The Biggest Injury Wild Card for 2019
I’ll grant that trying to answer this is unavoidably subjective. The Nationals just signed Brian Dozier, and a bone bruise might’ve clipped four wins from his WAR. The Braves are crossing their fingers for a healthy season from Josh Donaldson. Corey Seager is returning to the Dodgers after missing almost the whole year. The Cubs are looking for Yu Darvish to rebound. The Angels are looking for Zack Cozart to rebound. Dustin Pedroia should be coming back. Michael Pineda should be coming back. Buster Posey should be coming back. And so on and so forth. Baseball players get hurt. They try to put those injuries behind them. They try to get back to being what they were.
But as I think about this — certain recoveries are more predictable than others. Certain recovering players have bigger error bars than others. In a sense, the purpose behind this post is simply to remind you of the existence of Jimmy Nelson. But I think he really is the biggest injury wild card for the season ahead. The Brewers will play in a division with at least three and possibly five competitive teams. As of this moment, the Brewers are projected to have a below-average starting rotation. Jimmy Nelson might be a zero, as he was in 2018. Or he might be an ace, as he was in 2017. I don’t know which it’s going to be. The Brewers don’t, either.
Nelson is currently optimistic, saying he’ll be at 100% for spring training. That’s good news, and he’s well past a year since his surgery. This isn’t the first time we’ve heard optimism, though, as Nelson got going quickly in his rehab. For a while, it looked as if he might return in 2018, perhaps even around the All-Star break. No return ever happened. It’s not exactly that there was a setback — Nelson’s just trying to come back from a lot. He didn’t undergo some run-of-the-mill operation on his elbow.
Nelson was injured in September 2017, and he wasn’t injured pitching. Rather, he was injured sliding back into first base after rounding too aggressively. He actually pitched the bottom half of the same inning, but then he was removed, and he hasn’t pitched for the Brewers since. The slide destroyed his shoulder, and he needed major surgery.
A description, from Todd Rosiak:
Nelson, 29, underwent what could be described as almost complete shoulder reconstruction last Sept. 19 in Los Angeles, with the game’s pre-eminent shoulder surgeon, Neal ElAttrache, repairing his rotator cuff, anterior labrum and capsule.
You Aren't a FanGraphs MemberIt looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:✓Ad-free browsing✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles✓Historical & platoon projections✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps✓One-click data exports✓Customizable player-page dashboards✓Dark & Classic site modes✓Weekly Members-only mailbag✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review✓Optional homepage photo removal✓Gift articles to non-Members✓Full postseason coverage
It doesn’t really matter who you ask — “complete shoulder reconstruction” isn’t what you want. Baseball history is littered with talented pitchers whose shoulders let them down. On the plus side, Nelson’s still pretty young, and he has been throwing. Also, there was this, from Rosiak shortly after the injury happened:
“I’m not sure,” [Nelson] said. “The position where he said he saw the partial tear, the surgery procedure is a lot more successful than just a regular labrum procedure. He said that this certain procedure is 90-plus percent success rate. So that’s definitely good news, that part of it.”
With luck, Nelson won’t go the way of Brandon Webb. With luck, Nelson will be back, and he’ll be back just about fully restored. That can hardly be taken for granted; this really is a situation you just have to take one day at a time. Nobody knows how often Nelson might be able to pitch, but I’d like to remind you of how good he was the last time he was healthy. Two years ago might as well be 40 years ago, but to jog your memory, here are Nelson’s percentile rankings for 2017, out of 125 starting pitchers with at least 100 innings:
Almost across the board, Nelson was in the top fifth of all starters, and this is already a group that selected for guys worthy of getting 100+ innings. By park-adjusted FIP, Nelson ranked eighth; by park-adjusted xFIP, Nelson ranked sixth. He was similar to starters like, say, Carlos Carrasco and James Paxton. And the real shame is that, for Nelson, it was a breakout. For 175.1 innings, he became something he hadn’t been before. I had written about Nelson and his mechanical changes that June. Nelson was reaching his ceiling, and then the sky fell down.
Nelson’s year-to-year breakout was really something else. We have pitcher K-BB% going back to 1916. So here are the ten biggest year-to-year improvements in K-BB% since 1916, for starters with at least 100 innings in consecutive years:
| Pitcher | Year 1 | Year 2 | Y1 K-BB% | Y2 K-BB% | K-BB% Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Scott | 1985 | 1986 | 6.1% | 22.0% | 15.9% |
| Pedro Ramos | 1962 | 1963 | 1.3% | 17.1% | 15.8% |
| Mark Langston | 1985 | 1986 | -3.3% | 11.7% | 15.0% |
| Jimmy Nelson | 2016 | 2017 | 6.7% | 20.7% | 14.0% |
| Pedro Martinez | 1998 | 1999 | 19.4% | 33.1% | 13.7% |
| Darryl Kile | 1999 | 2000 | 0.8% | 14.0% | 13.2% |
| Justin Verlander | 2017 | 2018 | 17.3% | 30.4% | 13.1% |
| Danny Duffy | 2015 | 2016 | 7.0% | 19.8% | 12.8% |
| Ben Sheets | 2003 | 2004 | 12.2% | 24.8% | 12.6% |
| Justin Verlander | 2008 | 2009 | 8.6% | 21.0% | 12.4% |
I know that it’s easier to stand out in more recent years, since strikeout rates have gone up. But even though that table isn’t adjusted for era, fourth place is fourth place. We’d almost never seen a breakout like that, and unsurprisingly, it also shows up in park-adjusted FIP. Here are the ten biggest year-to-year improvements in that statistic, for the same pool of pitchers:
| Pitcher | Year 1 | Year 2 | Y1 FIP- | Y2 FIP- | FIP- Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Sadecki | 1966 | 1967 | 133 | 78 | -55 |
| Jimmy Nelson | 2016 | 2017 | 122 | 70 | -52 |
| Juan Pizarro | 1960 | 1961 | 131 | 80 | -51 |
| Mark Langston | 1985 | 1986 | 140 | 90 | -50 |
| Francisco Liriano | 2009 | 2010 | 113 | 64 | -49 |
| Mike Scott | 1985 | 1986 | 109 | 61 | -48 |
| Pedro Martinez | 1998 | 1999 | 77 | 30 | -47 |
| Jake Peavy | 2003 | 2004 | 119 | 74 | -45 |
| Bobby Bolin | 1967 | 1968 | 135 | 90 | -45 |
| Dave Boswell | 1965 | 1966 | 132 | 87 | -45 |
Nelson got better by 52 points, and only once has that been exceeded. Yes, Nelson had been better before. His FIP- the previous season was 103, instead of 122. But that 70 still came as a surprise. Nelson blew away his previous highs for strikeouts, and he was carried by a massive improvement against left-handed hitters. Nelson was pitching with power and location in and around the zone, and he was a big reason why those Brewers almost pulled off a Cinderella run to the playoffs.
This past year, without Nelson, the Brewers made the playoffs, and they almost made the World Series. That’s what can happen when you add Christian Yelich and Lorenzo Cain within a matter of hours. Yelich and Cain are still there, and they’ve also been joined by surprise signing Yasmani Grandal. The Brewers are taking this seriously, trying to capitalize on the window they’ve opened. They’ll be competitive again, albeit in a competitive division where the Cardinals are making a play to be favorites.
So much is going to come down to Nelson. It won’t always feel exactly like that, but Jimmy Nelson could be the difference between taking first place and missing the playoffs. Jhoulys Chacin is just fine as a starter, and guys like Corbin Burnes and Freddy Peralta can be electric. The Brewers already have more than five options, because the Brewers have needed more than five options. But no one is realistically capable of doing in 2019 what Nelson has already done in the past. He’s already pitched like one of the best starters in baseball. That was some time ago, on the other side of a shoulder reconstruction. What comes next is anyone’s guess.
Odds are, the Brewers are hoping, more than they’re planning. Even in private, even within the industry, baseball isn’t that knowable. Jimmy Nelson is a variable who might well decide the Central division.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

He might have been the biggest injury wild card for 2018 as well!
Man, every time I see the name Brandon Webb I get a little bit sad that he couldn’t stay around any longer than he did.
I feel that way about Rich Harden and Tim Lincecum and Dontrelle Willis and Ben Sheets and Erik Bedard and LaMarr Hoyt and José Rijo and Mark Fidrych and…
Losing Fidrych really hurt.
And Mark Prior.
What jumps out to me is Pedro Martinez 7th in FIP- improvements despite starting at 77. No one else on that table better than 109 in year 1!
Also how about Justin Verlander showing up twice in the top 10 in K-BB% improvements?
How about Mike Scott and the incredible power of an emery board?
Mike Scott: a man who scuffed his way to success.
Let’s all take a moment to appreciate that Pedro Martinez *started* with a 19.4% K-BB% and 77 FIP- and still managed to place highly on both lists of greatest year-over-year improvements with his 1999 performance. Crazy.
I never get tired of looking at Pedro’s 1999 season. He put up as many WAR that year as Greg Maddux and Mike Mussina COMBINED.
Interesting that the Brewers, Cubs and Cardinals each have extremely talented pitchers who they got nothing from last year — Nelson, Darvish and Reyes. Could be that the NL Central comes down to which of these pitchers comes back healthy and effective.
All this article did for me was reaffirm that pitchers should not be hitting.
Pitchers should not be sliding. Especially headfirst.
The entire Brewers’ starting staff is kind of a wild card in 2019. The only under 30, healthy starter they have with real MLB starting experience is Zach Davies, and he’s coming off a rough season. He’s probably better than his peripherals, but he’s not going to anchor a rotation. Burnes looks very good, and Woodruff looks pretty good, but neither is a slam dunk. This is not the rotation you want to see in a contender:
https://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=ALL&teamid=23#SP
Last season they went 33-10 in one run games, but that isn’t sustainable. Anything can happen in one season samples, but the Cubs and Cardinals look much deeper and much better.
Is it possible for your record in one run games to become sustainable when you have a bullpen anchored by Hader, Knebel, and Jeffress?
No, it is not possible. This subject has been very well litigated, and while there is some correlation between record in one run game and bullpen performance, it’s nowhere near strong enough to sustain a winning percentage that high. This 538 article is a few years old, but the 2018 Brewers belong right next to the 2012 Orioles on the graph:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-texas-rangers-are-making-unsustainable-history-in-one-run-games/
If the Brewers’ pen is that good again (which would be unlikely), then their expected winning percentage in one run games would be right around the 55-60%. Last year the Yankees and Astros had the best two bullpens in baseball (plus much better offenses than the Brewers to generate late scoring), and they went a combined 47-41 in one run games. And for what it’s worth, Fangraphs is currently predicting the bullpen to be about 2.5 wins above replacement worse than it was last year.
shhhhh, lets just keep Jimmy our little secret
I think it’s more fair to say that Jimmy Nelson is the biggest wild card in 2018, not necessarily Jimmy Nelson’s injury. That would be fair if we’re all assuming 2017 Jimmy Nelson is the real Jimmy Nelson; however, he has an entire minor league and major league career up until that point suggesting that not who he really is. Also, his 2016 was his worst year career making his improvements look that much more extreme. His projections do not look too promising either. Even if healthy, I think it’s more likely we see the results of a #3 starter verse that of a true ace.
Pedro Martinez on that chart. Wow.Oops. Should of known it would already be covered on fangraphs commments