The MLB Draft Is Once Again for Diehards Only

Michael Baumann, FanGraphs

I love the draft. Well, from a broader standpoint I find it morally abominable that workers entering an industry have no say in which company they work for or where they’ll be posted. But since we have a draft, and it seems highly unlikely that that’s going to change in the near future, I love covering it.

This is the confluence of amateur baseball (especially college ball, my great love) and the professional game. It’s the dawn of a new age of possibility; for months, we don’t know for sure where Roch Cholowsky or Jackson Flora are going to be playing in the pros. The moment in which we find out is an exciting one. I love seeing the stars of tomorrow before they’ve had their quirks sanded off by the great finishing school that is minor league baseball.

This is a minority position among baseball fans — even diehard fans — and media. In American professional sports, public interest in the draft is proportional to the proximity of draftees to the major leagues. This is as close to a law of natural science as you’ll find in sports, but since the pandemic, Major League Baseball has toyed with finding the limits of that law.

I’ve followed the draft closely since it was a perfunctory broadcast on MLB Network, followed by a conference call, but this is the first one I’ve attended in person.

Elements of it were impressive. The set, which featured three arched screens spanning the width of the Pennsylvania Convention Center’s Grand Hall, was terrific. It might not have been as evocative a location as the Fort Worth Stockyards — if the air in Philadelphia weren’t like an autoclave right now, it could’ve been fun to set up a stage on Independence Mall — but the Convention Center lies right at the heart of Center City and hosts events like this all the time.

The crowd, which packed the limited seating space, performed as advertised. When a selection of big league mascots paraded in before the first pick, they booed the hell out of Blooper. Commissioner Rob Manfred got the expected boos when he was introduced; when he announced the Braves’ pick at no. 26 and declared that the Mets were on the clock at no. 27, those jeers reached a peak so ferocious that even the normally humorless commissioner was unable to suppress an amused chuckle.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

But the logistics of the event were balky. There’s a skybridge between the event hotel and the Convention Center; I crossed it nearly three hours before the first pick and was waved through the security checkpoint. Shortly thereafter, the bridge was closed, forcing the rest of the press corps to go the long way around the block. The credential scanners didn’t work, which caused delays. Admittedly, this isn’t exactly MLB’s fault, and no one cares when the media gets inconvenienced, but we don’t run into problems like this at important events like playoff games, and rarely for regular season games. If you want your event to get attention, you make the process of covering it as smooth as possible.

In years past, the festivities proper would end after one round, but the rest of the Day 1 picks would still be shown on the screen while the writers who build their calendars around this event — not just our contingent, but MLB.com, USA Today, Yahoo, Baseball Prospectus, ESPN, and Baseball America, just to drop the names of publications who sent writers I spoke to — covered the draft at the draft. The press area would close only after selections were done for the day. This time, the draft board went dark right after the first round, and the working media was shooed out of the hall not long after Manfred’s benediction, leaving only the desk for the MLB.com live stream still in action as stagehands struck the sets. By the time league officials decided folks could stick around an hour longer, most of the writers had already left.

For an event created to highlight talented ballplayers, those were thin on the ground. Before the White Sox made their first pick, a pair of their former players — Greg Luzinski and Jimmy Rollins, who by coincidence also happen to be local legends in Philadelphia — made an appearance and chatted with MLB Network host Robert Flores for a few minutes. But that was about it.

Last year’s draft was the first in 15 years to not have a single prospect attend in person, and none attended on Saturday in Philadelphia. This was not as scandalous a revelation; last year’s draft took place in Cobb County, Georgia, one of the cradles of amateur baseball. The closest thing we had to a hometown prospect in this year’s first round was a pair of New Jerseyans, University of Virginia outfielder AJ Gracia and Coastal Carolina pitcher Cameron Flukey, who both grew up more than an hour away, well beyond the farthest reaches of Philadelphia’s exurbs.

The highlight of every NFL and NBA draft on TV is seeing the best college players take the stage and pose with their new team’s cap and jersey, and introduce themselves to their new community of fans. That’s never been quite as big a deal in baseball, but you don’t have to go back too far to find some really fun moments. In 2024, JJ Wetherholt, a Pittsburgher by birth, showed up in Fort Worth in a black Stetson and a bolo tie, to the uproarious approval of the fans in attendance. It was a first star moment for a player who quickly proved to be a star in the making.

Interaction with the prospects themselves was limited to a set of canned interviews taped at the MLB Draft Combine in Phoenix last month, plus an MLB Network segment on Georgia Tech catcher Vahn Lackey, the eventual no. 3 overall pick. In the convention hall, we did not get to see Cholowsky’s reaction to being selected first overall, and we might be better off for it; when the time came for Manfred to call the top pick’s name, he mispronounced it.

I was left wanting more, but I’ll sit at my computer and refresh the Draft Tracker on MLB.com all the live long day no matter where the draft is held, or under what circumstances. All things considered, I enjoyed the show, but it felt like an afterthought.

That’s a reversal from the direction Major League Baseball seemed to be going in the first half of this decade. In 2021, the draft moved from early June to the All-Star break. This rescheduling eased the awkwardness of college players being drafted with almost a month of the postseason left — every year, a handful of players got picked while they were actually playing in NCAA Tournament games — but it was supposed to take the draft out of that sleepy TV studio in Secaucus and turn it into a spectacle for fans.

MLB started putting on the Draft Combine, which put its stars of tomorrow on TV and in front of the national prospect media, including yours truly. In 2023, I spilled more than 4,000 words of virtual ink on the question of whether the Combine, which had been attended by a few dozen fans, could ever grow into something worthy of mainstream interest.

It was an interesting question, I thought, not least because it clearly mattered to MLB’s bigwigs. The response, both to my article and the Combine in general, was that almost no one in the mainstream cared.

Three years later, the draft has moved from a prime Sunday night slot to post-hangover brunch o’clock on Saturday. ESPN used to send its prospect guru Kiley McDaniel to call the draft alongside Kyle Peterson, Eduardo Perez, and a selection of the network’s college baseball announcers. NBC, in its first year with the rights to the event, simply used MLB Network’s panel. Only the top 10 picks made it to air on NBC itself; after that, viewers had to switch to MLB Network and Peacock.

The first round alone competed directly with 10 different regular season games. Even taking into account the day of the week, that’s a huge number of day games; it’s like MLB intentionally counter-programmed an event it was trying to turn into a special occasion just two or three years ago. When I made it back to my hotel and turned on MLB Network, I saw Big Inning whip-around coverage; the last three rounds of Day 1 had been relegated to a stream on MLB.com.

I don’t know if I’m cynical enough to believe that stepping back on the draft was a calculated decision, that MLB is diminishing the draft in order to soften the ground for restricting it in the next CBA. In the unlikely event that MLB gets its 12-round, all-college draft, the league would pay to ensure that the top prospects, reputations burnished by two years’ exposure on the road to Omaha, would be there to pick up a jersey and shake the hand of Manfred’s successor. Intentional or not, that would make a stark contrast to the drafts of 2025 and 2026, which could’ve been conference calls, as they were 20 years ago.

Regardless, this is clearly no longer a mainstream-interest event. The schedule is different and the TV sets are a million times fancier, but MLB is once again treating the draft like it’s for sickos only.

Which is fine. Like I said, I’m a draft sicko. It’s just disappointing that the league is no longer trying to create more of us.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
katmanisaliveMember since 2024
20 days ago

The idea that the skybridge between the hotel and the event location was closed is so laughable. Even though it’s insignificant in the grand scheme, it is definitely something that if I experienced it firsthand it would annoy me enough I’d consider never attending again.

soxfan1958Member since 2025
20 days ago

If you were a die-hard and tried to watch round 2 and beyond, it was almost impossible. The crashing and banging of the set being taken down was so loud at times one could barely hear the MLB Network team trying to fill us in on the players picked. I agree with you Michael, the MLB doesn’t really want us enjoying this aspect of the game.

nancy rulesMember since 2025
19 days ago
Reply to  soxfan1958

The venue being taken down during MLB network’s live draft feed was absolutely insane and isn’t getting near the amount of ire it deserves.

68FCMember since 2020
19 days ago

If the league is no longer trying to make the draft an event for TV/spectators, can they move it back to June? Nobody wants it at the all-star break where it is lost in the shuffle of everything else and causes logistical problems for teams who don’t want to get into trade deadline work until after the draft.

travis0548Member since 2016
19 days ago
Reply to  68FC

Why not do it the day after the ASG?

iamoninternetMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  68FC

Pair it with the CWS if you want to market it!

Jason BMember since 2017
18 days ago
Reply to  iamoninternet

Chicago White Sox? Sure, they will have lots of high picks anyway!! /s

alexi zemskyMember since 2025
19 days ago

I too am a sicko. I woke up at 2:00 AM Japan time to watch the whole thing. And I regret nothing. See you at midnight for the rounds 5-20!

Last edited 19 days ago by alexi zemsky
evo34Member since 2023
19 days ago

How does Manfred have a job? Dude just randomly tweaks the baseball every 2.5 years without telling anyone and otherwise kicks back. Doubt he actually watches baseball.

Eddie BMember since 2020
19 days ago

I am okay with conference call only if we can reincarnate Tommy Lasorda to announce Dodgers picks like the good old days.

docgooden85Member since 2018
19 days ago

I still don’t know how to pronounce Roch Cholowsky!

Chili Davis Eyes
19 days ago
Reply to  docgooden85

This is exactly why the draft will never be a big event! Even those of us who (kinda, sorta) know who these guys are haven’t heard their names out loud more than a handful of times. I can’t see casual fans ever getting excited about which team they don’t follow is going to draft which guy they’ve never heard of.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
19 days ago

This is the big problem that baseball has and that MLB steadfastly refuses to get involved with. Youth and college basketball and football are culturally relevant and baseball is not until you get to the pro game.

I don’t think MLB has any idea that it might play a constructive role in this problem. The only proposal they have that is even tangentially relevant to this is to put even more emphasis on sending teenagers to college. Which they may not have even connected to the lack of visibility of baseball, would probably be counterproductive, and would seem to be the opposite of assuming leadership.

docgooden85Member since 2018
19 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Youth and college basketball and football are culturally relevant and baseball is not until you get to the pro game.”

This might be regional to an extent. High school baseball is a Thing in Cobb & Gwinnett County GA, for example, and I am sure there are other spots like that.

Last edited 19 days ago by docgooden85
carterMember since 2020
18 days ago
Reply to  docgooden85

I would be very interested to see that. Not in ATL a lot, but maybe every couple of years. What sort of turnout do you get for games? What high schools would have the biggest tournout?

Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
19 days ago
Reply to  docgooden85

The guess I have in my head is Roch rhymes with botch and Cholowsky is Choh (as in orange) low (as in allow) sky, not the actual Polish pronunciation “awv-sky.” But that’s a 100% ignorant guess.

jtricheyMember since 2021
19 days ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Choh as in orange? WTF does that mean?

Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
19 days ago
Reply to  jtrichey

The o sound.

SPArnMember since 2024
19 days ago

I was at Fan Fest at the convention center which I’m pretty sure was in an adjacent room, and I had no idea where the draft was or how to get there. Even in the building, they were obtuse about it.

Another thing on my mind this morning – if they leave the schedule as is, how fun would it be to have the top three or five picks appear at the draft, and then play in the futures game the following afternoon? They would, in this dream scenario, be in the same city already

mike sixelMember since 2016
19 days ago

It’s like they don’t want us to like the actual players and only want us to root for jerseys…..oh, wait.

realitypolice
19 days ago

The correct lede is “The MLB Draft is only for die-hards only and MLB has stopped wasting effort pretending otherwise.”

timtomakethedonutsMember since 2025
18 days ago
Reply to  realitypolice

i 100% agree with this. to invest heavily in the draft is to invest heavily into players who don’t make it 90% of the time (probably more). it’s incredibly time consuming and little more than an exercise in futility. the failure rate of draftees making it to the bigs will forever distance the casual fan from the draft. us sickos enjoy it, but your mets loving uncle from long island who lays tile for a living has better things to do than spend 2 hours researching a ss from holy cross who is a 35+ and will probably never see aaa ball.

PP JutzMember since 2017
19 days ago

As a long time member and avid reader of FanGraphs, I feel the sentiment of this article is also indicative of the focus this site gives the draft. Eric’s content is top tier, once it gets released. Last year we got our first mock the day of the draft. This year the draft section of the board got refreshed for the first time in 6 months on Wednesday. It forces us sickos to check-in hoping for coverage, leave disappointed and look elsewhere for content. If this crowd can’t ignite excitement around the draft then it just may not be in the cards..

Brad JohnsonMember
18 days ago

I still think the answer to MLB’s draft woes is to change when players are drafted. Centralize development, use dev labs, and limit org rosters to 50 players. The midseason draft becomes how upper-minors talent is selected to the Majors, and the expectation is that your first-rounders will be on the MLB roster post-break. Can you imagine the chills seeing Kade Anderson or Seth Hernandez picked directly to the White Sox?

Granted, this requires a pie-in-the-sky restructure of MLB. I picture a more mercenary league with no reserve clause or arb years. Players can sign long-term if they choose, but the median player will chase opportunity on a year-to-year basis. Players on the 50-man roster but not active would be seconded to the minors.

gydemeMember since 2026
18 days ago

I was stunned when NBC cut away after 10 picks. I get this isn’t the NFL draft, but why even broadcast it on your main network if you can’t show every the first picks? It makes baseball feel cheap

airforce21oneMember since 2026
18 days ago

I find it morally abominable that workers entering an industry have no say in which company they work for or where they’ll be posted.”

What’s the solution here? Letting 30% of the drafted players sign with the Dodgers, Yankees, and Mets?

gydemeMember since 2026
18 days ago
Reply to  airforce21one

It’s also not even unique to baseball. Tons of careers have portions or the entirety of it where you wait around to see where you are placed/assigned. A medical student on match day opens an envelope to see where the next 4 to 6 years of their life will be located, they’ll be pleased if it’s LA or Springfield IL

markakis21
18 days ago

Well, from a broader standpoint I find it morally abominable that workers entering an industry have no say in which company they work for or where they’ll be posted. 

This is probably a bit much?

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
18 days ago
Reply to  markakis21

MLB is the company. There are others. They have a choice. Nothing morally questionable, let alone “abominable”

mizzousundevilMember since 2025
18 days ago
Reply to  markakis21

Nah Michael is right. Pro sports drafts are super odd and inherently anti labor.

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
18 days ago
Reply to  mizzousundevil

“Odd” is not the same as “morally abominable.” 

Super odd? The medical world was mentioned above as a comparative example, also the military, large-scale industrial production, executive tracks at global corps…

One of the goals of the Draft is to increase the popularity of the game on the national scale to earn more money for all. The majority of players have seen their salaries substantially outpace inflation, and they are not without options to remedy difficult situations.
Would the majority be better off under a different system? Maybe. But it’s not a simple argument. The current system is not broken, let alone “morally abominable.”

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
18 days ago
Reply to  mizzousundevil

A job that is overwhelmingly found to be enjoyable, operates entirely in safe conditions with negligible risk, comes with built-in support systems, and pays a median salary 10x greater than the national is not anti-labor.

The practice of initially assigning where new employees will be based and who they’ll be working with is not immoral.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
17 days ago
Reply to  markakis21

I find it morally reprehensible that the evil capitalist system forced me to take a job bagging groceries in high school at the age of 16. How was I supposed to provide for my family?