The Opener Goes to the Postseason
This year’s AL Wild Card Game will be a battle of competing philosophies, at least when it comes to the choice of starting pitchers. On Tuesday at Yankee Stadium, the opposing managers announced their picks for Wednesday night’s game. The Yankees have decided to remain old-school, with manager Aaron Boone tabbing 24-year-old righty Luis Severino, an All-Star who despite second-half struggles finished fourth in the league in WAR (5.7) and in a virtual tie for fifth in FIP (2.95) — and one whose early exit in last year’s Wild Card Game pushed the Yankees into a bullpen-oriented approach anyway. As for the A’s, a club whose rotation has has lost staff ace Sean Manaea and five other starters to season-ending surgeries, manager Bob Melvin is going the new-school route, with 29-year-old righty Liam Hendriks as his opener — a first of sorts. In eight September starts, Hendriks threw a combined 8.2 innings.
Together, the choices offer something of a callback to a year ago. Heading into the AL Wild Card game, then-manager Joe Girardi was ambivalent about the possibility of saving Severino for a potential Division Series Game One and relying upon his wealth of dominant relievers to face the Twins. “You could do that but that’s not something you’ve done during the course of the season,” Girardi told reporters. “And we have some starters who are pretty qualified to make that start… If you start doing crazy things, things guys aren’t used to, then I’m just not comfortable doing it. You want to keep it as normal as possible.”
Despite Girardi’s reservations, it was clear that the Yankees were built for such a scenario thanks to general manager Brian Cashman’s July 19 (re)acquisition of David Robertson and Tommy Kahnle to add to a bullpen that already included Aroldis Chapman and Dellin Betances. “A veritable clown car of effective righties who can miss bats and take over before Twins batters get too familiar with Severino,” is how one wag put it.
Despite Girardi’s best-laid plans, “normal” went out the window in the first inning, when Severino retired just one of the six batters he faced, served up two homers, and dug the Yankees a 3-0 hole. With Chad Green, Robertson, Kahnle, and Chapman combining to get 26 outs (13 by strikeout) while allowing just one additional run, the Yankees’ bullpen kept the Twins at bay long enough for their formidable offense to go to town on Minnesota starter Ervin Santana and lesser relievers.
Though he managed the Yankees to within one win of their first World Series berth since 2009, Girardi was replaced by Boone this past winter. The Yankees increased their win total from 91 to 100 but still wound up seeded as Wild Card hosts. In the days leading up to the game, Boone didn’t completely dismiss the possibility of a bullpen-oriented approach, though not an “opener”-type start. “Absolutely, it’s a consideration,” he said on “The Michael Kay Show” last Wednesday, explaining that he could use one of his top options for a shorter stint before opening the bullpen door. “I could see Happ, Masa, or Sevy [J.A. Happ, Masahiro Tanaka, or Severino] — even if they are pitching well — not going deep. We’ll be rested and lined up, so I can see getting two, three, four, or five innings from (the starter) and then roll it out.”
The Yankees even went through something of a dry run with an opener on Monday, September 24 against — who else? — the Rays. With Jonathan Holder making his first start since 2015 in High-A, Boone used eight pitchers, with exiled starter Sonny Gray representing the only one to throw more than one inning. The results were compelling: two hits and one run allowed, with 13 strikeouts to offset six walks in a 4-1 win that, coincidentally enough, eliminated Tampa Bay from postseason contention while clinching a berth for Oakland.
“I don’t think it’s fair for them to say a ‘bullpen day,’” Rays Manager Kevin Cash said afterwards. “More like a ‘closer day.’ They all just kind of come in there and have wipeout stuff from the second that Green steps on the mound.” Indeed, between Betances, Chapman, Robertson, and Zach Britton, who together accounted for four innings that night, the Yankees have no shortage of experienced ninth-inning types at their disposal. That’s part of what gave the idea of a bullpen game its appeal, particularly with relatively little clarity regarding the team’s options to start.
Severino had emerged as a Cy Young candidate in the first half, posting a 2.31 ERA and a 2.75 FIP en route to a spot on the AL All-Star team, but he was pummeled for a 5.57 ERA in the second half. His FIP was just 3.37 in that latter span, but his BABIP shot from .278 to .379, his homer rate from 0.7 per nine to 1.3, and his slugging percentage allowed from .316 to .490. From July 7 to September 5 — the last outing a six-run, 2.2-inning grind against this same A’s club — he made just two quality starts out of 11, with a 6.83 ERA and a 4.66 FIP. Only over his final three starts, during which he allowed four runs in 17.2 innings against the Twins, Red Sox, and Rays, did he right the ship.
“I feel like after some bumps in the road certainly the second half of the season, he’s turned a corner and really started to throw the ball better,” Boone said of Severino on Tuesday, adding that “performance, experience, stuff, opponent” and input from his coaching staff and Cashman went into the decision.
Tanaka was almost a mirror image of Severino this season, pitching to a 4.54 ERA and a 4.91 FIP before the All-Star break — during which he missed a month due to bilateral hamstring strains suffered while running the bases in an interleague game at Citi Field — and a 2.85 ERA and a 2.98 FIP after. However, he was pummeled for nine runs in eight innings in his final two starts against the Red Sox and Rays. Happ, the sole lefty under consideration, gave the Yankees a 2.69 ERA and a 4.21 FIP in 11 starts after being acquired from the Blue Jays on July 26.
For what it’s worth, the A’s have generally fielded a righty-heavy lineup, with Matt Olson the only lefty-swinging regular, though Nick Martini has lately platooned in left field with righty-swinging Mark Canha. Jed Lowrie is the team’s only switch-hitter. Even with that tilt, the A’s had the league’s second-highest wRC+ (112) against righties, and they were tied for third (105 wRC+) against lefties. Of the 43 qualified AL starters, Severino’s .280 wOBA allowed to righties ranks 10th, with Happ’s .313 at 24th and Tanaka’s .324 placing 29th. By comparison, Chapman (.238), Betances (.250), Robertson (.254), Holder (.261), and Green (.273) were all better at handling righties than any of the three starters.
As for the A’s, starting Hendriks is a gambit to which Melvin turned shortly after losing Manaea for the season in late August — this, after Jharel Cotton, A.J. Puk, Kendall Graveman, and Daniel Gossett all underwent Tommy John surgery, and Andrew Triggs went down with a nerve problem that culminated in surgery to alleviate thoracic outlet syndrome. At the time Manaea went down, the San Francisco Chronicle’s John Shea wrote of a potential matchup with the Yankees, “Don’t be surprised if management decides to go bullpen happy in a wild-card game, especially because it likely would follow two off days.”
Hendriks is the leader of that conga line. Roughed up for a 7.36 ERA and a 6.44 FIP in 11 first-half innings, he was designated for assignment on June 25 and outrighted to Triple-A Nashville, where he spent July and August. A long-toss program helped him boost his velocity: according to the Pitch Info daya, his average four-seam fastball velo jumped from 93.8 mph before the assignment to 96.7 mph after being restored to the 40-man roster in September. The 29-year-old righty allowed just two runs in his eight “starts”; only in the first of those turns did he go longer than an inning or throw more than 28 pitches. His second start came against the Yankees on September 4; he struck out Brett Gardner, then retired Giancarlo Stanton and Andrew McCutchen, as well.
The A’s went 4-4 in those games, with Daniel Mengden or Chris Bassitt — a pair that combined for 24 starts earlier in the season — usually following and throwing three to five innings as the “bulk guy.” From there, Melvin would piece it together with a bullpen bolstered by the in-season acquisitions of Jeurys Familia, Fernando Rodney, and Shawn Kelley to augment the work of ace closer Blake Treinen and setup men Lou Trivino and Yusmeiro Petit.
Said Melvin of the A’s adoption of the opener strategy:
“[W]ith as many injuries as we have had to our starters, we are trying to find a way to get a little bit better. Part of this was starting Liam, bringing a starter in after that, had mixed results as far as it went. Some games were good, some not. Sometimes we tried to extend Liam and tried to get him through a second inning; that didn’t work. So there’s been some trial and error with this. But I think the reason that we started looking at this is because we’ve had so many injuries in our rotation, and we’re just trying to do the best possible thing that we think for a particular day.”
Said Hendriks of the assignment:
“Same as any other game. I’m taking it the same way, warming up the same as I do, trying to keep it as much as a relief appearance as I can. All it means is I’m relieving in the first inning.
“There’s no difference in the game. Obviously it’s a do or die, but to everybody out there, it’s the same strike zone, same guys in the box, just going to go out there and do it and see how it goes.”
By the admittedly noisy measure Jeff Sullivan used last month in his effort to document the spread of the opener — starts of 40 pitches or fewer, which could also capture hooks of traditional starters due to injury or ineffectiveness — Oakland’s total of 11 such outings ranked second in the majors, well behind the Rays (58) and just ahead of the Angels and Twins:

Looking over Oakland’s log of such starts, only Trivino’s one-inning appearance on September 28 represents a true use of the “opener” role with a pitcher besides Hendriks. Triggs and Brett Anderson departed the other two early due to injuries. Still, given the rough performance of their ramshackle rotation in September — a combined 4.66 ERA and 5.08 FIP from Edwin Jackson (five starts), Mike Fiers (four), Anderson (four), Trevor Cahill (three), and Mengden (one), it’s understandable why they’d search for alternative approaches and lean heavily on their successful bullpen.
The A’s bullpen was not quite as dominant as the Yankees’, but Treinen (0.78 ERA, 1.82 FIP, 31.8 K%, 3.6 WAR) had a season for the ages. The unit as a whole was more clutch than the Yankees, performing better than expected in high-leverage situations:
| Team | ERA | ERA- | FIP | FIP- | K% | WAR | WPA | Clutch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yankees | 3.38 (3) | 78 (2) | 3.33 (2) | 76 (2) | 30.2% (1) | 9.7 (1) | 8.6 (2) | 2.16 (4) |
| Athletics | 3.37 (2) | 81 (3) | 3.91 (5) | 95 (6) | 23.6% (7) | 5.7 (3) | 12.5 (1) | 4.78 (2) |
As Sullivan pointed out on September 10, the A’s bullpen was on pace for a record WPA, but regression over the final few weeks dropped them merely to fifth in our calculations, which go back to 1974; the 2012 Orioles bullpen holds the record with 13.5 WPA.
The numbers above, of course, include the contributions of players currently absent from each club’s respective roster — and omit the starters who will be available out of the two bullpens on Wednesday night. According to Boone, the Yankees will carry 10 pitchers including Tanaka, Happ, and Lance Lynn to provide length and perhaps some tactical advantages as well as accounting for contingencies. The A’s will carry 11 pitchers, including Fiers as a potential bulk guy if not necessarily the first pitcher to follow Hendriks. (Mengden has been sent to Arizona to prepare for a possible Division Series start.) Unless Melvin chooses to include Anderson, Ryan Buchter will be the only lefty to counter lefties Didi Gregorius and Brett Gardner.
One game certainly won’t settle this philosophical clash, but it will be fascinating to see how the choices of Severino and Hendriks play out in the crucible of October baseball. The Rays’ innovation earlier this year led the A’s to go this route, and who knows where this could lead if Oakland has success on the game’s biggest stage.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
This game will be really interesting because while it could revolutionize things if it goes well for Oakland and bad for New York- it could also set back the bullpenning movement if you will if the opener doesn’t go well for Oakland while Severino pitches a gem.
I think most people expect that Oakland is going to be a heavy, heavy underdogs, so I doubt it will set it back a lot, except if Oakland ends up running out of pitchers and loses it in extra innings. But if Oakland pulls it off, then yeah the opener will definitely take a step forward.
If the Yankees blow the doors off of the A’s first 2-3 innings- you bet it would. If it’s like 9-0 after 3. Especially if the A’s Jackson comes in later in the game and throws 4-5 scoreless innings.
Other thing is that traditional starters have done really well the last 2 days. 5 ER in 35.2 ip. 1.26 ERA. So if the one bad pitched game is a bullpen game- it’s going to stick out like a sore thumb.
To act like it’s all possible goodness and no risk is rather naive.
Nobody in the world would say “Liam Hendricks gave up 5 runs in the first inning, thus we have proven that bullpenning is the wrong answer.”
If they lose 5-0? There would be a lot of folks in the media that would absolutely say that. Especially given how the other “real” starters have done so exceptionally well these last few days(and by definition, Severino would just add more to that column).
If by Folks in Media, you mean Chet Broman writing for Bleacher Report or something , then you’re right.
Nobody smart or even decently competent would use a ‘few days’ and ‘2-3 innings’ to declare the success or failure of a strategy or even the abilities of a single pitcher.
I think many members of this community would declare it a success if it worked.
The media has about as much influence on MLB front offices as the cheerleaders have on NFL coaches, and thank heaven for that.
Won’t Hendricks get pulled before he was able to give up 5 runs ? Severino gave up 3 last year before he was yanked last year, stop loss is 3 runs on Hendricks.
It will be interesting to see if Oakland uses Jackson early(ish) in the game, like any other reliever. I have to believe they won’t, and he’s only there so they don’t run out of pitchers (i.e. he’s there to come in in the 10th or 11th and pitch until the game ends either way).
i wouldnt be surprised if severino only faces the oakland lineup one time completely, and we get effectively two bullpening teams.
If he’s going well, I don’t think they’re going to take him out just to take him out. Especially if they have a lead.
With their remarkably excellent bullpen – the best in the playoffs by far – the Yankees would smart to pull Severino after one time through the order.
it would be even smarter to use an opener for 1-2-3 and then have Severino face 15 batters and bring in a new reliever for the top of the order again.
Given the way the A’s line up is constructed, I don’t think going 4-9, then 1-9 is that advantageous over just starting. You’d miss Chapman the second time, but 4-6 is Davis, Olsen and Piscotty. All of which do absolutely fine against RHPs. The A’s lineup is just incredibly balanced, which makes getting cute to squeak out small advantages even harder than it already is.
Why would they do that? That isn’t how the first Wild Card game worked out. Playoff baseball has always been quick to pull starters but we didn’t suddenly hop into an alternate reality. Wubba lubba dub dub!
If teams use the results of one game to judge a strategy, they are bad at making decisions.
Today’s game will be the first exposure that a lot of fans get to the concept, so it could impact their perspective. That, in turn, could have an impact on press coverage, which could have a slight impact on a team’s willingness to try it.
But that has to be a very small effect, and, at the end of the day (season), what matters to fans and teams is winning ballgames. Superior strategy usually helps with that, and the evaluation of a strategy should not be impacted by 1 game.
I am far from convinced that teams examine the effectiveness of radical ideas. I think they use data to concoct them, but measuring success is extremely problematic. The same people with the bold ideas would in all likelihood be also measuring the outcomes, which is why some flawed concepts continue to linger. There is an analogy to an MLB investigation somewhere in here… Success isn’t something you can measure accurately unless you want to oversimplify the outcomes. Good ideas don’t always result in wins and bad ideas don’t necessarily end with losses. In the end, the humans play a pretty large role in what some people like to look at as a controlled experiment.
I don’t think the A’s have a snowball’s chance in Hell but I will certainly be pulling for them. The race may not be to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that’s sure the smart way to bet.
Nonetheless, go A’s! Destroy the Evil Empire!
I am rooting for the A’s too, but since the last time Severino pitched against the A’s he gave up 6 runs and was pulled before the end of the third inning, I think the A’s chances aren’t that much worse than 50/50.
You can say, “but that was only one game!” but so is this. That’s the beauty of the wild card format.
I believe that game was also in Oakland, and Severino has struggled on the road compared to home starts this year, so it’s possible he may feel more comfortable in the Bronx tonight.
Well, one thing about baseball is that any MLB team always has better than a “snowball’s chance in hell” in one game against any other MLB team.
Even if the Yankees are a really big favorite by the standards of two playoff-caliber baseball teams playing each other in a single game, that should give the A’s at least about a 30% to 35% chance of winning this game.
The Yanks have a 141 2/3 chance of winning. The numbers don’t lie, and they spell disaster for the A’s.
lack of lefty bat options might hurt the Yanks in this matchup
Actually the Yankees are going with an opener, it just happens to be Severino. If he’s sharp, they will stay with him for a few IP, but probably not more than 5 unless he’s overpowering.
Given that 5 innings is the cutoff for getting a win as a starter, any pitcher that is slated to pitch 5 if good is considered a normal starter. Just like how Rich Hill is a starter even if the Dodgers take him out after 5 even when pitching well.
Opener is someone with absolutely no chance to go 5 innings even if he has a perfect game going.
details… lets talk about openers!
Even if the Athletics rotation was healthy, this might be smarter anyway. Calling Sean Manaea your “ace” spells out how bad this rotation is on paper, how lucky we perceive they have been, and how much of a ticking time bomb it would be to send out Fiers, Jackson, Anderson, etc.
Isn’t it still TBD if the A’s plan tonight is to try to use a true “opener” vs. simply a “bullpen game”?
The distinction I make between the terms is that the former includes having a pitcher – who Jay appropriately refers to as the “bulk” guy – who is a starter-type (albeit typically not a particularly good starter) expected to pitch about 3-4 innings if things go well. The opener pitches ~1 inning, so the bulk guy can come on in relief and potentially face about 15 hitters without having to face the top of the lineup twice.
A true bullpen game, by contrast, doesn’t plan to utilize a bulk guy but divides up 9 innings between about 6 or 7 relievers, each pitching 1 or 2 innings. A team using this plan would still have at least one “bulk guy” on a Wild Card roster for contingencies such as extra innings or multiple relievers having short stints due to ineffectiveness
From my understanding, the opener is called that ONLY WHEN followed by a multi-inning, two-times-through-the-order pitcher. Otherwise, it’s a bullpen game.
Media excitement I think has mislabeled what’s really going on – but a bullpen game still is extremely exciting on this stage!
Please don’t use the term Opener to refer to the first pitcher of a bullpen day. It cheapens the interesting term. An opener should be when a 1-2 inning guy goes in front of a starting pitcher type.
I think this is generally, in a one game vacuum, a very effective strategy, and I’d bet it pays off for the A’s.
The Yankees as an opponent have not handled bullpen games or the use of openers well this season. They’re highly strikeout prone. They don’t perform well in high leverage situations.
While I think this is the A’s best chance of winning the single elimination Wild Card Game, it does not set them up for success in the playoffs going forward. The back of their bullpen has little-to-no postseason experience and has not been subjected to a) regularly pitching more than one inning at a time, b) pitching this many innings in a season and c) pitching to the same opponent 3+ times in a short time period.
All of these factors are enough to limit the effectiveness of even the best bullpen. Just look at the Yankees last year. By the end of the ALCS, Tommy Kahnle was their most trusted RP. Or look at Houston last year, who stopped using their bullpen at all and opted to couple two starters together instead. Or look at Kenley Jansen last year. Or Andrew Miller and Aroldis Chapman in 2016.
The success of openers or bullpen games or whatever you want to call it is not sustainable in a postseason context. Great for one game, not for a seven game series.
I think that plays a part in why the Yankees are starting Severino. They want to at least give themselves a chance of getting some depth and not over exposing their less durable relievers (“less” being relative to their starters, not other relievers) this early in the postseason. Now if Severino isn’t sharp, as was the case in 2017, it’ll turn into a bullpen game anyway. He’s probably, objectively their best option to start in the context of a bullpen game anyway, being that he is their most talented pitcher.
So the A’s are playing for their lives, and if they win, they won’t go much farther because they simply don’t have the starting pitching to get past the Red Sox. The Yankees are taking a calculated risk in the attempt to set themselves up for a deep run.
What an incredible example of complicating something simple. The A’s don’t have a starter they trust and Severino was the Yankees opening day starter. That is a simpler way to look at it. I think I am one of the few readers that is going to settle for watching the game.
It definitely was not simple for the Yankees. They ultimately went with their most talented pitcher, but they were anything but decisive about it.
I think that if they were trying to decide between Severino and one other pitcher, it may have been even more difficult. But they decided to go with their best, despite how bad he’s been for the better part of 10 weeks, because they knew they’d have whoever they started on a short leash regardless. That was safer than trying to guess who the hotter hand is between Tanaka and Happ.
Anyways my greater point wasn’t really about this individual decision, but it was a long post, so I get if that was lost.
That really is interesting analysis, but as someone who wasn’t hanging on the outcome of the game it made sense to me. People on these pages seem to enjoy complicating simple matters. I am not trying to disrespect you – it is just a general point. In the end, you are a damn fool if you don’t go with your best player in the elimination game and that is what they did. I bet most teams would go with the opening day starter pending health or some trade acquisition. The beauty of the playoffs is that you have the entire bullpen available if things go off the rails early… unless you burn up your entire bullpen early which is what an opener potentially looks like. If it were me, I would line up my starters and use each until they got in a bit of a jam until I got to the late innings, then I would go with the bullpen. Fortunately for them, Severino was more than the A’s could handle and it was all simple game management.
womp womp
I have found The Opener strategy to be quite interesting over the course of this season, and with the Rays being close geographically I have followed it very closely. Tampa Bay has executed this strategy greatly with a talented array of young and veteran pitching. I have watched the use of The Opener spread as the season has progressed and it has been picked up quickly. Now, I watch as The Opener in a sense makes its playoff “debut”
I am very interested to see how well Oakland executes The Opener strategy against a tough Yankees team. Hendriks has adapted to the role well so far. I am intrigued to say the least!
Bullpen games have always existed in the context of the postseason. This discussion makes me question how much baseball this community collectively watches. Bullpenning won’t work over a long season, but teams have been riding RP hard in the playoffs for quite a while now. There is little doubt that pitchers are more effective in short spurts… the problems are in the long term. That said, when you have any pitcher making quick work of the opponent, you should stick with that guy. Best case, the next man up is as good as what you have.
“Bullpen games have always existed in the context of the postseason.”
Show your work? There’s a difference between a planned bullpen game and having a short leash on your starter.
Otherwise, you’re mostly right. Pitchers are more effective in short spurts. But there are short-term problems with stacking those short spurts in the context of a postseason series. Teams have been riding their RPs into the ground in recent postseasons and it’s become a war of attrition.
The Astros were really the first to adjust last year by leaning on their 4-5 SPs to give them multiple innings out of the pen, and then ultimately coupling them together, which limited the exposure of their overworked bullpen.
Can’t wait to see this year’s wrinkles.
Starters are used in relief all the time in the postseason, and that always follows a quick hook of the starter. Madison Bumgarner’s game 7 from a few years back is a very easy and well known example… as is Kershaw’s usage last year. I see no value in distinguishing between RP and SP in relief roles. When you remove a pitcher it is called the bullpen. Your best pitcher is usually going to be a starter and those are the guys that get used frequently in the role. Watch your baseball…. they talk about it every year. It kind of sounds like you became a superfan about a year ago. You also fail to mention Maeda who did exactly what you are giving the Astros credit for all through the playoffs. You know what I am talking about – you just want to describe it differently. I just don’t use words like opener and bullpenning but we are describing the same general things – things that existed before we made up terms to suggest that they are new. Another difference, is that I am not excited to see the wrinkles lol. I don’t really care about the script so much as that is not what I enjoy analyzing. There used to be a though that players played the games, it is interesting to see that sentiment fade.
I don’t even know what a planned bullpen game means. I certainly didn’t use that term. Bullpen, planned bullpen – those sound different to me. One makes sense and the other sounds misguided. Is it a scenario where you expect the starter to fail? Is it scripted where he gets pulled after 1 inning? Does 2 count? How is that different than pulling a guy early? Functionally I don’t see a difference. Being flexible sounds like a better idea to me. What if the misguided script falls apart? In a game like tonight the A’s fell behind immediately with a guy on the mound that really didn’t belong out there. That is a tough pill to swallow for the guys in the clubhouse that sweated and bled for 162 games. It seems awfully selfish to me to not let the guys that earned their way to that game to not decide the outcome. Even teams like the Rays ride a starting pitcher for 5 innings at some point or the system breaks. I don’t understand how having your middle reliever start is functionally different than pitching the 6th inning… except for the fact that you are going to certainly use a guy that ideally wouldn’t ever enter the game.
What kind of wrinkles are you expecting? It has all been done before. The Dodgers have been doing all kinds of wrinkly stuff this year – half of their high-leverage bullpen is starters. They are to the point where the rotation is in shambles, but that bullpen has a ton of talent. I think just seeing how they manage the bullpen will give you plenty to talk about as they don’t really have a choice… especially if they advance which will be tough given their very strange pitching staff. Maybe they shift some guys back into the rotation and it gets called bullpenning? I could see that – but I would just call that a short outing for a starting pitcher. I don’t think any remaining teams have weak enough staffs to do what people like to call bullpenning. Using 5 or 6 pitchers is certainly not unheard of, but throwing your 4/5th best RP out there for a start seems unlikely to me with the remaining teams. I am not intimately familiar with all of the starting rotations, but you have to be terrible to entertain bullpenning. It is an exceptionally bad idea in a series as your bullpen is fried in the best case… or it is a winner-take-all game where your bullpen is already fried. In the worst case, it is fried and you embarrass yourself in the process. I think that the sabermetric crowd has beaten down and insulted traditionalists enough that progressive ideas don’t face much scrutiny, but they would be wise not too push the issue too far on the big stages as people will begin to speak up against it at some point. I imagine that the A’s will get a pass tonight, but every other sports-related decision related to a loss would be calling for heads to roll. I bet that the A’s get credit for doing things right, but that is just a guess. As things currently stand, I think opponents of bullpenning are largely afraid of ridicule. However, fear of ridicule can only go so far to oppress ideas and discussion.
Dodgers rotation in shambles?
In September here were the Dodgers starting stats for guys starting in the playoffs….
Buehler 2-1 1.62 ERA/2.60 FIP in 6 starts/39 IP
Ryu 3-2 1.50 ERA/2.76 FIP in 5 starts/30 IP
Hill 5-0 3.90 ERA/3.36 FIP in 5 starts/30 IP
Kershaw 3-0 3.89 ERA/4.32 FIP in 6 starts/37 IP
How exactly is that being in shambles? 3 guys in the top 26 starters in MLB and then Kershaw at #72.
If anything the bigger question for the Dodgers is that pen. Jansen is not the same guy this year at all.
As far as last year with Maeda you say doing just what the Astros were doing- sorry but no. Maeda had 2 appearances all WS longer than an inning. 1.1 and 2.2 innings. The Astros on the other hand had
3.2 inning save by Hancock in game 3
2 inning outing by Peacock in game 7
4 inning save by Morton in game 7
Maeda had transitioned to be a much more normal part of the pen.
Last year Kershaw pitched once out of the pen in the playoffs. Game 7 of the WS. That’s it.
Before this year and the introduction of the term “opener”, a “bullpen game” was used to refer to a game wherein a team starts a non-traditional SP, knowing that they will not pitch more than 1 or 2 innings, and with the intention of cobbling together the rest of the game across multiple pitchers. I added the qualifier of “planned” because there seemed to be some confusion regarding the term, but it’s been commonly used in baseball. The whole point of the article was to highlight how groundbreaking this tactic was in the context of playoff baseball.
Typically we’ve seen this utilized during the dog days of summer when a team is playing long stretches, potentially including doubleheaders, with few or no off days. In order to give their rotation a break, or keep them on normal rest, the manager would decide to give up the battle for the sake of the war, so to speak, and throw a bullpen game, which was essentially viewed as conceding the game. This year has obviously been different, but this was the traditional application of the term “bullpen game”.
Now it’s also been argued in the comments here that there’s a difference between a bullpen game and using an opener, but that’s not something I care much about distinguishing here.
Using a SP out of the bullpen is entirely different than that. The games you’re referencing were started by traditional SPs, and due to a lack of alternatives and based on the ROS schedule, the Giants and Dodgers decided to lean on their best pitchers to finish the games. You’re right, this has been done before. It’s not new. But it’s also not the same as a bullpen game.
Separately, what I was referring to with the Astros wasn’t the shift of SPs into the bullpen during the postseason. Of course this has been done forever. I was referring to what they did in Game 7 of the ALCS, wherein they went in with the intention of coupling two SPs and hoping that they didn’t need to lean on anyone else. Morton pitched 5 innings, followed by McCullers 4 innings in what was ultimately a shutout. They probably knew going in that they may need to lean on another pitcher if it didn’t go well, but you better believe their ideal plan was exactly what played out.
If you can find me another example in the Wild Card era of a team doing that in the playoffs in a win, I’ll be all ears. That was the wrinkle I was referring to.