The Redisappearance of Matt Kemp
Matt Kemp is in a funk. I’m not talking about the kind of funk endorsed by Sly Stone or Parliament. Kemp’s funk is more like the time a friend of mine left a chicken salad sandwich in my car over a hot weekend and it fermented into a noxious cloud of nauseating death-barfiness. Or funk metal.
I’m nearly certain the Dodgers didn’t originally expect to ever have Kemp on the roster in 2018. LA acquired him from Atlanta in exchange for Charlie Culberson, Adrian Gonzalez, Scott Kazmir, Brandon McCarthy, and cash — and if the the deal were to have occurred in 2012, with those names, it would have been a blockbuster. In the winter of 2017, however, Kemp wasn’t so much a player as a tax loophole, the maguffin in a trade that was primarily about teams aligning their year-to-year payrolls in such a way as to avoid luxury tax.
But a funny thing happened on the way to the luxury tax: Kemp became interesting. For once, one of those articles about a player looking amazing in spring training actually bore real fruit. Kemp showed up to spring training in excellent shape, having lost a non-trivial 40 pounds and gained a renewed interest in playing defense.
The homecoming to Los Angeles, after a lot of hurt feelings years ago, turned out to be a positive one. When Kemp slugged .561 in spring training while also exhibiting improved defense and a real effort to be a mentor to the younger players, he gave the Dodgers enough justification to keep him on the team as a role player.
Los Angeles struggled early. Kemp, however, did not. With one of the club’s top batting marks and the promise of better defense — or at least decidedly less-atrocious defense — fulfilled, Kemp received more at-bats. Unlike in previous seasons with Atlanta and San Diego, Kemp’s playing time in this case was earned on the merits of his play and not his reputation or salary. He started in the All-Star Game.
Since the All-Star Game, though, things have not gone well for Kemp. Standing at .310/.352/.522 when baseball took its midsummer respite, Kemp’s OPS has bled about 100 points in just a month, and he’s stalled at 1.1 WAR for the 2018 season. Neither ZiPS or Steamer are optimistic about a turnaround, projecting him to finish at 1.3 and 1.2 WAR, respetively, the primary difference between the two being playing time.
Before Wednesday’s 2-for-4 performance, Kemp last had a multi-hit game on July 23rd and now has hits in four of his last 19 games. Overall, he’s 5-for-58 from that date with only a lone double. The result? A .086/.191/.103 line.
So, what happened to Kemp’s 2018?
The first part is our old friend and noted batting average blackguard, BABIP. In his best seasons, Kemp maintained a high BABIP, which was largely justified by the more advanced data (though no Statcast at the time!). zBABIP is the BABIP estimator built into ZiPS, in a similar vein to xBABIP or Andrew Perpetua’s work.
| Season | BABIP | zBABIP |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | .361 | .345 |
| 2009 | .345 | .326 |
| 2010 | .295 | .330 |
| 2011 | .380 | .335 |
| 2012 | .354 | .342 |
| 2013 | .353 | .342 |
| 2014 | .345 | .356 |
| Total | .347 | .339 |
Kemp had a .388 BABIP in March/April and a .416 BABIP in May, numbers that nobody should have expected to be maintained. In some way, his early-season numbers reflect the danger of believing small sample sizes when they correlate with the storyline, in this case a player who made a concerted effort to recapture his best days.
When comparing his seasonal BABIP to his predicted one from advanced stats, Kemp’s actually had the 2018 season overall that he’s deserved; he’s been no more unfortunate in recent months than he was fortunate early on, at least when talking about BABIP.
| Month | BABIP | zBABIP |
|---|---|---|
| March/April | .388 | .342 |
| May | .416 | .354 |
| June | .226 | .275 |
| July | .302 | .361 |
| August | .208 | .270 |
| Total | .328 | .328 |
One thing that has, in fact, changed is that pitchers are simply less aggressive at giving Kemp fastballs to hit, especially in the more favorable counts where Kemp may be seeing dead-red. From Brooks Baseball, here’s Kemp through the end of May…

… and from the start of June through Wednesday night:

This is relevant because, during Kemp’s period of greatest success, from 2008 to -14, he was 181 runs better than average against fastballs according to FanGraphs’ pitch value estimates. Against everything else, that total stands at two runs worse than league average.
Kemp’s still hitting fastballs even now. Through the end of May, Kemp batted .418 when hitting a fastball with a .758 slugging percentage. Those numbers have remained excellent, to the tune of a .377 batting average and a .689 slugging percentage. For his career, those numbers are .328/.601. Matt Kemp remains a hitter who lives or dies on the hard stuff and whose success in 2018 has been largely driven by seeing and hitting a lot of fastballs; taking a few of them away from him has a larger negative effect on his performance than for most hitters.
Even in the midst of a .173/.264/.280 second half, Kemp’s at .345/.621 against fastballs. Since his start in the All-Star Game, he has seen 208 pitches (as categorized by Brooks Baseball) that weren’t fastballs or sinkers. He’s gotten exactly one hit off those 208 pitches, a solitary single off a curve thrown by Yusmeiro Petit.
Every team in baseball pays attention to this kind of data, and for now, Matt Kemp is solved. Baseball is a game of continual adjustments, and as great a story as Kemp’s re-emergence has been, if he’s unable to adjust when the pitchers do, he may find himself out of baseball very quickly.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Dan, would you cash out Matt Kemp in a dynasty league straight up for Twins Wander Javier? He’s hurt but I like his upside.
Unless you think Kemp is going to help you win the league this year, or you are in a 20 teamer or something, why wouldn’t you? In a 12 team league I can’t imagine there aren’t better options on the wire now anyways.
Obvious troll is obvious
So Kemp is Pedro Serrano?
In early April, when Fangraphs wrote about Kemp’s dead cat bounce … errr …. hot start, someone rhetorically asked if anyone believed he would end the season with twice the WAR of Corey Seager, which he had at the time. Well, I have to say that at this point I think he has a decent shot.
I’m not even that proud of myself for being so right about Kemp, as I’m sure most Fangraphs’ readers were. His success being wholly unsustainable was about the most obvious thing in the world.
I pointed this out in one of those early season threads, but think it bears mentioning again: a shorter version of this same thing happened just last year. Kemp showed up in 2017 having lost a massive amount of weight. Through the team’s first 50 games or so, he had an OPS over 1.000. Then he gained all of the weight back in what seemed like an almost impossibly short amount of time, and had an OPS in the low 600s the rest of the season.
What over-simplistic assessment of a more complex situation. Y’all were wrong. That first half happened and it wasn’t a bunch of ground balls rolled through a shift. The Dodgers season is alive because of what Matt Kemp did, but yeah man, he sucks. So hitting .086 over 58 at bats was what everyone here predicted? Because that is what it took for everyone here to be right. Those folks that said Matt Kemp is worthless and should be cut should not be proud of themselves… ashamed would be better. I am 100% certain that you didn’t watch many of his at bats – he was hitting the ball well, not rolling a D20. This will be a good example of why looking at season totals doesn’t tell you a whole lot… just like 2017. Its funny you never get a chance to learn if you are too concerned with finding ways to prove that you are right.
I saw what happened in 2017 and predicted it would happen again. By watching in 2017, I was able to learn, and applied that to my thinking of what Kemp would do in 2018. And then he did that. I’m sorry it took you longer to learn the Matt Kemp lesson.
Every time I read one of your comments my memories of Mr Show grow a little less fond.
I did not think it was possible for Kemp to start out blazing hot for 200 PA, then do literally the exact same slump afterwards just like 2017. It seems insane to think he’s doing THE SAME EXACT THING. But here he is, just doing it. At least his defense is better, i guess.
“I’m not even that proud of myself for being so right about Kemp, as I’m sure most Fangraphs’ readers were. His success being wholly unsustainable was about the most obvious thing in the world.”
Totally true and the trolls should not be downvoting you for it.
1 for 208 on breaking balls. That’s utterly brutal.
And yet he’s still being pitched 52% fastballs.
His pull rate is way down, while opposite field rate is up. Is it an indication of his bat slowing down and trying to cheat on fastballs?
“who could have seen this coming” – Every braves fan that witnessed this last season. Also, Culberson has tied Kemp in fWAR for the season and playing very well as of late(high babip naturally).
Three words:
DEAD CAT BOUNCE
But he isn’t a total zero in the field which, combined with his streaky but somewhat above average offense, makes him a viable big leaguer. Which was actually in question.
Kemp’s breakout was unsustainable but so is this. In the end, he is the same guy he was before at the plate…good, but not great. It’s just that it looks like he might not require a DH anymore.
On June 16, Kemp hit a first-pitch homer off Madison Bumgarner — his 5th HR in 39 such PAs this year. Since then, no first-pitch HRs in 28 PAs.
Kemp has mashed first pitches most of his career. His decent stats for the prior 2 years were largely powered by first pitches:
— Overall: .271 BA, .484 SLG
— 1st pitch: .392 BA, .750 SLG
— Others: .252 BA, .441 SLG*
By first-pitch share of total bases or extra-base hits, Kemp in 2016-17 ranked 17th out of 131 guys with 1,000 PAs. By share of PAs, he was just 30th.
(*Corrected after original post.)
He was off to that same kind of start on first pitches this year — 13 for 39, .795 SLG through that 5th HR. Since then, he’s 5 for 28, slugging .214. I doubt there was a true lightbulb moment for pitchers, but I also doubt he’s seen many hittable first-pitch fastballs since June 16.
Trashing funk metal?
No Rage Against The Machine or Faith No More?!