Salvador Perez Faces Down Tommy John Surgery

On the heels of a 104-loss 2018 season, the Royals’ 2019 campaign was already heading nowhere in particular; projected for a mere 69 wins by our Depth Chart projections, only the Tigers (68 wins), Orioles (63), and Marlins (62) are expected to be worse. But on Friday, things went from bad to worse with the announcement that catcher Salvador Perez has damage to the ulnar collateral ligament of his throwing (right) arm. The 28-year-old backstop could miss the season due to Tommy John surgery, a procedure that’s relatively rare among catchers, without any resounding success stories on the level of other position players. Gulp.

A six-time All-Star and five-time Gold Glove winner who was the MVP of the 2015 World Series, Perez is a big (6-foot-4, 240 pound) free-swinging slugger with a powerful arm and a strong reputation for handling pitching staffs. He’s not without shortcomings — he hasn’t posted an on-base percentage of .300 or better since 2013, and has been about 10 runs below average as a pitch framer in each of the past three seasons according to Baseball Prospectus — but he’s immensely popular, a fan favorite who’s been elected to start the All-Star Game in each of the past five seasons. Last year, after missing the first 20 games of the season due to an MCL sprain in his left knee (a freak injury suffered while carrying a suitcase upstairs), he hit .235/.274/.439 with 27 homers, an 89 wRC+, and 1.7 WAR in 544 PA; by BP’s framing-inclusive stats, he was worth 1.3 WARP. For his career, he owns a 92 wRC+ and a total of 17.7 WAR.

Manager Ned Yost said that Perez began experiencing elbow soreness in January, at which time an MRI revealed that he had suffered a flexor strain, which resulted in the team shutting down his throwing program for four weeks. He was cleared to start throwing once he reached the Royals’ camp in Tempe, Arizona in mid-February, but soreness after live batting practice led to another MRI that revealed ligament damage. MLB Network’s Jon Heyman reported that surgery has been recommended for Perez, who will get a second opinion from Dr. Neal ElAtrache on Tuesday before a final decision is made. If he’s out, the team will likely turn to Cam Gallagher, a 26-year-old former second-round pick who has just 35 games of major league experience and figured to back up Perez.

As is the case with all position players, Tommy John surgery for catchers is much more rare than it is for pitchers, though because of the volume and intensity of throwing involved with the job, it’s more common for them than it is for any non-pitching position besides outfielders. Still, the limited number of such surgeries is striking. According to the Tommy John Surgery List kept by Jon Roegele, which now includes 1,669 surgeries, just 44 have been done on professional catchers, six of which occurred while they were still amateurs. As best I can tell, a total of 20 catchers who have had the surgery have played in the majors, eight of whom are still active:

Catchers Who Have Undergone Tommy John Surgery
Player Team Lvl Date Age Pre G wRC+ WAR Post G wRC+ WAR
Jamie Nelson MIL AAA 1/1/85 25 40 65 -0.1
Steve Christmas CHC MLB 1/1/86 28 24 19 -0.1
Todd Hundley NYM MLB 9/26/97 28 776 103 12.3 449 92 2.1
Tom Lampkin SEA MLB 6/30/00 36 594 86 5 183 81 1.7
J.R. House PIT AA 9/1/02 22 32 46 -0.4
Craig Tatum CIN A 1/1/05 22 100 50 -0.1
Ben Davis CHW AAA 6/28/05 28 486 78 3.7
Taylor Teagarden TEX A- 11/29/05 21 180 64 0.4
Vance Wilson DET MLB 6/13/07 34 403 78 2.3
Vance Wilson DET MLB 6/25/08 35 403 78 2.3
Curt Casali* DET Coll 1/1/09 20 213 92 2.0
Chris Coste PHI MLB 5/25/10 37 299 93 2.7
John Baker MIA MLB 9/3/10 29 196 101 2.6 163 52 -0.9
A.J. Jimenez* TOR AA 5/1/12 22 7 -78 -0.2
Spencer Kieboom* WAS Rk 1/1/13 22 53 79 0.6
Kyle Higashioka* NYY AA 5/1/13 23 38 26 -0.5
Andrew Knapp* PHI A- 10/4/13 21 140 81 0.8
Matt Wieters* BAL MLB 6/17/14 28 683 98 15.0 398 83 3.4
Christian Vazquez* BOS MLB 4/2/15 24 55 70 0.7 236 66 0.6
Travis d’Arnaud* NYM MLB 4/17/18 29 397 96 4.3
SOURCE: Tommy John Surgery List
* = Active. Dates listed as 1/1/XX are used when only the year of surgery is known.
Pre G denotes the number of games played prior to surgery; Post G indicates the number of games played after surgery.

So far, the returns haven’t been great, to say the least. We don’t have any information on the relative severity of these players’ injuries (Perez included) and, the further back we go, less information about players’ defense. But while it’s not hard to find examples of TJS recipients at other positions besides pitcher who have recovered to enjoy productive multi-year stretches or careers afterwards — Jose Canseco, Matt Carpenter, Shin-Soo Choo, Mike Greenwell, Kelly Johnson, Paul Molitor, Luke Scott, and Randy Velarde come to mind, and hopefully we’ll count Didi Gregorius and Corey Seager among them some day (Gleyber Torres too, though his surgery was on his non-throwing arm) — the best that can be said about the catchers is that some of them were able to slog onward with their careers.

Perhaps Knapp or Casali will eventually prove me wrong, but none of the eight catchers who underwent TJS in college or the minors have gone on to have substantial major league careers; Casali is the only one of that group who even reached 1.0 WAR post-surgery. It’s not like those guys were supposed to be stiffs, either. Teagarden was a third-round pick who made two Baseball America Top 100 Prospects Lists post-surgery, and the rest were all drafted in the first 10 rounds, too: Knapp (second, 2013), Tatum (third, 2004), House (fifth, 1999, and a two-time Top 100 prospect pre-surgery), Kieboom (fifth, 2012), Higashioka (seventh, 2008), Jimenez (ninth, 2008), and Casali (10th, 2011). Sure, many picks from the first 10 rounds don’t even reach the majors even without undergoing TJS, or fail to produce in their limited opportunities. Nonetheless, the extent to which the catchers in this subset failed to blossom in the aftermath of surgery is not encouraging.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Leaving those players aside, of the 10 who had major league experience prior to TJS, four (Christmas, Coste, Davis, and Wilson) never played in the majors again. That count doesn’t include d’Arnaud, who is in camp with the Mets and, his ongoing penchant for injury notwithstanding, seems likely to stumble into a game at some point. Of the other five, none has equaled his pre-surgical offensive potency or made a particularly large impact post-surgery. To be fair, the jury is still out on d’Arnaud and Vazquez, though the latter has never even come close to the solid offensive contributions he made at Single-A and Double-A levels.

The biggest name among this group besides Hundley — a two-time All-Star whose pre-surgical performance is clouded by his later appearance in the Mitchell Report, and whose post-surgery peformance featured back and hand woes — is Wieters, a player whose post-surgical plight had been on my mind even before the news about Perez was announced. When I began writing about the Nationals’ post-Bryce Harper era last week, Wieters — Washington’s regular catcher for the past two seasons, at least during the two-plus months of 2018 that he wasn’t sidelined by injuries — was still jobless. By the time that piece was published, the 32-year-old switch-hitting catcher had agreed to a minor-league deal with the Cardinals, still a rather humbling outcome for a player who made nearly $37 million over the past three seasons, and whose career was supposed to be so much more.

A former top-five pick (2007) and number one overall prospect (2009, according to both Baseball America and Baseball Prospectus), Wieters made a pair of All-Star teams in 2011-12, winning a pair of Gold Gloves and helping the Orioles emerge from a decade and a half of playoff-free futility along the way. Circa 2013, he was a candidate for a major contract extension, though at the time, agent Scott Boras reportedly countered with a request for something in the range of Joe Mauer’s eight-year, $184 million extension with the Twins, despite the fact that Wieters hadn’t racked up anything close to the accolades that Mauer, an MVP and three-time batting champion, had at the time he signed. Needless to say, Wieters didn’t get that kind of money; the Orioles explored trading him in the winter of 2013-14, and then the following season, he tore his UCL after playing just 26 games. While there was initial optimism he would avoid TJS, he ultimately went under the knife in June 2014, at which time I noted the dearth of positive outcomes from among the group above.

Since then, Wieters’ career has been spotty at best. He returned to major league action on June 5, 2015, 12 days shy of a year after surgery, made a solid half-season showing (.267/.319/.422, 102 wRC+, 1.1 WAR in 282 PA), and then, after making a combined $16 million in 2014-15, became just the second player to accept a qualifying offer, after the Astros’ Colby Rasmus. Playing for a $15.8 million salary, he made the AL All-Star team — to this date, he’s the only post-TJS catcher to garner such status — and finished 2016 with a modest 90 wRC+ (.243/.302/.409) and 1.8 WAR.

He’s been considerably less productive since. In February 2017, he signed a one-year, $10.5 million deal with the Nationals, which included a same-sized player option for 2018 (not to mention $5 million worth of deferred money), then stumbled to a 62 wRC+ with -0.3 WAR in the first year and, after exercising that option, something closer to his post-surgical level last year (.238/.330/.374 ,89 wRC+, 0.9 WAR) while making just 271 PA; he missed nearly 10 weeks due to an oblique strain and a left hamstring strain, the latter of which required in-season surgery. Unable to secure a major league deal this winter, he settled for a minor league one, with a base salary of $1.5 million assuming he’s in the majors, another half-million dollars worth of performance incentives ($100,000 apiece for reaching 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 games), and a March 22 opt-out.

Admittedly, once the above catchers are broken into subgroups, we have rather small sample sizes, and as far as the performance outcomes are concerned, we see correlation with surgery but not necessarily causation. Wieters hasn’t made any trips to the DL for elbow problems since returning from surgery, and has continued to throw out would-be base stealers at a more-or-less league-average clip. His decline as a defender — using BP’s FRAA, from 47.9 from 2009-14 to -10.2 from 2015-18 — really began in 2013 and has been driven by subpar pitch framing (-15.8 runs from 2015-18), which depends primarily on his non-throwing arm anyway. Vazquez is still a well above average defender in all facets of the game, averaging nearly 11 FRAA in the past three seasons despite receiving only 798 PA in that span. From among the other active catchers who aren’t on the fringes of jobs, Casali has been solid on both sides of the ball but has only once topped 156 PA in a season, while Knapp has been a rather woeful defender (-15.6 FRAA while making just 419 PA), struggling both with throwing (19% caught stealing) and framing (-9.6 runs).

All of which is a roundabout way of saying that while I don’t think we can draw strong conclusions from the group of catchers who have preceded Perez in TJS, their history doesn’t offer him and the Royals a particularly great roadmap for success. He’s relatively young, and under contract for a total of $36 million through 2021, so it’s unlikely he’ll fade into oblivion like some of the aforementioned recipients, but if his post-surgical success approaches his pre-surgical performance, he’ll be breaking new ground.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
whiptydojoe
7 years ago

This is one of the saddest posts I’ve ever read on FG.

Godspeed Salvy, hope your surgery, healing, and comeback are all successful.

Mike NMN
7 years ago

I’m curious why this position seems to have such a large fail rate. Catchers do throw max effort, but only a few times a game.

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

Catchers throw the ball back to the pitcher on every single pitch (including warmups). And they don’t exactly lob those throws, either. It accumulates. Catchers throw more than any position besides pitchers.

Dave from DCMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

I’d bet catchers actually throw more than pitchers, in fact, though not nearly as often at max effort.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave from DC

Also, catchers don’t get complete warmups before throwing maximum effort.

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

Catchers drop off quickly to begin with.

antone
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

I think it’s more of this than a correlation to TJS leading to a poor post-surgery career.

Kevbot034
7 years ago

I honestly forgot Wieters was actually pretty good for a while. The hype leading up to him made him feel like a disappointment always, even when he wasn’t.

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago

I was lucky enough to have great seats at a Spring Training game years ago in Surprise AZ when a pre-MLB Yordano Ventura pitched to young Salvador Perez. I was so impressed with them both in person. Ventura’s stuff was electric, and I saw Salvy unleash an absolute laser once, from his knees…that one might have been a different game. Anyway, I was really excited to watch them both play for years and years to come (and I’m not even a Royals fan, Bo Jackson notwithstanding). After Ventura’s sad & untimely death, I’m really rooting hard for Salvy to come back strong. Get well soon!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

This is bad, but none of these guys were much in the way of hitters, either, and when you come back after such a long layoff it might be the offensive skill that has atrophied. And Vazquez and Wieters don’t seem to have any problems defensively…they just don’t hit anymore, just like everyone else.

I have a sneaking suspicion that if Salvador Perez returns, his biggest problem is that he’s going to be a bad hitter, even worse than before.

I should note, it is tempting to blame the Royals for not trying to move Perez this winter. But given how tepid the market was for catchers so much better than him, I’m not sure anyone would have taken the salary off their hands. I think the Royals probably made the right decision there, and just got burned.

Paul-SF
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I came here to say something like this. Vasquez in particular gets short shrift in the article, but his bat was always a big question mark, and it seems to have been the same mix of short stretches of awesome punctuated by much longer stretches of mediocre both before and after TJS. I seem to recall that his defensive numbers took a hit in the year after his return – before the surgery his arm was electric on throws to second, and I’m not sure he’s ever quite gotten to the same level – but he’s remained a solid defender overall.

jim fetterolf
7 years ago

How’s the track record on depth chart projections? Numbers seem a bit low.

pedeysRSox
7 years ago

If he gets TJS then Martin Maldonado or Matt Weiters (trade/opt out) has himself a spot.

London Yank
7 years ago

At the risk of being overly critical, you’ve not provided the control situation of similarly aged catchers who have not had TJS, so there is no way to evaluate wether TJS is causing some additional decline over what is expected with normal ageing. Catchers, in general, don’t age well, and most of your players who had TJS during their prime years weren’t very good to begin with. Does Wieters’ dropoff from age 28 when he had the surgery to age 30 when he came back look significantly different than the decline of catchers who haven’t had TJS when comparing their age 28 to age 30 seasons? That is the question you want to ask.

rhswanzey
7 years ago

So, this is why you don’t play catchers in 150 games plus the playoffs, even when they’re very good players.

Seems like this is the home for Martin Maldonado (unsigned top 50 FA), or perhaps Blake Swihart if they want a shot at someone who could presumably still be there for their next contending season.

antone
7 years ago
Reply to  rhswanzey

I don’t know how much merit there is to that point regarding the big contract Boras was looking for with Wieters, but this is also why if you have a large offer on the table as a catcher, you should probably take it.

I’m not sure what position is riskier to “bet on yourself” – catcher or pitcher.

Shirtless George Brett
7 years ago
Reply to  rhswanzey

Royals have MJ Melendez in the low minors right now and so far (he is only just turned 20) he looks promising and scouts seem to be pretty high on him. Unless something really unforseen happens he is their catcher for their next contending season.

ItsPoPtime
7 years ago

As far as arm strength and accuracy goes the only guy I’ve seen consistently after TJ is Vazquez. While he still throws well and accurately most of the time and still seems to be a great framer/blocker/leader, the zing on his throws seems gone. The throws trail a little now, whereas his rookie year I remember him throwing out Trout, Altuve, Devon Travis etc all really fast guys at the time. Vazquez was a little fire plug

He hasn’t been the same since, but it is semi hopeful. CV is still effecrive, and I do hope for Salvy he at least comes back with the arm strength CV did.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

That is a big blow to their rebuild. Their farm has improved but is still in the bottom third of the league. They desperately needed big returns in trades of perez and merrifield.

You could say it was a miatake not trading him in the offseason but then again this is hindsight and i can understand them holding on to him due the bad catcher market as a lot of good catchers were on the market this winter.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
7 years ago

In regards to the idea of the Royals trading Salvador Perez, he’s about as beloved as a player can be and there are people who *do* go to games just to see him – I can’t imagine that the Royals would move him for what other teams would consider an appropriate return… He’s not the player that he was, and never will be, but I’m fine with him playing out his career here.