Sweet Snell of Success

It was closer than a lot of us thought it’d be, but Blake Snell has found a job before the Second Coming. The reigning Cy Young winner, left unemployed past St. Patrick’s Day by the merciless vicissitudes of the market, has come to terms with the San Francisco Giants on a two-year, $62 million contract with an opt-out after the 2024 season. Snell’s compensation includes a $17 million signing bonus, payable in January 2026, and a $15 million base salary in 2024.
The contract itself is something of an anticlimax for a player who supposedly turned down a similar AAV over six years because he wanted the same annual compensation over nine. And it’s not the one-year megabucks prove-it contract I speculated about six weeks ago. It’s probably not even worth the eyes emoji he posted to Instagram last Sunday.
Snell’s agent, Scott Boras, ran out the usual playbook — leave it late, hold the line, appeal directly to ownership. Boras has gotten more players nine-figure contracts than most agents have in their email contacts, and this is how he does it. And at the risk of being a huge bummer about Snell getting a top-10 AAV ever for a pitcher, the plan seems to have backfired.
When teams give out $30 million-a-year contracts to pitchers, they like consistency. That’s hard to guarantee, as the life of a pitcher is as precarious as the life of a spider in Jonathan Edwards’ fireplace — one false move and it’s a year lost, maybe two, to Tommy John surgery. Even acknowledging the risk inherent in signing a pitcher, Snell is a bit unpredictable.
He’s one of the hardest-throwing left-handed starters out there, with one of the best curveballs in the game, and a plus changeup. When it works? Well, last year, he led the league in opponent batting average by 19 points, and in ERA by almost half a run. He struck out a higher percentage of his opponents than any starter apart from Spencer Strider.
But he nibbles. He led the league in walk rate by 1.7 points over second-place Charlie Morton. “What would a pitcher have to do to win the Cy Young while leading the league in walk rate?” must’ve been the premise of an Effectively Wild listener email somewhere along the line.
Sure, it’s easier to pull off Snell’s unique double in a season in which only 44 pitchers qualified for the ERA title. By lowering the innings requirement to 100, we can expand the sample to 127 pitchers; of those, Snell had the second-highest walk rate and his ERA was still the lowest. Moreover, Snell’s two Cy Young campaigns are the only seasons in which he’s broken 130 innings. When he’s on, he’s one of the best pitchers in baseball. When he’s not, it’s frustrating. And in such small portions, too.
So here’s a pitcher with an aggressive agent and wild variation not only in his personal performance, but in perception of his ability. You’d expect his biggest supporters and his biggest detractors to disagree over his value. And with a qualifying offer attached to him, Snell would cost more than money. A team that’s over the CBT threshold would forfeit two draft picks and $1 million in bonus pool money. A team that’s not a tax payor and doesn’t receive revenue sharing would lose its second-highest pick and $500,000. That’s an afterthought when Shohei Ohtani is on the table, but a team that already has doubts about Snell would hardly be emboldened by these further penalties.
And then the market shrank. When big-spending teams were willing to break the bank for a pitcher, they were talking about Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Aaron Nola, both of whom went off the board early, as did Sonny Gray. The Mets are taking this season to reset rather than throwing around big money again. The Rangers, Yankees, and Cubs went for mid-tier options like Tyler Mahle, Marcus Stroman, and Shota Imanaga. The Padres and Orioles traded for Dylan Cease and Corbin Burnes, respectively.
By this past weekend, Snell’s options had narrowed to the point that any further hesitation might imperil the first half of his season. The Astros were reportedly in on Snell over the weekend. Both they and the Giants had already signed a qualified free agent, and would be subject to reduced draft penalties (San Francisco is now over the first tax threshold and will lose its third- and sixth-highest picks) as a result.
But by signing Matt Chapman two weeks ago, the Giants already established themselves as this offseason’s premier opportunists. Chapman’s deal — three years, $54 million — also has an opt-out after the first season.
Snell’s signing with San Francisco now is a bit like marrying Colonel Brandon after having one’s heart broken by the dashing but caddish and unreliable Mr. Willoughby. It might not be what he was hoping for at the start, but it’s a safe port in a storm. He’ll have a year in a pitcher-friendly park in which to convince the league that he’s worth $30 million a year over a much longer term, and when he hits the market again, he won’t be encumbered by a qualifying offer.
And he’ll have a shot to win, sure, but from that standpoint this is probably a lateral move from San Diego, or before that, Tampa Bay.
The Giants finished just under .500 and a distant fourth in the NL West last year. Even with their late signings, the Giants have been overshadowed by the Dodgers, who added Ohtani, Yamamoto, Tyler Glasnow, and Teoscar Hernández. The race for second place in the division, between the Giants, Diamondbacks, and Padres, is too close to call.
But San Francisco has been sneakily active this offseason. Even before adding Chapman and Snell, they signed Jorge Soler, Jung Hoo Lee, and Jordan Hicks, and traded for Robbie Ray. A rotation headlined by Snell, Logan Webb (Snell’s stylistic opposite), and Kyle Harrison looks pretty formidable. And it will only become more so once Ray and Alex Cobb return from injury.
Even so, the offense still has holes, especially compared to the Dodgers. And even if Los Angeles falters for some inexplicable reason (maybe Ohtani was the problem all along, and not the Angels!), the Giants will still have two other high-quality opponents standing between them and a division title.
Snell arrives in San Francisco at a time when the Giants are stumbling into one ugly headline after another. The Giants squandered much of the goodwill they generated by signing Chapman when they released their incumbent third baseman (and Chapman’s college roommate) J.D. Davis. The Giants had taken Davis to an arbitration hearing over a difference of $345,000. Having lost that hearing and signing Chapman, they elected to release Davis, using a CBA loophole to pay him $1.1 million in termination pay rather than his full contract. That saved the Giants $5.8 million, but cost Davis — who signed with the A’s for about a third of his original contract value — some $3.6 million.
Among those who took offense: Members of the Giants’ major league roster, including infielder Wilmer Flores, who said it was “not fair,” and Webb, who called it “a shitty part of the business.” Then, hours before news of the Snell signing broke, the Giants announced they were parting ways with popular PA announcer Renel Brooks-Moon, who was reportedly being forced out after 24 seasons with the club.
Ultimately, people have a much higher tolerance for stuff like what the Giants have pulled over the past week when the team in question wins. Signing Snell undoubtedly advances the team toward that end, and at a later time and much, much lower cost than anyone would have dreamed when free agency opened.
For the Giants, this signing is a step toward respectability. For Snell, it’s a shot at the contract he must feel he was owed from the beginning. For both, it’s a clear step in the right direction, but it’s only the start.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
A Jonathan Edwards reference where I least expected it!
Not even a Yalie, no less.
Quite.
Followed by a sensible Austen reference.
I’m not too surprised that he signed with the Giants, but I am surprised it took this long. Boras may need to rework his strategy a bit, as dragging out free agency all the way to the last 2 weeks of spring training is frustrating as hell for the fans, and probably for some players as well.
Snell is a west coast guy, wants to compete on a good team, and Oracle Park is a pitcher’s paradise. Giants have money to spend, a need for quality arms, and they’ve been tooling up all offseason. It just made sense. They probably won’t catch up to the Dodgers for the west, but I’d say they’ve put themselves in a good position to get after NLWC1.
The Giants figured out they could play the waiting game, too.
It turned into a staring contest and they didn’t blink.
Snell got neither the long length nor the big AAV and ended up on a pillow. Yes, he technically got two years but if he doesn’t do well enough to opt out he’s not going to come close to what he turned down regardless of what he does in year two.
Time is not on his side.
And, hopefully not, but… stuff happens. Usually to him.
BTW, Montgomery is still out there, right?
Wonder what kind of deal he gets…
I think $31M AAV is roughly where he wanted his salary. He initially was seeking 9/270, so a $30M AAV. He walked way back on the length of the deal, considering that nobody is signing a 31 y/o pitcher to a 9-year contract, even if said pitcher won a Cy Young award just a few months prior.
There’s red flags on his profile. The walks, the inability to go very deep into games, and he’s struggled with his health in some years as well. The fact that he got $31M AAV, even just for the 1-2 years, is actually pretty solid for him.
As for Montgomery, I think he probably gets a similar kind of contract, but for maybe 25% less money given that he’s mostly been a middle rotation starter who can luck into a solid year, not someone with legitimate ace upside. He pitched well last year, but doesn’t have that nasty whiff generating repertoire. He’s a command guy who relies on weak contact.
At least with Snell, you have a chance to see him put it together for a season and dominate with his wipe out stuff.
No way. The reigning Cy Young winner nets a $62m guarantee? That’s shockingly, gobsmackingly poor no matter how much you want to pick at the negatives in his profile. He was better than Nola per inning the last couple years. Even if you prefer the “security” of Nola’s innings (which, I obviously think is a bit illusory with pitchers), and you say Nola got a bit of an overpay from the Phillies, Snell shouldn’t have got $110m less than Nola. Definitely not less than Nola. The fact that he had $150m on the table tells you he was valued much higher than this. As a side note, I wonder if the fact that he turned it down was not just about thinking he’d get be able to get more years added on but also hoping he’d get at least a comparable offer from a California team that never materialized.
I think he just ran out of room at the inn, with any teams that would have paid him closer to his value having spent their budgets or gotten so far into the tax (Yankees)that they wouldn’t spend on him anymore. Sucks for him. I hate to see good players get screwed like that. Especially pitchers.
Hey, he chose the game, can’t bitch when he loses. Whatever will he do without that extra $100 million? My heart just bleeds for him.
Yeah, it is preferable that the Johnsons just keep their money for themselves
Doesn’t matter to me either way. YMMV.
The gap in commitment between the Nola and Snell contracts is vast, but so is the level of uncertainty. Nola is more likely than Snell to take the mound 30+ times annually, and that gave the Phillies more confidence to commit to longer duration with him than Snell’s suitors were with Snell.
Miles Mikolas is a good bet to take all his turns in the rotation. Ya wanna pay him more than snell? It’s a combo of good and durability and snell’s excellence makes him close to Nola.
Snell is closer to Mikolas than he is Nola.
From 2018 – Snell’s first CYA – through 2023, his second CYA, bookending the period to cherry pick so Snell looks good, Snell had a 3.02 ERA, 3.32 FIP, 3.39 XFIP, 17.8 WAR in 774 IP.
From 2018 through 2023, Nola had a 3.66 ERA, 3.38 FIP, 3.32 XFIP, 25.5 WAR in 1060 IP, playing in front of 6 1B/DH types spread across Citizens Bank Park.
From 2018 – 2023, Mikolas had a 3.78 ERA, 3.94 FIP, 4.11 XFIP, 13.1 WAR in 833 IP.
That’s 1.5 WAR and 50 more IP a season. Anticipating an extra 1.5 WAR from a single roster spot is a big deal. And add a year or drop a year, Nola pulls away more. Mikolas returned to America in 2018 so can’t really add there, but anyway you look at it, Snell is more Mikolas in terms of actual production than he is Nola.
“per inning” is doing a lot of work for your comment.
More than solid. You could argue that he’s still being overpaid on the AAV aspect of the deal.
The Montgomery situation is a big mystery to me because the only thing we know is that he has been seeking a deal similar to Nola. I don’t think that deal is there at this point. But a deal in the $140M range definitely would have been on the table and still might be.
There are also all sorts of weird rumors flying around about the Red Sox but I have to be skeptical, Red Sox media can sometimes get carried away with things. Not sure that matters.
Who would pay the $140M? The problem with him is that he’s a 3 WAR pitcher who will be a 2 WAR pitcher most of the contract, and then probably replacement level the last couple of years. I’m not seeing it prudent to sign him long term.
I can see 5/$100 or something but only for some team who desperately needs a pitcher like the Yankees.
What the Phillies signed Nola for is irrelevant to some other team making a decision on Montgomery. It’s not arbitration.
Players, and pitchers in particular, struggle without a real spring training. This is how you end up with Dallas Keuchel starting the season with a 6.83, and needing the best stretch of his career in late summer to end with a 3.75 ERA and 4.72 FIP. If not for a fluky 6-start, 37 IP stretch of 0.97 ERA ball, he never gets the White Sox contract the next offseason, bounces around for a couple 1-year contracts before he’s accepting ST invites. Craig Kimbrel never recovered that year – ended with a 6.53 ERA and an 8.00 FIP, and he was never the same after that.
Greg Holland was projected for a $50MM contract, he signs at the end of March for 1-year $14M, has a horrible year, and the next year he’s signing in January on a 1-year, $3.5M deal.
Arrieta is the success story for the players. Instead of the 4-year, $100M he was projected for, he ends up with 3-years and $75M, puts up a 4 ERA and 4.2 FIP, then tacks on about a half run to each of those the next two years, before he takes a 1-year for $6MM to go back to the Cubs and promptly retires after putting up a 7 ERA.
Tony Watson is the success story for the teams. Instead of the 2-year, $12MM deal he was projected to sign, he signs in March for 3-years and $9MM, and he put up a vintage season, an adequate season, 18 good IP in 2020, 1-year deal in 2021 and he’s done.
It shocks me that considering how this Boras waiting game can blow up so spectacularly in his face, and the players and teams allow it to happen again. There is not one good outcome for a Boras pitcher signing in March or later. Ever. The good examples – Scherzer and 2014 Francisco Rodriguez – signed in January and February, respectively. The rest of the January and February signings ended up not working out for the players and/or the teams.
I repeat. Not once ever has it worked well. And the pitchers themselves have blamed it on the late start. The teams have. Boras has. He’s lucky he got Snell what he did, and the Giants probably offered it assuming Snell isn’t going to opt out, and see it as a 2-year deal, since he’ll inevitably be a turd to start to season.
“And, hopefully not, but… stuff happens. Usually to him.”
I can appreciate that the Giants pulled the trigger on him, because he has been good and it makes a big splash.
At the same time, he has always struck me as a guy whose career shortening/ending arm injury is always in the bullpen, warming up.
I like this and the Chapman move together. It’s super tough because the Padres are now more competitive than they were before, and the Dodgers look great and the D-Backs are running back a similar team plus E-Rod. But the Chapman move didn’t make sense in a vacuum and they desperately needed more rotation help. They’re in a far better place now to get a wild card and maybe even win a playoff series or two (or three, if you want to dream big).
The GiANTS played it beautifully. They improved the team, gave fans something to dream on and even if all the FAs turn to pumpkins, aren’t on the hook with dead contracts for long enough to cripple them.
But it’s a tough division where even a successful infusion of talent might still leave them.in fourth.
(Peak Padres are still better than peak SF, methinks.)
They got better (on paper) without betting the future which gives them time to build the farm back up. The danger is that if the farm does deliver enough good player to build a strong team, say circa 2026, they may end up in .500 limbo; never good enough to win, never bad enough to rebuild. But they’ve bought themselves a year or two.
A good offsenson, all in all.
What I like about this is that this team now has the sort of front line pitching to make noise if they get a wild card. It’s not just “give a chance for the wild card” it’s “give a chance to win games once you get to the playoffs.” Having a top 2 of Snell and Webb is the sort of duo you want to get out of a short series.
Well, they’ll technically have that $17M signing bones as dead money in 2026, as Snell will be a free agent again by that point.
Technically.
But Chapman will be gone by then, no?
And $17M won’t cripple a team currently over the first tax limit.
Now $17M dead money for Cleveland or Tampa?
Different story.
Plus it’s one year of deferred money.
Or they gave up a lot of picks to sign two above average free agents at a high price.
Let’s see how it works out. I like it when teams take chances and this could help them make the playoffs
Playoffs or no playoffs, it helps sell tickets.
Good PR and good ROI either way.
More likely NLWC2, as NLWC1 is likely go to whoever doesn’t win the NL East between the Braves and Phillies.
If they can hold off the Padres and Dbacks, that is. And stay ahead of the 2nd place NLC finisher. The Giants are still a fringe playoff bet in my eyes.
The team is probably better than last year, but they were 79-83 last year. And BaseRuns also put them at 79-83, so it wasn’t a bad luck fluke. Their 83-79 forecast seems about right.
Fun with the plus stats leaderboard…
2018 (180 IP)
46 ERA- | 72 FIP- | 143 K%+ | 110 BB%+ | 65 HR9+ | 82 BABIP+
2019-22 (413 IP)
95 ERA- | 82 FIP- | 139 K%+ | 119 BB%+ | 87 HR9+ | 106 BABIP+
2023 (180 IP)
54 ERA- | 80 FIP- | 142 K%+ | 154 BB%+ | 61 HR9+ | 86 BABIP+
Fun with back of the baseball card stats…
Blake Snell two CY seasons: 35 wins
Blake Snell six other seasons: 36 wins
Basically, he should be kept in bubble wrap in between starts.
It’s the starts that wear him down, not what happens between them. He’s a better pitcher than Nola, but the Phillies for whatever reason place a big premium on IP, and didn’t want the PR hit of letting him walk (or the cost of trying to replace him). And guess what? Snell got $5 million more per year than Nola, so on a rate basis, he did better.
Your notion of what Snell should have gotten based on Nola’s contract is just invalid. Players are different, teams are different, and it appears nobody was interested in paying $30 million per year for nine years when, based on his track record, he’ll be an ace in three of them.
IIRC Nola had larger offers from other teams, so maybe they, too, place more emphasis on IP that you do. WAR certainly does. Nola has seven seasons of 2.2 bWAR or above, Snell has three.
The real takeaway for me is that MLB has instituted a salary cap in its misguided effort to protect owners from themselves. That’s why none of the big-spending teams entered the bidding. Salary caps are why I stopped following other sports, so I’m sad to see MLB going down the same path.
Found the Boras burner. Did Blake take these points well, Scott?
It’s not just the IP. Even when only counting when the players are healthy, Nola has also pitched quality innings much more consistently than Snell has over their careers to this point. Outside of his two Cy Young years, Snell has only been a slightly above average starter even while healthy.
Yes, Nola was overpaid, but even without that comparison Snell’s asking price was still clearly too high.
As for the CBT, it’s only a soft cap, and overall it’s been a good thing. The advantages it has provided in competitive balance (hence the official name) have easily outweighed minor disadvantages such as the one you’ve stated here. Ultimately, the fault was mostly Snell’s and Boras’s for overpricing themselves in the first place and then waiting too long to drop their demands and find a team once it became obvious they needed to do so once Spring Training was approaching.
“ERA is all just about BABIP?”
“Always has been.”
Whenever an agent seems to overplay his hand and turns down what’s a pretty good deal (or advises his client to do so), it’s hard not to wonder about a possible conflict of interest between the agent and the player. As an agent, he might feel he can maximize his earnings by having his clients take risks, in the hope that a few of them will hit pay dirt. That might not be in the best interests of each individual client.
That’s not a conflict of interest, that’s just risk tolerance and it’s something agents would talk with their clients about at length.
And the theoretical agent’s plan there is not a thing. Agents don’t treat players like a bunch of investments in start up companies hoping a few hit “pay dirt” while a bunch of others fail. For that agent’s plan to work, he’d have to have a whole wide ranging portfolio of players who all share that exact same risk profile (in which case, there’s no conflict), but that’s just not how real life works.
I know people speculate that Scott Boras is pulling the strings and some secret mastermind but the player picks the agent. And as far as I can tell, Boras really believes in his clients and thinks he can get them those deals. I see the potential for a conflict of interest but I’m pretty sure this isn’t it.
Players know his playbook; they sign up with him if they are willing to gamble for the bigger payoff. But gambling is just maybes and hoping.
A problem is his playbook depends on teams bidding against themselves and owners willing to overrule their GMs. He’s running out of those.
For all we know, the Astros “interest* was for a one year deal or maybe nonexistent. Maybe they’re wiling to roll with what they have to start the year, like the Yankees seem to be. Or maybe Montgomery goes to Houston.
(There’s also the prospect of a healthy Bieber in July.)
Two weeks and counting down…
I think the Astros were hoping he’d drop his AAV salary demands to something closer to $20M per year.
It would have to be a long deal even for Montgomery and the Astros were probably looking for 1 or 2 years, max.
The Contract That Took Forever. But that title probably will belong to Jordan Montgomery
Not necessarily. We’ve had free agents who have waited until mid-season to sign before, most notably Roger Clemens in each of his last two seasons.
That was planned and is a different model. Later Andy Pettitte followed suite. But this belongs in the “I’m telling you in December that I’m old and can’t give you a 220 inning season anymore so I’m waiting until midseason to sign with a contender and give you what I can” model.
Of course, but those contracts still took longer for them to sign than will likely be the case for Montgomery.
There are also a few more comparable examples.
I’m never going to question Boras’s motives but this offseason was a disaster for a lot of his guys. Bellinger did okay, as a guy with a QO and a lot of red flags. But Chapman and Snell turned down deals from the Blue Jays and Yankees that are probably as good as they are going to get. If not better.
I don’t agree that “the market” is at fault here. Snell comps pretty well to Carlos Rodon from last year, and we saw what he got. This is the agent misreading what teams are going to pay. Do we think that Snell is going to have a better platform year? This wouldn’t be so noticeable except that Boras usually wins.
Maybe the agent didn’t misread the market but the player did.
(shrug)
One thing Boras did do wrong was throw out the veiled hint of collussion. That does suggest *he* is the one misreading the changing economics of the game. There are real changes afoot and he’d better recognize them fast.
Yes, but turning down deals that are better than what they eventually get isn’t really a disaster. Snell/Boras lost the gamble, but they don’t get zero – they get a chunk of guaranteed money and then another crack at free agency in the near future.
If your bluffs never get called, you’re not bluffing enough.
“If your bluffs are never called, you’re not bluffing enough” is a salient point.
These are the sorts of things that make sense at the agent level and not so much at the player level. You don’t get a lot of chances as a player.
I don’t think this would be so obvious except that it seems like none of Boras’s top end clients are getting long-term contracts. In Chapman’s case, I think he straight up lost money; in Snell’s case, it’s salveagable.
Potentially salvageable, depending on what the next two years look like.
I believe the word “salvageable” implies a potential state, whereas “potentially salvageable” is redundant.
You are not incorrect, but language has a lot of use for redundancy.
Yeah, it really seems like we’re seeing this year how the Boras strategy of brinksmanship — even if we grant that it might be optimal on average or in aggregate over all his clients, which, separately, IDK — can still be decidedly suboptimal for any individual client. As a star-level player, you only get to place at most 3 or 4 of this kind of “bet” over the course of your career, and the outcome of those “bets” is going to be something like 80-90% of your lifetime earnings. It might matter a lot that you time the market right and don’t negotiate past the point of no return.
Just to be clear: Snell will break even if he gets 5/$120M next offseason. Let’s say he’s got a 50% chance of getting that; a 15% chance of him clearly beating it; and about a 35% chance of falling noticeably short. The most likely scenario is a long and tortured route to a place he could have gotten to easily. The second most likely outcome is a loss. This is a salvageable situation but not exactly a “good” position for him.
And his elbow had better hold up.
I think the RSN situations for a lot of teams had a hand in dictating how the market has changed this offseason. Bally Sports going under didn’t help things. TV providers renegotiating their deals with other networks such as ROOT Sports have reduced the number of eyeballs watching the channel in a not-so insignificant way. That’s enough to affect how teams spend their money for the time being since a sizable portion of their revenues comes from TV deals.
Disney and WBD are combining their sports operations (and contracts) into a unified streaming service. That is going to have an impact on future negotiations.
It’s a $62M pillow. He’s got two years to come up with one healthy and good year. If it’s 2024, he opts out. If it’s 2025 after a mediocre/injured 2024, he’s a FA with no compensation. His biggest risk is injury in 2025 after a mediocre 2024. We can harp on Boras, but I’m not necessarily sure his misread of the market was that bad, given the early signings. Or last year’s, with contracts like Rodon.
It must have a very high thread count
With $62M guaranteed, I’d sleep fairly comfortably…
His chance of having a healthy + good year in 2024 is already slightly compromised given he’s going to start late. He was beginning to undermine the value of his own opt out.
He got $62M which aint peanuts but that one good year needs to be 2024.
If he thuds in ’24 and shines in ’25, he’ll be back where he was in Novembut but two years older.
For the best chance at beating what he turned down he needs to excel *this* year.
IMO pillows are less of a thing for pitchers than position players. Each year of wear and tear is crucial for a pitcher to a degree that isn’t so for position players. And especially so when you’re in your 30s.
Snell entering the free agent market again at 32 or 33 isn’t a great scenario for him, even if he’s good Snell for those two years. Which we all know isn’t likely.
This is a pretty big L for Snell. This was probably his one chance to get a big, longterm deal, and it didn’t happen.
At least he didn’t marry Voskovec the herring merchant after having his heart broken by the two-timing Ivan Grushenko
Still surprised a team gave him over 30 million a year this late in the game.
You had this article title in your drafts folder for six months, didn’t you?
This will be fun to watch. The combination of the most polarizing available player and the most polarizing agent lands us here, with a move that could prove to be either brilliant or brutally bad, without surprising anyone.
What are the odds that he parlays watching paint drying and questionable command into another brilliant season (at least by ERA)?
My guess is Snell was insistent on a West Coast team. Everything with the Yankees/Astros/etc was just postering.
Snell’s certainly got the $$$ to play wherever he wants.
Make that ‘posturing’.
Dunno, postering works, too. 😎
I’m guessing he thought if he had to take a short term deal he wanted the best pitchers’ park, and one that favored lefties is even better.
I think one of the bigger factors in Boras’s more modest results for his players is that one of his classic strategies (appealing directly to ownership) didn’t work this year. Two many owners were just not interested in spending big this season and weren’t going to overrule their front offices. Once the Dodgers decided that Ohtani and Yamamoto were their big ticket items, that just didn’t leave many ownership groups willing to splash the pot.
No idea if this is true or not, but it’s definitely not as much fun having these rich guys and failsons who only see the team as a portfolio investment now. It was more fun when there were more dudes like Big George who wanted to win at all costs
And look what has happened to the Tigers and what will happen to the Padres over the next few years due to that mindset.
A lot of the teams are feeling tapped out, either because they’re up against the tax (i.e., it is working as intended) or because of TV deals being shaky.
It’s funny, I suggested that the Rockies or Angels were going to sign Bellinger, and maybe the Angels would sign Snell too because those owners like to make splashes. Because they’re the sorts of suckers who would pay a premium to land guys with award hardware. But the Rockies and Angels owners aren’t feeling it right now.
I am interested in the unusual contract structure (‘unusual contract structure’ becoming more the norm), which received little mention in the article: if I understand correctly, if Snell opts out after this year, he will not receive the signing bonus.
Therefore his ‘breakeven’ will be much different.
Assuming he performs well, what are the implications for a new contract, given the current terms? SF has certainly established itself as a death star employer, willing to cut the corners on norms.
No, MLB Trade Rumors says he gets the signing bonus either way.
Makes deferred money by another term.
Nice headline, Michael. The Giants better hope that Snell isn’t a cookie made of arsenic.
Nice callback to the film! I should watch it again. It’s been years. So good.
Interesting that the $16M signing bonus is payable in 2026, after the term of the contract. I’m not sure of SF’s luxury tax situation but this seems a bit like a lighter version of the Ohtani contract to avoid California income taxes.
It’s more likely they just didn’t have room in their 2024 budget for the entire $32M plus the resulting luxury tax hit. It’s the same reason the Cardinals are only paying $10M to Sonny Gray this year.
Cole’s injury following Giolito’s very possibly career ending injury along with Bradish breaking down on top of the deGrom disaster and with still more injuries of varying degrees to other pitchers, which aren’t too far removed from Strasburg’s catastrophic contract, has to have a deleterious effect on future long term pitcher contracts. It looks like even some desperate GM’s couldn’t be coerced into succumbing to Boras’s demands. I am already interested to see what happens after the 2024 season.
Bieber can’t be feeling too comfortable right now.
He turned down a long term deal and after last year he is under a lot of pressure this year. Even if he shines, he might be next year’s Snell: a high ceiling, low floor one time (or even two time) Cy Young winner.
How is Giolito’s injury possibly career ending? Outside of trivially anything being possible.
I thought it was “just” a UCL tear.
Question for the experts: Say I am the owner of a small market team (Pit, CLE, MIL, etc…), would it be a strategy to sign Snell to a deal like this knowing that if he remains healthy you will trade him mid year for a haul of prospects? Risky yes (injury risk), but upside would be big too.
This sort of a deal makes a ton of sense for revenue recipients who are under the luxury tax line (which is almost always all of them). They would be giving up a 4th round pick which will get you an FV40 at best. You can definitely do better than that at the deadline if he is healthy.
The main reason I think this doesn’t happen—aside from the fact that many of those teams don’t have an extra $30M hanging around—is that players probably don’t like signing with a team they think is going to trade them at midseason. But if they were to keep him? I think there could be a deal there. A 4th round pick is not something any team should worry about.
Good idea but super high risk. If he gets hurt and you have to pay the full 2/$62 then it really blows up your budget (these team run ~$100M payrolls). Doubt any small market owner would be okay with this. Also, owners aren’t super into ‘buying prospects’. That why when Cohen sent a bunch of money with Scherzer and Verlander to get better prospects in return it was so notable. Happens, but rarely.