The Most and Least Team-Friendly Strike Zones
It feels like it’s been a little time since I wrote about the strike zone. As such, it’s time to go back to the well, to a piece I get to write every season. To kick it off, how about a mention of the incredible, improbable Tyler Chatwood? Through a dozen starts, Chatwood is sitting on a sub-4 ERA. And he’s allowed only one unearned run, so, in a way, he’s already paying off. And yet, over 58.1 innings, Chatwood has 53 strikeouts and a genuinely unbelievable 56 walks. He’s running what would stand as one of the very highest walk rates in all of baseball history, and he’s routinely struggled to throw even half of his pitches for strikes. Related to this, the Cubs’ pitching staff has baseball’s highest team walk rate. The White Sox are next. The Indians’ walk rate is the lowest.
The strike zone itself is a funny thing. It is, of course, supposed to change for every hitter, depending on their height or stance, but the zone is fundamental to the game. Everything revolves around the strike zone, and there’s nothing in the rule book that would suggest that one team should get a different zone from another. But we know the team-to-team zones aren’t consistent. We actually sometimes celebrate the pitchers and catchers who can manipulate the zone to their benefit. Teams end up with friendly zones, and teams end up with less friendly zones. The zones can affect strikeouts, the zones can affect walks — the zones can affect records. It’s a part of the game we currently just have to accept.
Accept and acknowledge. Accept and observe! Accept and analyze. With the way the game is played in 2018, it’s a given that all the zones end up being a little bit different. Which teams this year have been happy about their zones? Which teams might have reason to complain? I’ve got a couple tables for you. You can skip all the words if you want. It’s only the numbers that matter.
I like to analyze the zone in terms of strikes above or below average. One strike is worth only about a sixth of a run, but then, because you’re familiar with math, you see how that can add up quickly. I’ve gotten all of my information from Baseball Savant. The idea is to find the difference, for every team, between actual strikes and expected strikes. I calculated the difference for every team’s pitchers, and I calculated the difference for every team’s hitters. For purposes of the table below, I flipped the hitting numbers around, so that, in all columns, a positive number is good for the team, and a negative number is bad. The “Total” column is self-explanatory, and the remaining columns just show the various ranks. The table below is sortable.
So that you know how to read this: Compared to the average, the Indians’ zone has been team-friendly by about 91 strikes. The White Sox’ zone has been team-unfriendly by about 134 strikes. These numbers are only estimates, so you should take them with a grain of salt, but this is capturing plenty of signal along with the noise.
| Team | Pitching | Batting | Total | Rank, P | Rank, B | Rank, T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indians | 62 | 29 | 91 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Rockies | 50 | 39 | 89 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| Diamondbacks | 106 | -33 | 73 | 1 | 28 | 3 |
| Mariners | 53 | 7 | 60 | 4 | 14 | 4 |
| Angels | 33 | 27 | 59 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| Athletics | -9 | 54 | 46 | 19 | 1 | 6 |
| Dodgers | 65 | -28 | 38 | 2 | 23 | 7 |
| Blue Jays | 17 | 15 | 32 | 12 | 12 | 8 |
| Tigers | 7 | 19 | 25 | 17 | 10 | 9 |
| Twins | -10 | 26 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 10 |
| Giants | 43 | -28 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 11 |
| Mets | -9 | 23 | 14 | 20 | 9 | 12 |
| Braves | 10 | 4 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 13 |
| Phillies | 14 | -4 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 14 |
| Marlins | 47 | -37 | 10 | 6 | 29 | 15 |
| Rays | -39 | 48 | 9 | 24 | 2 | 16 |
| Red Sox | 26 | -22 | 4 | 11 | 21 | 17 |
| Astros | 29 | -28 | 1 | 10 | 24 | 18 |
| Cardinals | 10 | -19 | -9 | 15 | 20 | 19 |
| Nationals | 11 | -31 | -19 | 14 | 27 | 20 |
| Orioles | -29 | 2 | -27 | 22 | 16 | 21 |
| Yankees | 34 | -62 | -28 | 8 | 30 | 22 |
| Padres | -4 | -30 | -33 | 18 | 26 | 23 |
| Cubs | -63 | 27 | -36 | 25 | 6 | 24 |
| Rangers | -73 | 37 | -36 | 26 | 4 | 25 |
| Brewers | -36 | -18 | -54 | 23 | 18 | 26 |
| Royals | -82 | 16 | -66 | 29 | 11 | 27 |
| Pirates | -81 | 14 | -66 | 28 | 13 | 28 |
| Reds | -78 | -19 | -97 | 27 | 19 | 29 |
| White Sox | -104 | -30 | -134 | 30 | 25 | 30 |
According to these numbers, combining pitching and hitting, the most team-friendly zones have belonged to the Indians, Rockies, Diamondbacks, Mariners, and Angels. At the other end, we find the White Sox, Reds, Pirates, Royals, and Brewers. The White Sox are quite a ways out there, and then the Reds are also pretty well separated from 28th place. By no means does this table show why the Indians have been pretty good while the White Sox have been pretty bad, but this is a part of the bigger picture. And it’s illuminating to look at the pitching and batting columns separately.
The pitching column will be related to pitch-framing effectiveness. The better the framer a team has, the fewer strikes that team will give away. But it’s also not all about pitch-framing — you also have to keep the pitchers themselves in mind, because some pitchers are able to locate a hell of a lot better than others, and no one can frame a wild pitcher very well. Thinking about the Cubs for a moment, it’s hard to imagine a worse combination than Tyler Chatwood and Willson Contreras. Chatwood is a very wild pitcher, and Contreras rates as a below-average framer. Put them together and the zone is almost destined to shrink.
From the mound, the Diamondbacks have pitched with easily the friendliest zone. The Dodgers are a distant second, with the Indians a close third. The White Sox bring up the rear, followed by the Royals and Pirates. The Pirates’ placement interests me, because, in the recent past, Francisco Cervelli rated as a quality framer. Since the start of 2017, he’s lost that skill, which is somewhat perplexing. At least he’s figured out how to hit for big power.
The batting column is a little noisier. It’s always harder to explain the variations here. Some of it is presumably a reflection of hitter skill. Some of it is randomness, and some of it is opponent pitch-framing. The A’s, Rays, and Rockies have hit with the friendliest zones, relatively speaking. The Yankees are at the bottom, followed by the Marlins and Diamondbacks. Note that, in the pitching column, the standard deviation is 52 strikes. In the batting column, it’s just 30 strikes. The former is more meaningful, even though the latter also matters.
As another consideration, I calculated all the same numbers for 2017. In this sortable table, then, you can see how all the teams’ ranks have changed year to year. A positive change is good. For example, the Rockies have moved up 21 spots.
| Team | Pitching | Batting | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockies | 25 | -2 | 21 |
| Tigers | 11 | -1 | 20 |
| Diamondbacks | 6 | 0 | 16 |
| Phillies | 12 | 3 | 16 |
| Astros | -1 | 6 | 7 |
| Marlins | 14 | -11 | 7 |
| Mariners | 19 | -11 | 7 |
| Giants | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| Rangers | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Mets | -8 | 8 | 1 |
| Blue Jays | -1 | 4 | 1 |
| Indians | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| Dodgers | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Twins | -2 | 3 | 0 |
| Athletics | -6 | 7 | 0 |
| Orioles | -14 | 11 | -1 |
| Reds | 0 | -9 | -1 |
| Royals | -3 | 2 | -1 |
| Brewers | -8 | 11 | -2 |
| Angels | -8 | 17 | -3 |
| Red Sox | -5 | 4 | -5 |
| Yankees | 8 | -8 | -5 |
| Nationals | 10 | -25 | -5 |
| Braves | -14 | 11 | -9 |
| White Sox | -8 | -11 | -9 |
| Padres | -8 | -5 | -9 |
| Pirates | -7 | -1 | -12 |
| Rays | -10 | 4 | -13 |
| Cardinals | -10 | -5 | -14 |
| Cubs | -7 | 1 | -16 |
Two years ago, the Rockies played with the 23rd-ranked zone. Now they’re in second, meaning they’ve jumped by 21 places. Just in the pitching column, they’ve jumped by 25 places, which is awfully dramatic. If you look at the bottom, you see the Cubs, whose zone-friendliness has fallen by 16 places. It’s probably not a total coincidence that Chatwood went from Denver to Chicago during the offseason. Anyway, another big change has happened with the Mariners, whose pitching zone has improved by 19 places. They’ve given some of that back on the hitting side, but the Mariners will take whatever they can get. And as for the rest, you’re free to peruse to your liking. This is only a small part of baseball here being analyzed, and the wins and losses are about so much more than just this, but still, it’s worth being reminded every single year that every team plays with slightly different rules. It’s an open question as to whether that makes the sport better or worse.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
As an Angels fan, this disturbs me. We are getting noticeably luckier with our strike zone than last year’s very lucky team, and Maldonado and the Backstops have been noticeably and quantifiably worse than last year at framing by a LARGE margin. Framing is exactly the kind of baseball statistic that you love when your catchers are great at it and despise when they are anything short of that. In fewer than 365 days, I went full robot umps.
And that’s with Anaheim in 5th place!
Yankees have gotten 25 more strikes called against their batters than the next worst team. That’s almost an entire standard deviation. I feel like that requires a deeper dive, but at the same time it’s probably just Judge.
Carig wrote an article on this: Judge and Gardner lead the league by a wide margin in extra called strikes. It does require a subscription to The Athletic, however.
https://theathletic.com/365213/2018/05/23/carig-why-yankees-manager-aaron-boone-needed-to-stand-up-for-his-team/
As a team, the Yankees are physically huge. I wonder if their above average stature makes umpires more likely to miss calls against them.
A whole team of Altuve-height players is the new market inefficiency
The Yankees are the top scoring team in baseball though. Maybe its better to have a team of giant mashers who have to suffer through a few underserved bad counts than it is to have a less powerful team hitting more frequently in undeserved good counts.
Not insane…. umpires see the upper zone better than the lower part. Also, the psychological aspect of subconsciously rooting for a bunch of little overachievers…
Also, 2/3 of pitches are thrown low in the zone, right into Altuve’s wheelhouse, per fangraphs.
As a team, the Yankees are physically huge. I wonder if their above average stature makes umpires more likely to miss calls against them.
– Excellent point. And I bet you’re right.
does aaron judge lead the league in “unlucky” strikes by himself? with a sidekick gardner maybe.
I’d throw Matt Davidson’s hat into that ring as well.
Yessir: https://theathletic.com/365213/2018/05/23/carig-why-yankees-manager-aaron-boone-needed-to-stand-up-for-his-team/
Do we know how this converts to runs/wins? Feels like those lost 134 strikes for the Sox should translate to an extra loss or two
Brooks and Pavlidis report a weighted context-neutral average of about 0.14 runs per ball to strike.
So about 18 runs, somewhere around 2 wins
From the hitting side, a lot of the variation might be explained by the zone tendencies of the lineup. Teams that take a lot of close pitches will have a greater chance to accumulate big deviations above or below zero on this metric.
Just to follow up on this point. Aaron Judge is well known to get lots of bad calls against him, and this is probably a large part to do with his height. However, it is also a function of his swing tendencies. He ranks 149th of qualified players by only swinging at 60% of pitches in the zone. This selectivity means umpires have a lot of opportunities to call borderline pitches against him.
if you do the statcast search you can find %s pretty easily. patience definitely matters a great deal but some guys like judge just suffer from height. you can see it by the location of bad strikes called vs him, mostly below the knees. in comparison a guy like justin bour has those mostly on either side of the plate.
A whole team of Altuve-height players is the new market inefficiency
– Don’t laugh. I’m sure Altuve’s success did wonders for Madrigal’s draft stock. Additionally, although I’m too lazy to look it up, there seem to be many cases of smaller players drafted much higher than they would have been drafted previous to Altuve, Betts, etc…
Excellent. Perhaps the White Sox starters are just bad and not atrocious? There is hope! Giolito 2019 baby!
Man, the NL Central isn’t exactly having a banner year when it comes to this stat.
It would have been nice to have discussed this alongside “clutch” when thinking about last year’s MVP race.
I’m not sure if it can be tracked or not, but seeing which hitters lead in favorable vs unfavorable calls and trying to extrapolate and find trends in that would be mighty interesting. For example – does exaggerating the location of the pitch by heavily moving in, out, down (aka hitter “flopping”) actually bear out that it works?
Cool article thanks Jeff
Very interesting analysis. I wonder what the first half to second half correl of these numbers was last season.
“…every team plays with slightly different rules”
That is a serious accusation that is not sufficiently supported by the present analysis, which establishes only that there is team-to-team variability. Is this variability larger, or more persistent over time, than what can be expected given the measurable degree of random error (which is fundamentally different from the sort of bias implied by ‘different rules’) in umpire calls?
It’s one thing to criticize MLB’s tolerance of random ball/strike errors, which balance out over time — the large changes in team rank since last year are testament to this. It’s another, and in my view indefensible, to characterize this randomness as unfair.
It would be interesting to see this analysis for umpires and how they may correlate to certain teams. Do umpires typically call games in certain regions of the country (thus leading to more good/bad calls therein)? If so, this could definitely be a factor with some teams.
I’ve been complaining about the zone against the Yanks for a couple of years now, and (understandably) other fans don’t like it and call it homerism. Seeing that my assertion has been vindicated doesn’t do anything for me, because it does nothing to rectify the situation. Is it wrong to blame a home plate umpire for not doing the only (essentially) job they’re paid to do? At least a digital zone would nullify any complaints I or other may have about incompetence (the real culprit) or impartiality (less and less of an issue in the modern game).
I also get the sense that people liked the plucky, “not supposed to be here” Yankees of yesteryear a lot more than what now feels like the next iteration of the evil empire lol.
I would suggest that it is not incompetence (primarily), but that the HP ump is given an impossible job to do. In particular, how is the ump supposed to be accurate when judging a speedy curving ball low in the zone with a catcher blocking his view? Since the job is impossible, at least Robo-ump would be able to be consistent (reliable in stat jargon), even if perfection (validity) cannon yet be achieved.
The Dbacks are at the extremes both lists (+ pitching, – hitting), which tells me that maybe the umps they drew so far this year are more pitcher-friendly.