The Dodgers Have Made It Look Way Too Easy

The Dodgers have won two playoff series, but they aren’t undefeated. Remember that the Cubs beat them by a run in NLCS Game 4. Other teams have somewhat recently advanced to the World Series without having lost. Back in 2007, the Rockies swept the NLCS, after they swept the NLDS, after they took a one-game playoff over the Padres. And in 2014, the Royals swept the ALCS, after they swept the ALDS, after they took a one-game playoff over the A’s. The Dodgers are one of six teams in the wild-card era to make the World Series by going 7-1.

And it’s not like the Dodgers have even made every win a laugher. Their most recent game was kind of the exception. In Game 2 of the NLDS, they fell behind the Diamondbacks early. In the NLCS, they trailed the Cubs by a couple runs in Game 1, and in Game 2 Justin Turner won it in the bottom of the ninth. Some nails have been bitten. The Dodgers haven’t looked completely invincible.

On the other hand, they have looked completely invincible. When you look at the numbers overall, it seems like the Dodgers have coasted. They’ve turned this postseason into a statistical mismatch.

Look at the series the Dodgers just finished. No, the Dodgers didn’t win every game, and usually a sweep is the surest sign of dominance. But over five games, the Dodgers scored 28 runs. They gave up a total of eight. Dodgers pitchers recorded 53 strikeouts. For their hitters, 41. Dodgers pitchers issued only five walks. Their hitters drew 28. Think about this for a moment — the Dodgers’ pitchers allowed the Cubs’ hitters to post a collective OBP of .193. Dodgers hitters, meanwhile, had a combined OBP of .366.

Dodgers hitters reached base almost twice as often. Maybe there was a carryover effect — maybe the Dodgers felt sufficiently rested, while the Cubs were still taxed from having been pushed to the brink by the Nationals. Whatever the circumstances, the Dodgers didn’t just defeat the Cubs. The Cubs didn’t belong on the same field. One of the best teams in baseball was reduced to the fragments of the shell of itself. The Cubs were simply outclassed.

I have a plot for you. Throughout baseball playoff history, there have been 176 series that were either bests-of-seven or bests-of-nine. Here are the winners of those series plotted by OPS differential. On the x-axis, OPS for, within the series. On the y-axis, OPS allowed. The Dodgers-Cubs 2017 NLCS is highlighted in yellow.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Over the five games, spanning 196 trips to the plate, the Dodgers posted an .881 OPS, equivalent to what Edwin Encarnacion did in the regular season. Meanwhile, the Cubs batted 162 times, and Dodgers pitchers limited them to a .491 OPS, basically equivalent to what Tyler Saladino or Adam Engel did in the regular season. This year, the average batter posted a .506 OPS after falling behind in the count 1-and-2. That’s what the Dodgers did to their opponent. Their opponent who, for a few months, had played better than almost any other team.

I mentioned that there were 176 series. The Dodgers finished with an OPS differential of .390. That’s the very largest in the sample. By that measure, no long series has ever been so lopsided.

By slugging differential, the NLCS ranks fifth-highest. By OBP differential, second-highest. By batting-average differential, 10th-highest. Run differential per game, fifth-highest. Walk and strikeout differential, highest. The Dodgers and Cubs did play some tight games. Yet the Dodgers just almost never opened the door. Even in the Cubs’ sole win, it almost felt like a Dodger triumph was an inevitability. Wade Davis had to dig deeper than he ever had before.

So much of that has to do with the NLCS. Let’s once again recall that the Dodgers also swept Arizona. Over eight playoff games, the Dodgers have outscored their opponents 48 to 19. On a per-game basis, that’s good for a run differential of +3.6. The Dodgers have also outwalked their opponents by 32, while striking out 13 fewer times. On a per-game basis, that’s good for a walk and strikeout differential of +5.6. For context, here’s another plot, spanning the wild-card era, which goes back to 1995. This shows the Dodgers and every other team, through the league championship series. The Dodgers are the point in yellow.

The Dodgers have the highest per-game run differential out of anyone. That includes even the two teams who made it to the World Series without losing. The Dodgers rank second in walk and strikeout differential per game, but the only team ranked higher is the 2012 Rangers, who lost the wild-card game to the Orioles despite making more contact. In other words, of teams in the wild-card era who have reached even a single series, the Dodgers look the most dominant entering the title round. They’ve outscored their opponents by the most, and they’ve had the best plate discipline. It’s hard to imagine a team looking stronger.

If you want to be further encouraged, the next-best teams by per-game run differential are the 2007 Red Sox and the 2005 White Sox. Those teams each won the World Series in a sweep. On the other hand, the next-best team by walk and strikeout differential is the 2000 Mets, who lost the World Series, and the next-best team is the 2013 Tigers, who lost in the ALCS. And, those two teams who entered the World Series undefeated? The 2014 Royals lost to the Giants. The 2007 Rockies were no match for the Red Sox. You know how playoff momentum is. You can’t have more momentum than by going undefeated, but defeat might await even the strongest of teams. You never know what’ll make the difference. The Astros won a game over the Yankees on a play where Jose Altuve should’ve been out by 25 feet.

There’s nothing to be guaranteed about the series ahead. All that can be seriously analyzed is only what’s already happened. What’s already happened is that the Dodgers have stomped the Diamondbacks, and they’ve stomped the Cubs. They’ve won seven of eight games against talented opponents, and they’ve made it look easy, relative to how the playoffs usually go. Perhaps the Astros will give the Dodgers an actual test. That’s something the National League couldn’t do.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

They are Dodgermating.

We are witnessing Dodgermation.

mikejuntMember
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, as a Dodger fan I have had exactly 0 anxious moments so far.

FyandorMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Same here. Even the one game they lost, it had the feel of a rest day for their main starters, as if they were so confident in eventual victory that putting in a travel-day squad was reasonable. And then they very nearly won that game too!

mikejuntMember
8 years ago
Reply to  Fyandor

it wasnt really a travel squad, it was the same platoon team that had won the previous night.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
8 years ago

This may not have changed the analysis too much, but it might have been worth mentioning that a big chunk of that NLCS run differential came in a single game. Obviously any team that can win a playoff game 11-1 has the ability to dominate, but I wonder if looking at overall run differential somewhat overstates the case. Of course you point out their impressive OPS differential as well, and I imagine that is probably a better measure.

John Autin
8 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

Take out that game and it’s 17-7 over 4 games, which is still a wipeout — a pythagorean W% of .835. Besides, almost any series with a big total margin has at least one big blowout.

There were two 3-run wins for LA. Both were tied after 5 innings, but the Cubs never threatened again; the last 18 went down in order in game 1, and 15 of the last 17 in game 2 (with a single and HBP, neither getting past 1st base).

In the whole series, the Cubs got just 14 at-bats with men in scoring position, with no hits and 6 Ks. It was a complete domination.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago

Who the hell is that with even higher K-BB than the Dodgers but *losing* by 4 runs?

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

And on the first chart is that the frickin’ Yankees all the way to the right?

RMD4
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

The outlier at the very top of the first chart is the 1960 World Series, where the Yankees trounced the OPS at .911 to .656 but lost in 7 games to the Pirates.

mikejuntMember
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

He mentioned that, it was the Rangers losing a wild card game, so a small sample where they walked a lot and didnt strike out and also didnt get any hits.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Oops. I thought that chart was still for 7+ game series and the Rangers were an aside, but I guess the text was clear enough if I read carefully.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

It was this wild card game – https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/TEX/TEX201210050.shtml

Looks like it was one of those games that is just “that’s baseball” in a single regular season game but stands out for the disparate BABIP and clustering in a playoff game, especially the Wild Card.

Orioles had 5 runs on 8 hits with only 1 extra base hit (a double). Orioles hitters walked once and struck out 12 times. Also one HBP.

Rangers hitters had 1 run on 9 hits (all singles). Rangers hitters walked twice and struck out 6 times.

The Rangers grounded into 3 double plays, compared to none for the Orioles. Each team also committed two errors.

potcircle
8 years ago

astros in 5…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  potcircle

I was going to try and make a “Spahn and Sain and pray for rain” joke and then I suddenly realized how terrible that would be given what happened in Houston.

If the game started in Houston, they could pray for rain because it would be in LA, where they could actually use some rain.

Ah, now I’m feeling like a jerk.

John Autin
8 years ago

The Dodgers *have* made it look way too easy…
Just like when they started the season 91-36.
We shouldn’t need a reminder of how quickly things can change, but if we do, “1-and-16” is a handy mnemonic.

Meir-w
8 years ago

That picture in the article thumbnail looks a lot like Trout. Boy would that make things easy…