The Art, Science, and Psychology of Catcher Framing

Catching is a thankless job, but it’s widely considered to be one of the most important roles on the field. In 2018, there were 721,191 pitches thrown in the major leagues, and there was a catcher on the receiving end of all of them. Of those pitches, umpires got the ball or strike call wrong nearly 5% of the time. Every umpire has quantifiable tendencies, some of which adjust from pitcher to pitcher and some of which remain consistent. Nearly all umpiring careers follow a trajectory similar to that of players, in that they start in the minor leagues and work to be promoted, calling balls and strikes in front of TrackMan arrays, often for years.

As such, the sample of data teams can use to detect those tendencies grows quickly. The more pitches called, the more data teams collect, meaning that by the time umpires reach the upper levels of the minor leagues, their tendencies are a known commodity. And while umpires can and certainly do improve their craft, old habits are tough to kick. In March, building on previous research, FanGraphs released an update to our catcher WAR that includes the value of pitch framing. Which catchers generate more called strikes for their pitchers can be quantified, but the question remains: How can catchers improve their receiving abilities?

To start, it’s probably better to think of it not as pitch “framing,” but as pitch “absorption.” Consider the following. A baseball is about five ounces. That might not seem like much, but try to envision yourself catching an object that is moving in different directions and hitting different locations with the speed of a major league pitch and not only being able to keep still, but guide the ball in a motion that we call “framing” in order to make the pitch seem closer than it is. Of those 721,191 major league pitches thrown in 2018, 604,007 were “competitive” — more than 124 pitches per game, per team, that had a chance to be called a strike.

In order to enhance the possibility that these competitive pitches are called strikes, catchers can train to optimize what I like to call their angles of strength. Angles of strength can be described as the most optimal angle at which to position your target (i.e. your body and your glove) to be able to control the ball as much as possible. When hitting and throwing a baseball, efficient movement patterns are crucial in optimizing strength. The same kinetic principles apply to a catcher absorbing a pitch.

A “standard” catcher squat, if you will, enables a catcher to equally distribute energy to either leg and maintain his weight in the center of his body. If done correctly, this is the strongest position at which a catcher can conceivably start his body in order to maximize his strength. From that squat position, subtle movements are tremendously valuable in mirroring pitch movement and pitch location in order to absorb pitches.

Say a right-handed pitcher is on the mound and his arsenal predominantly features a mix of two-seam fastballs and sliders. From the catcher’s point of view, the two-seamer will move from right to left, and the slider will move from left to right. In order to prepare to receive a pitch optimally, a catcher will turn his body a few degrees in the direction from which the pitch is coming. For the aforementioned right-handed two-seamer, a catcher will slightly pivot his right toes to face first base and move his heel slightly back, opening up his torso to face the area between where a traditional second baseman stands and the second base bag. This is the tunnel from which the pitch will arrive, so mirroring that pitch entry with his body is the goal. For a right-handed slider, which moves in the opposite direction, the same movement is done with the opposite leg.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The absorption of the baseball occurs at the point when the pitch is actually hitting the catcher’s mitt. Rather than moving the ball after receiving it, catchers train to beat the pitch to the spot and catch the ball while moving the glove toward the center of the body, which in turn moves the ball closer to the center of the plate. By angling the body to mirror the pitch, a catcher is optimizing his strength and using all of his body to absorb the ball inward toward the center of his torso. Moving the ball independent of the body decreases strength and allows those 124 competitive pitches to control the movement of the glove in a direction that might not be toward the center of the body.

The subtle movements that are important when angling the body are equally important when angling the glove to receive the ball. Given that the goal is to make the ball seem like it is at the center of the torso, a catcher aligning his whole body to prepare for that movement is important. If a pitch is coming and the catcher determines it to be low, he would move his glove to the spot and leave his elbow higher than the glove. From the pitcher’s point of view, if the glove is facing 7:00 on a clock, the elbow should be at about 2:00. When the ball is received, the glove begins moving up from 7:00 to 7:30, then 8:00, and eventually 9:00. The elbow will naturally shift closer to 3:00, to create an arm angle that is close to completely parallel to the ground.

Pivoting the arm in this manner creates a perception of fluidity and eliminates movement that is in more than one direction. If the elbow were to have also gone down with the glove and the catcher attempted to maintain a parallel angle throughout his entire pitch absorption, it would require the entire arm to move up toward the torso after receiving, which is both a less natural-looking movement and also more movement in general. The more subtle and natural the movement, the better.

Pitch framing is not all about anticipating pitch location or moving it after it is caught, however. It also has to do with giving the umpire the ability to see the pitch as well as possible. Umpires are taught to set up in the “slot” between the catcher’s head and the batter on the inner part of the plate. This is done for visibility and also to help protect them from foul balls, as more foul balls are hit over the outside shoulder of the catcher than vice versa.

Of course, the umpire angling themselves in such a manner also could cause inconsistencies in depth perception from one side of the plate to the other. In order to assist an umpire in seeing the entire plate and not blocking their view of the outer portion of it, catchers train to drop their leg down and out and receive the ball lower to the ground. If a right-handed hitter is up, the catcher drops his left leg. If a left-handed hitter is up, he drops his right leg. For some pitches that are low, this also helps a catcher’s absorption of the pitch — his torso is closer to the point at which the ball crosses the plate, and therefore the movement of the ball toward the center covers less distance.

Here is a catcher setting up in a “traditional” stance for a pitch away from a right-handed hitter, from the umpire’s point of view.

And this is a catcher setting up for a pitch away from a right-handed hitter with his left leg down, from the umpire’s point of view.

The final piece of the puzzle of teaching catcher framing is player engagement. Preaching the message is a lot different than getting the player excited about practicing it. People love winning. Baseball players are people. Professional baseball players are, almost to a fault, hyper-competitive people. Hyper-competitive people love winning more than the rest of us. For this reason, when dealing with professional baseball players, it is important to attempt to make a competition out of as many baseball-related things as possible. We’ve all heard stories about card games on the bus and ping pong games in the clubhouse and, now that it’s 2019 and I’m probably obliged to say this, late night games of Fortnite. Making a competition out of pitch presentation is a way to help catchers not only get excited about practicing the craft, but to also help them learn the tools by which they are evaluated.

For example, let’s say we have a pitch that is called a ball 60% of the time. We know this because of the umpiring data we’ve collected over the years. If a catcher receives that pitch and it’s called a strike, he gets 10 points. If the next pitch is called a strike 60% of the time and the catcher receives that pitch and it’s called a ball, he loses 10 points. The totals are then added up at the end of the game. Organizations can tweak and normalize as they wish depending on any umpiring outliers or game-dependent variables that might come up (things like amount of pitches, weather, pitcher’s arsenal, age, etc.).

This allows players from every level — from rookie ball at the complexes all the way up to the big leagues — to compare and contrast their receiving metrics against one another in a fun and competitive way, while also familiarizing them with the evaluative data in a very natural fashion. Those Fortnite games might be treated as tiebreakers, but the players are also well aware of how strikes are correlated to outs and outs are correlated to wins. Winning is an incentive for everyone, and catchers absorbing pitches has proven to be a very valuable way to increase a team’s chances of winning.

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this piece included a calculation of the force of the ball as it hit the catcher’s mitt. That calculation, as astutely noted by our readers, was a bit too simplistic, and has been removed to eliminate confusion as it wasn’t essential to the discussion of catching technique. Our apologies.





Josh Herzenberg has served as an area scout and a minor league coach for the Dodgers. He can be found on Twitter @JoshHerzenberg.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mclaughlin6464
7 years ago

Your force calculation is wrong. A baseball travels at ~ 42 m/s, not m/s^2. You’ve mixed velocity and acceleration.

AC_Butcha_AC
7 years ago
Reply to  mclaughlin6464

This. Sorry to be that guy but F=m*a where a=Acceleration e.g “change in velocity over change in time”. The quicker the ball is negatively accelerated (deccelerated), the more Force the catcher has to exert. So “soft hands” as in catching an egg decreases the Force. Hence less probability that the egg breaks.
To calculate a good estimate of the Force at impact you would have to get ball velocity at home plate and an estimation of how quick the ball chnages velocity to zero.

n_scheffel
7 years ago

I would suggest entirely removing the silly attempt at physics from the beginning of this article.

BKhipsterballMember since 2024
7 years ago

Around this time last year, Sawchick drew a negative relationship between catcher height and framing metrics. However, he didn’t investigate why. Curious if you have a theory.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  BKhipsterball

Back in 2017 I did a little research into this and found there to be nothing really there (I was looking into why Salvador Perez was such a bad framer – using BP’s framing runs)
comment image

And I just re-ran it again using FG’s rSZ
comment image

The best pitch framers (per rSZ) and then their height (in inches):

Jonathan Lucroy 83 72
Tyler Flowers 80 76
Russell Martin 74 70
Buster Posey 67 73
Miguel Montero 67 71
Yasmani Grandal 67 73
Jeff Mathis 43 72
Jose Molina 42 72
Mike Zunino 42 74
Yadier Molina 42 71

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago
Reply to  BKhipsterball

Being taller does not help your agility. I am sure that has a lot to do with it. I wouldn’t be surprised if it weren’t true either, but if you want a guess.

mgwalker
7 years ago

Still not understanding things like “moving at over 6 Newtons”. Newton quantifies force, which implies motion is changing and then it’s not obvious what we’re talking about. Seems to me like the more relevant physical concept here is the pitched ball’s momentum, which equals the impulse (force of glove on ball times time interval) that the catcher must supply during ‘absorption’.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago

Physics aside, this was a really interesting look into the body mechanics of catching cleanly.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago

I am convinced that framing metrics do not measure framing by any other definition than the mistaken moniker. I understand that this article is not about that, but if we are here to attempt to explain catching to those that don’t understand it, I think it is a relevant part of the discussion. There is framing, which helps a pitcher and catchers are taught to do… and there is the metric which is more about stealing strikes. I think MLB catchers of this generation are exceptionally bad at framing but we judge them using flawed metrics and they are adapting – its an interesting example of adapting to a changing set of circumstance. Catchers of today often plant their entire body off of the plate in an effort to screen out the umpire – they are not framing anything, moving hardly at all or beating the ball to the spot – they just plant themselves there in an attempt to sell the location. They have to know that what they are doing feels lazy, but if everyone will celebrate it and it gets them paid, then how can you really blame them? If the pitch is on the other side of the plate it might get to the backstop – I have a hilarious set of screen captures illustrating catchers reaching all the way across the plate for strikes. This article does a good job of explaining what catcher framing is, but it is also not how MLB catchers do it. As I said, I am not sure that modern catchers are very good at the art of framing, but they are goods at maximizing stolen strikes. It would be best if we didn’t mistake what we are measure as framing – it would be a leap forward… or we can just continue speeding down the path that everyone knows is flawed.

I have been thinking a lot about how they should do it… maximizing stolen strikes is probably the most profitable way to catch in MLB – but is that the right way for every other level? In MLB, you have the best umpires so they are not going to miss the strikes often despite terrible framing on pitches that don’t hit the glove. Pitchers at that level also need less help from their catcher in creating a target and helping with missed locations. At every other level, the “plant your entire body outside the zone” method is probably a losing bet as umpires are going to call the strikes they reach for as balls. In other words, missed strikes probably don’t offset stolen strikes at any level other than MLB. They very well might in MLB. I think the strike stealing method benefits catchers, but I think it makes the pitcher’s job more difficult. I know those two things sound like they should go together, but I am not sure they always do. Pitchers appreciate a target in the strike zone I am sure as well as catchers making their misses look more competitive, which is not how strikes get stolen. Next time you watch a game, pay attention to the catcher with his entire body outside the strike zone and watch how far he has to reach for the other edge of the plate in the strike zone. That is rough on the pitcher for sure as opposed to setting up in a neutral-ish position and actually beating the ball to a spot – that is just not how its done and I credit framing metrics for the decline of framing. It might be a profitable strategy, but at some point it will go too far if it hasn’t already. Ten years of data doesn’t really tell you much as we have been using poor metrics for quite some time now. The real test would be in the data that doesn’t exist. If I am correct, then the data will just continue to get weirder and weirder as catchers try harder to sell the pitch that hits the glove two inches off the plate by setting up in that location. I watch baseball every day and I don’t see much of what this article is about, which I would call proper pitch framing.

mgwalker
7 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Not sure I understand your criticism of modern framing. Seems to me like setting up off-center (or even, in the extreme case, outside the strike zone) and stealing strikes off the plate is a far better move than setting up down the middle in order to preserve the strike call on what would have been the far corner on a pitch that badly misses its target.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago
Reply to  mgwalker

I am sure you don’t understand my reply based on your reply. I am talking about the fundamental idea of framing. Pitches that hit the glove are already strikes. Screening the umpire is not framing – it goes unmentioned in the article. The article is about what framing is supposed to be… which is not what we measure. I’d be very happy if it was simply not called framing. My argument is a lot more complicated than what you are saying. I am saying that MLB catchers don’t frame. I am also pointing out that strike stealing probably only has a chance of succeeding in MLB – probably a terrible idea at any other level. We do not want to mistake framing for something that it is not. If we do, then it will probably get out of control bad… if it isn’t already. I think catchers of today do an increasingly poor job of helping their pitchers and it will likely get worse as catchers tailor their games to the flawed metrics that are going misunderstood. I think we do such a simplistic job of measuring catcher defense that catchers are going to move towards the crude metrics, which will effect the data sets that we use to approximate value – its a never-ending cycle that just gets us further way from what we are trying to do.

eastmanMember since 2022
7 years ago

I read this after the (apparently) I’ll fated force calculation was removed and I just want to chime in and say that as a former catcher, I enjoyed the article very much. I appreciate that you didn’t imply that “framing” or “pitch presentation” was discovered when the online community began to quantify it. I was introduced to the basics as a 12 year old in the 90s, and I know I wasn’t on the cutting edge. That said, I believe that quantification has allowed everyone to appreciate how massively impactful gaining or losing “a few” strikes is. Great work!

nchouinard
7 years ago

What is generally not calculated is that umpires read pitch framing metrics and adjust accordingly. All but the most secure have to in order to keep their jobs.

The GuruMember since 2026
7 years ago

umpires get 95% of the pitches correct, which is incredible …..yet that clown manfred is trying to change the entire game by installing robo umps. SAD. Guarantee you the robo ump cameras would be wrong a few percent a year due too, due to different algorithms of strike zone etc. No perfect solution and shouldnt go drastically change the game in which you elimiante one whole position.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Watch the robots get 95%… will people be happier? I have never heard a knowledgeable person assert that robots would be 100%. Watch any game and look at the plots of where pitches register – its not that great. There is the immediate read and the delayed one which is more accurate. The first one is generally pretty terrible. Its all approximation. If you want a good laugh look at where the top and bottom of the strike-zone is… I don’t know what it is based on but it certainly doesn’t shrink based on stance which it should.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago

I enjoyed the article. Sad to see how quickly this got pushed off the front page. People around these parts are much more interested in data than the actual game and how it is played. its just the wrong audience. What is interesting to me is that I don’t know how many places are actually interested in work like this. I think pitcherlist would be a better place for baseball-related content and they are always hiring.