The A’s Add More Major League-Ready Arms in Montas Swap

© Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Oakland fetched a sizable return in the trade that sent the potent combination of Frankie Montas and Lou Trivino to the Yankees on Monday afternoon. The deal is headlined by two top 100 prospects, lefty Ken Waldichuk and righty Luis Medina, and is supplemented by near-ready backend starter JP Sears and fleet-footed A-ball second baseman Cooper Bowman. All three pitchers are essentially big league-ready, with Medina and Sears already on the 40-man roster, and Waldichuk a lock to be added after the season and likely to debut next year.

The youngest of that trio is Medina, a 23-year-old flamethrower who has been a prospect of import for over half a decade, walking the starter/reliever balance beam all the while. Now at Triple-A Scranton Wilkes-Barre, he has made 17 starts (he typically works four to five innings at a time and has maxed out at six twice this season) while posting a 3.38 ERA, his third consecutive level where he has posted a sub-4.00 ERA. While he’s historically struggled with walks (he’s been at least a five walks per nine guy his entire career) and overall consistency, Medina’s stuff makes him tough to square up and induces lots of groundballs (50% GB%). His fastball has been in the mid-to-upper-90s his entire career and is parked in the 94-98 mph range again this season, peaking at 102.

Medina’s low-80s curveball and upper-80s changeup each flash plus, but neither does so regularly, often due to release inconsistency. He will sometimes dial down his arm speed to make sure he lands his curveball where he wants, a change hitters can pick up and adjust to. His best curveballs are the knee-buckling, high-arcing sort best for teaching kids what the pitch looks like. Medina’s changeup usage has increased this year (up to 21% this year from 13% in 2021), and he’ll show you glimpses of either creating big action on the pitch or having feel for locating it down and to his arm side. Again, inconsistent arm speed is sometimes an issue here, but Medina’s cambio could have late-arriving ceiling as a result of the increased usage.

The James Webb telescope has captured images of us wondering whether Medina will end up being a starter or a reliever — it’s been happening for that long. There are glimpses of tactile feel to pitch here, but they are rare. I tend to funnel prospects like this toward the bullpen, as that’s where I think they tend to wind up over time. But there’s an irony in that assumption because, well, this is a piece in reaction to Oakland trading Frankie Montas, who inspired a starter/reliever debate of his own. The A’s at least have the opportunity to continue to develop Medina as a starter because they are rebuilding and are less pressed to put him in a role where he might thrive immediately, the way Seattle did with Matt Brash. Instead, they can afford to give Medina a longer developmental runway and let him deal with growing pains at the big league level in the hope that his command will polish up and/or his changeup will blossom.

While anticipating a future bullpen role here, I do think it will be one of impact. Medina would likely sit toward the upper bound of his velocity range in relief, and his repertoire depth would allow him to navigate four to six outs at a time. That’s still an impact member of a pitching staff, even if Medina isn’t starting or closing. Were he still in New York, that outcome would be more likely. But rather than take that tack, when the bullpen clearly needed help following Michael King’s recent injury, as well as Jonathan Loáisiga’s velocity fluctuation and history of shoulder stuff, the Yankees decided to look outside the organization.

Waldichuk, an offseason Pick to Click who moved into the Top 100 late in the spring, is a big-league ready mid-rotation starter with three pitches that have bat-missing capability. His four-seamer sits 93-95 mph and has rise-and-run elements that make it a weapon at the letters, while his sweeping slider is obscured by his funky delivery, and he has consistent command of a screwball action changeup in the 80-84 mph range. A 2019 fifth rounder out of St. Mary’s, Waldichuk dominated Double-A throughout the back half of his full-season debut and reached Triple-A early in 2022. His fastball and slider command aren’t always crisp (though that changeup almost always finishes in the right spot), but the shape of Waldichuk’s fastball and the deceptive nature of his delivery give him some margin for error on that end.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Even though he throws his slider more frequently (stuff-grading metrics love the pitch — like, 70- or 80-grade love it), I have Waldichuk’s changeup graded as his best future pitch due to its relative newness in his repertoire and how consistently he finishes it, and because his delivery is so loose that he almost looks elastic. The way his upper back appears to fold in half behind him like a section of the newspaper is unique to Waldichuk, and this might contribute to his deceptiveness.

Sears is another plug-and-play rotation piece. He has plus-plus fastball command and has walked just 23 hitters during his 118 innings at Triple-A and above since arriving there in the middle of 2021. Originally an 11th rounder by the Mariners out of The Citadel, Sears quickly established himself as a high-floor prospect and was traded to the Yankees less than a year after he was drafted as part of a deal for Nick Rumbelow between the 2017 and ’18 seasons. He missed most of 2019 with injury and then lost 2020 to the pandemic; when the 2021 season finally rolled around, he was a 25-year-old who hadn’t pitched above A-ball yet, more or less an afterthought. His 2021 look put him back on the prospect map and on the Yankees’ 40-man.

Sears commands a flat-angle fastball that lives in the 92-95 mph range, consistently locating it in spots that hitters struggle to get on top of. His 79-83 mph slider can garner chases from lefties and also acts as a back-foot weapon against righties, giving him something other than his middling changeup to lean on against them. It’s not an overpowering mix, but Sears’ command will enable him to start.

Finally there’s Bowman, the Yankees’ 2021 fourth-round pick out of Louisville, whose swing has been changed since he entered pro ball. Bowman was an honorable mention prospect on the January Yankees list, projecting as a contact/speed second baseman. The footwork of his college swing was extremely conservative — he basically wasn’t striding, just shifting his weight from his back side to the front. He now has a run-of-the-mill leg kick, but the power it has unlocked is significant compared to Bowman’s previous iteration, and he appears very comfortable with the change.

His statistical performance has not been illustrious so far, though it certainly isn’t bad. He was only hitting .217 at High-A Hudson Valley this year, coming off a .237 mark at A-ball in 2021. Attached to that is a 26% strikeout rate and a .286 BABIP, both surprising for a plus-running, large-conference college hitter who had bat-to-ball success as an amateur. It’s more palatable with the swing change in mind, and Bowman does other stuff. He’s reaching base at a 35% clip and has stolen 35 bases in 41 attempts; you hope he can be a 40-grade second baseman with speed that enables him to also play the outfield, though he hasn’t yet. He’s definitely a prospect, just one I consider to be more on the periphery of my scope. The others have been added to Oakland’s prospect list, which you can find here. Waldichuk is my new No. 1 prospect in the org, but you could make a ceiling-based argument for Tyler Soderstrom or a positional scarcity argument for Shea Langeliers.

This trade continues a pattern of behavior Oakland has exhibited during their rebuild, acquiring near-ready pitching in droves in (in my opinion) the hope that it will put their rebuild in the express lane. Of the players acquired since the likes of Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, and Chris Bassitt started to move, the A’s have acquired 11 pitching prospects. They now have 17 players who were originally signed by other organizations on their prospect list. They are creeping up into the middle of the farm system rankings, though they are likely to fall toward the bottom again within the next year or so because so many of the best prospects they’ve acquired in their rebuild trades are likely to graduate in short order.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
oaklandfan312
4 years ago

Waldichuk looks great and I can’t wait to see him in the bigs.

Luis Medina reminds me a lot of Frankie Montas. 100 MPH fastball with the starter/reliever debate. Hopefully he can turn into an All-Star starter like Frankie down the road.

johndarc
4 years ago

Eric has a point: if the Yankees needed rotation and bullpen help, they certainly could have entertained the idea of just using Sears, Medina, and Waldichuk themselves. Instead, they traded for Montas and Trivino, who seem questionable due to stuff like health and performance, but I guess they’re already in the major leagues. You have no idea if Medina and Waldichuk can get major league outs.

But dammit, as a Yankee fan who has been following the journeys of these prospects for years, I would have liked to see them try. Wesneski, too. I’m sure Effross is cool but I wanted to see what Wesneski had.

The Yankees tell us these are the pitchers of the future, and then they go pitch for somebody else. I understand that prospects exist to be traded, and that the Yankees can just make more fireballers, but still. I wanted to see these specific guys play.

johndarc
4 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

It also seems like projections vary wildly: Eno Sarris and Keith Law seem unenthused about this trade as it pertains to Oakland, as these guys are considered as close to the majors but having “mediocre stuff”. Fangraphs seems more interested.

uncasf1Member since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

As an Oakland fan, I too am totally unenthused. I get the strategy of going for near major league ready high floor, lower ceiling guys. Oakland has done reasonably well using that strategy. But how you can trade a starter of Montas’ caliber without getting a high ceiling prospect in return (and I am not talking about Volpe or Peraza) just doesn’t make sense to me. Teams need high ceiling and high floor in their prospect mixes.

johndarc
4 years ago
Reply to  uncasf1

I mean, Waldichuk was/is a top pitching prospect in the Yankees system. It’s why I was surprised he was moved instead of just used by the Yankees. He is the piece you speak of.

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

The Yankees care more about this year than 3-4 years from now. Waldichuk might be good now, but we know Montas as good now. Hard to throw a rookie into a pennant race.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

If Waldichuk is their top prospect and he’s “major league ready” as the headline states, the only explanation for trading him for a recently injured starter is that Cashman doesn’t believe in him, or anyone else from the system to contribute in 2022.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  uncasf1

I can’t emphasize enough my unenthusement. It’s totally in keeping with my unenthusement about any of the recent deals. There’s nobody in the phalanx of acquirees about whom I’m remotely excited. I’m going to keep saying and typing “unenthusement” until Oxford recognizes it as a word.

okteds
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Totally agree. I think Enmanual Valdez, who the Red Sox just got for a 31 yo Christian Vazquez is more exciting than any prospect we received for Olson, Chapman, Manaea, Bassitt, or Montas.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  okteds

As a Red Sox fan I’m really happy you think that because Boston is ready to riot over the Vazquez deal

steveo
4 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

There’s no way Waldichuk has mediocre stuff. Sitting 94-96 from a lefty is almost as good as it gets. Sears has mediocre stuff, but his pitch metrics get a boost due to his vertical approach angle. Medina has great stuff too, but he has maybe 40 control at best and is probably a reliever.

Last edited 4 years ago by steveo
Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

94-96 isn’t that unusual anymore, especially with mediocre command. “As good as it gets” is Aroldis Chapman or Chris Sale. A 50 FV is probably right.

JoeMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

Agreed completely. I haven’t seen FG have a hard-on for a couple of mediocre non-Astro prospects in a while. Feels like the last paragraph was written first and then they crafted the article to fit that narrative.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Joe

The descriptions don’t match the enthusiasm. The headline says “Major League Ready Arms” That’s sounds like a euphemism for “ready to compete for 67 wins”. Exclamation Point!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I’ve been wondering since the trade was announced whether the A’s have been prioritizing pitching in this deal. It’s just so obvious with three upper level pitchers going back. The context of them acquiring all those other arms was something I missed, but it lends credence to the idea that the A’s were just not as interested as getting position players.

Which, IMO, seems a bit short-sighted, because this return is definitely not as strong as the one the Reds got for Castillo. Maybe the shoulder issues played a role, but Montas and Castillo are about as close comps as you can get and the Yankees paid less while also getting Trivino. It was always going to be tough to match the Castillo package but it didn’t have to be this obvious.

If I had to critique the return, it’s with Medina. Medina’s out of options after this year so it’s sink or swim in the big leagues next year. Are the A’s really willing to risk the utter embarrassment of watching Medina work through his problems in the majors? Maybe the front office is, but it’s going to be tough to swallow for the on-field staff and (especially) the players. I think he’s almost certainly a middle reliever next year with the chance to move into a late inning role if he can rein in the walks a bit.

I guess I have a very hard time swallowing the idea that Medina is actually an FV50. He seems like he’d be well behind the Yankees’ highly-touted but inexperienced youngsters (Arias, Dominguez).

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I can’t see Medina being a 50 either. It’s inconsistent to call someone a future reliever and give them the same grade as someone like Waldichuk you call a “mid-rotation starter”.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Getting something/anything/rid of Trivino is a plus for the A’s. He’s a fungible reliever who is arb-eligible next year. There’s no reason to have him on their team for the next 2+ years, and his value isn’t that high by any measure.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  synco

Yes but he’s non-tenderable

NYYfaninLAAlandMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  synco

Trivino is just a year removed from a better ostensible performance – actually he has remained somewhat consistent in his underlying metrics, just getting crushed this year by an extraordinary BABIP. That said, not seeing him as more than a middle innings guy, but the Yanks have had good success reshaping relievers so maybe they have some ideas on how to tweak him. There have been some pitch mix changes this year that may have required some adjustments impacting him.

Medina is a strange case here – he hasn’t pitched in AAA yet and his control wavers crazily start to start. His monthly splits this year go from near a BB an inning to fairly good. And ST pointed out something I too found missing in Eric’s analysis – the out of options issue. That said, I’m not certain its going to be so hard for the team to see how this plays out next season in the bigs. They are a long way from playing meaningful games.

I do think there’s more in the other 2 pitchers here. Sears looks like he could be a reliable back end starter right now, and Waldichuk could be even more than that next year. Oakland clearly valued proximity where Cincy didn’t. And Seattle was trying to get over the playoff hump while NY is augmenting a roster for October. Cashman had a bit more leverage than DiPoto and Oakland may have been more motivated to cut salary.

synco
4 years ago

Yeah my guess with Medina is that they stick him in a mop-up role next year and see how he does. Those games are already lost, and won’t matter anyway because the A’s are going to suck, so who cares.

okteds
4 years ago

I don’t get it. This A’s organization is starving for offense at all levels, yet in all of our trades this year the only half decent bats we’ve received are Langeliers and Euribiel Angeles. Hell, Enmanuel Valdez who the Red Sox just picked up for Christian Vazquez might be a better bat than anyone we got for Olson, Chapman, Manaea, Bassitt, or Montas.