Road Warriors Again: Astros Take Third Straight in Washington

So much for home field advantage. The visitors won for the fifth straight time in this World Series, which means that after losing the first two games of this series to the Nationals, the Astros are up three games to two. They took advantage of Max Scherzer being scratched from his rematch with Gerrit Cole due to neck spasms, tagging emergency starter Joe Ross with a pair of two-run homers. That was more than enough run support for a dominant Cole, though Houston’s lineup tacked on three more runs in the late innings and won 7-1. During the three games in Washington, they walloped the Nationals by a combined 19-3 score, and they’re now one win away from their second championship in three seasons.

A few quick thoughts on the game, which also featured a shaky strike zone from home plate umpire Lance Barksdale, a pair of flashers behind home plate that distracted Cole, and a visit from Donald Trump that did not go as well as the president envisioned…

Pain in the Neck

The character of Sunday night’s Game 5 changed significantly before a single pitch was thrown. Three and a half hours before game time, the Nationals announced that Scherzer, who had allowed two runs in five innings in Game 1 opposite Cole, had been scratched due to spasms and nerve irritation in his right trapezius, problems for which he had begun undergoing treatment on Friday. Though he had been able to play catch on Saturday, Scherzer had woken up on Sunday in intense pain, and “completely couldn’t get out of bed… I had to basically fall out of bed and pick myself up with my left arm,” as he said during a pregame media session during which his pain and immobility were quite apparent.

“I’m as disappointed as I possibly can be not to be able to pitch tonight,” he said. “I’ve pitched through so much crap in my career that would be easy to pitch through at this point. This is literally impossible to do anything with.” He received a cortisone shot in the hopes of being available for a Game 7, if there is one.

Obviously, there was no easy way for the Nationals to replace Scherzer, who in 25 total postseason innings (four starts plus an inning of relief) has pitched to a 2.16 ERA with 34 strikeouts and 11 walks. Ross, a 26-year-old righty who had made his postseason debut with two scoreless innings of relief in Game 3, pitched to a 5.48 ERA (fifth-highest ever for a World Series starter) and 4.59 FIP in 64 innings this year. After spending nearly two full months in Triple-A from late May to late July (save for a one-inning four-run stint for the Nationals on June 22), he posted a 3.83 ERA and a 3.90 FIP over his final 49.1 innings (nine starts and one relief appearance), though he missed three weeks in September due to forearm soreness.

According to our ZiPS-based playoff odds, the switch from Scherzer to Ross lowered the Nationals’ chances of winning Game 5 from 47.8% to 38.3%. As for their series odds, since it’s guesswork based upon whether Scherzer pitches again how well, Dan Szymborski offered a range of possibilities that showed a high of 40% for the Nationals winning (Scherzer starting Game 7 at full strength, followed by Stephen Strasburg and Ross) and a low of 35% (Ross starting Game 7 — an option that’s now off the table given his work — with Strasburg and Aníbal Sánchez following).

If at First You Don’t Succeed

Three times in the first four games of this World Series, the Astros put two runs on the board in the first inning; their total of six runs in the opening frame is just two short of the Wild Card-era record, held by the 2004 Red Sox. Their 16 first-inning runs during the postseason is the third-highest total of the era:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
Postseason Scoring in First Inning, Since 1995
Team Season G R AVG OBP SLG OPS
Cardinals 2011 18 21 .320 .414 .667 1.081
Cubs 2003 12 17 .411 .507 .661 1.168
Astros 2019 16 16 .328 .416 .567 .983
Yankees 1998 13 15 .357 .448 .446 .894
Phillies 2009 15 15 .306 .386 .677 1.063
Braves 1996 16 14 .313 .338 .463 .801
Red Sox 2007 14 14 .429 .486 .683 1.169
Indians 1997 18 14 .290 .380 .478 .858
Mets 2000 14 14 .291 .379 .491 .870
Cardinals 2000 8 14 .425 .465 .700 1.165
Red Sox 2004 14 13 .344 .452 .623 1.075
Red Sox 2018 14 13 .305 .397 .441 .838
White Sox 2005 12 13 .289 .373 .600 .973
Mets 2015 14 13 .281 .328 .649 .977
SOURCE: STATSPASS

The Astros did not add to that total on Sunday night, however. Ross began by walking leadoff hitter George Springer after an eight-pitch plate appearance, but he then got Jose Altuve to ground into a 6-4-3 double play and got Michael Brantley to ground out as well. Unfortunately, his second inning didn’t go so well. After Yuli Gurriel’s one-out single, Yordan Alvarez — playing left field for the first time this postseason and just the 11th time in his major league career after being limited to pinch-hit duty over the previous two nights — crushed a 2-1 sinker on the outer edge of the strike zone for his first home run of the postseason:

The hit was just Alvarez’s fifth over his past 41 plate appearances, dating to his final two plate appearances of Division Series Game 4 against the Rays; in that span, he had struck out 17 times. He had shown signs of emerging from his slump by getting on base a team-high five times in the first two games of the World Series, via three singles and a pair of walks, but his limited defensive abilities left him on the bench, and it’s tough to argue with the results given that the Astros evened the series.

After that homer, Ross retired seven of the next eight hitters before Alvarez won a seven-pitch battle with a single to right field. Ross got ahead of Carlos Correa 0-2, then just missed with a slider on the black outside:

That Ross didn’t get the call from Barksdale loomed large, because four pitches later, Correa demolished a hanging slider that was right over the heart of the plate:

Understandably leery of getting too deep into a bullpen that had allowed four runs in three innings in Game 4, and was down an extra man because of Ross’ emergency start, Nationals manager Davey Martinez let his starter remain in the game even as the lineup turned over for the second time in the fifth inning. After issuing a one-out walk to Springer, Ross again induced Altuve to hit into a double play. In his five innings, he allowed a total of five hits and two walks while striking out one; he netted just six swinging strikes out of 78 pitches. Of the 17 balls the Astros hitters made contact with, seven of them had exit velocities of at least 100 mph, including both homers. Whoosh. His was a tough and perhaps even impossible assignment; he was a pitch or two away from matching Scherzer’s Game 1 contribution, but he just didn’t get the breaks.

Young King Cole

That four-run lead would be more than enough for Cole, who as the Fox broadcast noted was 40-0 in his career when given a margin of at least that many runs. The pitcher that was roughed up for five runs in his Game 1 start opposite Scherzer was nowhere in evidence; this was the dominant version of Cole, the one that allowed just one run and 10 hits across 22.2 innings in the first two rounds of the postseason.

The 29-year-old righty allowed baserunners in only two of the first six innings. In the second, Juan Soto and Howie Kendrick hit back-to-back singles, but then Ryan Zimmerman struck out swinging and Victor Robles grounded into a double play. The 0-for-2 with runners in scoring position — the only two chances the Nationals would get all night — extended Washington’s three-game string of futility to 1-for-21 in such at-bats. In the fourth, Cole issued a one-out walk to Anthony Rendon that went unconverted. In the seventh, he finally yielded a run when Soto connected with a 98.7 mph fastball down Broadway, his second homer of the series off the Astros’ ace:

While Cole recovered to strike out Kendrick, he issued a six-pitch walk to Zimmerman, a pitch that came just after two models lifted their shirts while standing behind home plate, apparently to raise awareness of breast cancer. The pitcher stepped off the mound to refocus, and on the ensuing pitch, he just missed on a slider outside the zone that both he and catcher Martín Maldonado believed was strike three; the pitcher was so heated that manager A.J. Hinch came out to the mound to settle him down. Amid that plate appearance, his pitch count had crossed 100 — and his velocity had nearly reached 100 mph (Statcast had that as 99.5). He dialed it up as high as 99.8 mph against the next batter, Robles, before getting the benefit of the doubt on a 98.2-mph fastball that was further outside than either ball four to Zimmerman or the aforementioned Ross pitch to Correa.

Here are those two Cole pitches:

Ugh. Via the Brooks Baseball Fastmap — the “as called” zones drawn to the specifications of analyst Mike Fast, a pioneer in quantifying pitch framing who until recently worked for the Astros — Barksdale’s zone against right-handed hitters was terribly inconsistent:

That’s from the umpire’s point of view, so the Correa, Zimmerman, and Robles pitches are all on the right side, an area where the calls for balls and strikes was quite haphazard. Barksdale was relatively better when it came to the calls against lefties, but he did utterly blow one, as shown by the green dot in the lower right:

That should have been strike three to Brantley, but Barksdale apparently didn’t call it because Gomes got out of his crouch too quickly. “Oh, it’s my fault?” asked the catcher.

https://twitter.com/Jomboy_/status/1188637839707250688

These are the professionals, folks.

Anyway, Cole was brilliant and stifling. In his seven innings, he allowed just three hits and a run while walking two and striking out nine. He threw 110 pitches and netted 13 swinging strikes — six via his slider, four via a four-seam fastball that averaged 97.3 mph, and three via his curve. His total of 47 strikeouts is now tied with Randy Johnson (2001 Diamondbacks), Josh Beckett (2003 Marlins) and Cliff Lee (2010 Rangers) for the second-highest in a single postseason, behind only Curt Schilling’s 56 with the 2001 Diamondbacks.

And That Happened

The late innings became the Springer show. The 30-year-old center fielder led off the eighth with a double against Daniel Hudson, scoring on a two-out single by Gurriel. Facing Hudson again with two outs and a man on in the ninth, he hit a two-run homer, his second of this series, his seventh in any World Series (recall that he was the MVP in 2017 for hitting five dingers), and his 15th postseason home run. Not too shabby.

Anyone who wants my political commentary can get it via my Twitter feed, but I can’t write about this game without noting that Trump was in the park and got a frosty reception. ‘Nuf said.

With the Astros’ win, road teams are now 18-17 in this postseason. This isn’t all that uncommon, though. During the Wild Card era, road teams have gotten the upper hand in 1996 (18-14), ’98 (16-14), 2003 (20-18), ’10 (19-13), ’12 (19-18), and ’16 (18-17). Good teams, short series, et cetera.

Meanwhile, this is the first time in 23 years that the road team has taken the first five games of the World Series. In 1996, the Braves took the first two games against the Yankees in the Bronx, but the Yankees stormed back to take three in Atlanta, then wrapped up their first championship in 18 years by winning Game 6 in the Bronx. With Justin Verlander going for them against Strasburg at Minute Maid Park, the Astros could be positioned to join their company.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

Does MLB realize how big of an issue these umpires have been?

And it’s amazing to think these are supposedly the best of the best… That’s the saddest part of things.

bglick4
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

I thought the catcher’s did a nice job framing in game 4 and I like to see that skill rewarded, but it wasn’t framing that lost or gained several strikes in 5. The ump was just inconsistent and it was annoying. It really seemed the call in the seventh on Robles was just a make up call for the borderline Zim call Cole complained about. That’s no way to call a game.

Sittch
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

The umpire did not cause the Nationals to lose by six runs.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

This

mervdiddyMember since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

Sure, but at the time of that Robles call, the Nationals would have had tying run up to bat. Gomes got a hit to lead off the next inning; lots of if’s, but there’s a chance at that point it’s a 4-2 game with tying run on instead of 5-1.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

The umpire did not cause the Nationals loss. Houston did that. It is disappointing that in addition to having to overcome Cole and the Astros never-ending lineup of awesome hitters, the Nats ALSO had to overcome Lance Barksdale’s bad day.

Luy
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

Did you accidentally reply to the wrong comment (because the OP did not hint at this)?
Or are you arguing that missing balls and strikes isn’t inherently a big issue?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

Are you fine with with umpires missing on average 14 calls per game both ways this series? THAT’S the problem right now. An average of 1.5 calls per inning are wrong. 4.4% of the pitches in the series have been wrong- 69 of 1577 for both teams. Is that acceptable for you? Because it sure as hell isn’t for me.

And like I said- these numbers are with the supposed best of the best.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

saw somewhere online where folks were proposing instead of going full robo umps a challenge system similar to tennis. Teams would get 3 challenges for balls/strikes. If sucessful get to keep the challenge(just like replay).

Think this could be a possible winner..

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

A knock on effect could be speeding up the pace of play. Presumably pitchers would have more incentive to get the next pitch in before opposing teams have time to relay in from the video room that a challenge should be issued.

…on the other hand, if the pitching team wants to challenge it could have the opposite effect of slowing down pace of play. On reflection, a challenge system really gives an advantage to the pitching team.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

I think the challenge itself would be instantaneous like in Tennis.

I really don’t think it would favor batters or pitchers.

curt schillings ketchup bottle
6 years ago

In the immortal words of Dennis green “they are who we thought they were!!!”

You had a nice run, nats

bglick4
6 years ago

Your guys lost the game six matchup just last week and and Greinke has hardly been a rock. This series isn’t over.

WARrior
6 years ago

I think this year and 1996 are the only WS in which the road team won the first five games. And if the Nats should win Game 6, I think it would be the first time the road team won six games in a WS.

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

Interestingly, if and when robot umps get here, it will likely remove some of the home field advantage, making this more likely in the future.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

What home field advantage??

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Yeah, the Nats would like to know what that is.

For game 3, the Umpire Auditor on Twitter had 11 blown calls in favor of the Astros and only 3 in favor of the Nats.

Game 4, the Nats did “win” 9-6 but as noted “….a bad call to Carlos Correa turned a strike ’em out/throw ’em out into a grand slam 3 ABs later”.

No official tally yet from last night but the twitter feed shows two gifs: 1) the one from this article and 2) a blown call against Victor Robles with a runner on first, two outs, 3-2 count and a 4-1 score. So instead ofRobles walking/ bringing the tying runner to the plate, Robles was rung up and the inning was over.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

That wasn’t actually a big situation even thought the call wasn’t good. The tying run to the plate would have been the 8 hitter v Cole. Cole had the answer all night long. The very next pitch to HOU was an even bigger blown call (makeup call), but I get that it wasn’t with 2 strikes and 2 outs. HOU won that game handily. That game was over when WAS had to scratch Scherzer.

warkol
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Pressly was ready and waiting in the bullpen in the 7th.. if Cole loses Robles there’s a high chance that the previously shaky Pressly enters that game. Who knows what happens at that point.

Still would have likely lost obviously, but you’re definitely glossing over the situation there.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

BOTH teams would like to know what home field advantage? For the whole playoffs- road teams will worst case be .500 this postseason.

It’s just a shame that when the attention on MLB is greatest the umpires are a primary story. That should never be.

Luy
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

This whole thread is about the concept as a whole – which very much exists (ie it’s why this year sticks out as such an anamoly). Som sticking to the topic… This is what home field advantage looks.

The book Scorecasting has a compelling chapter that talks about a study that shows a bias in balls and strikes in favor of the home team. The idea seems to be, we’re hardwired to want to fit in/ be liked… and a subconscious bias emerges as umpires work behind the plate.

Check out the last 4-5 paragraphs on this Scorecasting review: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/books/review/Weber-t.html

I’m sure other studies have been done into this area.

So many times in the last year or two this community has really just felt like an espn comment culture that uses wOBA instead of AVG.

Sittch
6 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

2001 WS had the home team win every game. Pretty amazing.

kevinthecomic
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

I never liked the 2-3-2 set up for home vs away. If the underdog wins one of the first two games, then the hard won home field advantage shifts to it. I like how hockey does it with 2-2-1-1-1. Then again, with home/away records nearing 0.500, maybe it doesn’t matter all that much?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

If the underdog wins one of first 2 games, the home field advantage still shifts to the lower seeded team. If they win games 3,4,6- they win the title.

shumway
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

As a fan I do like 3 nights of baseball in a row with the current format. I don’t believe I’m saying anything new here, but I think it’s fair to have the 2-2-1-1-1 format so that the team that earned 4 games of home field advantage is not expected to be down 3-2 with two games to go, but it’s understandably taxing with how much additional travel there would be over 7 games (2 trips from the starting city vs. 4 trips).

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  shumway

yeah and especially with the chance of having cross country trips. Also, do you do it for the LCS? And then calendar. If you did it for both LCS and WS- the WS this year would have ended on….. Sat 11/3.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

Thanks for doing some work on this. I was wondering if there was ever a situation where the road team won every game. Aside from the fact that I’m rooting for the Nats hard here, it’s nice to see something that hasn’t been done before.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
6 years ago

So in the World series an umpire makes a bad call on purpose because he thinks the catcher is showing him up? That’s… Amazing…

kevinthecomic
6 years ago

Strange that Nats fans booed the President. For some reason they must not like a 50-year low in the unemployment rate and the stock market at record highs.

Sittch
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

They probably don’t like the fact that he’s a pathetic lowlife loser who spends most of his time rage tweeting and watching TV.

kevinthecomic
6 years ago
Reply to  Sittch

Ah, yes, personal attacks. The last resort of the debater who has run out of cogent arguments. Interesting that this was your opening salvo.

Sittch
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

Your dear leader spends half his time personally attacking anyone who hurts his fragile ego. What are you talking about?

antone
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

Market manipulation is an impeachable offense. Or is supposed to be.

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

Nationwide Trump’s approval rating lags nearly 15 percentage points behind his disapproval rating (40.7% to 54.6%), and that gulf is even wider in the DC area. It is completely normal and expected that Nats fans booed the President.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

Low approval rating or no, in a normal world I would find the booing really depressing.

But we don’t live in a normal world anymore, so it was just another bit of dark comedy in the terrible performance art piece that we live in.

Luy
6 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

I wish there was a Russian bot that I had access to in order to downvote this comment more than once.

antone
6 years ago

Best part of the series was game 5, bottom 7, 2 outs, 3-2 count.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

How is it tough to argue with the results of having YA on the bench in two games? Those were not exactly nip and tuck games – they would have won with or without him in LF. They have sat arguably their best bat of the WS on the bench. Another way to describe him would be the WS MVP if he started those two games and had any success. He hasn’t had any of his production come in garbage time either which is a positive modifier on the value of the production. That guy shouldn’t be sitting. They didn’t need to lift him last night after three hits either, but someone in HOU is committed to being cute with how they manage YA. Thankfully they have the talent to mitigate any personnel decisions. LAD is similar in that way – they can do all kinds of things wrong and still have the better players on the field. Those are the two teams at the finish line the most as it really does come down to talent over a big enough sample. Creative strategy is a distant second.

rhswanzey
6 years ago

Terrible article – you promised boobies

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  rhswanzey

Here you go!