Taylor as basically a healthy version of Kiermaier at this point. Both Kiermaier and Pederson are more likely to be zero WAR than Taylor for reasons of suddenly diminished bat speed and injury respectively

Duvall seems less valuable as a short side of a platoon but theoretically similar to Taylor if he plays full time

On the other hand teams might value the certainty of filling a position early and not being left with nobody

Last edited 2 years ago by Ivan_Grushenko
Mike NMN
2 years ago

Good posting. What are the off-price signings…the bargain deals, like Taylor and Duval, or the early signers, like IKF? If you need to fill a hole and don’t have an obvious way of doing it, you may end up paying a premium price. Yankees signed Marcus Stroman and the RedSox Giolito for what seemed to be at the time what the market was pricing that kind of pitcher. Now, it wouldn’t surprise me if that money doesn’t pay for much of a short-term Jordan Montgomery deal.

Thatguy47
2 years ago

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the weirdness around this class of FAs is clearly a result of a bimodal payroll scheme and not the Bally Sports and revenue situation.

Otherwise there’s no way to explain the massive FA deals from the last 2 offseasons and the market-rate deals to so many FAs like Nola, Kiermaier, IKF, and the Dodgers’ guys.

What we have are like 15-20 teams who spend and 10-15 teams who don’t, and FA spending is overwhelmingly dependent on the teams who spend having enough payroll and holes to be big players. This is how Castellanos and Schwarbergot $100mil and $80mil 2 years ago while Chapman got $54mil including maybe $16mil/1yr despite being a much better player.

Good players start running out of interested teams very early, and it’s difficult to anticipate what a player’s market will look like. This is why Bellinger and Chapman are both taking optouts after every year, because if certain teams are spending it completely changes the picture in FA.

Lots of people have been gloating over these guys getting snubbed their demands and saying they’re paid their weight, but this isn’t true in any meaningful sense. Market rates are vastly different when the Phillies/Dodgers/Mets/Yankees/etc are spending vs when they aren’t b/c of lux tax.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  Thatguy47

Two of the “big” signings, as mentioned above, were by the same team that has it’s own TV network.

Thatguy47
2 years ago

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the weirdness around this class of FAs is clearly a result of a bimodal payroll scheme and not the Bally Sports and revenue situation.

Otherwise there’s no way to explain the massive FA deals from the last 2 offseasons and the market-rate deals to so many FAs like Nola, Kiermaier, IKF, and the Dodgers’ guys.

What we have are like 15 teams who spend and 15 teams who don’t, and FA spending is overwhelmingly dependent on the teams who spend having enough payroll and holes to be big players. This is how Castellanos and Schwarbergot $100mil and $80mil 2 years ago while Chapman got $54mil including maybe $16mil/1yr despite being a much better player.

Good players start running out of interested teams very early, and it’s difficult to anticipate what a player’s market will look like. This is why Bellinger and Chapman are both taking optouts after every year, because if certain teams are spending it completely changes the picture in FA.

Lots of people have been gloating over these guys getting snubbed their demands and saying they’re paid their weight, but this isn’t true in any meaningful sense. Market rates are vastly different when the Phillies/Dodgers/Mets/Yankees/etc are spending vs when they aren’t b/c of lux tax.

dozingoffdadMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  Thatguy47

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again

Last edited 2 years ago by dozingoffdad
bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
2 years ago

The Braves pulled another rabbit out of the hat with the Duvall signing. Given the LF position he is perfectly capable of a .240/35/100 line and if not a regular, he is exactly what a platoon player or fourth outfielder looks like on a strong team. I have next to no belief in Kelenic’s ability to actually be a contributor. His brief period of competence reminds me of another very highly touted player who had a few months of average performance then turned back into a frog. Does the name Domonic Brown resonate with Phillies fans? Adam Duvall is better than Joc Pederson at 25% of the cost.

fjtorres
2 years ago

Not mentioned is that a lot of the “90%” minor leaguers have the potential to get better while a lot of the “middle class” FAs ending with part time and rotational utility jobs have reached or declined past theirs.

Atlanta is hoping Jelenic reaches his ceiling but unlike most of the teams in the Central divisions, they can’t give him as much leeway as, say, Detroit or Pittsburgh. Besides, they can use Duval even if Jelenic reaches his full ceiling. As mentioned, he can backup in the OF, 1B, DH. They’re less likely to trade him at the deadline and they offer a shot at a ring. That is worth something to Duval.

There’s more than money in the calculus on both sides of this deal.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I would think Atlanta has more room for leeway than Detroit or Pittsburgh. Kelenic could put up a historically bad full season and Atlanta will still make the playoffs.

Devlsh
2 years ago

I see this more a matter of timing and expectations.

Timing, in that it’s a game of musical chairs, with X number of openings and X number of FAs able to fill them. Expectations in that if you overprice yourself early, you may end up paying for it later. A good agent needs to weigh those factors, and this year it applied to both the mid range FA as well as the Snell/Montgomery/Bellinger class.

Last edited 2 years ago by Devlsh
fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Devlsh

To an extent, those three are effectively midrangers because of their attached uncertainties. They may not be ending up with rock bottom deals but their pillows so far are pretty cut-rate compared to the november expectations.

Lanidrac
2 years ago

A couple notes on their lower than expected salaries:

First, just like the Boras 4, hanging on the market this far into Spring Training has also caused their market prices to drop to some degree.

Second, I don’t consider either Taylor or Duvall as “solid regulars.” Taylor is about as good at defense as he is bad at offense, but offense is quite a bit more valuable than defense. Taylor is only a regular due to signing with a somewhat mediocre Pirates team. Duvall is no longer a very good overall hitter, as the amount of power he has left isn’t enough to make up for his terrible on-base ability. He’s only a decent bench player and backup, which is what the Braves have signed him to be.