Soto-Free Yankees Turn to Max Fried

Two days after coming up short in their bid to retain Juan Soto, the Yankees made their first major move of the offseason, landing left-hander Max Fried via an eight-year, $218 million contract. The deal is pending a physical, a nontrivial matter for a pitcher who has made 30 starts just once in the past four seasons while landing on the injured list seven times, though only one of those absences was for longer than three weeks.
Though he was chosen by the Padres in the first round of the 2012 draft out of Harvard-Westlake High Schol in Los Angeles, Fried — who will turn 31 on January 18 — has spent his entire eight-year big league career with the Braves, helping them to seven playoff berths, including a 2021 World Series victory; in fact, he helped seal the deal by throwing six shutout innings in the Game 6 clincher against the Astros. After making just 14 starts in 2023 due to a forearm strain that cost him three months and then a blister that limited him to 10 innings (four in the postseason) after September 12, he returned to take the ball 29 times in ’24, throwing 174.1 innings with a 3.25 ERA, a 3.33 FIP, and a 3.64 xERA. While those were his highest marks in each category since 2019, his ERA still ranked fifth among National League qualifiers and his FIP seventh.
Those numbers were not only quite respectable at face value, they were more impressive once you account for his early-season struggles. In his first turn on March 30, Fried retired just two of the seven Phillies he faced while throwing 43 pitches, walking three and allowing three runs before getting pulled. In his second start, against the Diamondbacks on April 6, he yielded six first-inning runs including a leadoff homer by Ketel Marte (who added an RBI double in the same inning) but hung around until the fifth, when he got into a jam and was charged with two more runs. But from that point to the end of the regular season, he posted a 2.82 ERA and 3.26 FIP, and at times he was downright unhittable.
On that note: On April 23 against the Marlins in Atlanta, Fried allowed just one hit over his first six innings and not only finished with a three-hit shutout but a Maddux, as he needed just 92 pitches to go the distance. In his next start, on April 28 in Seattle, he threw six hitless innings, walking two and striking out seven before getting pulled after 100 pitches. On May 11 against the Mets at Citi Field, he threw seven hitless innings, walking three and striking out five before getting the hook after 109 pitches. Two starts later, on May 28 against the Cubs at Wrigley Field, he took a no-hitter into the sixth and finished with a three-hit, two-run (one unearned) complete game while striking out nine. In the wake of a 17-day IL stint in late July and early August due to a bout of ulnar neuritis, he continued his anti-hit parade, taking a no-hitter into the fifth against the Dodgers on September 16 and a one-hitter into the seventh against the Royals on September 27; in the latter, he came within one hit and one out of another Maddux.
Fried turned to his sinker more often in 2024 (15.8%) than ’23 (11.7%) and got fewer swinging strikes than in the past (10.2%, down from 11.7%), but he once again did an excellent job of suppressing hard contact. His 86.3 mph average exit velocity placed in the 95th percentile, his 5% barrel rate in the 89th percentile, and his 34.6% hard-hit rate in the 81st percentile. All of those numbers were more or less in line with his career marks, and his marks since the start of 2020. Per MLB.com’s Thomas Harrigan, Fried’s 4.7% barrel rate is the lowest among starters with at least 1,000 balls in play over the past five seasons, 0.1% below second-ranked Justin Steele, and 0.7% below third-ranked Corbin Burnes, the top remaining frontline starter on the free agent market. Meanwhile, Fried’s 86.1 mph average in that same span is second, and his 32.7% hard-hit rate is tied for fourth.
My colleague Michael Rosen, who cited those numbers in a November 25 article, additionally noted that Fried has done a very good job of preventing doubles in that span, with just 16 allowed this year (tied for the lowest among qualifiers) and against 3.5% of all hitters faced since 2020, the sixth-lowest mark out of 173 pitchers with at least 300 innings in that span. Per Rosen, Fried’s skill in that area shows up in a model called Mix+ that Driveline “uses to quantify the breadth of an arsenal. Mix+ calculates the pairwise distance between a pitcher’s offerings in three-dimensional space when the faster pitch reaches the plate and then adjusts for the frequency of each pitch.” More:
“[Pi]tchers who rank higher in Mix+ should receive more takes owing to the spread of potential pitch movement patterns. But the positive effects of a wide arsenal also extend to the quality of contact that a pitcher allows… Because hitters must account for a variety of potential shapes at varying speeds, they’re less likely to unleash an ‘A’ swing.”
Fried mixes his 94-mph fastball and 94-mph sinker with an outstanding two-plane curveball that produced a 38.1% called strike and walk rate, and held batters to a .154 AVG and .285 SLG. By Mix+, only Fried’s teammate, NL Cy Young winner Chris Sale, was better in 2024.
As for what this means for the Yankees, this is the biggest contract ever for a left-handed pitcher, and the fourth largest in history, with new teammate Gerrit Cole still first at nine years and $324 million. Fried’s deal is $36 million more in sticker price than that of two-time Cy Young winner Blake Snell’s deal with the Dodgers, but Snell’s covers only five years. Once Snell’s $66 million in deferred salary is factored in, his AAV for competitive balance tax purposes is $31.36 million compared to Fried’s $27.25 million.
Via MLB.com’s Bryan Hoch, general manager Brian Cashman pursued Snell, but the Yankees believed they couldn’t sign both him and Soto, and so declined to make an offer since the slugger’s situation had not yet been resolved. They lost Soto to the Mets, who landed him with a whopping 15-year, $765 million deal on Sunday. During his Tuesday media session here at the Winter Meetings in Dallas, manager Aaron Boone said that one route the team could take to improving in the wake of Soto’s departure was to upgrade their pitching:
“There’s more than one way to build a team or skin a cat. Maybe it allows you to be more defensive. Maybe it allows you to play in the pitching market more often… Last year, we had an outstanding offense, obviously anchored by Juan and Aaron [Judge] hitting back to back. That’s not the only way to be a great team, though, you know what I mean? We’ll see. We’re going to try our best to, and are confident that when we get to spring training, we’ll be in a position that we’ll be one of those teams that has a chance to go compete for it all.”
With Cole remaining in the fold despite exercising his opt-out clause in November, the Yankees now have a rotation surplus, with Carlos Rodón and Clarke Schmidt the likely third and fourth starters, respectively, and AL Rookie of the Year Luis Gil, Nestor Cortes, and Marcus Stroman all options to round out the rotation. The 26-year-old Gil, who posted a 3.50 ERA and 4.14 FIP in 151.2 innings after missing most of the previous two seasons due to Tommy John surgery, has four years of club control remaining and thus by far the highest trade value of the trio. The 30-year-old Cortes, who posted a 3.77 ERA and 3.84 FIP in 174.1 innings, has one more year of control and will make something in the neighborhood of $7-8 million; he has trade value as a potential low-cost stopgap. The 33-year-old Stroman posted a 4.31 ERA and 4.62 FIP in 154.2 innings in the first year of a two-year, $37 million deal for the Yankees, but by the postseason had become a bystander. He’ll make $18.5 million in 2025, with an $18 million player option for ’26 if he reaches 140 innings.
Stroman’s salary could be used in a trade to offset the Yankees taking on another contract, which may be a necessity since they may not be able to fill all of their major needs via free agency. Gleyber Torres is a free agent, so they need either a second or third baseman, with Jazz Chisholm Jr. slotting into the other spot. Both first base (where Anthony Rizzo and Ben Rice struggled) and left field (where Alex Verdugo was one of the least productive players at the position) are ripe for significant upgrades. The Yankees do plan to return Judge to right field with Soto’s departure, opening up center field for prospect Jasson Domínguez, but they will need some outfield depth and insurance in case he struggles. In theory, Stroman’s money could serve to help offset the remaining $74 million on Nolan Arenado’s deal from 2025–27; the Cardinals were connected to Stroman when he was a free agent last winter. [Update: the Yankees are not among the six teams included on Arenado’s list of teams to which he’d accept a trade.]
As for the contract, Dan Szymborski ran the ZiPS projections in an earlier Instagraphs post, but here it is again:
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12 | 8 | 3.43 | 27 | 27 | 162.7 | 141 | 62 | 15 | 48 | 147 | 120 | 3.1 |
| 2026 | 11 | 7 | 3.59 | 26 | 26 | 153.0 | 137 | 61 | 15 | 45 | 135 | 115 | 2.7 |
| 2027 | 10 | 7 | 3.76 | 25 | 25 | 146.0 | 135 | 61 | 16 | 44 | 125 | 110 | 2.3 |
| 2028 | 9 | 8 | 3.95 | 23 | 23 | 134.3 | 129 | 59 | 16 | 42 | 113 | 104 | 1.8 |
| 2029 | 8 | 8 | 4.13 | 22 | 22 | 128.7 | 129 | 59 | 16 | 43 | 105 | 100 | 1.4 |
| 2030 | 7 | 7 | 4.43 | 19 | 19 | 111.7 | 117 | 55 | 15 | 41 | 88 | 93 | 0.9 |
| 2031 | 6 | 6 | 4.66 | 17 | 17 | 96.7 | 104 | 50 | 14 | 37 | 74 | 89 | 0.6 |
| 2032 | 4 | 6 | 4.93 | 14 | 14 | 76.7 | 83 | 42 | 12 | 32 | 57 | 84 | 0.2 |
That’s just 13.0 WAR over eight years for a value of $120 million. ZiPS is obviously quite wary of Fried’s ability to stay healthy, and less enamored with his 23.2% strikeout rate than, say, Snell’s 34.7% mark. But while Fried’s durability may be in question, some of his absences in recent years were for minor injuries (blisters in 2021 and ’23, hamstring strains in those same years) or fluky ones (a concussion in 2022). His forearm strain cost him nearly three months, though his bout of neuritis sidelined him for just 17 days.
Eight years for any pitcher is a risk, and at the dollars the Yankees are throwing at Fried, the deal is hardly without potential downside if things go south. Plus, there’s always the possibility that Hal Steinbrenner once again pulls up short when it comes to the Yankees’ other needs after making his one big splash of the offseason. Still, as Boone said, there’s more than one way for the Yankees to improve, and here they’ve fortified an already strong rotation while giving themselves some options to deal for more help.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
That elbow/forearm tho…TJ waiting to happen. He’ll take a year off at some point.
I’d bet that if you picked eight random starting pitcher seasons over the next 8 years, from eight different pitchers, there’s a decent chance that you’ll stumble into a TJ year somewhere along the way. Or any other pitcher for 8 years. Or any two pitchers four years each, and so on and so on.
May as well bet on quality
Yes although maybe it’s not great to bet on someone who has reported “forearm troubles” in their recent history.
I don’t think this would matter so much if it wasn’t for the big money involved.
You know every pitcher will be overpaid so Max was worth the gamble. I wanted him so bad ahead of Corbin Burnes who is healthy but that is actually concerning since his numbers are heading straight down. And Walker Buehler…just waiting to waste a contract.
There really aren’t significant red flags in Burnes underlying numbers in spite of his declining K rate. His velocity is as good as ever and he has thrown 4 straight seasons of essentially 200 innings (which could be both a blessing and a curse).
The biggest overall difference the last two years seems to be declining swing and miss on his cutter. He’s been losing horizontal movement on the cutter while gaining vertical drop, which makes the pitch less slider-y.
I’m not sure if the cutter change was intentional or potentially the result of some of the other changes he’s been making that have led to more differentiation in the movement profiles of his pitches:
1. He’s clearly been playing with his slider. In 2023 the movement profile looked nothing like his slider from previous years, adding both horizontal movement and drop. There was a big shift in the shape of it again last year, where it’s closer to his early career slider with more horizontal movement and now, less drop.
2. Burnes curveball is also changing, having seen a drastic increase in vertical movement between 2022 and 2024
3. His arm angle has been creeping up from 39 -> 42 -> 41 -> 43 -> 44 degrees. Unclear if it’s been intentional to optimize mechanics or induce more vertical movement, or an unintended result of something else.
Both the cutter and curveball have lost effectiveness (by pitch value) with the increased drop, while the slider has pretty much stayed flat regardless of changes. It seems like the easy answer is to get the cutter and curveball back to their older, flatter profiles.
But Burnes is still a highly effective pitcher even with the changes, albeit potentially less effective than we know he can be.
Between Cole and recently Tanaka the Yankees seem to have a good idea on when surgury can be avoided.
So will every pitcher. Max Fried is worth the gamble.
I must point out again that in Fried’s first start of 2024, he pitched a scoreless first inning but for the home plate umpire’s temporary blindness.
I don’t think that having a few calls go against him is unique to max fried
Pretty sure he’s just calling out what was one of the worst calls of the year, not saying that Fried is the only pitcher prone to getting bad calls.
I forgot all about that and instantly re-lived the trauma after reading this comment. Haha. Yea. he was 100% out of that inning.
As a Mets fan on social media, I’m seeing lots of “the Yankees overreacted with this one.” And maybe they did, but Fried’s a hell of a pitcher.
But I’m pretty sure Corbin Burnes is feeling good tonight, too.
As of this moment, Burnes has not signed yet. Based on this deal, what do you think he would get? This is looking like at least $265M and I think it is more likely to be $300M. Outside chance he tops Gerrit Cole.
$300M is my guess
I’d have gone with that over Fried
Fried had a higher K% in 2024 than Burnes
Burnes just has to be satisfied with being better than Fried, then.
Ya one more drop in K’s and Burnes will become the dreaded “pitch to contact” soft tosser.
Wow. You know the game inside out and I value your opinion, always look to read it, but Corbin Burnes strikeouts are much more than concerning. He gets worse every year…..by leaps and bounds. I was praying the Yankees would not sign him. I’d rather gamble on Fried who is of course a lefty.
Burnes is going to beat this deal and by a lot.
That doesn’t mean I think it is wise to give him $300M. I don’t. I think it’s fair to be concerned about the lower K rate but his stuff looks fine in the models, so I am pretty sure most teams are higher on him than Fried.
The price on starting pitchers this offseason is crazy.
Since they are a team that expects to be in the playoffs, I bet they will limit his number of innings closely. Especially in the late months of the season.
First non-A’s deal I was light on. Had him getting a touch more than Nola. He got an extra year and more per.
Yanks zagging while others seem to be zigging away from long term pitching deals. Or are they the ones zigging?
Might not be going against the grain. Corbin Burnes is still out there and Blake Snell got a 5 year deal. Fried isn’t that old.
The Dodgers gave Yamamoto a ton of years/money, and Sasaki would too if he were allowed unrestricted free agency. Now, giving a pitcher that many years when he’s over 30 is a whole other thing, but all stars require an overpay (see: Snell), and what other FA pitcher would you prefer this year or next? It is the cost of doing business; I’m just not sure it was better spent on Fried+others than on Soto+others
Yankees now have a bunch of pitching assets to trade. That’s another reason why.
Seems about right.
It is really easy to talk yourself in or out of a player if you spend enough time looking at the numbers. You can say Fried pitched like a league ace you throw out his worst starts, or that he has an innate ability to prevent doubles. But the more you do this, the more likely it is that you’re selecting evidence based on a decision you already made.
Here is what we know about Fried: He is one of the few pitchers whose pitching abilities can shut down elite hitters in the playoffs. His xERA might underrate him a bit because he puts the ball on the ground a lot, and while xERA does take this into account it doesn’t do so enough (FIP actually handles this better). Taking that into account, his typical regular season output puts him as a guy who is probably a #2 in an ideal rotation, probably a Top 15 starter and maybe not a Top 10, but his numbers on this full year put him around 3.5 wins which is approximately top 20. He had a run a couple years ago where he was pitching at about a 5-win rate but it is not clear if those days are coming back. The injuries are starting to pile up.
While this is a very good pitcher to have on your team, I am feeling like this deal is going to blow up in a bad way. Who is the sort of pitcher you would want to give a long deal to? He more closely resembles Patrick Corbin, Carlos Rodon, and Stephen Strasburg than someone like Scherzer or Cole. I think his deal almost has to turn out better than theirs, but at some point this deal is going to look very bad and you hope it is in year 5 and not year 2.
You should look at his playoff history. Can he shut down hitters in the playoffs? yes. Does he? No.
Eh, I don’t remember the Dodgers being worried about this with Kershaw.
There are always reasons to be skeptical of big deals (especially for pitchers), but basing your opinion on his postseason line, which is only 67 IP, shouldn’t be one of them. And if we look more closely at those innings, there are a few more HR, but the hit seems to come from an unlucky 353 BABIP (combined with a lower FIP, maybe the ATL defense let him down?).
Anyway, splitting hairs over whether he’s the 10th or 15th best pitcher seems like a great thing to say about the guy you just signed; not not sure what the complaint is other than “this doesn’t make me feel better about Soto signing with the Mets”
Fried seems to be considered an ideal #2 despite really having #1 results because he doesnt throw high 90s
In traditional baseball world, you want your playoff starters to throw high 90s. Thus, he’s a #2 even as guys with worse regular season results get cast as #1s.
Projecting out, I would actually think his approach is more likely to age well…as long as his arm doesn’t give out
He’s a #2 because aside from 2022 he has only had stretches of looking like a #1. Really, calling him a number 2 is a little generous considering that he put up about 3.5 wins last year. He’s more like a #3 unless he bounces back.
His 3.4 WAR last year was 25th in the majors for pitchers over 100 IP
Yeah the #25 pitcher probably shouldn’t be getting a $200M deal, should he?
That is a #3 in my book. I should have been clearer, I use the 5-4-3-2-1 thresholds. #1 has 5 or more, #2 has 4 or more, etc. Good idea to define your terms when you use them and I forgot this time.
It’s egregious to label Max Fried a #3. He was a #1 on the open market, as were Burns & Snell. A career 3.07 ERA 3.29 FIP.
Since becoming a full time starter:
2019 – 30 starts 4.02 ERA 3.72 FIP (Full Season)
2020 – 11 starts 2.25 ERA 3.10 FIP (Full Season)
2021 – 28 starts 3.04 ERA 3.31 FIP (Full Season)
2022 – 30 starts 2.48 ERA 2.70 FIP (Full Season)
2023 – 14 starts 2.55 ERA 3.14 FIP (1/2 Season Injury)
2024 – 29 starts 3.25 ERA 3.33 FIP (Full Season)
He’s actually number one in all of baseball in ERA over the last three years amongst qualified SP.
But I see you’re using a methodology that has three number ones in all of baseball last year (Sale, Skubal, Wheeler), ten number twos (Ragans, Cease, Lugo, Christopher Sanchez, Crochett, Webb, Skenes, Kirby, Gilbert, King) twenty-three number threes, including Burns and other playoff number ones in the literal sense. Your dream rotation is Sale, Skenes, Burns, Zac Gallen as your number four of choice, and Gerrit Cole as your five & you’re taking on the looney tunes in space balls.
This is a long way of saying: I think the Yankees are going to regret this.
Penny wise and Pound foolish:
The Eldest Boy Story.
And that’s the story of how Seattle never made the playoffs
Yup, on all counts.
It’s a prototypical Hal Steinbrenner deal, driven primarily by a desire to save face by spending, after refusing to invest in a true difference maker.
“See! Look! I spend!!!” on an older, second-class FA whose contract he’ll use as an excuse to drop below the Tax-line in a few years as his revenue flatlines thanks to competition with a man who’s ever run a successful business.
Max Fried is a bulldog who will give the Yankees a playoff-worthy starter if he is healthy, but there’s no way to make an argument that you’ve landed a league ace unless you take 2022 as his standard and round up based on his ground ball tendencies. You’ve got to be really committed to running above the luxury tax to do stuff like this and not have it come back to bite you later.
Every team wanted Max Fried but suddenly it is a dumb Steinbrenner move ? Overpay for sure but they are all getting overpaid.
Hm?
My point is that Hal has a pattern of overpaying in dollars and years for second tier players to allay criticism, after he refused to pay for difference makers.
I do indeed worry about Tommy John but every pitcher worries about it. I just think Fried is worth the gamble. 5 year ZIPS are quite good for Fried. 5 years in and still in the high 3 projection is darn good.
The ZiPS projections see him taking a step back immediately to the point where he will be a #4 type starter by Year 3, maybe even year 2. ZiPS does take the ability to suppress hard contact into account, maybe even too much (hello Dean Kremer!) so for it to show a decline that soon is a huge concern.
He’s probably a solidly worse starter than Nola and Snell but is making solidly more than either of them.
Big difference with Snell is age, Snell’s deal is shorter for that reason. Nola is a more straightforward comp and I would definitely prefer Nola.
Really…Nola. If there was 1 pitcher you had to pick that collapsed next season he would be a perfect pick for it. K rate keeps declining, fastball keeps getting slower, his arm has piled on a ton of innings, he already has a high homerun rate.
A few years ago Craig Edward’s had a table with the biggest inflation adjusted contracts and A-Rod was still #1. Does anyone know of an updated list of what that would look like today?
I looked up the same article. When Soto signed his deal, I thought it was the biggest ever, even after factoring in the overall spending environment. Now I’m thinking I underestimated the environment.
Just a shade more per year then the Rangers gave to Eovaldi for a pitcher with much higher upside?
Good deal for the Yankees.
I’m not sure which of the two is higher injury risk.
I don’t think you can just say “almost same AAV” when you’re comparing with a contract more than twice as long…
Exactly. The AAV here is fine, maybe even good, if you knock off the last two years.
I was higher on Fried than most. I was hoping the Braves would give him the seventh year and that would make up for a lower AAV.
I do think we’re seeing some inflation of salaries and WAR/$ at this point. Several deals suggest a need to adjust expectations.
The only big deal I like at this point is Adames. His deal may not look that great when comparing him to somewhat similar players like Story and Swanson, but if you factor in heavy inflation of salaries, it’s a steal.
They will both be 38 when the contract terminates. The Yankees get many more high upside years out of Fried then the Rangers can out of Eovaldi. In a decade this cost per year won’t even be notable for quality starters.
Fried will be 38 when his contract ends, at which point Eovaldi will have been retired for many years. I agree with your third sentence, which I believe undermines your original point due to time value of money?
So…when will Cole’s ambiguous kinda-sorta-opt-out be resolved?
It has been. The Yanks said “we’ll let you opt out, we’re not adding the extra year” and Cole said “um, er, I guess I won’t opt out after all”
Saw an article saying as much later, what an embarrassing and lame move by Cole to be honest.
Fried is obvously very good and the adage “you can never have enough starting pitching” is mostly true, but this seems an odd allocation of resources if it bumps Cortes/Storman out of the rotation and Schmidt/Gil to its periphery.
This money seems better allocated to 1B/LF/3B.
Saw a rumor they could trade Luis Gil for Kyle Tucker. Which would be a pretty good Soto replacement, as far as you can “replace” him. Maybe they could give him a $350M extension too!
I would trade Gil for Tucker in a New York minute. People will say Tucker will walk away but I bet hard that the Yankees would keep him even at 500. He is 27 years old and a better player than Soto. Not as good at bat but pretty damn good plus defence plus speed. And I love Gil.
“He might be older than Soto, but he’s better at every aspect of baseball other than providing value on the baseball field…so I’m a genius for trading a cost-controlled pitcher for him.”
– Hal Steinbrenner.
The Yankees have 3/5 of their rotation cost controlled right now because of their big contracts. I don’t think the Yankees want Stroman in there, but you could count him as well. They have two more SP prospects in the top-100, never mind Nestor Cortes either. I would certainly trade il (a player whose walks leave me doubtful over how much I would trust him long-term, especially in the playoffs). The Yankees got hammered for not trading their prospects in the past, and now you have the opportunity to replace Soto as well as you possibly can and you wouldn’t do that?
I don’t know if this will happen but it would be fun.
At least two starters will be traded to address other needs, and giving such a big contract also increases the trade value of said starters as teams are priced out from FA
One time I tried to figure out what it would take to “corner the market” on players like this. The problem is that in order to raise the price for others, first you have to raise it for yourself with multiple players. You can’t do this with Corbin Burnes, Jack Flaherty, Nick Pivetta, and Sean Manaea still out there. And then if you try to extort the market in trade then other teams will step in to trade starters more readily…these are the circumstances where teams like the Brewers or Rays start trading starters.
Dealing from surplus is a reasonable strategy but I don’t think this is going to yield some sort of big extra surplus elsewhere because they gave out a big deal to Fried.
Stroman is now a flat out lousy pitcher. The Yankees had no intention of him starting. Schmidt & Gil are still 100% in the rotation.
I’ll take the significant over on the projections
As a Red Sox fan, I think it’s a solid signing. They stretch out the funds over 8 years, keep the annual cost down a little bit and continue to fill needs.
It’s good management by a well run MLB team. Sure, Fried has done some stints on the IL, but I don’t think you’ll find many pitchers who are 30 who haven’t. He’s got really good stuff and looks a reasonable bet to throw 150+ innings over the next few seasons. All NY needed to do there was better the #5 guy and they’ve done that by leaps and bounds. I see the Sox just traded for Crochet, so a bit of tit for tat there….
Two words: Patrick Corbin
also, way back in 1969-71, a shutout with < 100 pitches might have been called a “Bosman.”Great pitcher. Great pitching coach. Great man.