The Red Sox Hook Crochet With a Six-Year Extension

Tim Heitman-Imagn Images

Back in December, the Red Sox acquired pitcher Garrett Crochet with the intention of signing him to a long-term contract, and that’s just what they did on Monday, extending the big lefty on a six-year, $170 million deal that kicks off starting in 2026. There’s no deferred money in this deal, nor is there a no-trade clause, though there is a $2 million bonus in the event that he is traded. There is also the typical incentive clause (up to $10 million) for Cy Young Award finishes and an opt-out after 2030. In an extra bit of injury protection, the Red Sox get a $15 million team option and the opt-out disappears if Crochet misses 120 consecutive days to a significant arm injury. Crochet was the main reason to watch about 20% of White Sox games in 2024, as he threw 146 innings over 32 starts, put up a 3.58 ERA, a 2.85 FIP, and 4.7 WAR, and earned his first All-Star selection. He then changed his Sox over the winter in that trade from Chicago to Boston.

I talked a little about this a few weeks ago, when I discussed what I’d do as a brutal despot of MLB. What I demanded — without, as I remind you, any legal authority to do so — was that the Red Sox close the deal with Crochet. The extension was, in my view, one of the most obvious things that should happen in baseball right now. The Red Sox appear to be on the verge of a return to contention, supported by a very good farm system, and they really needed a high-end pitcher for the top of the rotation. Before the extension, Crochet was set to hit free agency after next season, and keeping him around long term was essential for both baseball and public relations reasons; an ace pitcher was unlikely to come cheaper for the 2027 season, and his departure might have opened up old Mookie Betts-related fan wounds that have healed to an extent.

Suffice it to say, ZiPS likes him quite a bit. I discussed the projections for Crochet in the aforementioned article.

After also taking into account his $4.5 million salary for 2025 and the fact that he’s still arbitration eligible for 2026, ZiPS suggests offering Crochet a seven-year, $175 million contract starting this season. That doesn’t need to be Boston’s final offer, but it is a solid framework for what an extension could and should look like. Yes, there are risks, but the Red Sox shouldn’t sit at the high rollers table if they’re not willing to push in their chips.

That projected deal was a bit lighter than his actual six-year, $170 million contract, with the main difference being that I had it going into effect this year, when he’s scheduled to get paid $4.5 million. Projections aren’t static things, however, and Crochet is coming off a dynamite spring in which he struck out 30 batters in 15 2/3 innings and allowed just a single run. He also had a decent, though not amazing, Opening Day start against the Texas Rangers. Spring training and one regular-season start aren’t enough to drastically change most projections, especially for established players, but they do nudge them in one direction or the other. Let’s stuff some stats onto the ZiPS griddle and flip off some projection flapjacks.

ZiPS Projection – Garrett Crochet
Year W L ERA FIP G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR $ STATUS
2026 12 5 2.88 2.68 29 29 137.3 117 44 11 43 172 145 3.6 $18.1M ARB3
2027 12 5 3.01 2.78 29 29 140.7 123 47 11 43 172 139 3.5 $32.8M FA
2028 12 6 3.14 2.88 30 30 140.7 127 49 12 42 167 134 3.4 $32.4M FA
2029 11 7 3.21 2.98 30 30 140.0 129 50 12 41 161 130 3.2 $31.8M FA
2030 11 6 3.36 3.08 29 29 136.7 128 51 12 40 153 125 3.0 $30.3M FA
2031 11 7 3.42 3.14 30 30 139.7 133 53 13 42 154 123 3.0 $31.3M FA

With a projected $18.1 million salary in 2026, which would’ve been Crochet’s final season before free agency, ZiPS would offer him a six-year, $176.6 million extension (though in both the previous and current projections, I think ZiPS is being too optimistic on his final arbitration year salary given how large a jump it is). The opt-out clause in Crochet’s new contract isn’t a major one in that it only allows him to exit a year early, so it doesn’t have the same dramatic effect as one after 2026 or 2027 would have.

You could say that this is a lot of money for a pitcher with 224 career innings in the majors, an injury history, and a résumé that was more speculation than results at this time last year. You’d be right that it’s a lot of money, but the projections already factor in these risks. Crochet, with a lengthy track record and a spotless injury history almost certainly would’ve received a larger sum of cash. I actually accounted for this by telling ZiPS to assume that Crochet throws 200 innings in 2025, and to insert pre-injury projections of him as a starter in 2022 and 2023. With that lengthier and more durable track record, ZiPS would project him to get a six-year, $270 million contract! You can look at this actual extension as the Red Sox saving about $100 million for the risks they’re assuming, on top of the injury protection clause in the contract.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Anyway, back to non-imagination Crochet. You should ignore the games started total in the projections, as ZiPS is a little befuddled on his exact usage because of his very unusual workload pattern. More than half his 2024 starts lasted fewer than five innings, as the White Sox were (rightly) extremely careful with him as he was coming off Tommy John surgery and being converted to a starter. The innings totals, though, are far more solid, and this projection is generated based on Crochet never having better than coin-flip odds to qualify for the ERA title. ZiPS projects Crochet to be the fifth-most valuable pitcher in baseball through the 2031 season, behind Tarik Skubal, Logan Webb, Paul Skenes, and Corbin Burnes, and just ahead of Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Logan Gilbert, George Kirby, and Hunter Greene. Who among those names would you likely get for merely $170 million if they were free agents soon?

Crochet clearly wanted this deal, making public statements last year to the effect that he was seeking a long-term contract no matter where he ended up. The Red Sox clearly wanted this deal; while they have better prospects, I doubt they would have traded Kyle Teel, Braden Montgomery, and Chase Meidroth if they had zero expectation of extending Crochet. And Red Sox fans ought to have wanted this deal. Crochet is a true no. 1 starter who, in just six years, is projected to become the fifth-most valuable lefty in Red Sox history. The last day of March 2025 was a good day for the Boston Red Sox.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jon SealsMember since 2018
1 year ago

Nice headline. 😉

JimMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Seals

Way to go, Meg!

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
1 year ago

I’d be curious what the wording of the “significant arm injury” clause is exactly, and who makes the call if Crochet thinks he’s good to go and the team wants him to cook in rehab a week or two longer.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

120 days is a lot though. Seems rare that people miss 4 months of the season and not an entire calendar year.

cashgod27Member since 2024
1 year ago

Crochet has been one of the biggest success stories in the past year for the White Sox, the Red Sox, and for any player. Happy for him, even if I’m not happy to see the Yankees face him 3-4 times a year for the next half decade.

Dante
1 year ago

As a Sox fan, this came through just in time. A 1-4 start and the Raffy drama has really got the season off on the wrong foot. Good on Breslow for grinding out a very reasonable extension for our current and future ace.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Dante

You said it!!! I was wallowing in the depths of despair when this ray of sunshine came across the wire. The Raffy thing reminds so much of George Scott in 1968. The Boomer hit .303 (138 OPS+) in the Impossible Dream season of 1967 then dropped off a cliff to an unimaginable .171 (40 OPS+) in the Year of the Pitcher. I have never seen an established star hitter look as helpless as Devers does now. Seldom does he even make any contact.

steveo
1 year ago

This is a fair deal but I can’t help but think the Red Sox should’ve just let his next two years play out. And if he’s healthy and they want to keep him, then just pay up. Sure they’d have to pay market value, but you’re the Red Sox. You have money. I’d want to see him sustain more success as a starter before giving him a huge contract. It’s still a fair deal and even if he gets hurt, the Red Sox (in theory) should be able to sign other guys.

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  steveo

If they waited 2 years and he was reasonably healthy, he’s getting probably 300+ and the biggest pitcher contract in history. Risks to both

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

As an MLB player without huge career earnings to this point, I’d imagine that when looking at 170m or the chance of getting double that in a couple years, there isn’t really a lot of difference. Some people might go the Scherzer route and get insurance, but Crochet also has much less track record.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

If he’s healthy and great. If he misses a bunch of time or falls off, he’s getting a lot less.

OddBall Herrera
1 year ago

“You could say that this is a lot of money for a pitcher with 224 career innings in the majors, an injury history, and a résumé that was more speculation than results at this time last year.”

Glad you called this out because this is precisely what I would say. Maybe this deal effectively splits the difference between a team risking that they are paying big bucks for a guy who has been good for literally a few months, and the team laughing all the way to the bank because he continues to be that good for a significant chunk of the contract term. Maybe Crochet pitches well this season and the team that signs him is paying well north of $30/per. Maybe by even just the end of this season the Red Sox realize they got talked into trading prospects and $170 million for an incomplete bullpen->rotation experiment. I guess you could argue this deal splits the difference between these possibilities. Me, personally though? I think the Red Sox are risking a lot more with this deal than Crochet is. He’s parlayed a 3.0 ERA for one half of one season into a $170 million payday, and I would be much more surprised six years from now to find out Crotchet regrets this deal than that the Red Sox do.

Last edited 1 year ago by OddBall Herrera
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

IDK, this isn’t that different than the Rodon deal a few years ago, and even though Rodon had two years of performance instead of one they also appear to have more protections built in here.

The logic and price tag is the same, though. You grab a guy with the potential to be a 5-win starter and huge injury risk throughout their peak. You can look at the Rodon deal and say “see, it was a bad deal” but I think you have to keep betting on guys with this kind of stuff if you have the money to do it.

MikeSMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s not really the same thing. Crochet only had the one injury. Rodon had a bunch of different things.

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  MikeS

Also Crochett is 25. Rodon signed his deal at 30.

Last edited 1 year ago by Brock244
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  MikeS

The guy has barely pitched since high school, mostly due to injury (although some due to the pandemic).

I think the main concern is how durable he can be over a full season.

Still: I think the deal works.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  MikeS

Crochet has had a lot of injuries, some more serious than others.

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s a lot different from Rodon. Rodon was an actual free agent. He had been pitching full starter workload for almost two years, and doing so at an All-Star level. And despite all of that, he still got less than Crochet did.

CromulentMember since 2017
1 year ago

I’m not even a Red Sox fan but I’d bet there is nothing that could heal the Mookie wounds as long as he’s performing superpoopinhuman feats like the walk off bomb the other night.

LdboyleMember since 2018
1 year ago

I’d be far from shocked if we enter, say, 2027 with Crochet having as much support as anyone for the title of “best pitcher in baseball.”

He’s steeping in risk, but as Dan points out, that’s why the dollar amount starts with a 1 and not a 2 or 3. I often find myself being risk-averse, but the combination of raw upside and already-demonstrated skill here is tantalizing. Good, smart deal by the Sox here. And hey, if it blows up, you’re the Red Sox! Your wallets can handle it!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Definitely a fair deal. The risk with Crochet is astronomical but if he pitches even close to what he did last year his free agency price will start with Max Fried’s / Chris Sale’s deal and has the possibility to get much, much higher than that depending on what happens in 2026.

These sorts of deals are exactly the thing that big market teams should be doing. A team like the Twins couldn’t do something like this, because if it fails it will be an anchor on their roster building for the next 5 years. But teams like the Red Sox should be collecting premium talent. If it works out, and there’s a good enough chance that it will, they’ve got an elite playoff-caliber pitcher. It’s hard to find those and for a team that shouldn’t have to worry about making hard choices later, you take a chance on the upside.

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Also, the injury protection on here helps too. If he has an arm injury for a full season, the opt out gets wiped + they get a team friendly club option.

Given his age (25) he should still be effective throughout this whole deal, so even in a big injury, they still get the upside, it’s just pushed back further

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

That worked out great with John Lackey. He threatened not to pitch and they traded him on the cheap. Hopefully they handle it better this time.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

No, his free agency price would start at Verlander and Scherzer’s 43 million and those were years ago. In today’s game the risk is substantial, and will probably continue to get worse, with every pitcher who goes out there. If he avoids injury???? That question is a part of every pitcher’s future and if he lives up to his potential then 7 for $175, with 2025 included, is the steal of the 21st century. The HOF pitchers I mentioned got those deals even after they were well past their prime. Lucas Giolito, who might very possibly never win a game for the Red Sox, and was awful just before signing, got $38 M. I hate the market for pitchers as it is now but that is the game and this deal looks as good as possible from a Red Sox perspective.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

100%. You’re getting an affordable ace to build around if he stays healthy. Gotta take that gamble if you can still compete even if Crotchet ends up with zero value over the contract (which seems unlikely even with injury).

darren
1 year ago

This seems like a great deal for Crochet. 6/170 looks like a free-agent deal for an established non-elite ace. Comps:

Nola 7/$172m
Rodon 6/$162m
Snell, 5/$180m (deferrals make is more like 5/155)

All of these guys are older, of course, which is a factor. But all of them were free agents with much longer track records of success than Crochet has. All of them were free agents, able to shop their talents to 30 teams. And their contracts started the season after they were signed, not two years off in the future.

In Crochet’s position, given his injury history, I would have been very tempted to settle for something like 5/$110 mil., starting in 2025. I get my last arb year guaranteed no matter what happens in 2025m, and then something like $30+ mil/year through age 30. I’m set for life and if things go well, I can get another big contract at age 31. Given that Boston was under pressure to sign me after trading for me, I might have hoped to squeeze another year out of them for another $30+ mil.

But this deal goes well beyond that, and even gives him an opt out on the last year. Good for him!

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  darren

the major thing here is Crochet is 25 and all those pitchers are 30+, not that comparable

A more comparable pitcher could be Yammamto getting 300+ mil in FA

Last edited 1 year ago by Brock244
darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Brock244

His age does make it pretty hard to find a good comp. I chose these guys because age is not as big of a factor for pitchers as it is for hitters and Crochet’s injury history makes the risks a little more similar to what an older pitcher would face.

I don’t think Yamamoto is much better as a comp since he had a much longer track record of success and generally good health. He was also a free agent in his age 25 season. The Red Sox already control Crochet for age 26 and 27, and the contract only secures him from age 28 on. So his free agent years are closer in age to Rodon, the same 3 years away from Nola, and a year further away than Snell. (Interestingly, Snell was 3 years away when he got his 2/62 contract, coming off 180 ip).

That’s not to say that these are really great comps, but the best I could come up with. He’s in a pretty unusual situation.

JuuuustAnotherBaseballFanMember since 2018
1 year ago

It’s good to see the Sox spend more money. I hope that, unlike another contract for an expensive Sox star, management doesn’t relegate Crochet to the bullpen in his second year, let him pout and get fat, and then watch him break the major league record for runs allowed per inning in the first few games.

Fred BellemoreMember since 2021
1 year ago

So Lefty Grove, Mel Parnell, Bill Lee, and Bruce Hurst?

darren
1 year ago
Reply to  Fred Bellemore

Sign me up for that please. I’ll settle for Hurst or Parnell even, I’m not greedy.